Left, Right and Center. All things Political. The Political Forum.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • slewfan
    replied
    Bill Clinton, hero of the Democrat Machine allowed terrorists into America who reaped their Jihad on the U.S. with the 9/11 attacks after he was out of office. Remember they tried in 1993.?. They failed the first time but Billy Boy was too busy smoking a cigar to notice.

    So now, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris allow 15 million illegal people, give or take a few million into the U.S. not even knowing who many are. If only one percent are terrorists looking to destroy America, that's around 150 thousand of them. That's not counting the 10's of thousands of killers, disturbed criminals and retarded individuals.

    In a year, two, three whatever, they will be organized enough to kill as many Americans as possible. When this happens, Biden, Kamala and Obama will be long gone from the political scene. Hunkered down somewhere in one of their mansions out of harms way.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    ya don't say. How many new wars under Biden? 2.

    Dems and GOP all believed the lie that there was WMD in Iraq. They all voted together to invade.

    "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."

    President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

    "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

    -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998


    "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
    Letter to President Bush, Signed by:

    -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

    "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."

    -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

    "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."

    -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."

    -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."

    -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

    "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."

    -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

    "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
    -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

    "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
    -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

    "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"

    -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

    "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

    -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

    "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."

    -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

    "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."

    -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

    How many new wars under Trump? None.

    How many people did Obama put away after the subprime mortgage meltdown thing?

    You are trying to blame one party over another when reality is they are basically the same. “Republicans may not be the solution of your problems but democrats are certainly the cause of all your problems right now” - Bongino

    What you should be doing is voting for the only person not beholden to any party. Someone who fights for his country and correctly calls out dirtbag politicians on both sides of the isle. A modern day hero who was within an inch away from having his head blown off but got back on the horse to keep fighting. I mean, talk about courage. But you cannot do that because you have been told he's a bad man because a few businesses he had failed. Instead, you will shit on him and certainly vote for a DEI moron who fukked her way to the top and can't think for herself.
    Boots on the ground? 100 thousand USA troops deployed? Don't be shy, how many American troops dead?

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by slewfan
    You just say nothing with allot of words jack.

    Like when you said Corporations move to foreign countries for cheap labor when the main reason is the U.S. ridiculous taxing of the companies. I answered your phony answer and you just ignored it. So, what YOU say is bullshat in my view and simply a diversionary tactic to push your pro communist agenda along with the democrats. Or maybe you're just overmedicated at certain times.
    I'm a communist? Thats rich. I'm for the working middle class and working poor in the USA. You are always defending tax breaks for big business and rich. I do not support Putin although I bet you do. More of a dictator than communist.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    To cure Banks and big pharma problem you need to vote out all GOP. Bush and Bush Jr. put our soldiers in wars.
    You want to take away, freedom of the press. NICE.
    ya don't say. How many new wars under Biden? 2.

    Dems and GOP all believed the lie that there was WMD in Iraq. They all voted together to invade.

    "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."

    President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

    "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

    -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998


    "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
    Letter to President Bush, Signed by:

    -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

    "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."

    -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

    "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."

    -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."

    -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."

    -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

    "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."

    -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

    "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
    -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

    "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
    -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

    "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"

    -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

    "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

    -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

    "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."

    -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

    "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."

    -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

    How many new wars under Trump? None.

    How many people did Obama put away after the subprime mortgage meltdown thing?

    You are trying to blame one party over another when reality is they are basically the same. “Republicans may not be the solution of your problems but democrats are certainly the cause of all your problems right now” - Bongino

    What you should be doing is voting for the only person not beholden to any party. Someone who fights for his country and correctly calls out dirtbag politicians on both sides of the isle. A modern day hero who was within an inch away from having his head blown off but got back on the horse to keep fighting. I mean, talk about courage. But you cannot do that because you have been told he's a bad man because a few businesses he had failed. Instead, you will shit on him and certainly vote for a DEI moron who fukked her way to the top and can't think for herself.
    Last edited by DwightShrute; 10-19-24, 05:51 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    No different here, if you put a Harris sign up. So don't play that its only one side. Shit like this that makes supporting GOP impossible. Alwas lying or at least misleading. GOP no better than anyone else. Worse most times.

    Desantis wanting to charge people at TV station with a crime for running an ad he doesn't like.


