When the spread doesn't move, follow the money

[McRich]

I like RLM in college sports.. Pros RLM Suck, even tho i won huge on the SF vs Cards MNF game which that game had HUGE RLM.. I usally stay away from Pros RLM and play what i want even tho the line moves i stick to my plays.. If you want the best way to go about readiing line moves you should really think about getting Sports Insights.

Yeah, I have been thinking about subscribing to Sports Insights. For me, the NFL is tough to cap no matter what my strategy.

[McRich]

Also i have to say this thread turned out pretty good.. A good thread for alot of Newbies to learn a bit about RLM.

Yes, I agree.

[McRich]

Never follow RLM if you dont know which book had the move.. There are some books that do better then some.. Like i said in my other post Pros RLM are pretty much worthless unless you follow the right book.

I only play with two places. Last night I had a +7 line and a +5 line for S. Alabama at the same time. Well, you know which one I took. S. Alabama won outright.

[McRich]

I am on Auburn +12.5 and Northwestern -2.5 for RLM plays.

[apk2k6]

I made a spreadsheet last night for RLM plays that will keep track of individual sports win % and overall win % using RLM.

I also use the same "filters" as you. At least 60% bets and at least 1 point movement.

Tonight I had:

Heat +4 (NBA)
Auburn +12.5
USF +10
NorthWestern -3
Fresno +6.5
North Colorado +5.5
Cornell +15.5
Furman +3.5

It's 5-2 so far tonight with a win % of 71.42 pending Fresno State

[McRich]

I made a spreadsheet last night for RLM plays that will keep track of individual sports win % and overall win % using RLM.

I also use the same "filters" as you. At least 60% bets and at least 1 point movement.

Tonight I had:

Heat +4 (NBA)
Auburn +12.5
USF +10
NorthWestern -3
Fresno +6.5
North Colorado +5.5
Cornell +15.5
Furman +3.5

It's 5-2 so far tonight with a win % of 71.42 pending Fresno State

Very nice night of wins. Congrats!!!

[McRich]

I went 3-0 in my RLM wagers tonight. All in NCAABB.

Overall record is 33-21-2.

The breakdown of RLM that I have wagered on per sport so far is:

NBA 11-8
NCAABB 14-7-1
NCAAF 5-4-1
NFL 3-2

[apk2k6]

Fresno State a winner too, 6-2 tonight.

I'm not playing all of these, just keeping track right now. If after 100 plays or so it's over 60% overall, then I'll play all of the plays.

Btw, Louisville is looking good for an NCAAF play tomorrow

[McRich]

Fresno State a winner too, 6-2 tonight.

I'm not playing all of these, just keeping track right now. If after 100 plays or so it's over 60% overall, then I'll play all of the plays.

Btw, Louisville is looking good for an NCAAF play tomorrow

Good call on the Louisville game. A strong lean that I will probably hit up later today. I have been playing my RLM wagers. This week I have gone 6-1 in basketball wagers using RLM. My bankroll likes it.

[LT Profits]

FYI. I got +340 ML for Louisville. But back on point, if you can get +10.5, do it ASAP.

[I.R.B]

CBB is where to be if yoiu like RLM.. This will be a great CBB season.

[yisman]

Louisville is now +11 on Bodog and Skybook. -110

ML +355 on Bookmaker and +352 on Pinnacle

[roasthawg]

The Raiders look like the RLM play in the NFL tonight.

[CR22CH]

so what about tonight...i like Oakland what does your system say??

[McRich]

so what about tonight...i like Oakland what does your system say??

Yes, the Raiders fit the RLM system. I have them +9 for a play. I am also on Kent State in NCAABB at a pick 'em. I am also on Louisville in NCAAF at +10.5.

[roasthawg]

Yes, the Raiders fit the RLM system. I have them +9 for a play. I am also on Kent State in NCAABB at a pick 'em. I am also on Louisville in NCAAF at +10.5.

Det and Denver are a couple other rlm plays in the ncaa tonight.

[McRich]

Det and Denver are a couple other rlm plays in the ncaa tonight.

The number of bets has not hit the numbers I am looking for yet.

[roasthawg]

The number of bets has not hit the numbers I am looking for yet.

Gotcha.

[spmurph]

Surprised no one has mentioned the Eagles this Sunday. 2 point RLM

[McRich]

Surprised no one has mentioned the Eagles this Sunday. 2 point RLM

Good one. I made a play yesterday on the Eagles,

[roasthawg]

Surprised no one has mentioned the Eagles this Sunday. 2 point RLM

Eagles are always an rlm play.

