Left, Right and Center. All things Political. The Political Forum.

[b1slickguy]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I wanted to share this video to help spread awareness, especially to my peeps in San Antonio and Texas. <br><br>This video is from a awesome dude named Taylor Hansen who is putting boots down in San Antonio and exposing what&#39;s going on. Check him out on Rumble.<br><br>This is exactly why the… <a href="https://t.co/mfluA9yTh4">pic.twitter.com/mfluA9yTh4</a></p>&mdash; Phoeni�� 2A ���� (@Phoenix2A_1980s) <a href="https://twitter.com/Phoenix2A_1980s/status/1843371775029018897?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 7, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[DwightShrute]

I think so. I was 5. Nixon needed a pardon for something, I guess.

was that ok?

I think you can see my point. Sometimes you have to go beyond what others are willing to do in order to get to the truth. Don't you agree?

I mean, what if someone broke in and released info that there were no WMD's in Iraq before America went into Iraq?

What is someone found proof there was no plane that hit the pentagon or how Building 7 happened to fold like a deck of cards despite never being hit? What about the Twin Towers?

Where are the Epstein files?

[jackpot269]

that's interesting.


Did those who broke into Watergate break any laws?

I think so. I was 5. Nixon needed a pardon for something, I guess.

[DwightShrute]

She stole someone else's Id, to let others in the voting machines. I never said she cheated. I said we don't know what her intent was. With crazy pillow guy in on it, you never know, what they may have done. Theft and illegally accessing voting machines we know for sure.

that's interesting.


Did those who broke into Watergate break any laws?

[jackpot269]

Supreme Court Rules Against Republicans in Election Case Against Biden

GOP don't want Usa citizens to register to vote.

aligning with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. This directive is seen as part of Biden's broader effort to increase voter participation ahead of the 2024 election


Supreme Court Rules Against Republicans in Election Case Against Biden (msn.com)

[ByeShea]

Why would anyone from the left focus on Trump.?. To deflect what is really taking place in a faltering America due to the present administration.

Exactly.

Under Kamala's watch inflation became a real and painful American issue for the first time since the 1970s as MILLIONS of illegals walked unchecked across the southern border ... so let's try and paint Trump as a wanna be dictator who will end democracy (wtf?) and if that doesn't work, well, let's try and bankrupt, jail, or kill him as they know damn well they have no record to stand on or message that appeals.

[jackpot269]

Kamala and the Fake News awful quiet these days.

Kamala’s comments on domestic violence resurface amid hubby’s slapping scandal


Ever since the story emerged Wednesday, both the corporate propaganda press and Harris’ presidential campaign have been completely silent about the matter as if the report doesn’t even exist.
However, the report does exist, and the fact that Harris refuses to address it head-on strongly points to her being a hypocrite.
Why? Well, take for instance what she tweeted in mid-2017:


Responding to these tweets now years later, critics were eager to know why Harris and other Democrats aren’t holding her husband to the same standard they held Kavanaugh to years earlier.

“It’s being reported that your husband b-tch slapped his girlfriend plus he impregnated his nanny,” one critic, a woman, tweeted. “Maybe you should start at home with the abuse lecture.”

“It’s hilarious how leftists whine non-stop about toxic masculinity. Then turn around and support a domestic abuser. Absolutely zero standards,” another critic added.

She stole someone else's Id, to let others in the voting machines. I never said she cheated. I said we don't know what her intent was. With crazy pillow guy in on it, you never know, what they may have done. Theft and illegally accessing voting machines we know for sure.

[DwightShrute]

Kamala and the Fake News awful quiet these days.

Kamala’s comments on domestic violence resurface amid hubby’s slapping scandal


Ever since the story emerged Wednesday, both the corporate propaganda press and Harris’ presidential campaign have been completely silent about the matter as if the report doesn’t even exist.
However, the report does exist, and the fact that Harris refuses to address it head-on strongly points to her being a hypocrite.
Why? Well, take for instance what she tweeted in mid-2017:


Responding to these tweets now years later, critics were eager to know why Harris and other Democrats aren’t holding her husband to the same standard they held Kavanaugh to years earlier.

“It’s being reported that your husband b-tch slapped his girlfriend plus he impregnated his nanny,” one critic, a woman, tweeted. “Maybe you should start at home with the abuse lecture.”

“It’s hilarious how leftists whine non-stop about toxic masculinity. Then turn around and support a domestic abuser. Absolutely zero standards,” another critic added.

<iframe class="rumble" width="640" height="360" src="https://rumble.com/embed/v5f8bx1/?pub=t84gb" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[slewfan]

Kamala and the Fake News awful quiet these days.

Kamala’s comments on domestic violence resurface amid hubby’s slapping scandal


Ever since the story emerged Wednesday, both the corporate propaganda press and Harris’ presidential campaign have been completely silent about the matter as if the report doesn’t even exist.
However, the report does exist, and the fact that Harris refuses to address it head-on strongly points to her being a hypocrite.
Why? Well, take for instance what she tweeted in mid-2017:


Responding to these tweets now years later, critics were eager to know why Harris and other Democrats aren’t holding her husband to the same standard they held Kavanaugh to years earlier.

“It’s being reported that your husband b-tch slapped his girlfriend plus he impregnated his nanny,” one critic, a woman, tweeted. “Maybe you should start at home with the abuse lecture.”

“It’s hilarious how leftists whine non-stop about toxic masculinity. Then turn around and support a domestic abuser. Absolutely zero standards,” another critic added.

[DwightShrute]

Read her conviction. She stole a security badge, impersonated officials, copy hard drives and gave to another guy. Plus….

Those included three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty and failing to comply with the secretary of state.

Yes, you are wrong. We have no idea what her intent was. We know crazy pillow guy cannot be trusted. From his past actions.
She broke the law. You are big on defending these people that break into voting machines, unlawfully. Since you think there is nothing wrong with that, let's get a group from the other side to go around, with no one watching, and have a look see with their tech folks. They will just be making sure there was no cheating. You seem ok with that happening, unless you are a hypocrite.

''So to recap, she wasn't cheating. She was trying to find proof of cheating''

Or more likely planting evidence of cheating. If you are being honest. I mean letting crazy pillow guy, and his people in them, that's a red flag.

this is how unhinged you two have become at times. I never defended her. Read it again if you need to. I simply wanted clarification on what she did exactly because it seems a little unclear to me.

Yes I read the link you provided. Its unclear to me what she actually did when it comes to cheating as you both seem to imply. I was hoping you had more information as to what she actually did that would fall under "cheating". I like to get as much information about discussion topics.

Ya I see she broke that law. I never defended her for breaking law as Jackpot insinuated. I read the charges like influencing a public servant, conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, etc, but I couldn't find anything online which shows how she tried to cheat the results of the election. All I see is she broke the law in her attempt to discover proof that the election wasn't legitimate. Being a human being, I am susceptible to making mistakes, so I just wanted an honest opinion for you guys as to whether or not I am missing something here?

Once more, did she try to change election results or did she try to discover proof of election fraud? Do you know or are you just speculating? If its the later, then I fail to see how you can say she was cheating. If on the other hand, like Jackpot stated ... she was more likely trying to plant evidence, which makes no sense at all to me, then wouldn't there be some evidence of the evidence she was attempting to plant? I think there would be and it would be in the article.

[jackpot269]

On Thursday evening, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia tweeted: “Yes they can control the weather. It’s ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can’t be done.”
This is wholly unsurprising for Greene, the right-wing firebrand and conspiracymonger who once mused about the possibility of Jews controlling space lasers for the purpose of starting wildfires. The more surprising aspect is that it reflects the approach the Republican Party is taking generally to Hurricane Helene: rather than doing its job and offering concrete aid to people suffering from the devastation, GOP lawmakers are devolving into conspiracy theories and, like everything else, fearmongering about undocumented immigrants.


Republicans in Congress leave Helene victims hanging (msn.com)

[jackpot269]

Hold on. She didn't try and cheat did she? She was trying to gather evidence proving the election was stolen right? Whether she would have found that evidence or not, we'll never know.

