on3's MLB 2012 Opening Game system thread 194-8 last year +60 units

[jturn49]

What a night for everyone that hung with it. Just what the doctor ordered. Congratulations

[Gndias]

[Bostongambler]

Congrats

[Bradfordmiller]

Great night, hope everyone kept the faith and got rewarded. Actually looking forward to the next series of games.
Also won on "Crusher, System Int and went 1-1 with Hagball's JM System. Will celebrate with a (gallon) beer tonight.
Thanks for all your contining work on3.

[Apathy31]

I have a question about the 5 run system and I know this is not the place to ask it so I apologize in advance.

Is that just a straight chase or are you just suppose to manage it how you want to?

Sorry again I just do not know where to ask this question.

[Nino7]

straight chase.there is a chat where u can ask questions at the bottom of the spreadsheet

[oklahoma]

A long overdue sweep.

[KennyM10]

Wow this thread started at 20 a play. Now to try to hide the losses the lines start at 80? And where is that numbnuts rizzo now reminding everyone he created this mess.
Congrats for washing out several bankrolls for the year.

[stevex]

Washing out several bankrolls?

If your losing your bankroll by early May using a system then there is something very very wrong with the numbers you're betting. This racket isn't rocket science, but you still have to apply some basic math in order to stay in the game and show a profit at the end of the season.

Like I said before we got the nice sweep on Friday. Stay in the game, don't over bet or think that you're "due" so you bet more after a couple of series loses. This isn't a sprint, but rather a long walk fellas. Lets get that money!

[darkmatter117]

Looks like we have at least two filtered plays starting tomorrow. I think our game one schedule missed May 14.

[ifiwaspresident]

Delete delete delete. That popping sound you heard was me pulling my head out of my ass. Went ahead and consulted the schedule like most people who don't go off half-cocked. It looks like all of the series that are beginning tomorrow are 2-game sets so they aren't candidates.

There is a rumor going around that if you apply the parameters and filters as plainly explained by On3 in the beginning of this thread, you can actually figure crap out for yourself. It seemed a silly notion when I first heard it, but I'm starting to wonder if there might be something to it. I ain't saying'...I'm just saying'.

[therizz]

Wow this thread started at 20 a play. Now to try to hide the losses the lines start at 80? And where is that numbnuts rizzo now reminding everyone he created this mess.
Congrats for washing out several bankrolls for the year.

KennyM,

You are my new favorite poster. You're contributions to this thread have been invaluable. As you have so kindly pointed out, we have not been doing too well this year. When you keep having to tack numbers on to your labby lines for losses you have to make bigger plays to recoup the money you lost. When you backtest things they sometimes look good and you try them out. Won over 200U the last two seasons. This year this thing may turn around and be profitable or maybe it will keep tanking. I don't know. It seems you are pretty convinced this is a terrible system, so you should be coming in here to thank us as you have a great system to fade which will give you a lot of dogs as plays.
thanks again,
rizz/rizzo/numbnuts

[on3]

i split the filtered units and put them in their own section, so see the adjustments below. and congrats on the good friday. as always, lets keep it rollin. there is a weird scheduling quirk where there 2-game series starting tomorrow, and per the rules, 2-game series' dont qualify.

System record 41-4-0; 10-0-0; 1-0-0
Units -19; +10; +5
1 unit = $20

5/14

no plays today -- every qualifying play is a 2-game series and therefore no play

Game 1 win = 25-21; 7-2
Game 2 win = 15-6; 3-0; 1-0
Game 3 win = 2-3; 0-0

Labby Line (regular)

50-x-x-50
40-65-67-63
85-152-126-134

Labby Line (filter)

x-10-10-x

[Sportsnut1968]

It came thru

[WVU9494]

What does that mean that you split the filtered units? Just curious

[WVU9494]

Keep my name out of your threads sir.....you have proven over and over you are not intellectually sound

So you mean to tell me that because you, we, whoever follows "a system" that it's no longer gambling? A system is still infallible? It's called GAMBLING for a reason. With or without a system there are aspects of it which you can't control. Therefore my statement remains. If you can't handle the losses then don't gamble, simple. It's not about being tough. People are here crying as if there is 0 expectancy for losses or that it's improbable that the system can go bad.

Secondly, my comments aren't directed at anything constructive. If people are telling others that are blindly following as you put it to reduce their unit bets, that's fine, I have nothing against that. My comments are directed to those who are here simply trolling and running their mouth (Kenny, WVU9494, to name a few). No idea why you felt the need to comment, since I didn't direct it at any one specific person, especially you.

