Left, Right and Center. All things Political. The Political Forum.

[jackpot269]

I'm shocked!
Vance suggests the left stole 2020 … by doing what his own campaign did

Vance couldn't say Trump lost. Instead, he reverted to a version of the same response he presented during that debate.
“Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?” he was asked.
“Did big technology companies censor a story that independent studies have suggested would have cost Trump millions of votes?” he replied.

And now the throughline: The Times’s Elon Musk story notes that the Trump campaign had a direct hand in now-X limiting a story about Vance.
Hackers linked to Iran reportedly obtained the briefing book compiled as Trump was vetting potential running mates. (His former vice president, Mike Pence, needed to be replaced on the ticket for noteworthy reasons.) The hackers shopped the briefing book around, finding few takers.
Independent journalist Ken Klippenstein bit, however, publishing the document on his website. And in short order, X banned Klippenstein’s account, purportedly because the linked document included personal information about Vance.

But also because the Trump campaign wanted it to be limited, according to the Times’s Elon Musk story.
“After a reporter’s publication of hacked Trump campaign information last month,” the story notes, “the campaign connected with X to prevent the circulation of links to the material on the platform, according to two people with knowledge of the events. X eventually blocked links to the material and suspended the reporter’s account.”
In 2020, Twitter blocked the New York Post story after warnings from the federal government — then run by Donald Trump! — that foreign actors might disseminate stolen information. They soon lifted that limit. In 2024, X blocked Klippenstein’s story in coordination with the Trump campaign.

Vance suggests the left stole 2020 … by doing what his own campaign did (msn.com)

[slewfan]

Trump tried to fix Immigration. He was attacked by the left relentlessly. Even accused of building cages and putting children in them. But when the truth came out, it turned out to be Obama and the democrats who built the cages and separated kids from their families.

Kamala and Joe opened the border to 10's of millions of unvetted illegal people. But they get a pat on the back from the Lefties.

Democrats never - ever tell the truth.

[BOA12]

I Just Posted an article about an issue that was being talked about. From a group that checks facts. The lie about it being secret flights is classic GOP. They can't just go with the truth, even if they think it is bad, they always got to add on lies. (usually it's all lies anyway)
Like the Jan 6 tapes. When the GOP took the house in 2022, McCarthy gave Tucker 40.000 hours of tapes and said anyone else that wanted them, just ask. About a year later, when they were being released, all you heard from GOP was took us 3 years to get these tapes. When someone from their own party offered them to everyone a year before. Sad part is their cult always believes this shit.

Show me where I said illegal immigration was not a problem. Been a problem for many decades.




''if Trump loses this election, it will be the last election in USA.''

If you want to bet some money on this, let me know.

The duke of SBR is a hard core Nationalist.

Epitome of a shit poster.

[slewfan]

Barry lookin’for a fourth term. He be lovin’ the power. If we get lucky and Trump wins, we’ll get rid of the Bidens, Kamala, Pelosi, Clintons and Obama’s once and for all. How sweet that would be.


‘SICKENING’

Critics pounce after Obama scolds Black men hesitant to vote for VP Harris

[jackpot269]

come on Jackpot. Unvetted? These are the same people who told you the border was secure for years! Only when the polls showed that it was the right at the top of issues that voters cared about, did the dems pretend they cared. Do you know what allowing 15-20 million people into teh country in a few short years does? How many billions of dollars it costs?

Just imagine if they spent a fraction of the time and money just on its own people rather than people from other countries? My friend just came back from CA. She took he daughter to Disneyland. She loved it. However, she said it Hollywood walk of fame was disgusting. Drug addicts everywhere and smelled like a toilet. She also couldn't believe the smells of urine in other parts of LA and the miles of tents on the sidewalks.

This government are purposely spending billions of dollars in order to secure votes in a few years. They and their friends will make a ton of money long the way.

These people should be in prison. Instead, the government funds wars all over the world, spends billions bringing in people from other countries and convinced so many of you that this is ok. Over a half a million criminals that they know of, including thousands of rapists and murderers. And to make it worse, you accept it and will vote against the only candidate who will deport these people and put the country first. Unreal.