So to recap, she wasn't cheating. She was trying to find proof of cheating. Am I wrong? Isn't that what happened?

Yes, you are wrong. We have no idea what her intent was. We know crazy pillow guy cannot be trusted. From his past actions.
She broke the law. You are big on defending these people that break into voting machines, unlawfully. Since you think there is nothing wrong with that, let's get a group from the other side to go around, with no one watching, and have a look see with their tech folks. They will just be making sure there was no cheating. You seem ok with that happening, unless you are a hypocrite.

''So to recap, she wasn't cheating. She was trying to find proof of cheating''

Or more likely planting evidence of cheating. If you are being honest. I mean letting crazy pillow guy, and his people in them, that's a red flag.

[Mac4Lyfe]

Hold on. She didn't try and cheat did she? She was trying to gather evidence proving the election was stolen right? Whether she would have found that evidence or not, we'll never know.

So to recap, she wasn't cheating. She was trying to find proof of cheating. Am I wrong? Isn't that what happened?

Read her conviction. She stole a security badge, impersonated officials, copy hard drives and gave to another guy. Plus….

Those included three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty and failing to comply with the secretary of state.

[b1slickguy]

[DwightShrute]

Amazing how those who claim there’s cheating are usually the ones doing the cheating. How soon before Mr. My Pillow will be in jail too? This part reeks of Trump…


The judge also said he believed she would do the same things she was found guilty of doing again.
“I am convinced you would do it all over again if you could. You’re as defiant as any defendant this court has ever seen,” Barrett said to her, according to The Associated Press. “You are no hero. You abused your position, and you’re a charlatan.”

Hold on. She didn't try and cheat did she? She was trying to gather evidence proving the election was stolen right? Whether she would have found that evidence or not, we'll never know.

So to recap, she wasn't cheating. She was trying to find proof of cheating. Am I wrong? Isn't that what happened?

[b1slickguy]

[Mac4Lyfe]

Amazing how those who claim there’s cheating are usually the ones doing the cheating. How soon before Mr. My Pillow will be in jail too? This part reeks of Trump…


The judge also said he believed she would do the same things she was found guilty of doing again.
“I am convinced you would do it all over again if you could. You’re as defiant as any defendant this court has ever seen,” Barrett said to her, according to The Associated Press. “You are no hero. You abused your position, and you’re a charlatan.”

[slewfan]

Biden admin ignites fury for prioritizing illegal immigrants with your cash over Americans


We Gonna take care of that middle class.

[jackpot269]

Tina Peters sentenced to 9 years behind bars in voting system data scheme (msn.com)


Prosecutors alleged Peters stole a county employee’s security badge to help a man associated with MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell gain access to the county’s voter systems to assist Lindell’s false conspiracies about the validity of the 2020 election results.
Lindell at the time and since has promoted false claims that voting machines were manipulated to prevent then-President Trump from winning reelection.

[slewfan]

Why would anyone from the left focus on Trump.?. To deflect what is really taking place in a faltering America due to the present administration.


MIXED MESSAGE

Mayorkas contradicted by his own department after FEMA warning ignites backlash

• State official lashes out at Biden admin over depleted FEMA funds spent on migrants

[b1slickguy]

Maybe your best ever post!

[jackpot269]

Maybe your best ever post!

[ByeShea]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Citizen just LIT UP columnist Paul Krugman at CUNY over Helene victims, billions to Ukraine, and the Economy<br><br>“We’re getting evicted and you’re making millions!” <a href="https://t.co/t0bj2YhIQM">pic.twitter.com/t0bj2YhIQM</a></p>&mdash; Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) <a href="https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1841813298817196389?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 3, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[b1slickguy]

[b1slickguy]

[DwightShrute]

Do you every think before you post? If Biden died tomorrow, who would you appoint? You would be the one to make that decision, I'm sure, and since we know now, it would not be KH, because you told us. Even if that is the VP's #1 job, moving up.

ok, if Biden dies tomorrow, she'll be president for 3 months.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">As this video describes, Trump supports women’s rights far more than Kamala!<br> <a href="https://t.co/dsVTeMZFV0">pic.twitter.com/dsVTeMZFV0</a></p>&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1841023808053866931?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 1, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[jackpot269]

she will never be president.

