Trump Legal Cases

[jt315]

I hope he talks more shit about her.

Would love to see her buy Mar a lago with his own money and laugh at him even louder.

Hilarious that she can now troll him like this and he can't say a word... unless he has another spare 85 million to pay for it. LOL


The guy snubbed his nose at the law and acted like he was above it. Even you far right wing loonies must see how great it is to see him slapped back into his place, and see him cower and keep quiet like a good boy now.

He’s gonna be talking shit right back into the WH .

So much for free speech I guess . Commies rejoice !

I hope she recovers from her trauma .

[DwightShrute]

I hope he talks more shit about her.

Would love to see her buy Mar a lago with his own money and laugh at him even louder.

Hilarious that she can now troll him like this and he can't say a word... unless he has another spare 85 million to pay for it. LOL


The guy snubbed his nose at the law and acted like he was above it. Even you far right wing loonies must see how great it is to see him slapped back into his place, and see him cower and keep quiet like a good boy now.

Its just her word against Trump and not one sliver of evidence was presented. The owner of Linkedin, a democrat donor, reached out the E-jean-carrol offering to cover her legal costs if she sues Trump. So she made up something that never happened in the 90's.

Trump will win the appeal and she won't see a dime. In fact, I believe she will end up with a judgement to pay Trump. Just like Stormy had to. We will see.

The lady is a total wacko as you can see in the video below

[Optional]

Its just her word against Trump and not one sliver of evidence was presented.

Man, you are lost.

But whatever, a court has ruled on the rape and the defamation multiple times.

Juries of our peers have actually listened to the evidence and decided. Not some deep state leftie cabal.

The law has spoken.

Respect for your country = respect for the law... at least AT SOME POINT.

[DwightShrute]

Man, you are lost.

But whatever, a court has ruled on the rape and the defamation multiple times.

Juries of our peers have actually listened to the evidence and decided. Not some deep state leftie cabal.

The law has spoken.

Respect for your country = respect for the law... at least AT SOME POINT.

respect the appeal process. The law has not spoken. I am awake. Not lost. Just as taking Trump off the ballot and all those indictments. Any normal person know it was bullshit.

Somewhere along the process, sanity has to step in. 83 million for a woman who says rape is sexy? Have you heard this lunatic speak? Trump called he a nut. She is. That isn't defamatory. That is the truth. Imagine if everyone who called someone a name won a civil lawsuit? She showed no evidence of sexual assault. There were no witnesses. Just her word again his on something that happened 30 years ago? It wasn't a criminal case. LOL

[Optional]

The lady is a total wacko as you can see in the video below

Sure, probably completely off her rocker.

Possibly could be the most disgusting human being ever place on earth after Hillary, Pelosi and Stormy of course.


But how does your mind twist that to be that Trump should not be subject to our laws???

[Optional]

respect the appeal process. The law has not spoken. I am awake. You are woke.

I am have been preaching respect for the law = care for your country for a loooong time Dwight. So of course I will also show some respect for the appeal process too.


Buit let's see if YOU are capable for doing that once every option is exhausted...

[jt315]

The list of men E Jean Blasey Ford has accused of raping her



A babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief executive Les Moonves.

[Optional]

The list of men E Jean Blasey Ford has accused of raping her



A babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief executive Les Moonves.

Does it make your head feel like it is going to explode that such a low life witch is the one holding your hero to account with the law?

You should learn from Trump and accept the loss and STFU now, and be a good little boy like he is too. Well, if you are as smart as him to know when you have lost the battle.

[DwightShrute]

Sure, probably completely off her rocker.

Possibly could be the most disgusting human being ever place on earth after Hillary, Pelosi and Stormy of course.


But how does your mind twist that to be that Trump should not be subject to our laws???

I never said he shouldn't be. The system is arguable the best in the world but its far from perfect. There are many instances where people were convicted but years later they were exonerated. Have you never heard of this happening ever? Surely you must have at least seen a movie or two based of such an event?

You seem to be willing to accept than any accusations against Trump being true, no matter how ridiculous they are, no matter how many times these accusations have eventually turned out to be fabricated stories and outright lies, but yet when the next accusation comes up, there ya go again.

This is why outlets like CNN and MSNBC still exist. They can literally go one air and tell their viewers that they are a bunch of fukking assholes for believe the garbage we've been feeding you all these years, and they will continue to tune in.

[DwightShrute]

The list of men E Jean Blasey Ford has accused of raping her



A babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief executive Les Moonves.

everyone is raping her. She just remembered decades later.