Most of the illegal drugs, in the USA come from Mexico or at least thru Mexico. There are no more drugs here now than when Trump was POTUS. Prices of most drugs dropped by 50% while Trump was POTUS and has stayed low due to the flooding of it here in the USA. The supply exploded while Trump was POTUS and have not slowed down. Under Trump is when the fentanyl started coming in, and with a steady rise from when it first found in my region.
The reason I'm telling you this, they are not going to stop the criminals from coming or bringing drugs, unless something slows demand. Sure, you can stop the ones wanting to come here to work and send almost all their money back home to their families.
I know Fox news has been lying to you for years and telling you different. I've seen it, out on the streets. The day workers, waiting to go to work, and the ones that work for the cartels selling the dope. Seen it, and heard it myself, firsthand, needed no one to tell me about it. They will not stop the cartels from getting their people, or products in. Not even Trump, it got worse not better his first term.

So, you are saying people convicted of felonies should be in jail? I agree!

[b1slickguy]

Some banks in Australia are also questioning their customers' motives for withdrawing cash. Why would banks do this?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Canadian bank refuses to give customer cash without proof of why he needs it... <a href="https://t.co/7mvmpTAHT6">pic.twitter.com/7mvmpTAHT6</a></p>&mdash; illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) <a href="https://twitter.com/iluminatibot/status/1844150446979678547?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 9, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[DwightShrute]

The program has never been secret. DHS announced it when it began in October 2022:

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is developing a new, voluntary Advance Travel Authorization (ATA) process to collect information from eligible noncitizens requesting advance authorization to travel to the United States to seek a discretionary grant of parole. … ATA launched October 12, 2022, to implement a parole process for certain undocumented noncitizens from select countries and their qualifying immediate family members, under which those individuals may request advance authorization to travel to the United States to seek a discretionary grant of parole. … CBP's ATA collection is conducted through the CBP One™ mobile application.

These Migrants Were Not 'Unvetted'

The assertion that these migrants are simply dumped in America without any vetting is false, despite being made by the Daily Mail, Musk and several members of the GOP:
To participate, eligible beneficiaries receiving ATAs must "have a supporter in the United States" and "undergo and clear robust security vetting." Their supporters must agree "to provide them with financial support for the duration of their parole in the United States."
CIS characterized the humanitarian asylum program as "Biden Parole Flights." Such a phrase is great fodder for scary social media posts, like the one below from former Trump aide Steven Miller's PAC, but the word parole means a specific thing in the context of immigration law that differs from its meaning in the criminal justice system.

The other major component of the policy changes is a new process to allow up to 24,000 Venezuelans who are outside the United States to travel by air to the U.S. interior and be paroled into the country. … Venezuelans granted parole will be allowed to stay for up to two years and apply for work authorization. Parole does not provide a dedicated pathway to U.S. lawful permanent residence.

This is not parole from jail.

The tapes, I guess Truck Lied then because he said he got 40,000 hours on tapes and showed 5 minutes on his show. If he was only allowed to view in them in a room he would have had nothing to show, not even the 5 minutes.


That guy beings released had nothing to with Truck. I've told you this several times

Please stop telling this lie. When you ask other poster to state lies you have told, all they got to do is fellow my post. Here is one you repeat ever chance you get.

[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.95)]Albert Watkins, the attorney who handled Chansley’s plea and sentencing, tells TIME that the new footage did not play any role in his former client’s release. “Absolutely no,” he says. “I have seen no indication of any filings related to the new footage. There are no docket entries indicating the same.”

See, just stop. Why do you do that, you know it's a lie, yet you post it over and over.[/COLOR]

come on Jackpot. Unvetted? These are the same people who told you the border was secure for years! Only when the polls showed that it was the right at the top of issues that voters cared about, did the dems pretend they cared. Do you know what allowing 15-20 million people into teh country in a few short years does? How many billions of dollars it costs?

Just imagine if they spent a fraction of the time and money just on its own people rather than people from other countries? My friend just came back from CA. She took he daughter to Disneyland. She loved it. However, she said it Hollywood walk of fame was disgusting. Drug addicts everywhere and smelled like a toilet. She also couldn't believe the smells of urine in other parts of LA and the miles of tents on the sidewalks.

This government are purposely spending billions of dollars in order to secure votes in a few years. They and their friends will make a ton of money long the way.

These people should be in prison. Instead, the government funds wars all over the world, spends billions bringing in people from other countries and convinced so many of you that this is ok. Over a half a million criminals that they know of, including thousands of rapists and murderers. And to make it worse, you accept it and will vote against the only candidate who will deport these people and put the country first. Unreal.