[apk2k6]

I'm not counting Raiders because they haven't moved a full point at the comparison site I use. Same with Louisville, the line has actually moved up to -12 now. In NCAAB I'm playing Kent State, Denver, Detroit.

[McRich]

I'm not counting Raiders because they haven't moved a full point at the comparison site I use. Same with Louisville, the line has actually moved up to -12 now. In NCAAB I'm playing Kent State, Denver, Detroit.

Yeah, I noticed the Louisville move. This is one of the first times since I have been using RLM that I have seen the line move back and forth so much.

I am on University of Detroit +4 tonight for an RLM play.

[roasthawg]

Yeah, I noticed the Louisville move. This is one of the first times since I have been using RLM that I have seen the line move back and forth so much.

I am on University of Detroit +4 tonight for an RLM play.

Could be a head fake...smart money might be on Rutgers after all. Who knows, that's what makes RLM betting so difficult.

[apk2k6]

Looks like a losing night. Oh well they happen. Long term is what matters

[McRich]

I went 0-4 in my RLM wagers last night. My first really bad night for RLM. Lost one in NFL. Lost one in NCAAF. Lost two in NCABB.

Overall record is 33-25-2.

The breakdown of RLM that I have wagered on per sport so far is:

NBA 11-8
NCAABB 14-9-1
NCAAF 5-5-1
NFL 3-3

[spmurph]

Eagles are always an rlm play.

Was that supposed to mean something other than the literal interpretation? I can't remember the last game where they were the RLM play. The last game I can remember that they were involved in and had RLM was vs. SEA and SEA was the RLM play (and lost).

[spmurph]

I went 0-4 in my RLM wagers last night. My first really bad night for RLM. Lost one in NFL. Lost one in NCAAF. Lost two in NCABB.

Overall record is 33-25-2.

The breakdown of RLM that I have wagered on per sport so far is:

NBA 11-8
NCAABB 14-9-1
NCAAF 5-5-1
NFL 3-3

Do you have a criteria for RLM? I think you might do better, in NFL anyway, if you stick to at least 1 point RL moves.

[yisman]

there was a little on Thanksgiving. The line didn't actually move, but the Eagles went from -3 (+105) to -3 (-117) despite like 80% of the action being on the Cardinals.

[patsfan2727]

FYI. I got +340 ML for Louisville. But back on point, if you can get +10.5, do it ASAP.

hope everybody jumped on this advice! not only did you get the crappiest line, but the bet was losing with 10 minutes to go in the FIRST QUARTER.

From what I can tell "RLM" plays are essentially fading the public and betting on some crappy-ass team in the hopes that they show up and show that you were on the "sharp side".

Oakland is a "RLM" play every week and they are 5-8 ATS

Please stop keeping track of these RLM plays, as they are clearly no better than flipping a coin. If you want to bet a Dog, fine, just stop trying to pretend there is reasoning behind the play. "RLM's" got SMOKED last night, both Oakland and Louisville never even had a shot of a backdoor cover.

[LT Profits]

hope everybody jumped on this advice! not only did you get the crappiest line, but the bet was losing with 10 minutes to go in the FIRST QUARTER.

From what I can tell "RLM" plays are essentially fading the public and betting on some crappy-ass team in the hopes that they show up and show that you were on the "sharp side".

Oakland is a "RLM" play every week and they are 5-8 ATS

Please stop keeping track of these RLM plays, as they are clearly no better than flipping a coin. If you want to bet a Dog, fine, just stop trying to pretend there is reasoning behind the play. "RLM's" got SMOKED last night, both Oakland and Louisville never even had a shot of a backdoor cover.

I already provided the stats that this is a winning strategy in every sport. If you choose to ignore the numbers, that is your problem.

[patsfan2727]

I already provided the stats that this is a winning strategy in every sport. If you choose to ignore the numbers, that is your problem.

no, I will pay attention to the numbers...please give me another RLM play that will lose by 20 points!!! I need a solid fade pick!

[gizmo2431]

no, I will pay attention to the numbers...please give me another RLM play that will lose by 20 points!!! I need a solid fade pick!

1 play does not justify a history of plays that have previously worked, or in this case... 2 plays vs the entire past...

[FreeFall]

Man we should have a test and sort posts by the intelligence level of the poster. I'm really tired of seeing over and over the simple idea of a sample size (n=1) making a solid observation for a trend.

[patsfan2727]

1 play does not justify a history of plays that have previously worked, or in this case... 2 plays vs the entire past...

come on dude, system goes 0-4 and you want to back it still? the "coin flip" system would have worked better.