Left, Right and Center. All things Political. The Political Forum.
Collapse
X
-
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Kamala answers the tough questions... <a href="https://t.co/5ZQ1JasTXu">pic.twitter.com/5ZQ1JasTXu</a></p>— C3PMeme (@C3PMeme) <a href="https://twitter.com/C3PMeme/status/1844368012809470409?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 10, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> -
Originally posted by BOA12Decline to go on rogan?
10 hours ago — "The vice president's campaign confirmed Thursday that Harris will not meet with Rogan before Election Day. "- Newsweek
3 hours of cackling and word salads avoided.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ByeSheaHere's the difference between an insecure candidate who backdoored her nomination via her handler's bizarre coup and a campaigning savant on his 3rd go around:
Trump read the tea leaves a month ago and declined a late October debate ... instead he will be going on Joe Rogan podcast on Friday. Yet again, all the oxygen in the room goes to Trump all weekend and then some.
Meanwhile Kamala is taking her 2nd day off this week. She declined to go on Rogan as her campaign implodes.
-
GOP early voting up like crazy - the point was to get low-propensity Trump voters (people who like Trump but would basically never get off their ass to vote) to the polls ... and it's working beautifully, I think because of how badly inflation hits EVERYONE the past 2+ years ... but we'll see.
Enjoy the antics, not from Kamala - she'll be drunk, but from high profile Democrats and media talking heads. Desperation has kicked into overdrive.Decline to go on rogan?
Leave a comment:
-
Trump's Civil War comments are as ignorant as letting the states decide
Trump's Civil War comments are as ignorant as letting the states decide | OpinionLeave a comment:
-
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">AI is out of control <a href="https://twitter.com/thedorbrothers?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@the dorbrothers</a> <a href="https://t.co/GYLurfrtP8">pic.twitter.com/GYLurfrtP8</a></p>— Clown World ™ (@ClownWorld_) <a href="https://twitter.com/ClownWorld_/status/1849144960811212863?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 23, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ByeSheaHere's the difference between an insecure candidate who backdoored her nomination via her handler's bizarre coup and a campaigning savant on his 3rd go around:
Trump read the tea leaves a month ago and declined a late October debate ... instead he will be going on Joe Rogan podcast on Friday. Yet again, all the oxygen in the room goes to Trump all weekend and then some.
Meanwhile Kamala is taking her 2nd day off this week. She declined to go on Rogan as her campaign implodes.
-
GOP early voting up like crazy - the point was to get low-propensity Trump voters (people who like Trump but would basically never get off their ass to vote) to the polls ... and it's working beautifully, I think because of how badly inflation hits EVERYONE the past 2+ years ... but we'll see.
Enjoy the antics, not from Kamala - she'll be drunk, but from high profile Democrats and media talking heads. Desperation has kicked into overdrive.
Like I said before, Kamala will never be president. (unless they assassinate Trump). She is clueless and anyone who hears her speak can see this. How can you not? Giggling and smiling isn't enough to be the leader of the free world. It shouldn't be, but apparently it is for some people. Hopefully sanity will prevail and the DEI hire will lose and by a lot.Leave a comment:
-
Here's the difference between an insecure candidate who backdoored her nomination via her handler's bizarre coup and a campaigning savant on his 3rd go around:
Trump read the tea leaves a month ago and declined a late October debate ... instead he will be going on Joe Rogan podcast on Friday. Yet again, all the oxygen in the room goes to Trump all weekend and then some.
Meanwhile Kamala is taking her 2nd day off this week. She declined to go on Rogan as her campaign implodes.
-
GOP early voting up like crazy - the point was to get low-propensity Trump voters (people who like Trump but would basically never get off their ass to vote) to the polls ... and it's working beautifully, I think because of how badly inflation hits EVERYONE the past 2+ years ... but we'll see.
Enjoy the antics, not from Kamala - she'll be drunk, but from high profile Democrats and media talking heads. Desperation has kicked into overdrive.Leave a comment:
-
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If you violate your fiduciary duty to your clients — and use *their hard earned money* to push the ESG scam — you should go to jail for that.<br><br>It really is that simple. Accountability is key to creating real, lasting change.<a href="https://t.co/SmZQtopMav">pic.twitter.com/SmZQtopMav</a></p>— Will Hild (@WillHild) <a href="https://twitter.com/WillHild/status/1848389997260402696?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 21, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by slewfanWhile allowing the most terrorists into America. That is until Biden-Harris administration.Leave a comment:
-
A must read, very disturbing, no matter what side of the isle you are on.