    It may not be totalitarian in the full definition of the word, but it is suppression by fear and threat, and denying Constitutional protections. A Kommie-la regime would follow Great Britain, which is already like East Germany, where "inappropriate" social media posts land you in jail. The GOP in this country is in the process of nullifying the Constitution by simply ignoring it unless it suits them. We are very close to losing it all, and some already have.


    Fixed it.
    You just say nothing with allot of words jack.

    Like when you said Corporations move to foreign countries for cheap labor when the main reason is the U.S. ridiculous taxing of the companies. I answered your phony answer and you just ignored it. So, what YOU say is bullshat in my view and simply a diversionary tactic to push your pro communist agenda along with the democrats. Or maybe you're just overmedicated at certain times.
    Last edited by slewfan; 10-19-24, 05:44 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by slewfan
    Larry David had it wrong. He said, when he didn't want to talk to anyone, he should wear a MAGA hat in L.A.

    In a blue state wearing a MAGA hat would guarantee human interaction--where you suffer some physical violence unless you're a 6'5 bruiser. Or, if you put a Trump sign on your property, at the very least it would be stolen or defaced, but more likely your property would be damaged. Put a Trump bumper sticker on your car, and guarantee that it will be keyed. You already know the cops would laugh in your face if you reported any harassment or abuse since there are no longer enough of them to deal with small crimes. Nor would any judge mete out punishment.


    It may not be totalitarian in the full definition of the word, but it is suppression by fear and threat, and denying Constitutional protections. A Kommie-la regime would follow Great Britain, which is already like East Germany, where "inappropriate" social media posts land you in jail. The Left in this country is in the process of nullifying the Constitution by simply ignoring it unless it suits them. We are very close to losing it all, and some already have.



    [COLOR=var(--ht-color-box-text-light)]



    [/COLOR]
    No different here, if you put a Harris sign up. So don't play that its only one side. Shit like this that makes supporting GOP impossible. Alwas lying or at least misleading. GOP no better than anyone else. Worse most times.

    Desantis wanting to charge people at TV station with a crime for running an ad he doesn't like.


    It may not be totalitarian in the full definition of the word, but it is suppression by fear and threat, and denying Constitutional protections. A Kommie-la regime would follow Great Britain, which is already like East Germany, where "inappropriate" social media posts land you in jail. The GOP in this country is in the process of nullifying the Constitution by simply ignoring it unless it suits them. We are very close to losing it all, and some already have.


    Fixed it.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    To cure Banks and big pharma problem you need to vote out all GOP. Bush and Bush Jr. put our soldiers in wars.
    You want to take away, freedom of the press. NICE.

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    Larry David had it wrong. He said, when he didn't want to talk to anyone, he should wear a MAGA hat in L.A.

    In a blue state wearing a MAGA hat would guarantee human interaction--where you suffer some physical violence unless you're a 6'5 bruiser. Or, if you put a Trump sign on your property, at the very least it would be stolen or defaced, but more likely your property would be damaged. Put a Trump bumper sticker on your car, and guarantee that it will be keyed. You already know the cops would laugh in your face if you reported any harassment or abuse since there are no longer enough of them to deal with small crimes. Nor would any judge mete out punishment.


    It may not be totalitarian in the full definition of the word, but it is suppression by fear and threat, and denying Constitutional protections. A Kommie-la regime would follow Great Britain, which is already like East Germany, where "inappropriate" social media posts land you in jail. The Left in this country is in the process of nullifying the Constitution by simply ignoring it unless it suits them. We are very close to losing it all, and some already have.



    [COLOR=var(--ht-color-box-text-light)]



    [/COLOR]

    Leave a comment:


  • b1slickguy
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Why are you not telling everyone to go watch your Fox News interview? Why so quiet about it? Could it be because you spent the entire time dodging questions and deflecting? Candidates with real solutions don't do this: ���� -VJ<a href="https://t.co/GPGbUQMD56">pic.twitter.com/GPGbUQMD56</a></p>&mdash; RealVinnieJames (@RealVinnieJames) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealVinnieJames/status/1847387385971298689?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 18, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>







    .
    Last edited by 19th Hole; 10-19-24, 09:47 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • b1slickguy
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • b1slickguy
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    This guy literally destroyed CNN in 4 minutes. These talking head gals are nasty and narrow minded.


    https://youtu.be/yFf_1-Eoru4?t=234

    Leave a comment:


  • b1slickguy
    replied
    "So the burden of proof to determine whether or not their food is dangerous is actually the guy trying to turn his product into profit and not the governmental organization whose job it is to keep us safe."