[jackpot269]

when you say secret flights like as if they were flown in on a Stealth bomber, its being a little disingenuous. They are boing flown in, 30,000 a month. Why do you think they are doing this? I know you can't say so because it make the dems look like traitors. It all about votes ----> power -----> Money. I suspect you know this but you just can't bring yourself to say it. I get it. Politics. Too bad.

30,000 a month! Unvetted. The out some info on an app and then they get flown into the States, get a debit card, a hotel, a cell phone and flight to anywhere they want. Mostly persuaded to one of the swing States of course. Oh I know, this is normal for countries to do. Fly in hundreds of thousands of people and allow millions cross the border illegally. Happens all over the world. No ill effects. Hey look at Germany, France and England for example. The millions of migrants has had a profound positive effect on their countries. I mean, when you allow millions of mostly young males to come in, what could possibly go wrong?

As far as the j6 tapes go, its my understanding that no one was given those tapes. You were given permission to view them in a designated room at the Capitol. Just to clarify. The footage was vital to show that the government fought to withhold the video and did withhold it from the defense and the court. Once evidence was uncovered by Tucker, the judge released the guy who was serving a 4 year federal prison sentence for trespassing. No violence whatsoever. Held in solitary for a year or so. Where is the investigation about that? The MSM said a cop was killed because he was bashed in the head by a fire extinguisher. Tucker showed the same cop on video hours later walking around the building alive.

Do you know how thick those doors are? Why did the cops open them? Why did Pelosi refuse 10,000 national guards? Do you think its at all possible that the dems wanted to see a riot so they could gain a political advantage while also blaming Trump? Maybe that is why the bombs were never detonated and no one has caught the person who planted them. They were a back up plan. Threat to out democracy? The biggest threat in US history.

You don't think these people are capable of doing anything like this? If not, then you probably believe Oswald shot JFK and Building 7 fell by itself.

The program has never been secret. DHS announced it when it began in October 2022:

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is developing a new, voluntary Advance Travel Authorization (ATA) process to collect information from eligible noncitizens requesting advance authorization to travel to the United States to seek a discretionary grant of parole. … ATA launched October 12, 2022, to implement a parole process for certain undocumented noncitizens from select countries and their qualifying immediate family members, under which those individuals may request advance authorization to travel to the United States to seek a discretionary grant of parole. … CBP's ATA collection is conducted through the CBP One™ mobile application.

These Migrants Were Not 'Unvetted'

The assertion that these migrants are simply dumped in America without any vetting is false, despite being made by the Daily Mail, Musk and several members of the GOP:
To participate, eligible beneficiaries receiving ATAs must "have a supporter in the United States" and "undergo and clear robust security vetting." Their supporters must agree "to provide them with financial support for the duration of their parole in the United States."
CIS characterized the humanitarian asylum program as "Biden Parole Flights." Such a phrase is great fodder for scary social media posts, like the one below from former Trump aide Steven Miller's PAC, but the word parole means a specific thing in the context of immigration law that differs from its meaning in the criminal justice system.

The other major component of the policy changes is a new process to allow up to 24,000 Venezuelans who are outside the United States to travel by air to the U.S. interior and be paroled into the country. … Venezuelans granted parole will be allowed to stay for up to two years and apply for work authorization. Parole does not provide a dedicated pathway to U.S. lawful permanent residence.
This is not parole from jail.


The tapes, I guess Truck Lied then because he said he got 40,000 hours on tapes and showed 5 minutes on his show. If he was only allowed to view in them in a room he would have had nothing to show, not even the 5 minutes.


That guy beings released had nothing to with Tucker. I've told you this several times

Please stop telling this lie. When you ask other poster to state lies you have told, all they got to do is fellow my post. Here is one you repeat ever chance you get.

[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.95)]Albert Watkins, the attorney who handled Chansley’s plea and sentencing, tells TIME that the new footage did not play any role in his former client’s release. “Absolutely no,” he says. “I have seen no indication of any filings related to the new footage. There are no docket entries indicating the same.”

See, just stop. Why do you do that, you know it's a lie, yet you post it over and over.[/COLOR]

[DwightShrute]

I Just Posted an article about an issue that was being talked about. From a group that checks facts. The lie about it being secret flights is classic GOP. They can't just go with the truth, even if they think it is bad, they always got to add on lies. (usually it's all lies anyway)
Like the Jan 6 tapes. When the GOP took the house in 2022, McCarthy gave Tucker 40.000 hours of tapes and said anyone else that wanted them, just ask. About a year later, when they were being released, all you heard from GOP was took us 3 years to get these tapes. When someone from their own party offered them to everyone a year before. Sad part is their cult always believes this shit.

Show me where I said illegal immigration was not a problem. Been a problem for many decades.




''if Trump loses this election, it will be the last election in USA.''

If you want to bet some money on this, let me know.

when you say secret flights like as if they were flown in on a Stealth bomber, its being a little disingenuous. They are boing flown in, 30,000 a month. Why do you think they are doing this? I know you can't say so because it make the dems look like traitors. It all about votes ----> power -----> Money. I suspect you know this but you just can't bring yourself to say it. I get it. Politics. Too bad.

30,000 a month! Unvetted. The out some info on an app and then they get flown into the States, get a debit card, a hotel, a cell phone and flight to anywhere they want. Mostly persuaded to one of the swing States of course. Oh I know, this is normal for countries to do. Fly in hundreds of thousands of people and allow millions cross the border illegally. Happens all over the world. No ill effects. Hey look at Germany, France and England for example. The millions of migrants has had a profound positive effect on their countries. I mean, when you allow millions of mostly young males to come in, what could possibly go wrong?

As far as the j6 tapes go, its my understanding that no one was given those tapes. You were given permission to view them in a designated room at the Capitol. Just to clarify. The footage was vital to show that the government fought to withhold the video and did withhold it from the defense and the court. Once evidence was uncovered by Tucker, the judge released the guy who was serving a 4 year federal prison sentence for trespassing. No violence whatsoever. Held in solitary for a year or so. Where is the investigation about that? The MSM said a cop was killed because he was bashed in the head by a fire extinguisher. Tucker showed the same cop on video hours later walking around the building alive.

Do you know how thick those doors are? Why did the cops open them? Why did Pelosi refuse 10,000 national guards? Do you think its at all possible that the dems wanted to see a riot so they could gain a political advantage while also blaming Trump? Maybe that is why the bombs were never detonated and no one has caught the person who planted them. They were a back up plan. Threat to out democracy? The biggest threat in US history.

You don't think these people are capable of doing anything like this? If not, then you probably believe Oswald shot JFK and Building 7 fell by itself.

[jackpot269]

uhhh what the fukk?

320,000 migrants is true and you dont think this is a problem

who knows how many "illegals"

if Trump loses this election, it will be the last election in USA

I Just Posted an article about an issue that was being talked about. From a group that checks facts. The lie about it being secret flights is classic GOP. They can't just go with the truth, even if they think it is bad, they always got to add on lies. (usually it's all lies anyway)
Like the Jan 6 tapes. When the GOP took the house in 2022, McCarthy gave Tucker 40.000 hours of tapes and said anyone else that wanted them, just ask. About a year later, when they were being released, all you heard from GOP was took us 3 years to get these tapes. When someone from their own party offered them to everyone a year before. Sad part is their cult always believes this shit.

Show me where I said illegal immigration was not a problem. Been a problem for many decades.




''if Trump loses this election, it will be the last election in USA.''

If you want to bet some money on this, let me know.

[b1slickguy]

[DwightShrute]

[slewfan]

On March 4, 2024, the claim that the Biden administration had secretly flown 320,000 migrants into the U.S. in 2023 went viral. That claim originated from a report by the Center for Immigration Studies, a conservative think tank. The report, and its assertions, gained significant exposure when the Daily Mail covered it and Elon Musk shared the Daily Mail article on X (formerly known as Twitter). Former U.S. President Donald Trump also repeated the claim in his Super Tuesday victory speech on March 5, 2024.
The central assertions made by CIS, repeated by the Daily Mail or others, were that:

• A Biden administration program was responsible for flying 320,000 migrants directly into the United States between January and December 2023. (True)
• The program was a secret whose details were discovered by an outside group. (False)
• The program allowed unvetted aliens to enter the United States. (False)
• The U.S. government admitted that the program was a national-security risk. (False)
• Such a program could affect U.S. politics by altering voter demographics. (False)

Of these five claims, only the first was true. The program has never been a secret, it does not transport "unvetted" aliens, and participation in it requires significant vetting and a sponsor who is a U.S. citizen. The program provides no pathway to citizenship, which is a requirement to vote.