You can check my post history. I don't troll threads, I don't go on people's threads hoping for them and others to lose. I don't wish ill will on anyone so your comments are directed at the wrong person. I'm all about winning as a group and anything constructive. I just don't find 5 pages of bitching and moaning, blaming ON3, and people saying they blew their entire bankroll when the system is only down 22 units to be constructive at all.

[SlickRick1382]

Keep my name out of your threads sir.....you have proven over and over you are not intellectually sound

I'm not intellectually sound? LOL ....

Guess we can't all have a PhD like you. You're all proper now but we'll see you soon when people go on a losing streak and you start crying once again ...

P.S.

I'll speak your name as I see fit just like you have no problem defaming the reputation of reputable handicappers with your slanderous posts.

[eric14tsui]

Wish TEX and DET were 3game series......too bad.

[The HOFF]

MAY 18
Yankees vs Reds
Rays vs Braves
Blue Jays vs Mets
Indians vs Marlins
Tigers vs Pirates
Royals vs D-Backs
Phillies vs Red Sox
Nationals vs Orioles
Cubs vs White Sox
Astros vs Rangers
Brewers vs Twins
Rockies vs Mariners
Dodgers vs Cardinals
Padres vs Angels
Giants vs Athletics

[WVU9494]

[Show me a slanderous post sir



QUOTE=SlickRick1382;14767404]I'm not intellectually sound? LOL ....

Guess we can't all have a PhD like you. You're all proper now but we'll see you soon when people go on a losing streak and you start crying once again ...

P.S.

I'll speak your name as I see fit just like you have no problem defaming the reputation of reputable handicappers with your slanderous posts.[/QUOTE]

[Sportsnut1968]

let's see what happens

[GGPLAYER]

Wish TEX and DET were 3game series......too bad.

I've been chasing Tex all week. Good time to get on them since they are like a D bet in another system.

[J.M. Disciple]

I've been chasing Tex all week. Good time to get on them since they are like a D bet in another system.

what system is that? A's usually suck, but I have to give them some credit this year; way better then expected, but im on texas well. Texas should be money all season if you manage it right.

[J.M. Disciple]

ON3

Have been looking for some road favorites at -145 and higher with o/u 9 and I have not seen any since you posted it. Not much of a system there it seems... Maybe lower the o/u to 7 and you could have some series.

[on3]

ON3

Have been looking for some road favorites at -145 and higher with o/u 9 and I have not seen any since you posted it. Not much of a system there it seems... Maybe lower the o/u to 7 and you could have some series.

nothing wrong with being selective my man. if you give me 10 plays a year and they go 10-0, thats all i need.

[thelimit0310]

ON3

Have been looking for some road favorites at -145 and higher with o/u 9 and I have not seen any since you posted it. Not much of a system there it seems... Maybe lower the o/u to 7 and you could have some series.

A few weeks is not a very large sample size...

[eric14tsui]

I wish there will be more series, but I agree perfect record or high % wins are all we need.

[on3]

System record 41-4-0; 10-0-0; 1-0-0
Units -19; +10; +5
1 unit = $20

5/18

#46 -- ny mets @ TOR -160 (A) -- o/u 7.5
#47 -- pittsburgh @ DET -230/-115 (A) -- o/u 7 -- play RL
*maybe colorado and milwaukee as well, watch for the update

Game 1 win = 25-21; 7-3
Game 2 win = 15-6; 3-0; 1-0
Game 3 win = 2-4; 0-0

Labby Line (regular)

50-x-x-50
40-65-67-63
85-152-126-134

Labby Line (filter)

x-10-10-x

TOR to win 50
DET to win 50

[J.M. Disciple]

The dreaded detroit....Been extremely high favorite and been sucking balls as usual. Under .500

[airattackers]

im a little bit scared of that detroit..they are under .500

[hagball52]

The dreaded detroit....Been extremely high favorite and been sucking balls as usual. Under .500

Handicap the series and you won't feel too bad. They have better pitching 2 out of 3 games, they are better in runs scored, team batting avg., on base percentage and slugging percentage. Det is in the upper half of those stats and PIT ranks dead last in 2 and 2nd to last in the other 2. Detroit's streak is lost 2 and they are at home. It's time for their bats to show what they can do. Hope this eases your pain. GL

[thelimit0310]

Keep an eye out on Colorado they could very well be a play by game start which would also make them a 4/2 qualified A bet

[Mr. Green]

Are the Yankees and Phillies plays?

[Win89]

I thought plays were based on opening lines not midday or closing. Colorado opened below -145 so if they're a play then Yankees and Phillies should be as well. What's the actual method were going by for picking series because it seems like opening lines have gone out the window?

[knugen]

Yes, both yankees and phillies should be plays?