'I'd never seen such an audacious attack on anonymity before': Clearview AI and the creepy tech that can identify you with a single pictureLeave a comment:
-
Originally posted by slewfanWhile allowing the most terrorists into America. That is until Biden-Harris administration.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jackpot269Bill Clinton left the country in better shape than any GOP POTUS in my lifetime. No GOP POTUS in that time except, maybe RR has left the country better than they found it. It's not even debatable.Leave a comment:
-
Bill Clinton left the country in better shape than any GOP POTUS in my lifetime. No GOP POTUS in that time except, maybe RR has left the country better than they found it. It's not even debatable.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by slewfanBill Clinton, hero of the Democrat Machine allowed terrorists into America who reaped their Jihad on the U.S. with the 9/11 attacks after he was out of office. Remember they tried in 1993.?. They failed the first time but Billy Boy was too busy smoking a cigar to notice.
So now, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris allow 15 million illegal people, give or take a few million into the U.S. not even knowing who many are. If only one percent are terrorists looking to destroy America, that's around 150 thousand of them. That's not counting the 10's of thousands of killers, disturbed criminals and retarded individuals.
In a year, two, three whatever, they will be organized enough to kill as many Americans as possible. When this happens, Biden, Kamala and Obama will be long gone from the political scene. Hunkered down somewhere in one of their mansions out of harms way.Leave a comment:
-
Bill Clinton, hero of the Democrat Machine allowed terrorists into America who reaped their Jihad on the U.S. with the 9/11 attacks after he was out of office. Remember they tried in 1993.?. They failed the first time but Billy Boy was too busy smoking a cigar to notice.
So now, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris allow 15 million illegal people, give or take a few million into the U.S. not even knowing who many are. If only one percent are terrorists looking to destroy America, that's around 150 thousand of them. That's not counting the 10's of thousands of killers, disturbed criminals and retarded individuals.
In a year, two, three whatever, they will be organized enough to kill as many Americans as possible. When this happens, Biden, Kamala and Obama will be long gone from the political scene. Hunkered down somewhere in one of their mansions out of harms way.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DwightShruteya don't say. How many new wars under Biden? 2.
Dems and GOP all believed the lie that there was WMD in Iraq. They all voted together to invade.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
How many new wars under Trump? None.
How many people did Obama put away after the subprime mortgage meltdown thing?
You are trying to blame one party over another when reality is they are basically the same. “Republicans may not be the solution of your problems but democrats are certainly the cause of all your problems right now” - Bongino
What you should be doing is voting for the only person not beholden to any party. Someone who fights for his country and correctly calls out dirtbag politicians on both sides of the isle. A modern day hero who was within an inch away from having his head blown off but got back on the horse to keep fighting. I mean, talk about courage. But you cannot do that because you have been told he's a bad man because a few businesses he had failed. Instead, you will shit on him and certainly vote for a DEI moron who fukked her way to the top and can't think for herself.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by slewfanYou just say nothing with allot of words jack.
Like when you said Corporations move to foreign countries for cheap labor when the main reason is the U.S. ridiculous taxing of the companies. I answered your phony answer and you just ignored it. So, what YOU say is bullshat in my view and simply a diversionary tactic to push your pro communist agenda along with the democrats. Or maybe you're just overmedicated at certain times.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jackpot269To cure Banks and big pharma problem you need to vote out all GOP. Bush and Bush Jr. put our soldiers in wars.
You want to take away, freedom of the press. NICE.
Dems and GOP all believed the lie that there was WMD in Iraq. They all voted together to invade.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
How many new wars under Trump? None.
How many people did Obama put away after the subprime mortgage meltdown thing?
You are trying to blame one party over another when reality is they are basically the same. “Republicans may not be the solution of your problems but democrats are certainly the cause of all your problems right now” - Bongino
What you should be doing is voting for the only person not beholden to any party. Someone who fights for his country and correctly calls out dirtbag politicians on both sides of the isle. A modern day hero who was within an inch away from having his head blown off but got back on the horse to keep fighting. I mean, talk about courage. But you cannot do that because you have been told he's a bad man because a few businesses he had failed. Instead, you will shit on him and certainly vote for a DEI moron who fukked her way to the top and can't think for herself.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jackpot269No different here, if you put a Harris sign up. So don't play that its only one side. Shit like this that makes supporting GOP impossible. Alwas lying or at least misleading. GOP no better than anyone else. Worse most times.