[DwightShrute]

I am have been preaching respect for the law = care for your country for a loooong time Dwight. So of course I will also show some respect for the appeal process too.


Buit let's see if YOU are capable for doing that once every option is exhausted...

I have the ability to think. When something smells bad, I will investigate, form an opinion and share it. I will not believe what I am told to believe just because they tell me to. Sometimes I am wrong but most of the time I am proven right in the end. It just make take longer for certain things than with others.

[jt315]

Does it make your head feel like it is going to explode that such a low life witch is the one holding your hero to account with the law?

You should learn from Trump and accept the loss and STFU now, and be a good little boy like he is too. Well, if you are as smart as him to know when you have lost the battle.

The skank wasn’t smart enough to have pulled off this charade by herself .
When you come back with any kind of details a to what was behind bringing this joke of a trial to light , as well as what wasn’t permitted into evidence by the defense get back to me .

[Optional]

I never said he shouldn't be. The system is arguable the best in the world but its far from perfect. There are many instances where people were convicted but years later they were exonerated. Have you never heard of this happening ever? Surely you must have at least seen a movie or two based of such an event?

You seem to be willing to accept than any accusations against Trump being true, no matter how ridiculous they are, no matter how many times these accusations have eventually turned out to be fabricated stories and outright lies, but yet when the next accusation comes up, there ya go again.

This is why outlets like CNN and MSNBC still exist. They can literally go one air and tell their viewers that they are a bunch of fukking assholes for believe the garbage we've been feeding you all these years, and they will continue to tune in.

So no conviction can ever be believed based some being over turned years later??? You're clutching at straws here after multiple courst and juries have ruled on the matter.


And far from willing to accept anything about Trump... you will find no comment from me about if Trump was guilty or not before the verdicts.

It seems way more like you being unwilling to accept any court decision OR allegation against him to me.



You may not recall but months ago I pointed out that this case and the trying to hide evidence in the mar a lago papers case would be the two matters that would really hurt him. He should have played this one way smarter and shut up and not given her the publicity and extra 85 mill order.

Do you still think she will never see a cent btw?

If he wants to be POTUS again I think he has no choice but to pay now.

[jt315]

everyone is raping her. She just remembered decades later.

Her and her ilk will all be crawled up in the fetal position come November

[Optional]

The skank wasn’t smart enough to have pulled off this charade by herself .
When you come back with any kind of details a to what was behind bringing this joke of a trial to light , as well as what wasn’t permitted into evidence by the defense get back to me .

Awesome. Keep talking. The shaudenfaude feeling is making me a bit giddy.

How badly does it trigger you that a "skank" owned your boy with the law?

[jt315]

Awesome. Keep talking. The shaudenfaude feeling is making me a bit giddy.

How badly does it trigger you that a "skank" owned your boy with the law?

Awesome ! Response just as predicted .Thanks for playin’
You ain’t worth a second more of my time .

[DwightShrute]

So no conviction can ever be believed based some being over turned years later??? You're clutching at straws here after multiple courst and juries have ruled on the matter.


And far from willing to accept anything about Trump... you will find no comment from me about if Trump was guilty or not before the verdicts.

It seems way more like you being unwilling to accept any court decision OR allegation against him to me.



You may not recall but months ago I pointed out that this case and the trying to hide evidence in the mar a lago papers case would be the two matters that would really hurt him. He should have played this one way smarter and shut up and not given her the publicity and extra 85 mill order.

Do you still think she will never see a cent btw?

If he wants to be POTUS again I think he has no choice but to pay now.

I am willing to accept the good and bad with Trump. As for anyone else for that matter. And I have on several occasions. Can you? I am honest with myself when I say humans make mistakes. No one is perfect.

Me and others have listed dozens of lies about Trump which at one time were reported as facts by the liberal establishment media. To categorically deny their track record of deception, fabricated stories, outright lies, and quickly jump all-in on yet another story which stinks like so many before is ... well ... fukking crazy. Think Lucy, Charlie Brown and the football.

No man, I call it like I see it. That triggers a lot of people.

Yes I do think she will not see cent. I am certainly not guaranteeing it. Who knows what juries or judges will say. I still say OJ killed his wife and her friend despite the jury saying he was not guilty. Call me crazy I guess.

[jt315]

everyone is raping her. She just remembered decades later.

Hilarious . Believe all woman I guess .

[Optional]

I am willing to accept the good and bad with Trump. As for anyone else for that matter. And I have on several occasions. Can you? I am honest with myself when I say humans make mistakes. No one is perfect.