    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Why would the FDA approve putting potentially DANGEROUS chemicals like food dyes into our food? Well, maybe it's because payments from Big Food and Big Pharma make up 46 PERCENT of the FDA's funding? Let's call this what it is: BRIBERY. <a href="https://t.co/pJvtdK039b">pic.twitter.com/pJvtdK039b</a></p>&mdash; Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) <a href="https://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/1846727831797080432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 17, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">JUST IN - <a href="https://twitter.com/JDVance?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JDVance</a> Slams Reporter for Repeatedly Asking About 2020 Election:<br><br>&quot;Do your job and focus on the problems the American people care about, rather than BULLSHlT from 4 years ago.&quot; �������� <a href="https://t.co/i04XG57COZ">pic.twitter.com/i04XG57COZ</a></p>&mdash; ��Qᵁᴱᴱᴺ��ᴹᴬᴳᴬ��ᵁᴸᵀᴿA�� (@QueenMAGAUltra) <a href="https://twitter.com/QueenMAGAUltra/status/1846684743544324424?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 16, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    they won't let you see the crimes. They are protecting Biden. His son will pay until his daddy pardons him.

    Speaking of evidence. Hillary bleach bitted her computer, had he staff smash all her devices with hammers, and deleted 33,000 email AFTER getting an FBI subpoena to hand them all over. She even admitted it. She joked about it. Nothing happened to her. Trump has 34 guilty charges for paying off Sloppy Daniels which isn't even against the law.

    Biden has classifies docs in several places including his open garage where his crackhead son lived and the special council didn't charge him because he said he was unable to comprehend what he did while at teh same time he was supposedly able to be president. Oh but Trump had docs too. Let's raid his place. While we are at it, lets fine Trump 500 million for for inflating the value of his property and ban him and his family from doing business in NY even thought the bank where her borrowed the money testified on Trump's behalf saying he repaid the loan, plus interest, one time as he's always done and they would be glad to lean him more money anytime he wants. Your hatred of Trump has clouded your judgement. Wake the fukk up man.

    Do you not see what is happened? Are you that much in denial? This is the definition of election interference and apparently you (and a handful of others) are the only ones who refuse to see it. They are playing you and you are letting them.
    If Hunters last name was ''Trump''. He would have been arrested years ago. It is undeniable.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    "Speaking of evidence. Hillary bleach bitted her computer, had he staff smash all her devices with hammers, and deleted 33,000 email AFTER getting an FBI subpoena to hand them all over. She even admitted it. She joked about it. Nothing happened to her. Trump has 34 guilty charges for paying off Sloppy Daniels which isn't even against the law."

    Did the DOJ not recovery theses. After a federal judge order that they try? Did Trump not lie and say he was going to lock her up. You ever wonder, why after he got won the election you never heard about it again? He got them votes from the ones he lied to and then they forgot.

    Your evidence was not good enough for a court or the GOP congress. See sports forum know it all's. Just talk.

    That alarm is going off again! That snooze is a bitch. I got a fix for that snooze button.

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">THREAD: In addition to his military career &amp; drunk driving arrest, there’s another topic about which <a href="https://twitter.com/Tim_Walz?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Tim_Walz</a> has been lying for political purposes —the conception of his own children. Since IVF treatments entered the news earlier this year, Walz has been repeatedly claiming he… <a href="https://t.co/hHdfSsiGaI">pic.twitter.com/hHdfSsiGaI</a></p>&mdash; Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) <a href="https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1825898567304728890?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >August 20, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Helpful list: <a href="https://t.co/7oKbxufyR7">https://t.co/7oKbxufyR7</a></p>&mdash; Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) <a href="https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1825919673826693208?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >August 20, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Tim Walz's wife confirms she did not undergo IVF as the Governor and VP candidate stated several times. DETAILS: <a href="https://t.co/mp0jwwZkDz">https://t.co/mp0jwwZkDz</a></p>&mdash; VOZ (@VozMediaUSA) <a href="https://twitter.com/VozMediaUSA/status/1826230698786869622?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >August 21, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



    ..
    Last edited by 19th Hole; 10-16-24, 07:33 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Reality 👇 <a href="https://t.co/ADrs6rI1OZ">pic.twitter.com/ADrs6rI1OZ</a></p>&mdash; TheBitchIsBack😋 (@hotnostril) <a href="https://twitter.com/hotnostril/status/1846508131724993005?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 16, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    If he committed crimes, he should pay the price for the crime, if that includes jail time, he should be sentenced, just as I would be. Same for Trump. Let a jury decide after they hear ALL THE EVEIDENCE.

