Republican vs Democrat

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • guitarjosh
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer

    I'm not here to argue how Republicans and Democrats interpret the constitution. This job according to the forefathers who wrote the laws of the land is the judiciary, the third element of the republic. So when you see judges ruling on everything that violates the constitution (examples are 5th and 14th amendment I posted earlier)they are doing their jobs. It is the government's job to comply to these rulings and then follow procedures through the court system. If the courts rule one way or the other then the law has to be obeyed so that the constitution is not violated. Let the process run through the courts before making judgement. What the republican or democrat voters think is the law has no value when the courts are to decide. Just because a judge rules one way it doesn't mean he is doing a favor to democrats or republicans.
    I understand how the process is supposed to work, the problem is that the left has decided that they can get around the rights of the people through misinterpretation. The job of the court is to rule based on how the law was written, not be able to amend the Constitution by themselves! Doing that denies the people their due process rights, which the democrats don’t care about as long as they get what they want.

    Leave a comment:


  • pavyracer
    replied
    ‘Yeah, we’re getting lied to. The pedophiles aren’t getting rounded up,’ one attendee at a Turning Point USA event complained on Friday.


    Steve Bannon confronted over Jeffrey Epstein at MAGA event: ‘Trump has become the deep state!’

    MAGA world remains in a state of chaos over the Trump administration’s Jeffrey Epstein memo, if the events of Friday are any indication.

    While the FBI’s deputy director was taking a mental health day and considering resigning amid the continued fallout over the handling of the Epstein files, Steve Bannon got an earful from attendees at a MAGA youth event who declared that Donald Trump “has become the deep state” because he is “covering up for pedophiles.”

    Nearly a week after the Department of Justice released an unsigned two-page letter concluding that Epstein committed suicide and the disgraced financier had no “client list” to blackmail prominent figures who took part in his underage sex trafficking, the administration is still facing fury from MAGA supporters who feel betrayed by the about-face.

    Much of that anger has been directed at Attorney General Pam Bondi, who breathlessly hyped the release of explosive evidence in the Epstein case and even said the long-fabled “client list” was on her desk, only to release binders of already-public documents and later put out a letter claiming the list never existed.

    Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, the FBI’s top two leaders who spent years as right-wing podcasters who trafficked in Epstein conspiracy theories, have also taken heat from Trump fans for backing the memo. The pair had already come under fire in recent months for reversing course on claims Epstein was murdered in his jail cell – a theory they’d long promoted – and insisting the convicted sex offender killed himself.

    Amid the continued fallout over the Epstein memo, Bongino and Bondi were involved in a heated argument this week that resulted in Bongino taking the day off on Friday and threatening to quit. At the heart of the clash was Bondi’s “publicly overpromised and underdelivered disclosures” about the “client list,” and accusations that Bongino leaked a story about the FBI being held back on releasing more Epstein information.

    While this was going on within the Trump administration, MAGA youth organization Turning Point USA was holding its Student Action Summit in Florida, which featured Bannon recording his War Room podcast from the lobby.

    Throughout the MAGA meltdown over the Epstein fiasco, the former Trump adviser has tried to thread a very fine needle due to his own personal connections with Epstein, which has featured former “first buddy” Elon Musk – who has long feuded with Bannon – claiming “Bannon is in the Epstein files.” The world’s richest man, who has called the Epstein memo the “final straw” regarding his support for Trump, did not elaborate on how he knew this was the case.

    Bannon has since reacted by calling for a special prosecutor to review “all” Epstein documents while urging Bondi to step aside. At the same time, much like the majority of MAGA media, he has largely steered clear of directly laying the blame at Trump’s feet. That was put to the test, however, on Friday morning.

    A group of self-described “young right-wing men” who were attending SAS had gathered near the broadcast and were approached by War Room reporter Jayne Zirkle to chat with Bannon, only for them to complain that they were being “lied to” by the administration.