Me and others have listed dozens of lies about Trump which at one time were reported as facts by the liberal establishment media. To categorically deny their track record of deception, fabricated stories, outright lies, and quickly jump all-in on yet another story which stinks like so many before is ... well ... fukking crazy. Think Lucy, Charlie Brown and the football.

No man, I call it like I see it. That triggers a lot of people.

Yes I do think she will not see cent. I am certainly not guaranteeing it. Who knows what juries or judges will say. I still say OJ killed his wife and her friend despite the jury saying he was not guilty. Call me crazy I guess.

Ok, then we are on the same page.

I think I have been pretty clear in my opinion that the NY case is an abuse of the legal system. And that the Georgia phone call case is heavily politically motivated and pushing the line of what is reasonable too.

But this Defamation case was so clearly a no-win for him since the first jury found him liable for the assault that I genuinely can't see how, as the reasonable person you say you are, you could continue to argue he should not be held legally responsible for trying to publicly destroy her with clear defamatory language over and again.

[DwightShrute]

Hilarious . Believe all woman I guess .

Think Duke Lacrosse team.



Things people say with the media pushes every day

Black Lives Matter
Defund the police
The Border is closed.
Hunter laptop is Russian disinformation
Covid came from a wet market
Biden created 14 million new jobs
Inflation is transitory
Sanctuary cities
racist
More than 2 genders
Gender is fluid
Men can get pregnant

Crazy times

[DwightShrute]

Ok, then we are on the same page.

I think I have been pretty clear in my opinion that the NY case is an abuse of the legal system. And that the Georgia phone call case is heavily politically motivated and pushing the line of what is reasonable too.

But this Defamation case was so clearly a no-win for him since the first jury found him liable for the assault that I genuinely can't see how, as the reasonable person you say you are, you could continue to argue he should not be held legally responsible for trying to publicly destroy her with clear defamatory language over and again.

publicly destroy her? She filed a fake civil suit against him about something that happened 30 years ago! You think this is on the up and up when a jury awards her 83 million for him calling her names? How many trillions would Trump have if he could sue CNN and MSNBC for the names they called him? Russia asset. Traitor. Racist. Nazi. Etc. That's not trying to publicly destroy him with clear defamatory language over and again.

The case in total nonsense. I have a gut feeling you know it is also but you can't bring yourself to say it. So you do what a lot on the Left seem to do nowadays, pretend rather than admit it. Take Trump out of the story, your feelings change because the TDS is removed, and you can wee more clearly.

[Optional]

publicly destroy her? She filed a fake civil suit against him about something that happened 30 years ago! You think this is on the up and up when a jury awards her 83 million for him calling her names? How many trillions would Trump have if he could sue CNN and MSNBC for the names they called him? Russia asset. Traitor. Racist. Nazi. Etc. That's not trying to publicly destroy him with clear defamatory language over and again.

The case in total nonsense. I have a gut feeling you know it is also but you can't bring yourself to say it. So you do what a lot on the Left seem to do nowadays, pretend rather than admit it. Take Trump out of the story, your feelings change because the TDS is removed, and you can wee more clearly.

I don't know about your theories either way.
+
All I do know 100% is that a JURY listened to the evidence and ruled him liable.

I also know 100% that if he did not like that decision he is within his rights to complain it is a miscarriage of justice as much as he likes.

And I know 100% that instead of doing that he chose to repeatedly perform the dictionary definition of defaming her.

I also know 100% that another court heard that matter and said he was guilty of defamation.

I also know 100% that Trump then repeated the same behaviour he was sanctioned for.



At what point could you accept this isn't about if Carrol is skank or a liar. It's only about Trump thumbing his nose at the law itself and being held to account for that alone?

[Hareeba!]

[jt315]

Lawfare is a construct for media consumption intended to manipulate public opinion .

[DwightShrute]

there were 574 riots across the country a few weeks before J6. Dozens killed, billions in damages, and thousands injured. All in the name of a career criminal who died of a drug overdose and was Black. Crickets from far Left radicals such as yourself.

[DwightShrute]

I don't know about your theories either way.
+
All I do know 100% is that a JURY listened to the evidence and ruled him liable.

I also know 100% that if he did not like that decision he is within his rights to complain it is a miscarriage of justice as much as he likes.

And I know 100% that instead of doing that he chose to repeatedly perform the dictionary definition of defaming her.

I also know 100% that another court heard that matter and said he was guilty of defamation.

I also know 100% that Trump then repeated the same behaviour he was sanctioned for.



At what point could you accept this isn't about if Carrol is skank or a liar. It's only about Trump thumbing his nose at the law itself and being held to account for that alone?