Desantis wanting to charge people at TV station with a crime for running an ad he doesn't like.
It may not be totalitarian in the full definition of the word, but it is suppression by fear and threat, and denying Constitutional protections. A Kommie-la regime would follow Great Britain, which is already like East Germany, where "inappropriate" social media posts land you in jail. The GOP in this country is in the process of nullifying the Constitution by simply ignoring it unless it suits them. We are very close to losing it all, and some already have.
Fixed it.
Like when you said Corporations move to foreign countries for cheap labor when the main reason is the U.S. ridiculous taxing of the companies. I answered your phony answer and you just ignored it. So, what YOU say is bullshat in my view and simply a diversionary tactic to push your pro communist agenda along with the democrats. Or maybe you're just overmedicated at certain times.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by slewfanLarry David had it wrong. He said, when he didn't want to talk to anyone, he should wear a MAGA hat in L.A.
In a blue state wearing a MAGA hat would guarantee human interaction--where you suffer some physical violence unless you're a 6'5 bruiser. Or, if you put a Trump sign on your property, at the very least it would be stolen or defaced, but more likely your property would be damaged. Put a Trump bumper sticker on your car, and guarantee that it will be keyed. You already know the cops would laugh in your face if you reported any harassment or abuse since there are no longer enough of them to deal with small crimes. Nor would any judge mete out punishment.
It may not be totalitarian in the full definition of the word, but it is suppression by fear and threat, and denying Constitutional protections. A Kommie-la regime would follow Great Britain, which is already like East Germany, where "inappropriate" social media posts land you in jail. The Left in this country is in the process of nullifying the Constitution by simply ignoring it unless it suits them. We are very close to losing it all, and some already have.
[COLOR=var(--ht-color-box-text-light)]
[/COLOR]
Desantis wanting to charge people at TV station with a crime for running an ad he doesn't like.
It may not be totalitarian in the full definition of the word, but it is suppression by fear and threat, and denying Constitutional protections. A Kommie-la regime would follow Great Britain, which is already like East Germany, where "inappropriate" social media posts land you in jail. The GOP in this country is in the process of nullifying the Constitution by simply ignoring it unless it suits them. We are very close to losing it all, and some already have.
Fixed it.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DwightShrute
You want to take away, freedom of the press. NICE.Leave a comment:
-
Larry David had it wrong. He said, when he didn't want to talk to anyone, he should wear a MAGA hat in L.A.
In a blue state wearing a MAGA hat would guarantee human interaction--where you suffer some physical violence unless you're a 6'5 bruiser. Or, if you put a Trump sign on your property, at the very least it would be stolen or defaced, but more likely your property would be damaged. Put a Trump bumper sticker on your car, and guarantee that it will be keyed. You already know the cops would laugh in your face if you reported any harassment or abuse since there are no longer enough of them to deal with small crimes. Nor would any judge mete out punishment.
It may not be totalitarian in the full definition of the word, but it is suppression by fear and threat, and denying Constitutional protections. A Kommie-la regime would follow Great Britain, which is already like East Germany, where "inappropriate" social media posts land you in jail. The Left in this country is in the process of nullifying the Constitution by simply ignoring it unless it suits them. We are very close to losing it all, and some already have.
[COLOR=var(--ht-color-box-text-light)]
[/COLOR]Leave a comment:
-
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Why are you not telling everyone to go watch your Fox News interview? Why so quiet about it? Could it be because you spent the entire time dodging questions and deflecting? Candidates with real solutions don't do this: ���� -VJ<a href="https://t.co/GPGbUQMD56">pic.twitter.com/GPGbUQMD56</a></p>— RealVinnieJames (@RealVinnieJames) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealVinnieJames/status/1847387385971298689?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 18, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
.Leave a comment:
-
This guy literally destroyed CNN in 4 minutes. These talking head gals are nasty and narrow minded.
https://youtu.be/yFf_1-Eoru4?t=234Leave a comment:
-
"So the burden of proof to determine whether or not their food is dangerous is actually the guy trying to turn his product into profit and not the governmental organization whose job it is to keep us safe."