    “Yeah, we’re getting lied to. The pedophiles aren’t getting rounded up. The people aren’t getting deported. We’re not getting what we asked for,” one attendee, who said his name was Julian, exclaimed.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    ...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	31
Size:	80.0 KB
ID:	29886438

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    Originally posted by Hareeba!
    2028

    Worth an early small punt: Jon Ossoff, currently around the 100/1 mark

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied


    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    2028

    Worth an early small punt: Jon Ossoff, currently around the 100/1 mark

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Here’s the transcript of Trump's response to his daughter-in-law's question:

    Read his answer for yourself to see just how far gone he is mentally:

    Lara Trump: Some people refer to you as ‘the bodyguard of Western Civilization.’ How do you feel about that title?

    “Well, I understand what they mean. It was gone bad. We were going bad. This country was going bad. Uhh lot of people were talking to China and others about getting involved because we were a dead country. We were gone in the minds of many; I tell ya, in my mind; one of the reasons I ran I saw what was happening very early on when I saw people pouring across our border, I said, “No, put up that little, it’s a little, it would’ve taken three three weeks to put up little sections of wall” that we laid out because of legal reasons we had condemnation reasons, you know, different things and because we wanted to bring our equipment back in through the wall cause we built hundreds of miles and I said, “Don’t, why aren’t they filling that in? It would have just been that would’ve been complete.” In fact I added a lot more I built a lot more than I said I was gonna build, I made it much longer. But I said “You know, they wanna have open borders.” That was the first time I realized that. I didn’t think it would be possible for anybody to want open borders, because, you know, who would want open borders?”

    This was a softball question meant to tee him up to sound strong, heroic, and thoughtful.

    But he totally fails to address the question!

    Instead, what followed is an incoherent, rambling, often self-contradictory word-salad stream of consciousness.

    And this isn't just a one-off thing ... it's repeated in almost every interview he does.

    The world is laughing at the President you voted in.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by 19th Hole


    Expert sounds off on ‘disgusting’ Newsom for trying to obstruct ICE raid

    Newscum is pathetic. The dems are lost.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	35
Size:	143.8 KB
ID:	29886408

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	37
Size:	111.5 KB
ID:	29886400
    for those who like to say both sides are the same

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    After Trump slapped big tariffs on Brazil saying disgraced former president Jair Bolsonaro should be released from prosecution, Brazilian officials are reportedly debating an equal tariff on the US until the Epstein files are released.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	35
Size:	127.6 KB
ID:	29886396
    truth

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	35
Size:	50.6 KB
ID:	29886389

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied




    Netanyahu touts US and Israel as the 'two innovation nations in the world'

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied


    Expert sounds off on ‘disgusting’ Newsom for trying to obstruct ICE raid


    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied



    Netanyahu Interview

    Leave a comment:


  • pavyracer
    replied
    Originally posted by slewfan
    If you are here illegally, you are breaking the law and therefore you are a criminal.
    I agree. Let ICE arrest her:
    Melania became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2006. However, reports from the Associated Press suggest she may have engaged in paid modeling work in the U.S. before obtaining a valid work ****. According to documents examined by the AP, she was paid for ten modeling assignments between September 10 and October 15, 1996. She entered the U.S. on a B1/B2 visitor **** on August 27, 1996, and later secured an H-1B work **** on October 18, 1996. Her visitor **** allowed her to be in the country and seek employment but not to perform paid work.

    Leave a comment:


  • pavyracer
    replied
    Originally posted by guitarjosh

    The democrats misinterpret the Constitution so they don't have to follow it, have said they'll add states to the country so they can get more seats in the House and Senate, & have called for a massive expansion of the courts so they can misinterpret the laws and remove all checks and balances on their power.
    I'm not here to argue how Republicans and Democrats interpret the constitution. This job according to the forefathers who wrote the laws of the land is the judiciary, the third element of the republic. So when you see judges ruling on everything that violates the constitution (examples are 5th and 14th amendment I posted earlier)they are doing their jobs. It is the government's job to comply to these rulings and then follow procedures through the court system. If the courts rule one way or the other then the law has to be obeyed so that the constitution is not violated. Let the process run through the courts before making judgement. What the republican or democrat voters think is the law has no value when the courts are to decide. Just because a judge rules one way it doesn't mean he is doing a favor to democrats or republicans.

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    If you are here illegally, you are breaking the law and therefore you are a criminal.