She 100% defamed him calling accusing him of being a rapist. 100% no evidence whatsoever. I hope he counter sues once its dismissed and hope the case is heard outside NY.

[jackpot269]

I never said he shouldn't be. The system is arguable the best in the world but its far from perfect. There are many instances where people were convicted but years later they were exonerated. Have you never heard of this happening ever? Surely you must have at least seen a movie or two based of such an event?

You seem to be willing to accept than any accusations against Trump being true, no matter how ridiculous they are, no matter how many times these accusations have eventually turned out to be fabricated stories and outright lies, but yet when the next accusation comes up, there ya go again.

This is why outlets like CNN and MSNBC still exist. They can literally go one air and tell their viewers that they are a bunch of fukking assholes for believe the garbage we've been feeding you all these years, and they will continue to tune in.

With the assumption of the Spencer analysis that judges are at least as accurate as jurors after completion of all testimony, we can get an estimate of jury accuracy that is likely to be higher than the actual accuracy. Thus, the 77 percent agreement rate means that juries are accurate up to 87 percent of the time or less, or reach an incorrect verdict in at least one out of eight cases.

[jackpot269]

publicly destroy her? She filed a fake civil suit against him about something that happened 30 years ago! You think this is on the up and up when a jury awards her 83 million for him calling her names? How many trillions would Trump have if he could sue CNN and MSNBC for the names they called him? Russia asset. Traitor. Racist. Nazi. Etc. That's not trying to publicly destroy him with clear defamatory language over and again.

The case in total nonsense. I have a gut feeling you know it is also but you can't bring yourself to say it. So you do what a lot on the Left seem to do nowadays, pretend rather than admit it. Take Trump out of the story, your feelings change because the TDS is removed, and you can wee more clearly.

Can you show your evidence that it's a fake suit!

[DwightShrute]

Can you show your evidence that it's a fake suit!

can you show its not?

[Hareeba!]

Can you show your evidence that it's a fake suit!

Sure he can ... just like all that evidence he's produced to support the BIG LIE.

[jackpot269]

can you show its not?

No, I never said it wasn't. You said it was. With nothing to back it up.

[slewfan]

No one is above the law. Unless of course your name is Joe Biden.

President Biden's team reportedly is fearing that photos included in Special Counsel Robert Hur's imminent report on the handling of classified documents could impact his 2024 reelection bid.

Axios reported that Biden's aides do not expect criminal charges as a result of the investigation, but they are concerned about potentially embarrassing photos included in Hur's expected report that could be released as soon as this week. The images could show how Biden stored classified materials, which were discovered in late 2022 in the garage of Biden's Delaware home as well as in a private office. The classified documents were carried over from Biden's time as former President Obama's vice president.

Biden's aides told Axios that they are fearful former President Trump's campaign could use the photos against the Democrat incumbent ahead of their likely 2024 rematch.

Trump himself is facing more than 40 counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information, for improperly storing classified documents at his private residence at Mar-a-Lago in Florida after leaving the White House, following a probe by Special Counsel Jack Smith.

[Hareeba!]

No, I never said it wasn't. You said it was. With nothing to back it up.

If he knew he was innocent why did he refuse to provide a DNA sample which could have ended the matter up front?

[jt315]

If he knew he was innocent why did he refuse to provide a DNA sample which could have ended the matter up front?

What a mind on this attention starved skank . Imagine believing this garbage .



Renowned writer and advice columnist E. Jean Carroll claims in a new excerpt from her upcoming book, What Do We Need Men For? A Modest Proposal — shared in a cover story for New York magazine — that she was sexually assaulted by disgraced former CBS exec Leslie Moonves and President Donald Trump.

In the excerpt, Carroll, 75, recounts the time she wrote an article on Moonves for Esquire. She claims that after her interview with Moonves, he followed her into an elevator and cornered her.


“He steps into the elevator behind me,” Carroll writes, “and his pants bursting with demands, goes at me like an octopus. I don’t know how many apertures and openings you possess, Reader, but Moonves, with his arms squirming and poking and goosing and scooping and pricking and prodding and jabbing, is looking for fissures I don’t even know I own, and — by God! — I am not certain that even if I pull off one of his arms it won’t crawl after me and attack me in my hotel bed. Hell, I am thrilled I escape before he expels his ink.”

[Hareeba!]

Presidents who don’t spend their entire time in office committing crimes have no need for “absolute immunity.” And you know who argued that Presidents DON’T have absolute immunity and can be prosecuted after leaving office? TRUMP’S OWN LAWYERS IN HIS IMPEACHMENT TRIAL