Trump Legal Cases

[DwightShrute]

Some people just refuse to believe their own eyes and ears but will continue pushing the same lies by the same people who've been caught lying to them for years. It's like a women who stays in an abusive relationship. It's truly mind boggling.

[Mike Huntertz]

the orange turd doing what he does best....selling garbage and lies.....

[brooks85]

the orange turd doing what he does best....selling garbage and lies.....

lady if you can't afford 400 bucks just say it... you're a broke loser. Ok.

[DwightShrute]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="qme" dir="ltr">������ <a href="https://t.co/5pFgmI6TTI">pic.twitter.com/5pFgmI6TTI</a></p>&mdash; il Donaldo Trumpo (@PapiTrumpo) <a href="https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1760081379906257109?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >February 20, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[DwightShrute]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Last night, Stacey Abrams claimed she “never denied the outcome” of her 2018 loss.<br><br>But Abrams repeatedly said she “won” and the race was “stolen.”<br> <br>ROLL THE TAPE. <a href="https://t.co/4PEHWg5YZY">pic.twitter.com/4PEHWg5YZY</a></p>&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1577316610267922440?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >October 4, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[jt315]

Lol !


Trump's attorneys have Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade's cell phone data

At least 35 visits to Fani Willis's condo before the "relationship" started

2,000 calls and 12K texts between Wade/Willis in 2021.

Late night hook-ups after calls from Willis.

Bad news for Willis

[jackpot269]

You should learn math then you won't struggle so much in life.

Top 5 largest tax-cut in middle class history.... Trump did that.



The problem with you is you think you have any business thinking. You don't. You haven't earned that privilege until you come out of the sheep pen.

Owned and ran a business for 20 years.

[slewfan]

Biden never met these guys.

[b1slickguy]

Biden never met these guys.

That looks like rubbing elbows with "the big guy."

[b1slickguy]

Lol !


Trump's attorneys have Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade's cell phone data

At least 35 visits to Fani Willis's condo before the "relationship" started

2,000 calls and 12K texts between Wade/Willis in 2021.

Late night hook-ups after calls from Willis.

Bad news for Willis

This is the same type of cell phone data collected by the US government to successfully identify and round up some of the J6ers. So the data's validity and accuracy can't be seriously questioned by rational people.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">��NEW: Megyn Kelly and Phil Holloway discuss Fani Willis and Nathan Wade seemingly lying under oath, as cell phone data reveals over 2,000 calls, nearly 10,000 text messages, and over 35 home visits before they claim their affair began.<a href="https://twitter.com/megynkelly?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@megynke lly</a>: &quot;This is evidence of the big… <a href="https://t.co/NlfFXhikYd">pic.twitter.com/NlfFXhikYd</a></p>&mdash; KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) <a href="https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1761188051618070942?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >February 24, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[jt315]

This is the same type of cell phone data collected by the US government to successfully identify and round up some of the J6ers. So the data's validity and accuracy can't be seriously questioned by rational people.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">��NEW: Megyn Kelly and Phil Holloway discuss Fani Willis and Nathan Wade seemingly lying under oath, as cell phone data reveals over 2,000 calls, nearly 10,000 text messages, and over 35 home visits before they claim their affair began.<a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/megynkelly?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@megynke lly</a>: &quot;This is evidence of the big… <a rel="nofollow" href="https://t.co/NlfFXhikYd">pic.twitter.com/NlfFXhikYd</a></p>&mdash; KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1761188051618070942?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >February 24, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Hold on there one second


'So, if phone records were to reflect that you were making calls form the same location as the condo before November 1 of 2021, and it was on multiple occasions, the phone records would be wrong?'


Wade replied: 'If phone record reflected that? Yes sir.'

Sadow: 'They'd be wrong?'

Wade: 'They'd be wrong.'

lol

[DwightShrute]

slowly but surely the facts are coming out proving all these indictments are BS and those behind it are lying scumbags. Most of us knew this from day one, some are starting to realized it now, and some will never admit it. No need to mention any names, we know who you are and you know who you are. Hareeballs, khicks.B O A. Jackpot.

[DwightShrute]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Judge Orders Trump To Pay Whatever Amount It Takes To Bankrupt Campaign <a href="https://t.co/y7vTjGEWJB">https://t.co/y7vTjGEWJB</a> <a href="https://t.co/4gfXuUr3BN">pic.twitter.com/4gfXuUr3BN</a></p>&mdash; The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1761420896135184870?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >February 24, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[Slurry Pumper]

Sometime next week probably, the Trumpster will get rid of one of the 4 cases. Well that is what should happen. The dems wont allow for it so the prosecutor will just be tossed. The affect wont matter however as it will be difficult to find another DA's office dumb enough to take on a conspiracy case involving the top level of government participants.
I kind of think they should keep Fani Packed Willis on the case as this DA is full on stupid and I'm sure that if she was to somehow stay on the trial one of the 19 members of the defense will have an attorney that will outclass and out smart her. Hell it already happened even before any real action.