Did Biden Secretly Fly 320K Unvetted Migrants to American Airports in 2023? | Snopes.com

Dwight thanks for letting me know about my wrong numbers on contest!!
GL on your picks!

This article is a total propaganda net written by a proletariat Left.

But he did allow over 15 million other illegal people in..

[RudyRuetigger]

On March 4, 2024, the claim that the Biden administration had secretly flown 320,000 migrants into the U.S. in 2023 went viral. That claim originated from a report by the Center for Immigration Studies, a conservative think tank. The report, and its assertions, gained significant exposure when the Daily Mail covered it and Elon Musk shared the Daily Mail article on X (formerly known as Twitter). Former U.S. President Donald Trump also repeated the claim in his Super Tuesday victory speech on March 5, 2024.
The central assertions made by CIS, repeated by the Daily Mail or others, were that:

• A Biden administration program was responsible for flying 320,000 migrants directly into the United States between January and December 2023. (True)
• The program was a secret whose details were discovered by an outside group. (False)
• The program allowed unvetted aliens to enter the United States. (False)
• The U.S. government admitted that the program was a national-security risk. (False)
• Such a program could affect U.S. politics by altering voter demographics. (False)

Of these five claims, only the first was true. The program has never been a secret, it does not transport "unvetted" aliens, and participation in it requires significant vetting and a sponsor who is a U.S. citizen. The program provides no pathway to citizenship, which is a requirement to vote.

Did Biden Secretly Fly 320K Unvetted Migrants to American Airports in 2023? | Snopes.com

Dwight thanks for letting me know about my wrong numbers on contest!!
GL on your picks!

uhhh what the fukk?

320,000 migrants is true and you dont think this is a problem

who knows how many "illegals"

if Trump loses this election, it will be the last election in USA

[jackpot269]

of course that's the reason. I just wanted to see if Jackpot would admit it as well. I am skeptical. I expect some kind of spin to justify what they are doing. Maybe I am wrong.

On March 4, 2024, the claim that the Biden administration had secretly flown 320,000 migrants into the U.S. in 2023 went viral. That claim originated from a report by the Center for Immigration Studies, a conservative think tank. The report, and its assertions, gained significant exposure when the Daily Mail covered it and Elon Musk shared the Daily Mail article on X (formerly known as Twitter). Former U.S. President Donald Trump also repeated the claim in his Super Tuesday victory speech on March 5, 2024.
The central assertions made by CIS, repeated by the Daily Mail or others, were that:

• A Biden administration program was responsible for flying 320,000 migrants directly into the United States between January and December 2023. (True)
• The program was a secret whose details were discovered by an outside group. (False)
• The program allowed unvetted aliens to enter the United States. (False)
• The U.S. government admitted that the program was a national-security risk. (False)
• Such a program could affect U.S. politics by altering voter demographics. (False)

Of these five claims, only the first was true. The program has never been a secret, it does not transport "unvetted" aliens, and participation in it requires significant vetting and a sponsor who is a U.S. citizen. The program provides no pathway to citizenship, which is a requirement to vote.

Did Biden Secretly Fly 320K Unvetted Migrants to American Airports in 2023? | Snopes.com

Dwight thanks for letting me know about my wrong numbers on contest!!
GL on your picks!

[DwightShrute]

I can answer that for Jack. In case he hasn't seen the ''real'' news on what is taking place around America today. Because he's a decent guy and believes in America.

The reason why Kamala and Joe allowed 15 or so Million illegal people into America, is so 15, 20, 25 other nations can empty out their prisons, insane asylums and homeless areas and send them all to American soil. Then those countries can save money and donate to the DNC. This way they can continue creating chaos right here in good ole' U.S. of A. Just like Jimmy Carter did. It's just history repeating itself in a ''democrat way''.

While they are spending Billions on these illegal people, they give them money so they will vote for Heil Kamala.

A Democrat will always turn a blind eye to facts and truth.

of course that's the reason. I just wanted to see if Jackpot would admit it as well. I am skeptical. I expect some kind of spin to justify what they are doing. Maybe I am wrong.

[slewfan]

No I am not saying that. I am saying that you don't know 100% that these machines didn't change votes and that the election wasn't stolen. Sometimes it take years for the truth to come out. You remember the Steele dossier that Trump was accused to colluding with Russia which lead the the Mueller Reports and he found nothing? Then a couple years later it was discovered that it was crooked Hillary who paid for the dossier and tried to pin on Trump. She might have gotten away with with it too.