    A jury, not some know it all's on a sports forum.


    Your alarm is going off again. Did you hit snooze; I know a good fix for that.
    they won't let you see the crimes. They are protecting Biden. His son will pay until his daddy pardons him.

    Speaking of evidence. Hillary bleach bitted her computer, had he staff smash all her devices with hammers, and deleted 33,000 email AFTER getting an FBI subpoena to hand them all over. She even admitted it. She joked about it. Nothing happened to her. Trump has 34 guilty charges for paying off Sloppy Daniels which isn't even against the law.

    Biden has classifies docs in several places including his open garage where his crackhead son lived and the special council didn't charge him because he said he was unable to comprehend what he did while at teh same time he was supposedly able to be president. Oh but Trump had docs too. Let's raid his place. While we are at it, lets fine Trump 500 million for for inflating the value of his property and ban him and his family from doing business in NY even thought the bank where her borrowed the money testified on Trump's behalf saying he repaid the loan, plus interest, one time as he's always done and they would be glad to lean him more money anytime he wants. Your hatred of Trump has clouded your judgement. Wake the fukk up man.

    Do you not see what is happened? Are you that much in denial? This is the definition of election interference and apparently you (and a handful of others) are the only ones who refuse to see it. They are playing you and you are letting them.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    Come on. Hunter is going to prison but will be pardoned by papa. Biden's former business partner testified at all the secret deals the Biden family made with the CCP and the Ukraine. How many offshore LLC's does a family have to open up? The Biden's have powerful allies. wake up.
    If he committed crimes, he should pay the price for the crime, if that includes jail time, he should be sentenced, just as I would be. Same for Trump. Let a jury decide after they hear ALL THE EVEIDENCE.

    A jury, not some know it all's on a sports forum.


    Your alarm is going off again. Did you hit snooze; I know a good fix for that.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    I didn't make any excuses. I said you lied about the "letter" that more than 50 former senior intelligence officials signed.

    almost 4 years, and no creditable evidence that will stand up in court. Just talk. With all the money and investigating nothing to prove a rigged election.
    Why, because there is a 99.99999% chance it was not. Just a sore loser
    Come on. Hunter is going to prison but will be pardoned by papa. Biden's former business partner testified at all the secret deals the Biden family made with the CCP and the Ukraine. How many offshore LLC's does a family have to open up? The Biden's have powerful allies. wake up.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    Levin doesn't hide the fact that he is biased. Everyone is biased. I am biased. You are biased. The difference between Levin and the MSM is that he doesn't pretend he's not biased. They do. Being biased doesn't mean you are wrong either. Tons of biased people are right about all sorts of things quite often. What you are doing is using a lazy argument when attempting to somehow diminish the facts he presented by saying he is biased. That's is silly.

    You said you watched the video before. Is there something that you can dispute that isn't factual? I doubt it. He may be biased, but he is highly intelligent and he does his homework. If anyone watched the video, there is no possible way you can deny the election was stolen.

    Now, back to the 51 former intelligence officials. Same applies. More than once I have shown you how they deliberately worded the headline in order to purposely deceive the public.

    Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say
    More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice president’s son.

    More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”


    The fact that the MSM went with that same false narrative right up to the election is a disgrace on journalism. They pushed the lie. Why? Well, because it works. The proof is that 4 years later, you are still making excuses for the lie. Read the friggen headline. That is from Politico. They purposely lied while claiming they are a fact checker with no bias.

    So claiming to be unbiased but lying is ok but being biased but telling the truth isn't?