[Hareeba!]

[jt315]

Come on down


Judge rules no attorney-client privilege for Fani Willis prosecutor” Nathan Wade’s former lawyer.


This means he will have to testify about potentially incriminating texts and other information that could prove Willis affair started earlier than she said.

[DwightShrute]

[jt315]

I bet you’d like to have one of the following cases to be completed by Election Day as well .

DC , GA , FLA


Ouch !

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to decide whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted on charges he interfered with the 2020 election, calling into question whether his case could go to trial before the November election.

[Hareeba!]

This Trump appointed Judge is an embarrassment. Not fit for the job. Like so many other Trump appointments and himself included.

[jt315]

This Trump appointed Judge is an embarrassment. Not fit for the job. Like so many other Trump appointments and himself included.

Big news out of Ft Pierce

Judge Cannon signals to the illegally appointed Jack Smith , who desperately wants a conviction before Election Day that his requested July 8 trial start date is unrealistic .

“A lot of work needs to be done in the pretrial phase of this case,”

[OldBill]

[jackpot269]

slowly but surely the facts are coming out proving all these indictments are BS and those behind it are lying scumbags. Most of us knew this from day one, some are starting to realized it now, and some will never admit it. No need to mention any names, we know who you are and you know who you are. Hareeballs, khicks.B O A. Jackpot.

''Some people just refuse to believe their own eyes and ears but will continue pushing the same lies by the same people who've been caught lying to them for years. It's like a women who stays in an abusive relationship. It's truly mind boggling.''

Looked in the mirror lately?

Do you always forget about to ones that was with Trump, that have testified to his guilt. Not democrats, not the media, but people who was once by his side. You may be right, they were pushing what Trump wanted then, so they were most likely, lying to us.

[Hareeba!]

Whilst it's disappointing that SCOTUS chickened out of accepting that they had the power to determine whether TFG was disqualified from standing for office, saying that that call is up to Congress, lets not forget that Congress has already determined that he engaged in insurrection.

The House impeached him for it. And the Senate voted 57-43 that he did.

[Hareeba!]

If you're a convicted felon you cannot vote for president.

But you can BE president.

That's some seriously fukked up shit...

[jt315]

Whilst it's disappointing that SCOTUS chickened out of accepting that they had the power to determine whether TFG was disqualified from standing for office, saying that that call is up to Congress, lets not forget that Congress has already determined that he engaged in insurrection.

The House impeached him for it. And the Senate voted 57-43 that he did.

9-0
Cry Harder

[DwightShrute]

Whilst it's disappointing that SCOTUS chickened out of accepting that they had the power to determine whether TFG was disqualified from standing for office, saying that that call is up to Congress, lets not forget that Congress has already determined that he engaged in insurrection.

The House impeached him for it. And the Senate voted 57-43 that he did.

then he was acquitted

[DwightShrute]

Whilst it's disappointing that SCOTUS chickened out of accepting that they had the power to determine whether TFG was disqualified from standing for office, saying that that call is up to Congress, lets not forget that Congress has already determined that he engaged in insurrection.

The House impeached him for it. And the Senate voted 57-43 that he did.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">LOVING THE MELTDOWN!!!�������� <a href="https://t.co/TsMbST9np2">pic.twitter.com/TsMbST9np2</a></p>&mdash; il Donaldo Trumpo (@PapiTrumpo) <a href="https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1764766086677819458?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >March 4, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[DwightShrute]

If you're a convicted felon you cannot vote for president.

But you can BE president.

That's some seriously fukked up shit...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="qme" dir="ltr"> <a href="https://t.co/4dgW9wNvJE">pic.twitter.com/4dgW9wNvJE</a></p>&mdash; MAGA MAN ���� (@MAGAMAN614) <a href="https://twitter.com/MAGAMAN614/status/1764768171146252538?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >March 4, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[Hareeba!]

Whilst it's disappointing that SCOTUS chickened out of accepting that they had the power to determine whether TFG was disqualified from standing for office, saying that that call is up to Congress, lets not forget that Congress has already determined that he engaged in insurrection.

The House impeached him for it. And the Senate agreed 57-43 that he did.

The ruling is astonishing and unprecedented, not for its decision of the exceedingly narrow — and only — question presented (though, significantly, four of the Justices agreed only with the “result” of that decision, and not with its reasoning) but rather, for the five-Justice majority’s decision to reach out gratuitously and decide essentially all of the equally, if not more momentous, constitutional questions that would need to be decided in order for the former president or any other person in the future to be disqualified under the Fourteenth Amendment.

