this is accepted as the explanation
Highly publicized allegations of insider trading in advance of 9/11 generally rest on reports of unusual pre-9/11 trading activity in companies whose stock plummeted after the attacks. Some unusual trading did in fact occur, but each such trade proved to have an innocuous explanation. For example, the volume of put options — instruments that pay off only when a stock drops in price — surged in the parent companies of United Airlines on September 6 and American Airlines on September 10 — highly suspicious trading on its face. Yet, further investigation has revealed that the trading had no connection with 9/11. A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10. Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades. The SEC and FBI, aided by other agencies and the securities industry, devoted enormous resources to investigating this issue, including securing the cooperation of many foreign governments. These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous.
its all been called random (even though the amounts were 25-100 times the norm)....however if 95% was traced US based entity or group.....can you trust the US intelligence to tell us the truth anyway?
watch that video I linked above....the real money to be made maybe is in ways we will never see or will ever know.... like could be who the bids to rebuild and secure the new site....or perhaps some form of weapons technology, or a remote airplane override system that Boeing would be forced to purchase...who knows.
The point is greed has no limits of moral....too many coincidences of bombs, laser beam accusations with buildings that were not hit by planes that end up burning, falling, large holes in the streets...video of nothing that looks like a plane hitting the pentagon......something other then just foreign terror seems plausible
the problem is sifting what is legit and what isn't seems nearly impossible
Highly publicized allegations of insider trading in advance of 9/11 generally rest on reports of unusual pre-9/11 trading activity in companies whose stock plummeted after the attacks. Some unusual trading did in fact occur, but each such trade proved to have an innocuous explanation. For example, the volume of put options — instruments that pay off only when a stock drops in price — surged in the parent companies of United Airlines on September 6 and American Airlines on September 10 — highly suspicious trading on its face. Yet, further investigation has revealed that the trading had no connection with 9/11. A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10. Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades. The SEC and FBI, aided by other agencies and the securities industry, devoted enormous resources to investigating this issue, including securing the cooperation of many foreign governments. These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous.
its all been called random (even though the amounts were 25-100 times the norm)....however if 95% was traced US based entity or group.....can you trust the US intelligence to tell us the truth anyway?
watch that video I linked above....the real money to be made maybe is in ways we will never see or will ever know.... like could be who the bids to rebuild and secure the new site....or perhaps some form of weapons technology, or a remote airplane override system that Boeing would be forced to purchase...who knows.
The point is greed has no limits of moral....too many coincidences of bombs, laser beam accusations with buildings that were not hit by planes that end up burning, falling, large holes in the streets...video of nothing that looks like a plane hitting the pentagon......something other then just foreign terror seems plausible
the problem is sifting what is legit and what isn't seems nearly impossible