    And I never even mentioned the big Tech colluded to suppress the Hunter lap top story. Twitter suspended the NY Post's Twitter page unless they agreed to remove the story. The 2nd oldest paper in the country was gaged because their reporting did look good for the democrats. The FBI told Facebook to bury the story. YouTube blocked it. Big Tech blocked anyone from downloading the Parler app because they said they would allow people to read the article. You know, the first amendment.

    I mean, how can you possible say the election wasn't rigged?
    I didn't make any excuses. I said you lied about the "letter" that more than 50 former senior intelligence officials signed.

    almost 4 years, and no creditable evidence that will stand up in court. Just talk. With all the money and investigating nothing to prove a rigged election.
    Why, because there is a 99.99999% chance it was not. Just a sore loser

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    There is some good news.



    [COLOR=var(--flag--stamp--text)]exclusive

    Border patrol agents threaten to leave in droves if Harris wins election: ‘Not doing this s–t again’

    [/COLOR]

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    Levin is as biased, and believable as MSM and the other news outlets/personalities you talk about daily.

    You think a lot more of social media companies, than I do. If they are as powerful as you think they are ( can take away your free speech or 1st amendment) then they absolutely got Trump elected in 2016.100% no doubt, he doesn't get elected without the Facebook push, that he got the last few months before the election.


    About
    free speech or 1st amendment. Social media cannot take mine away from me. It's sad, that they have the ability to take yours, or anyone else's. I will never give them that power over me.

    Your argument about the 2020 election is weak at best. There are many reasons why this is true, but the ones that come to mind right now are: you say nothing about Trump, Vance and Musk doing the same thing, or the E-mails Russia hacked in 2016. Once again you are being hypocritical.

    For anyone that Dwight tells to show just one lie he has told, below is #2 in three days that I have pointed out. Just follow my post and I'll give you plenty.

    ''
    Then 51 former US intelligence official all colluded to lie to the public by signing a letter saying the Laptop was just Russian disinformation.''

    That is not what the signed document
    said. (or letter as you called it) I've told you this at least 10 times. You are being untruthful again.

    '' Then 51 former US intelligence official all colluded to lie to the public by signing a letter saying the Laptop was just Russian disinformation. They did did intentionally to effect the election. That is the definition of rigging or election interference or whatever you want to call it.''

    Just like 2016, with the Clinton E-mails. This was interference from another country. We should never allow other counties to decide who our POTUS will be. So, this is even worse assuming all you said was even true. We already know one line was not true.

    Please don't ever say, ''o
    nly if you are willing to hear the truth,'' with all the untruthful things you post on a regular.
    Plus, you simply keep
    on repeating,the lying right-wing media's narrative.

    Levin would not know the truth, if it was a 150ft oak, that fell and landed on his head. He is
    committed to deception.
    Levin doesn't hide the fact that he is biased. Everyone is biased. I am biased. You are biased. The difference between Levin and the MSM is that he doesn't pretend he's not biased. They do. Being biased doesn't mean you are wrong either. Tons of biased people are right about all sorts of things quite often. What you are doing is using a lazy argument when attempting to somehow diminish the facts he presented by saying he is biased. That's is silly.

    You said you watched the video before. Is there something that you can dispute that isn't factual? I doubt it. He may be biased, but he is highly intelligent and he does his homework. If anyone watched the video, there is no possible way you can deny the election was stolen.

    Now, back to the 51 former intelligence officials. Same applies. More than once I have shown you how they deliberately worded the headline in order to purposely deceive the public.

    Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say
    More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice president’s son.

    More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”


    The fact that the MSM went with that same false narrative right up to the election is a disgrace on journalism. They pushed the lie. Why? Well, because it works. The proof is that 4 years later, you are still making excuses for the lie. Read the friggen headline. That is from Politico. They purposely lied while claiming they are a fact checker with no bias.

    So claiming to be unbiased but lying is ok but being biased but telling the truth isn't?

    And I never even mentioned the big Tech colluded to suppress the Hunter lap top story. Twitter suspended the NY Post's Twitter page unless they agreed to remove the story. The 2nd oldest paper in the country was gaged because their reporting did look good for the democrats. The FBI told Facebook to bury the story. YouTube blocked it. Big Tech blocked anyone from downloading the Parler app because they said they would allow people to read the article. You know, the first amendment.

    I mean, how can you possible say the election wasn't rigged?

