Would of liked the 2H over if this game didn't turn into a likely blowout. The score may alter the flow to a clock management pace in the 4th quarter.
-
Comment -
Game 3 was a blow out and there were 60 points in the fourth quarter. Maybe that means they will keep up the fast pace the whole way through. I agree with you that it is risky though - it's too bad because this would be a great play given the paceComment -
Good luck with your picks.Comment -
Any action tonight?Comment -
Portland / Dallas Under 91.5 2HComment -
Good luck on your 2h under play in the Por/Dal game. I'm on the game under. BOL
Comment -
i hope you hit this 70kgman...looking for a little recovery. thanks for the play either way.Comment -
4q may save you on the portland gameComment -
Congrats n thanks for the trailblazers 2h pick
Comment -
Thanks for the points.
Updated playoff record: 6-6. 6-2 on 2H plays, which is all I am playing going forward.Comment -
Nice call on the 2h under...Comment -
Damn I asked you if you had action then I missed your play...lol...thanks for the picks keep up the good work!Comment -
Any thoughts on NHL the Tampa by series bet is down to game7Comment -
I think Tampa has a good chance to win game 7. One of the main reasons I liked Tampa in the series to begin with is Pitt's lack of depth. It is two forward lines and four defensmen getting the bulk of the ice time for Pitt out of necessity. Those top players should be pretty fatigued by game 7 logging that kind of ice time every game. Tampa has outscored Pitt 21-14 in the series, and 10-4 last 2 games...Clearly Tampa has had no problem scoring, and it looks like that series long fatigue has already set in for Pitt.Originally posted by aussieH
Have a chance to wrap up the series bet on Boston tonight in game 6 too. I took the updated series price after they lost game 1. Not sure if anyone followed on that one.Comment -
What about the blackhawks...don't you feel they are in luongos head? I like getting + money on that play. Thoughts? Thanks...Comment -
Per your recommendation, I got down on Boston for -130. Not sure if that was the updated price. I think not.Comment -
Luongo has never really been a good playoff goalie, all the way back to his days in junior. Chicago has looked much faster the last few games, winning most of the 1 on 1 battles within the game. I don't think I personally am going to bet on the game, but I think the value is defintely on Chicago at +155. The pressure of home ice has seemed like more of a detriment than an advantage so far in the NHL playoffs in general. Vancouver's line of -170 is juiced a lot higher than it should be.Originally posted by Love The ActionComment -
It was. I Should of waited one more game. Could of got them for the series at +230 after they lost game 2 as well.Originally posted by dume walkerComment -
Any thoughts for LAL/NO 2nd half? Thinking under with that great shooting 1st half.Comment -
I would lean under, but don't like it nearly enough to consider playing it. I tend to just avoid those games where the variance on the 1H shooting percentages are drastically off average.Originally posted by daneault23Comment -
I don´t know about the the under, 1st H 105 points but shooting % should go down. 91 is still a pretty low number for an under, especially with the risk of a close game and fouling in the last 30 seconds...Comment -
San Antonio / Memphis Under 95.5 2HComment -
with u as always locked 95 underComment -
Denver / OKC Under 102.5 2HComment -
locked sameComment -
Let's get it!Originally posted by 70kgmanComment -
mem one just missed it ....
Comment -
Ouch. 13 points in final 13 seconds of the game. That is the life on an under bettor. lol.
If SA could of stopped Memphis on that possesion that ended with 13 seconds left, there never would of been any intentional free throws, and it would of covered easily.Comment -
My Bet was "cancelled" with no explanation yet..... That's just horsesh*t. (Have money back obviously but WTF). GL guys - no live totals been put back up since 1H over here.Comment -
Pissed that I missed your OKC/Den under while out to dinner. But we did cash on both hockey series, right? Thanks for that, K-Man.
And in that same vein, why are the Canadiens called the Habs? (Like I said before, I am not a hockey guy.)Comment -
i hope we r not seeing another OT here plz noComment -
Yes. Won both the Tampa Bay (+125) and Boston (-130) series bets tonight.Originally posted by dume walkerPissed that I missed your OKC/Den under while out to dinner. But we did cash on both hockey series, right? Thanks for that, K-Man.
And in that same vein, why are the Canadiens called the Habs? (Like I said before, I am not a hockey guy.)
Habs is an abbreviation of "les habitants", which is a term that has to do with the original settlers of that area of Canada.Comment -
Man my A system plays are killing it in the playoffs...not a lot of plays but it's 9-3-1 including the Miami over which I never thought would hit. Wasn't really expecting this for the playoffs and not even sure how to view it but I may be on to something though because it did fairly well in the reg season too. Backtesting is a bitch though so I'll have to figure something out.Comment -
Sounds good. Did you make any playoff adjustments to your model? I got off to a rough start in the playoffs, mostly because I was still using regular season averages in my capping as a general baseline for a couple different areas. Took me a little while to notice the flaw and make adjustments. If you look at at the shooting in the playoffs, the FG percentage averages are down 2%-4% in just about every series to where they would of projected to be for those two teams in the regular season. That is very drastic.Originally posted by ManBearPigComment -
Youre not playing that much play everyday. So not alot of profit for poeple who are playing little $$$ on each unit. But still a good way to make good money.
thks alotP.S. Im not good in english. I apologize for any error in my post.Comment