Answer me this on the other subject in this thread. Take your political cap off for sec

Do you think it OK for the Biden administration to fly in 30,000 people from 4 countries into the USA every month?

Why do you think they are doing this?

I can answer that for Jack. In case he hasn't seen the ''real'' news on what is taking place around America today. Because he's a decent guy and believes in America.

The reason why Kamala and Joe allowed 15 or so Million illegal people into America, is so 15, 20, 25 other nations can empty out their prisons, insane asylums and homeless areas and send them all to American soil. Then those countries can save money and donate to the DNC. This way they can continue creating chaos right here in good ole' U.S. of A. Just like Jimmy Carter did. It's just history repeating itself in a ''democrat way''.

While they are spending Billions on these illegal people, they give them money so they will vote for Heil Kamala.

A Democrat will always turn a blind eye to facts and truth.

[DwightShrute]

Sure, but you can't get caught doing it, if you are committing a crime, or you have to do the time. There is no proof that voting machines chanced votes, so being that person, and being wrong even worse. Her 1st mistake was believing the lies.

You are saying, its ok to break and enter, as long as you find evidence someone else also committed a crime.

I was taught, 2 wrongs don't make a right.

No I am not saying that. I am saying that you don't know 100% that these machines didn't change votes and that the election wasn't stolen. Sometimes it take years for the truth to come out. You remember the Steele dossier that Trump was accused to colluding with Russia which lead the the Mueller Reports and he found nothing? Then a couple years later it was discovered that it was crooked Hillary who paid for the dossier and tried to pin on Trump. She might have gotten away with with it too.


Answer me this on the other subject in this thread. Take your political cap off for sec

Do you think it OK for the Biden administration to fly in 30,000 people from 4 countries into the USA every month?

Why do you think they are doing this?

[jackpot269]

was that ok?

I think you can see my point. Sometimes you have to go beyond what others are willing to do in order to get to the truth. Don't you agree?

I mean, what if someone broke in and released info that there were no WMD's in Iraq before America went into Iraq?

What is someone found proof there was no plane that hit the pentagon or how Building 7 happened to fold like a deck of cards despite never being hit? What about the Twin Towers?

Where are the Epstein files?

Sure, but you can't get caught doing it, if you are committing a crime, or you have to do the time. There is no proof that voting machines chanced votes, so being that person, and being wrong even worse. Her 1st mistake was believing the lies.

You are saying, its ok to break and enter, as long as you find evidence someone else also committed a crime.

I was taught, 2 wrongs don't make a right.

[DwightShrute]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I wanted to share this video to help spread awareness, especially to my peeps in San Antonio and Texas. <br><br>This video is from a awesome dude named Taylor Hansen who is putting boots down in San Antonio and exposing what&#39;s going on. Check him out on Rumble.<br><br>This is exactly why the… <a rel="nofollow" href="https://t.co/mfluA9yTh4">pic.twitter.com/mfluA9yTh4</a></p>&mdash; Phoeni�� 2A ���� (@Phoenix2A_1980s) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/Phoenix2A_1980s/status/1843371775029018897?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 7, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

sad isn't it?

[b1slickguy]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I wanted to share this video to help spread awareness, especially to my peeps in San Antonio and Texas. <br><br>This video is from a awesome dude named Taylor Hansen who is putting boots down in San Antonio and exposing what&#39;s going on. Check him out on Rumble.<br><br>This is exactly why the… <a href="https://t.co/mfluA9yTh4">pic.twitter.com/mfluA9yTh4</a></p>&mdash; Phoeni�� 2A ���� (@Phoenix2A_1980s) <a href="https://twitter.com/Phoenix2A_1980s/status/1843371775029018897?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 7, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[DwightShrute]

I think so. I was 5. Nixon needed a pardon for something, I guess.

was that ok?

I think you can see my point. Sometimes you have to go beyond what others are willing to do in order to get to the truth. Don't you agree?

I mean, what if someone broke in and released info that there were no WMD's in Iraq before America went into Iraq?

What is someone found proof there was no plane that hit the pentagon or how Building 7 happened to fold like a deck of cards despite never being hit? What about the Twin Towers?

Where are the Epstein files?

[jackpot269]

that's interesting.


Did those who broke into Watergate break any laws?

I think so. I was 5. Nixon needed a pardon for something, I guess.