    Leave a comment:


  • Optional
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    When you try to debate an issue, they CAN NOT STAY ON THE SUBJECT. Always spinning or going to something else.
    Imagine if any media outlet acted that way, there would be outrage!

    Oh wait a sec, they love Newsmax, OAN and Breitbart... so maybe not, if it spins the way they want to hear it anyway. "Drone Vision".

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    If he can't stand the heat, get out of the Kitchen. I can explain what this means.

    People on TV lie. What are you going to do? I don't know about most, but Trump is going to cry! Biggest crybaby to be POTUS, at least in my lifetime. Some on TV lie so bad, it cost their company 3/4 of a billion to stay out court.


    Why do you think Russia was ''false Russian bullshat'' several went to jail over Russia. At least some plead guilty. Not found guilty, by a jury, but admitted to breaking the law.

    One of the best economies ever? I did much better, in the mid to late 90's. I was no better off in
    Trumps first 3 years, than in Obama's last 4 years. Thats bad, to be no better than Obama.
    Then covid hit, and Trump dropped the ball. We were back to a 2008 type economy.
    I'm sure it was different for everyone.


    If you think I'm a democrat that is fine, I've never given any money to anyone in politics,
    or had a card for a party, and I have never voted a straight ticket.

    The GOP and Democrats- I follow no one blindly.
    If I ever do it will be, JC. I can explain what this is, if you need me too.


    ''you sure side with the left and slant the facts to favor them.''

    Well, everyone is entitled to their opinion. My goal when I post, is for it to be truthful. In my opinion the GOP supporters that post in these threads, cannot just be straight forward honest about anything. When you try to debate an issue, they CAN NOT STAY ON THE SUBJECT. Always spinning or going to something else.
    Hypocritical about so many things one quick example: Biden had a fundraiser, and it was very successful. Then, on this forum the GOP talked shit for a week about the huge amount and it was elitest. The next weekend Trump had a record
    fundraiser, most ever or some bullshit, and it was all praise, about how he out did Biden, and it was great. ( Hypocritical) If it is wrong for one, its wrong for the other. There is way too much money in all of politics.
    If your goal is to be truthful, why use so much conjecture.?. If the media lies and you print their stories, then you are lying also.?.

    You have TDS like so many others. So many of your statements are untrue and hypocritical. We all make mistakes. Some more than others.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Candidate Lists

    The state and federal candidates listed below will appear on the November 5, 2024 general election ballot. The GoVoteTN app will help you determine the U.S. House, Tennessee Senate, and Tennessee House districts where you will vote.

    Image

    President and Vice President of the United States

    • Donald J. Trump for President and JD Vance for Vice President (Republican)
    • Kamala D. Harris for President and Tim Walz for Vice President (Democratic)
    • Jay J Bowman for President and De D Bowman for Vice President (Independent) X
    • Claudia De la Cruz for President and Karina Garcia for Vice President (Independent)
    • Rachele Fruit for President and Dennis Richter for Vice President (Independent)
    • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for President and Nicole Shanahan for Vice President (Independent)
    • Jill Stein for President and Samson LeBeau Kpadenou for Vice President (Independent)

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by slewfan
    You mean while the Democrats were attacking him along with the fake news with false Russian bullshat and rapes and all other kinds of things to keep him from governing and doing his job.

    Despite all of the Democrat lies along with the fake news, he had one of the best economies for the middle class ever.

    I think for someone who 'says' he's not a Democrat, you sure side with the left and slant the facts to favor them.
    If he can't stand the heat, get out of the Kitchen. I can explain what this means.

    People on TV lie. What are you going to do? I don't know about most, but Trump is going to cry! Biggest crybaby to be POTUS, at least in my lifetime. Some on TV lie so bad, it cost their company 3/4 of a billion to stay out court.


    Why do you think Russia was ''false Russian bullshat'' several went to jail over Russia. At least some plead guilty. Not found guilty, by a jury, but admitted to breaking the law.

    One of the best economies ever? I did much better, in the mid to late 90's. I was no better off in
    Trumps first 3 years, than in Obama's last 4 years. Thats bad, to be no better than Obama.
    Then covid hit, and Trump dropped the ball. We were back to a 2008 type economy.
    I'm sure it was different for everyone.