    Leave a comment:


  • guitarjosh
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer

    The President must follow the constitution. When the president violates the constitution the other two branches serve as check and balances. The judges oath is to the constitution and not to the president. And since you are not a citizen or are allowed to vote in the US here is what he constitution says.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	14th-am650X390.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	47.7 KB
ID:	29886242
    The democrats misinterpret the Constitution so they don't have to follow it, have said they'll add states to the country so they can get more seats in the House and Senate, & have called for a massive expansion of the courts so they can misinterpret the laws and remove all checks and balances on their power.

    Leave a comment:


  • guitarjosh
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer

    Read again until it sticks in the empty space between your ears:
    I eagerly await the day the democrats will actually abide by this, not just accuse others of not doing it.

    Leave a comment:


  • guitarjosh
    replied
    Originally posted by Optional

    Why do you think that?

    And why would it matter? Are you suggesting that whatever AOC does is the benchmark for what is ok for Trump to do??

    AOC is an extremist idiot btw. As is MTG. And Biden is a dishonorable POS, just like Trump is.

    What does it matter if another scumbag exists? Unless you think the lowest common denominator of scum bags is the level your guy should use as his benchmark??


    But back to the actual point you are trying so hard to avoid...

    "do you think everyone should stick their head in the sand and ignore that quacking, walking duck in the room???"
    Because you rarely complained about the left compared to Trump, even though the left is the much bigger problem.

    It’s not what AOC does, it’s what the party will go along with. They always say that silence is complicity. If they refuse to condemn her, they’re clearly okay with what she’s doing. I’m suggesting that you can’t play nice with evil, you’ve got to be as brutal as you can with it. You must escalate until they are broken. You cannot play nice with people who boast that when they get power, they will put you in jail for going against their party. You can’t be nice to people who claim they’ll gut your Constitutional rights for public safety. Everything they accuse Trump of doing, they’re doing it worse. They’re claiming Trump is violating due process rights by not giving people who came here illegally in the past 2 years a trial, despite it was Bill Clinton who signed into a law that allowed people who came here illegally within the past 2 years to be expelled without any court date. Meanwhile, the democrats are saying that they can ignore the Constitution by misinterpretation. If you don’t like something in the Constitution, you go through the process in Article 5 of the Constitution to make an amendment, not misinterpret the law. All Americans have due process rights through Article 5, yet the democrats try to ignore it.

    Let me ask you, if Iran explicitly states that if they get a nuclear weapon, they’ll use it to wipe America off the face of the earth, is it wrong for America to use force to prevent Iran from getting a nuke? I don’t think it is. I also don’t think it’s wrong to use force to stop people who openly boast that if they can get a small House majority, a 50-50+1 Senate, and the presidency, they’ll make a massive power grab, eliminate all checks and balances on their power, change the rules so they never lose power, and eliminate most of your rights.

    I don’t think people should stick their heads in the sand, I think people like you should stop seeing things that aren’t in the sand while ignoring the army of ducks called democrats that are aiming to turn America into a managed or guided democracy. You know, one where everyone gets a ballot, but the only people who control what goes on a ballot are democrats who will never allow real change to happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer

    Shoppers are seeing record high beef prices at the grocery store. That’s in part because the number of cattle in the U.S. is at an all-time low, while consumer demand has remained strong.


    Beef prices are at an all-time high. Here's why it's gotten so expensive

    Shoppers are seeing record high beef prices at the grocery store. That’s in part because the number of cattle in the U.S. is at an all-time low, while consumer demand has remained strong.


    In the past, ranchers used to worry whether people would eat beef.

    That’s not a concern anymore, according to Mark Gardiner. Today, he said producers like himself are seeing the greatest demand in history.

    “Beef has differentiated itself as the protein of choice, not only in the U.S., but worldwide,” he said.

    The fourth-generation producer, who runs Gardiner Angus Ranch in southwest Kansas with his family, believes that’s largely because of the quality of beef consumers get today.

    But even as beef prices hit record highs in May, demand does not appear to be slowing.

    The average price of a pound of ground beef hit a record $5.98 in May, according to the most recent data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. That’s a 16% increase from a year before, and with a short supply of cattle, experts say they don’t expect prices to fall anytime soon.