[DwightShrute]

She stole someone else's Id, to let others in the voting machines. I never said she cheated. I said we don't know what her intent was. With crazy pillow guy in on it, you never know, what they may have done. Theft and illegally accessing voting machines we know for sure.

that's interesting.


Did those who broke into Watergate break any laws?

[jackpot269]

Supreme Court Rules Against Republicans in Election Case Against Biden

GOP don't want Usa citizens to register to vote.

aligning with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. This directive is seen as part of Biden's broader effort to increase voter participation ahead of the 2024 election


Supreme Court Rules Against Republicans in Election Case Against Biden (msn.com)

[ByeShea]

Why would anyone from the left focus on Trump.?. To deflect what is really taking place in a faltering America due to the present administration.

Exactly.

Under Kamala's watch inflation became a real and painful American issue for the first time since the 1970s as MILLIONS of illegals walked unchecked across the southern border ... so let's try and paint Trump as a wanna be dictator who will end democracy (wtf?) and if that doesn't work, well, let's try and bankrupt, jail, or kill him as they know damn well they have no record to stand on or message that appeals.

[jackpot269]

Kamala and the Fake News awful quiet these days.

Kamala’s comments on domestic violence resurface amid hubby’s slapping scandal


Ever since the story emerged Wednesday, both the corporate propaganda press and Harris’ presidential campaign have been completely silent about the matter as if the report doesn’t even exist.
However, the report does exist, and the fact that Harris refuses to address it head-on strongly points to her being a hypocrite.
Why? Well, take for instance what she tweeted in mid-2017:


Responding to these tweets now years later, critics were eager to know why Harris and other Democrats aren’t holding her husband to the same standard they held Kavanaugh to years earlier.

“It’s being reported that your husband b-tch slapped his girlfriend plus he impregnated his nanny,” one critic, a woman, tweeted. “Maybe you should start at home with the abuse lecture.”

“It’s hilarious how leftists whine non-stop about toxic masculinity. Then turn around and support a domestic abuser. Absolutely zero standards,” another critic added.

She stole someone else's Id, to let others in the voting machines. I never said she cheated. I said we don't know what her intent was. With crazy pillow guy in on it, you never know, what they may have done. Theft and illegally accessing voting machines we know for sure.

[DwightShrute]

Kamala and the Fake News awful quiet these days.

Kamala’s comments on domestic violence resurface amid hubby’s slapping scandal


Ever since the story emerged Wednesday, both the corporate propaganda press and Harris’ presidential campaign have been completely silent about the matter as if the report doesn’t even exist.
However, the report does exist, and the fact that Harris refuses to address it head-on strongly points to her being a hypocrite.
Why? Well, take for instance what she tweeted in mid-2017:


Responding to these tweets now years later, critics were eager to know why Harris and other Democrats aren’t holding her husband to the same standard they held Kavanaugh to years earlier.

“It’s being reported that your husband b-tch slapped his girlfriend plus he impregnated his nanny,” one critic, a woman, tweeted. “Maybe you should start at home with the abuse lecture.”

“It’s hilarious how leftists whine non-stop about toxic masculinity. Then turn around and support a domestic abuser. Absolutely zero standards,” another critic added.

<iframe class="rumble" width="640" height="360" src="https://rumble.com/embed/v5f8bx1/?pub=t84gb" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[slewfan]

Kamala and the Fake News awful quiet these days.

Kamala’s comments on domestic violence resurface amid hubby’s slapping scandal


Ever since the story emerged Wednesday, both the corporate propaganda press and Harris’ presidential campaign have been completely silent about the matter as if the report doesn’t even exist.
However, the report does exist, and the fact that Harris refuses to address it head-on strongly points to her being a hypocrite.
Why? Well, take for instance what she tweeted in mid-2017:


Responding to these tweets now years later, critics were eager to know why Harris and other Democrats aren’t holding her husband to the same standard they held Kavanaugh to years earlier.

“It’s being reported that your husband b-tch slapped his girlfriend plus he impregnated his nanny,” one critic, a woman, tweeted. “Maybe you should start at home with the abuse lecture.”

“It’s hilarious how leftists whine non-stop about toxic masculinity. Then turn around and support a domestic abuser. Absolutely zero standards,” another critic added.

[DwightShrute]

Read her conviction. She stole a security badge, impersonated officials, copy hard drives and gave to another guy. Plus….