    If you think I'm a democrat that is fine, I've never given any money to anyone in politics,
    or had a card for a party, and I have never voted a straight ticket.

    The GOP and Democrats- I follow no one blindly.
    If I ever do it will be, JC. I can explain what this is, if you need me too.


    ''you sure side with the left and slant the facts to favor them.''

    Well, everyone is entitled to their opinion. My goal when I post, is for it to be truthful. In my opinion the GOP supporters that post in these threads, cannot just be straight forward honest about anything. When you try to debate an issue, they CAN NOT STAY ON THE SUBJECT. Always spinning or going to something else.
    Hypocritical about so many things one quick example: Biden had a fundraiser, and it was very successful. Then, on this forum the GOP talked shit for a week about the huge amount and it was elitest. The next weekend Trump had a record
    fundraiser, most ever or some bullshit, and it was all praise, about how he out did Biden, and it was great. ( Hypocritical) If it is wrong for one, its wrong for the other. There is way too much money in all of politics.

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    ''But when the truth came out, it turned out to be Obama and the democrats who built the cages and separated kids from their families. ''

    So, Mr. Trumps first order business as POTUS was to clean this up, get rid of the cages and stop the children from being away from their families?
    Oh, OK I understand he had a few other important things to do first. So, it was 2nd? Oh, I see so on the 2nd day then? I get it, there was a lot. So, the 2nd week? Oh, but surly the 2nd month? After the 1st year? No, really after the 2nd year? Never mind.

    Thought I had caught him doing the right thing, but nope just like Obama same ole same.
    You mean while the Democrats were attacking him along with the fake news with false Russian bullshat and rapes and all other kinds of things to keep him from governing and doing his job.

    Despite all of the Democrat lies along with the fake news, he had one of the best economies for the middle class ever.

    I think for someone who 'says' he's not a Democrat, you sure side with the left and slant the facts to favor them.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by slewfan
    Trump tried to fix Immigration. He was attacked by the left relentlessly. Even accused of building cages and putting children in them. But when the truth came out, it turned out to be Obama and the democrats who built the cages and separated kids from their families.

    Kamala and Joe opened the border to 10's of millions of unvetted illegal people. But they get a pat on the back from the Lefties.

    Democrats never - ever tell the truth.
    ''But when the truth came out, it turned out to be Obama and the democrats who built the cages and separated kids from their families. ''

    So, Mr. Trumps first order business as POTUS was to clean this up, get rid of the cages and stop the children from being away from their families?
    Oh, OK I understand he had a few other important things to do first. So, it was 2nd? Oh, I see so on the 2nd day then? I get it, there was a lot. So, the 2nd week? Oh, but surly the 2nd month? After the 1st year? No, really after the 2nd year? Never mind.

    Thought I had caught him doing the right thing, but nope just like Obama same ole same.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    J.D. Vance Says Trump Was Right to Try to Steal the Election, Because of Twitter

    The reason J.D. Vance has a chance to become vice-president of the United States is that, unlike Mike Pence, Donald Trump’s running mate on his two previous campaigns, he’s willing to repeat Trump’s false claim to have won the 2020 election. His support for the Big Lie is the essential act that has thrust him into his upward trajectory.

    But Vance knows perfectly well that Trump did legitimately lose the 2020 election. And unlike Trump, who is unable to articulate linear arguments, Vance is a Yale-trained lawyer who holds a certain pride in his standing among fellow intellectuals, even as he postures as their class enemy. And so, even as he supports Trump’s lies, he cannot simply parrot them. He feels compelled to wrap them in a pseudo-intellectual veneer.
    A new interview with Lulu Garcia-Navarro of the New York Times put Vance’s sweaty dishonesty on vivid, almost uncomfortable display. When first asked whether he believes Trump lost the 2020 election, Vance tries to deflect, as he did during the vice-presidential debate: “I think that Donald Trump and I have both raised a number of issues with the 2020 election, but we’re focused on the future. I think there’s an obsession here with focusing on 2020. I’m much more worried about what happened after 2020, which is a wide-open border, groceries that are unaffordable.”