    How expensive is ground beef?

    The average cost of a pound of ground beef has been climbing toward $6 over the past few years. The average price was $5.98 in May, the highest ever, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.






    Gas prices near lowest level in 4 years ahead of Fourth of July


    Maybe post the price of beef article a third time .



    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer

    Read again until it sticks in the empty space between your ears:
    reading something and understanding aren't always the same. Your post history is evidence.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer


    The average price of a pound of ground beef hit a record $5.98 in May, according to the most recent data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. That’s a 16% increase from a year before, and with a short supply of cattle, experts say they don’t expect prices to fall anytime soon.

    How expensive is ground beef?

    The average cost of a pound of ground beef has been climbing toward $6 over the past few years. The average price was $5.98 in May, the highest ever, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    • 2024: $5.71
    • 2023: $5.43
    • 2022: $5.31
    • 2021: $4.88
    • 2024: $5.71
    • 2023: $5.43
    • 2022: $5.31
    • 2021: $4.88
    • 2020: $4.63
    • 2019: $4.23
    • 2018: $4.12
    • 2017: $4.12
    • 2016: $4.25
    • 2015: $4.63
    • 2014: $4.30
    • 2013: $3.82
    • 2012: $3.72
    • 2011: $3.46
    • 2010: $3.18
    • 2009: $3.10
    • 2008: $3.04
    • 2007: $2.85
    • 2006: $2.72
    • 2005: $2.74
    Fukking Trump did that.

    Leave a comment:


  • pavyracer
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute

    reading something and understanding aren't always the same. Your post history is evidence.
    Read again until it sticks in the empty space between your ears:
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • pavyracer
    replied
    Originally posted by jt315


    ^^^

    Yes he did

    Inflation Drops To Four-Year Low Under Trump

    Let me guess . You’re paying $5 for a dozen eggs nowadays . Lol !
    Shoppers are seeing record high beef prices at the grocery store. That’s in part because the number of cattle in the U.S. is at an all-time low, while consumer demand has remained strong.


    Beef prices are at an all-time high. Here's why it's gotten so expensive

    Shoppers are seeing record high beef prices at the grocery store. That’s in part because the number of cattle in the U.S. is at an all-time low, while consumer demand has remained strong.


    In the past, ranchers used to worry whether people would eat beef.

    That’s not a concern anymore, according to Mark Gardiner. Today, he said producers like himself are seeing the greatest demand in history.

    “Beef has differentiated itself as the protein of choice, not only in the U.S., but worldwide,” he said.

    The fourth-generation producer, who runs Gardiner Angus Ranch in southwest Kansas with his family, believes that’s largely because of the quality of beef consumers get today.

    But even as beef prices hit record highs in May, demand does not appear to be slowing.

    The average price of a pound of ground beef hit a record $5.98 in May, according to the most recent data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. That’s a 16% increase from a year before, and with a short supply of cattle, experts say they don’t expect prices to fall anytime soon.

    How expensive is ground beef?

    The average cost of a pound of ground beef has been climbing toward $6 over the past few years. The average price was $5.98 in May, the highest ever, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.





    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by Optional
    Do you think it's radical that journalists should not be targeted when reporting on protests?

    What's radical is that anyone would even need to propose it as law in the land of the free.


    What do you think is the point of spending time trying to stop the situation being documented during a riot? Is it the journalists or the rioters causing the problem they are there to handle?
    Judge Vera’s order hamstrings LAPD’s ability to maintain order during volatile protests. Transtifa or any other terrorist group can just put on a vest and pretend to be the Press.

    The police should be able to determine the safely for all concerned, not some radical judge.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer

    Read the 14th Amendment. You should have learned it in school in the US that it is taught at all grade levels. My kids know more about the constitution than you do. If you read and understand the amendment you will understand the judiciary decisions of the judges.
    reading something and understanding aren't always the same. Your post history is evidence.