Do you every think before you post? If Biden died tomorrow, who would you appoint? You would be the one to make that decision, I'm sure, and since we know now, it would not be KH, because you told us. Even if that is the VP's #1 job, moving up.

[DwightShrute]

The vice president sat down with “All The Smoke” hosts Matt Barnes and Stephen Jackson, telling the former NBA players she made a “gut” decision to select Walz after “a few hours’ sleep.”

“From the time that the president called me and told me he wasn’t running, I mean, it’s just like everything was in speedy, speedy motion, and I was not sleeping so well,” Harris said.


“And that one morning I just, I mean, I had, I don’t know, a few hours’ sleep — and I, you know, I like to sleep. I just got up,” she said. “I was like — so I just went out and got a pork roast and started marinating it.”

According to the woman running for president, cooking helps calm her mind.


“And my family were all going to be in town, so they were very happy about the whole situation, but I just got up and started — everybody’s asleep, I just got up and started cooking,” she added.

This is not the first time Harris described the Walz pick as a “gut decision.”

“Probably the biggest gut decision I’ve made most recently is to choose my running mate,” Harris said last week during her softball interview last week with MSNBC lapdog Stephanie Ruhle. “There were lots of good, incredible candidates, and ultimately that came down to a gut decision.”

she will never be president.

[slewfan]

The vice president sat down with “All The Smoke” hosts Matt Barnes and Stephen Jackson, telling the former NBA players she made a “gut” decision to select Walz after “a few hours’ sleep.”

“From the time that the president called me and told me he wasn’t running, I mean, it’s just like everything was in speedy, speedy motion, and I was not sleeping so well,” Harris said.


“And that one morning I just, I mean, I had, I don’t know, a few hours’ sleep — and I, you know, I like to sleep. I just got up,” she said. “I was like — so I just went out and got a pork roast and started marinating it.”

According to the woman running for president, cooking helps calm her mind.


“And my family were all going to be in town, so they were very happy about the whole situation, but I just got up and started — everybody’s asleep, I just got up and started cooking,” she added.

This is not the first time Harris described the Walz pick as a “gut decision.”

“Probably the biggest gut decision I’ve made most recently is to choose my running mate,” Harris said last week during her softball interview last week with MSNBC lapdog Stephanie Ruhle. “There were lots of good, incredible candidates, and ultimately that came down to a gut decision.”

[b1slickguy]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&quot;Our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to hammer [disinformation] out of existence. What we need is to win...the right to govern by hopefully winning enough votes that you’re free to be able to implement change.&quot;<br><br>No thanks.<a href="https://t.co/SLGHOLVjCr">pic.twitter.com/SLGHOLVjCr</a></p>&mdash; Colin Wright (@SwipeWright) <a href="https://twitter.com/SwipeWright/status/1840231811554664541?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >September 29, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[DwightShrute]

with 30 million EV cars on the road, CA is losing so much money from the gas taxes that they are trying to find a way to tax EV users ...


"California is considering a pilot program to charge drivers based on the miles they drive instead of the amount of gas they use."

Hands up who saw that coming?

[b1slickguy]

[slewfan]

https://youtu.be/lpEYu0mslAI?list=LL&t=3

[slewfan]

And you are voting for ''THIS'' ..??

[b1slickguy]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Gates, Soros, Biden, Harris, Walz, Clinton, Obama, the legacy media, the FBI, CIA, DHS, the EU, Brazil, and the Five Eyes nations are desperate to censor the Internet. They&#39;re not hiding it. Look at them: they&#39;re trying to normalize it. This is an exceedingly dangerous moment. <a href="https://t.co/DTA1eoqLO4">https://t.co/DTA1eoqLO4</a> <a href="https://t.co/JfgWLyMcGD">pic.twitter.com/JfgWLyMcGD</a></p>&mdash; Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) <a href="https://twitter.com/shellenberger/status/1838617777143529699?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >September 24, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>