    Deflection is a familiar move for use when one’s allies do something unacceptable. A hackish response is to insist the unacceptable position should not be discussed because it is a distraction — a move that allows you to avoid endorsing it directly but avoids a breach within your own coalition. Conservatives hardly have a monopoly on the form of argument “Why are you angry about a bad thing done by my allies when you should be angry about a bad thing done by my opponents?” You’ll see some progressives pull it out any time the left does something indefensible. In the Trump era, though, this reflex has become possibly the most dominant tic of conservative rhetoric.

    To read all of this very well written article.
    J.D. Vance Says Trump Was Right to Try to Steal the Election, Because of Twitter (msn.com)


    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    they did steal the election. They rigged it also. When the FBI tells social media companies that the Hunter laptop story is about to break, they all colluded to suppress the story. The NY Post, who broke the story, their Twitter was suspended and would remain suspend until they removed the story. The story about the Biden crime family making secret deals with the CCP and Ukraine. Then 51 former US intelligence official all colluded to lie to the public by signing a letter saying the Laptop was just Russian disinformation. They did did intentionally to effect the election. That is the definition of rigging or election interference or whatever you want to call it. Up to 17% of the people who voted for Biden in those swing states said they would have changed their vote if they knew about the laptop. Google it. That is more than enough to change the election results to Trump.

    Here's evidence the election was stolen. Its undeniable. Only if you are willing to hear the truth. If you aren't, then you can keep on simply repeating the fake news liberal media's narrative and all the others that turned out to be lies as well like Russia collusion, fine people on both sides, Trump told people to drink bleach, Border Patrol on horseback whipped illegals, there was an insurrection on J6, and dozens more.
    Levin is as biased, and believable as MSM and the other news outlets/personalities you talk about daily.

    You think a lot more of social media companies, than I do. If they are as powerful as you think they are ( can take away your free speech or 1st amendment) then they absolutely got Trump elected in 2016.100% no doubt, he doesn't get elected without the Facebook push, that he got the last few months before the election.


    About
    free speech or 1st amendment. Social media cannot take mine away from me. It's sad, that they have the ability to take yours, or anyone else's. I will never give them that power over me.

    Your argument about the 2020 election is weak at best. There are many reasons why this is true, but the ones that come to mind right now are: you say nothing about Trump, Vance and Musk doing the same thing, or the E-mails Russia hacked in 2016. Once again you are being hypocritical.

    For anyone that Dwight tells to show just one lie he has told, below is #2 in three days that I have pointed out. Just follow my post and I'll give you plenty.

    ''
    Then 51 former US intelligence official all colluded to lie to the public by signing a letter saying the Laptop was just Russian disinformation.''

    That is not what the signed document
    said. (or letter as you called it) I've told you this at least 10 times. You are being untruthful again.

    '' Then 51 former US intelligence official all colluded to lie to the public by signing a letter saying the Laptop was just Russian disinformation. They did did intentionally to effect the election. That is the definition of rigging or election interference or whatever you want to call it.''

    Just like 2016, with the Clinton E-mails. This was interference from another country. We should never allow other counties to decide who our POTUS will be. So, this is even worse assuming all you said was even true. We already know one line was not true.

    Please don't ever say, ''o
    nly if you are willing to hear the truth,'' with all the untruthful things you post on a regular.
    Plus, you simply keep
    on repeating,the lying right-wing media's narrative.

    Levin would not know the truth, if it was a 150ft oak, that fell and landed on his head. He is
    committed to deception.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    they did steal the election. They rigged it also. When the FBI tells social media companies that the Hunter laptop story is about to break, they all colluded to suppress the story. The NY Post, who broke the story, their Twitter was suspended and would remain suspend until they removed the story. The story about the Biden crime family making secret deals with the CCP and Ukraine. Then 51 former US intelligence official all colluded to lie to the public by signing a letter saying the Laptop was just Russian disinformation. They did did intentionally to effect the election. That is the definition of rigging or election interference or whatever you want to call it. Up to 17% of the people who voted for Biden in those swing states said they would have changed their vote if they knew about the laptop. Google it. That is more than enough to change the election results to Trump.

    Here's evidence the election was stolen. Its undeniable. Only if you are willing to hear the truth. If you aren't, then you can keep on simply repeating the fake news liberal media's narrative and all the others that turned out to be lies as well like Russia collusion, fine people on both sides, Trump told people to drink bleach, Border Patrol on horseback whipped illegals, there was an insurrection on J6, and dozens more.

    Leave a comment:

SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...