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-u...120000336.html

    Why U.S. Beef Prices Keep Scaling New Heights
    • The lowest U.S. cattle inventories in 73 years have pushed U.S. beef prices to all-time highs in recent months.
    • Reduced slaughter is forecast to limit beef production in the months ahead and into 2026.
    • Tariffs and a ban on cattle shipments from Mexico could crimp otherwise strong beef imports that have helped pick up the slack.
    U.S. beef cattle supplies have reached their lowest point since the Truman Administration, propelling beef prices to all-time highs that likely will persist in the months ahead.

    Covid-19 pandemic disruptions, drought in the western U.S. and meatpacking industry consolidation all have played a role in declining cattle inventories in recent years.

    Now, with supplies down, tariffs and Mother Nature may limit beef and cattle imports, maintaining upward pressure on prices. This week, the U.S. reinstituted a ban on cattle imports from Mexico because of concerns about screwworm, a flesh-eating larvae that can spread throughout cattle herds.

    Prices Surge


    Ground beef prices reached an average of $5.98 per pound in May, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That's a 16% increase from the same month a year ago and 46% higher than four years ago. A broader measure of retail beef prices, including steaks and roasts, from the U.S. Department of Agriculture shows a 17% increase since the beginning of 2023.

    Beef prices that have repeatedly scaled new all-time highs this year directly reflect the declining availability of cattle for slaughter. As of Jan. 1, U.S. cattle inventories were at the lowest level since 1952. Inventories have declined steadily since the pandemic.

    As consumer demand has remained steady, the lower supply has pushed up prices at cattle auctions and prices for cattle fattened at feed yards. Feeder cattle and live cattle prices have surged 21% and 14% so far this year, and average prices for slaughter steers have reached record highs.

    Click image for larger version Name:	il_1140xN.6666496178_mmry.jpg Views:	0 Size:	26.4 KB ID:	29886256





    ^^^

    Yes he did

    Inflation Drops To Four-Year Low Under Trump

    Let me guess . You’re paying $5 for a dozen eggs nowadays . Lol !

    Leave a comment:


  • Optional
    replied
    Do you think it's radical that journalists should not be targeted when reporting on protests?

    What's radical is that anyone would even need to propose it as law in the land of the free.


    What do you think is the point of spending time trying to stop the situation being documented during a riot? Is it the journalists or the rioters causing the problem they are there to handle?

    Leave a comment:


  • pavyracer
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute

    I am familiar with the constitution. Apparently you are not. Where has the president violated the constitution?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	image.png Views:	0 Size:	56.9 KB ID:	29886262
    Read the 14th Amendment. You should have learned it in school in the US that it is taught at all grade levels. My kids know more about the constitution than you do. If you read and understand the amendment you will understand the judiciary decisions of the judges.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    speaking of radical political activist judges ...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	29
Size:	102.7 KB
ID:	29886266

    Leave a comment:


  • Optional
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute

    Judges are supposed to rule using the laws. Not invent a reason to interfere with the president.

    Not all judges and journalists are good. In fact, many are crooked. One judge out of thousands can't undermine the decision of the duly elected president of the country. Why even have elections then? The SCOTUS already ruled on it. Are you saying that some appointed judge from bumfukk Rhode Island can decide to .... oh let's say ... block troop movement orders by the commander in chief on the battlezone somewhere?

    These are radicals. Not people doing good or check and balances. These are political activists. How many lies do CNN have to tell before no one watches them anymore? Apparently these isn't a limit. They aren't journalists anymore. Is Copper Anderson a journalist still? No he isn't. Is 60 minutes a trusted news program like it used to be? Fuk no. Anyone can see it. They are radical biased political activists, and they were just caught editing Kamala's interview to make her look good. Which, btw, is impossible. One idiot judge decides to make a name for himself, taints the entire justice system.
    I guess yes, I am saying some judge from bumfukk RI can rule whatever he decides to rule in his jurisdiction.

    There is a robust appeals system in the USA designed to make sure any radical or corrupt judgments are not allowed to stand.

    In fact wouldn't you say that the judicial system has pretty much handed out the results you think it should have in most Trump cases?

    You might hate that prosecutors bought cases but I really don't think you can really have too many complaints about many actual judgements or how the system played out. Therefore the attack on the judiciary looks a bit orchestrated for some other reason...

    Leave a comment:

SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...