And in the course of unnecessarily deciding all of these questions when they were not even presented by the case, the five-Justice majority effectively decided not only that the former president will never be subject to disqualification, but that no person who ever engages in an insurrection against the Constitution of the United States in the future will be disqualified under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Disqualification Clause — as the concurrence of Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson witheringly explain.

- Judge Luttig

[DwightShrute]

The ruling is astonishing and unprecedented, not for its decision of the exceedingly narrow — and only — question presented (though, significantly, four of the Justices agreed only with the “result” of that decision, and not with its reasoning) but rather, for the five-Justice majority’s decision to reach out gratuitously and decide essentially all of the equally, if not more momentous, constitutional questions that would need to be decided in order for the former president or any other person in the future to be disqualified under the Fourteenth Amendment.

And in the course of unnecessarily deciding all of these questions when they were not even presented by the case, the five-Justice majority effectively decided not only that the former president will never be subject to disqualification, but that no person who ever engages in an insurrection against the Constitution of the United States in the future will be disqualified under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Disqualification Clause — as the concurrence of Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson witheringly explain.

- Judge Luttig

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">White liberal professor attacking the first-ever Latina Supreme Court Justice and the first-ever black woman on the Court as *cowards*, all because they didn&#39;t rule in accordance with the political agenda he imposed. They exercised independent thought.<br><br>Shameful but typical. <a href="https://t.co/nquXzdxlWB">https://t.co/nquXzdxlWB</a></p>&mdash; Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) <a href="https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1764785881431347458?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >March 4, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[DwightShrute]

Imagine being all for allowing the people to choose their president while pretending that asking people to "peacefully march to the capitol" somehow means something totally different than "peacefully" and that somehow that means inciting violence. There people are fukking insane. You can't have a discussion with people like this. Thankfully the court sees this.

9-0

Just another bad day for the lunatic Left.

[19th Hole]

The ruling is astonishing and unprecedented, not for its decision of the exceedingly narrow — and only — question presented (though, significantly, four of the Justices agreed only with the “result” of that decision, and not with its reasoning) but rather, for the five-Justice majority’s decision to reach out gratuitously and decide essentially all of the equally, if not more momentous, constitutional questions that would need to be decided in order for the former president or any other person in the future to be disqualified under the Fourteenth Amendment.

And in the course of unnecessarily deciding all of these questions when they were not even presented by the case, the five-Justice majority effectively decided not only that the former president will never be subject to disqualification, but that no person who ever engages in an insurrection against the Constitution of the United States in the future will be disqualified under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Disqualification Clause — as the concurrence of Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson witheringly explain.

- Judge Luttig

~~

HairieBallz

You're a typical Fascist-minded pussy.

You want one-party controlling the government so you try to
eliminate any dissenting voices. If you cannot quiet opponents
then you bury the freedom loving opposition with bogus crimes
and multiple court cases.

You see a 9-0 court decision while hiding in the corner with a tear streaked face.

Fascist tears.

[jt315]

The ruling is astonishing and unprecedented, not for its decision of the exceedingly narrow — and only — question presented (though, significantly, four of the Justices agreed only with the “result” of that decision, and not with its reasoning) but rather, for the five-Justice majority’s decision to reach out gratuitously and decide essentially all of the equally, if not more momentous, constitutional questions that would need to be decided in order for the former president or any other person in the future to be disqualified under the Fourteenth Amendment.

And in the course of unnecessarily deciding all of these questions when they were not even presented by the case, the five-Justice majority effectively decided not only that the former president will never be subject to disqualification, but that no person who ever engages in an insurrection against the Constitution of the United States in the future will be disqualified under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Disqualification Clause — as the concurrence of Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson witheringly explain.

- Judge Luttig

More good news HairyBalls

Stick a fork in this pig

Sources have confirmed that the GA Senate committee looking into the Fulton DA have subpoenaed Attorney Ashleigh Merchant to testify Wednesday, 3-6-24

The hearing will be live streamed and is open to the public.

This is more than a subpoena for records of Merchant's communications with Bradley as previously announced

[DwightShrute]

[Hareeba!]

Whilst it's disappointing that SCOTUS chickened out of accepting that they had the power to determine whether TFG was disqualified from standing for office, saying that that call is up to Congress, lets not forget that Congress has already determined that he engaged in insurrection.

The House impeached him for it. And the Senate agreed, voting 57-43 that he did.

Also notable is that all 9 SCOTUS justices ruled against acceding to TFG's plea that they rule he's not an insurrectionist.