Those included three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty and failing to comply with the secretary of state.

Yes, you are wrong. We have no idea what her intent was. We know crazy pillow guy cannot be trusted. From his past actions.
She broke the law. You are big on defending these people that break into voting machines, unlawfully. Since you think there is nothing wrong with that, let's get a group from the other side to go around, with no one watching, and have a look see with their tech folks. They will just be making sure there was no cheating. You seem ok with that happening, unless you are a hypocrite.

''So to recap, she wasn't cheating. She was trying to find proof of cheating''

Or more likely planting evidence of cheating. If you are being honest. I mean letting crazy pillow guy, and his people in them, that's a red flag.

this is how unhinged you two have become at times. I never defended her. Read it again if you need to. I simply wanted clarification on what she did exactly because it seems a little unclear to me.

Yes I read the link you provided. Its unclear to me what she actually did when it comes to cheating as you both seem to imply. I was hoping you had more information as to what she actually did that would fall under "cheating". I like to get as much information about discussion topics.

Ya I see she broke that law. I never defended her for breaking law as Jackpot insinuated. I read the charges like influencing a public servant, conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, etc, but I couldn't find anything online which shows how she tried to cheat the results of the election. All I see is she broke the law in her attempt to discover proof that the election wasn't legitimate. Being a human being, I am susceptible to making mistakes, so I just wanted an honest opinion for you guys as to whether or not I am missing something here?

Once more, did she try to change election results or did she try to discover proof of election fraud? Do you know or are you just speculating? If its the later, then I fail to see how you can say she was cheating. If on the other hand, like Jackpot stated ... she was more likely trying to plant evidence, which makes no sense at all to me, then wouldn't there be some evidence of the evidence she was attempting to plant? I think there would be and it would be in the article.

[jackpot269]

On Thursday evening, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia tweeted: “Yes they can control the weather. It’s ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can’t be done.”
This is wholly unsurprising for Greene, the right-wing firebrand and conspiracymonger who once mused about the possibility of Jews controlling space lasers for the purpose of starting wildfires. The more surprising aspect is that it reflects the approach the Republican Party is taking generally to Hurricane Helene: rather than doing its job and offering concrete aid to people suffering from the devastation, GOP lawmakers are devolving into conspiracy theories and, like everything else, fearmongering about undocumented immigrants.


Republicans in Congress leave Helene victims hanging (msn.com)

[jackpot269]

Hold on. She didn't try and cheat did she? She was trying to gather evidence proving the election was stolen right? Whether she would have found that evidence or not, we'll never know.

So to recap, she wasn't cheating. She was trying to find proof of cheating. Am I wrong? Isn't that what happened?

Yes, you are wrong. We have no idea what her intent was. We know crazy pillow guy cannot be trusted. From his past actions.
She broke the law. You are big on defending these people that break into voting machines, unlawfully. Since you think there is nothing wrong with that, let's get a group from the other side to go around, with no one watching, and have a look see with their tech folks. They will just be making sure there was no cheating. You seem ok with that happening, unless you are a hypocrite.

''So to recap, she wasn't cheating. She was trying to find proof of cheating''

Or more likely planting evidence of cheating. If you are being honest. I mean letting crazy pillow guy, and his people in them, that's a red flag.

[Mac4Lyfe]

Hold on. She didn't try and cheat did she? She was trying to gather evidence proving the election was stolen right? Whether she would have found that evidence or not, we'll never know.

So to recap, she wasn't cheating. She was trying to find proof of cheating. Am I wrong? Isn't that what happened?

Read her conviction. She stole a security badge, impersonated officials, copy hard drives and gave to another guy. Plus….

Those included three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty and failing to comply with the secretary of state.

[b1slickguy]

[DwightShrute]

Amazing how those who claim there’s cheating are usually the ones doing the cheating. How soon before Mr. My Pillow will be in jail too? This part reeks of Trump…


The judge also said he believed she would do the same things she was found guilty of doing again.
“I am convinced you would do it all over again if you could. You’re as defiant as any defendant this court has ever seen,” Barrett said to her, according to The Associated Press. “You are no hero. You abused your position, and you’re a charlatan.”

Hold on. She didn't try and cheat did she? She was trying to gather evidence proving the election was stolen right? Whether she would have found that evidence or not, we'll never know.

So to recap, she wasn't cheating. She was trying to find proof of cheating. Am I wrong? Isn't that what happened?