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Why would the FDA approve putting potentially DANGEROUS chemicals like food dyes into our food? Well, maybe it's because payments from Big Food and Big Pharma make up 46 PERCENT of the FDA's funding? Let's call this what it is: BRIBERY. <a href="https://t.co/pJvtdK039b">pic.twitter.com/pJvtdK039b</a></p>— Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) <a href="https://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/1846727831797080432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 17, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Leave a comment:
-
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">JUST IN - <a href="https://twitter.com/JDVance?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JDVance</a> Slams Reporter for Repeatedly Asking About 2020 Election:<br><br>"Do your job and focus on the problems the American people care about, rather than BULLSHlT from 4 years ago." <a href="https://t.co/i04XG57COZ">pic.twitter.com/i04XG57COZ</a></p>— QᵁᴱᴱᴺᴹᴬᴳᴬᵁᴸᵀᴿA (@QueenMAGAUltra) <a href="https://twitter.com/QueenMAGAUltra/status/1846684743544324424?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 16, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DwightShrutethey won't let you see the crimes. They are protecting Biden. His son will pay until his daddy pardons him.
Speaking of evidence. Hillary bleach bitted her computer, had he staff smash all her devices with hammers, and deleted 33,000 email AFTER getting an FBI subpoena to hand them all over. She even admitted it. She joked about it. Nothing happened to her. Trump has 34 guilty charges for paying off Sloppy Daniels which isn't even against the law.
Biden has classifies docs in several places including his open garage where his crackhead son lived and the special council didn't charge him because he said he was unable to comprehend what he did while at teh same time he was supposedly able to be president. Oh but Trump had docs too. Let's raid his place. While we are at it, lets fine Trump 500 million for for inflating the value of his property and ban him and his family from doing business in NY even thought the bank where her borrowed the money testified on Trump's behalf saying he repaid the loan, plus interest, one time as he's always done and they would be glad to lean him more money anytime he wants. Your hatred of Trump has clouded your judgement. Wake the fukk up man.
Do you not see what is happened? Are you that much in denial? This is the definition of election interference and apparently you (and a handful of others) are the only ones who refuse to see it. They are playing you and you are letting them.Leave a comment:
-
"Speaking of evidence. Hillary bleach bitted her computer, had he staff smash all her devices with hammers, and deleted 33,000 email AFTER getting an FBI subpoena to hand them all over. She even admitted it. She joked about it. Nothing happened to her. Trump has 34 guilty charges for paying off Sloppy Daniels which isn't even against the law."
Did the DOJ not recovery theses. After a federal judge order that they try? Did Trump not lie and say he was going to lock her up. You ever wonder, why after he got won the election you never heard about it again? He got them votes from the ones he lied to and then they forgot.
Your evidence was not good enough for a court or the GOP congress. See sports forum know it all's. Just talk.
That alarm is going off again! That snooze is a bitch. I got a fix for that snooze button.
Leave a comment:
-
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">THREAD: In addition to his military career & drunk driving arrest, there’s another topic about which <a href="https://twitter.com/Tim_Walz?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Tim_Walz</a> has been lying for political purposes —the conception of his own children. Since IVF treatments entered the news earlier this year, Walz has been repeatedly claiming he… <a href="https://t.co/hHdfSsiGaI">pic.twitter.com/hHdfSsiGaI</a></p>— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) <a href="https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1825898567304728890?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >August 20, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Helpful list: <a href="https://t.co/7oKbxufyR7">https://t.co/7oKbxufyR7</a></p>— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) <a href="https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1825919673826693208?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >August 20, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Tim Walz's wife confirms she did not undergo IVF as the Governor and VP candidate stated several times. DETAILS: <a href="https://t.co/mp0jwwZkDz">https://t.co/mp0jwwZkDz</a></p>— VOZ (@VozMediaUSA) <a href="https://twitter.com/VozMediaUSA/status/1826230698786869622?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >August 21, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
..Leave a comment:
-
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Reality 👇 <a href="https://t.co/ADrs6rI1OZ">pic.twitter.com/ADrs6rI1OZ</a></p>— TheBitchIsBack😋 (@hotnostril) <a href="https://twitter.com/hotnostril/status/1846508131724993005?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 16, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Leave a comment:
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
Leave a comment: