CK's 2025 MLB Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • atthehalf
    replied
    CRUMBS PODS ARE 28-8 so far-looking for more today

    The highest rated arm that I have for the CRUMBS POD is

    Red Leggins Nick Martinez#10 with only 19% rostership

    The top level ratios aren't pretty but he's solid, and the Nats have 275 K's this season already in 34 games-good for approx 8 K's per game. I mean what more do you want? I can definitely see the 5/3/1/K/W in him. Get it Nick-you got this

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    5/4/25

    Snakes+115 Rodriguez 2 UNITS
    Guardians-102 Bibee 2 UNITS
    Royals/Orioles OVER 9.5
    A's/Fish UNDER 8.5
    Rays/Bombers OVER 8.5

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    NBA Clippers+100 ML 2 UNITS

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    I just blasted away on a BET OUT of Arizona and another move

    Blunts-125 Nola DOUBLE DOWN 2 UNITS
    Red Leggins-1.5 +105 RL Lodolo 2 UNITS

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Astros-230
    Giants-300
    Red Leggins-190
    Tigers-190

    4 WAY ML PARLAY +346 ODDS

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    5/3/25

    Rot.#970 Guardians/Jays UNDER 4.5 -135 FF Williams/Gausman
    Rot.#960 Nats/Red Leggins UNDER 4.5 FF -115 Williams/Lodolo
    Rot.#964 Braves-118 Schwellenbach
    Rot.#957 Snakes+107 Pfaadt
    Rot.#956 Buccos-119 Falter
    Rot.#975 Royals+100 Bubic
    Last edited by atthehalf; 05-03-25, 12:01 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Warriors-3.5 2nd half

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Snakes 10 hits and 2 runs; Blunts 6 hits 3 runs...darn!

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    They are rooting for

    Snakes
    Orioles
    Cardinals
    Twins
    Fish

    I am already on a few of those-will add on Orioles, Snakes now

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Hard Rock backed bets coming up in a little bit

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    I am STRICTLY utilizing what my confidant taught me about parlaying-we will see how it goes

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    3 WAY ML PARLAY +187 ODDS

    Red Leggins-180
    Bombers-260
    Giants-300

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Bounce Back Day!

    5/2/25

    Twinkies-107 Ryan 1 UNIT
    Cardinals+107 Gray 1 UNIT
    Fathers (Cease) OVER 6.5 K's (Buccos AVG 8.6K's per game anyway)
    Fish+119 Bellozo 1 UNIT
    Giants-1.5 -123 RL Ray 2 UNITS
    Red Leggins-1.5 +122 RL Greene 2 UNITS
    Nat/Red Leggins OVER 8.5 -105 1 UNIT
    Bombers-1.5 -105 RL Fried 2 UNITS
    Rays/Bombers OVER 8.5 -110 1 UNIT

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Clippers-3.5 2nd half

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Ok so

    Knicks+100 ML

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    I will be taking the Knicks this evening-just waiting for our runner to get here and then I can give you the number

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Wow! The Rays have forgotten how to hit-no sweat-I will just take my lumps for today and move on to tomorrow. There are 2 identified SIDES and TOTALS to work with so there's slim pickins.

    Colin Rea pissed on the money and didn't get my 5/3/1/K/W too which didn't make me happy...

    I am gonna run back Michael Wacha again tomorrow since he still only has 18% rostership

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    1:00 Rot.#961 Twinkies-110 FF ML Woods-Richardson 1 UNIT
    1:00 Rot.#964 Rays-1.5 +115 ML Baz 2 UNITS
    1:00 Rot.#963 Royals/Rays OVER 7.5 -130 1 UNIT
    1:00 Rot.#956 Metropolitans-1.5 +1115 RL Senga 2 UNITS
    1:00 Rot.#955 Snakes/Metropolitans OVER 7.5 1 UNIT
    9:30 Rot.#960 Giants-1.5 -105 Verlander 2 UNITS
    9:30 Rot.#959 Rox/Giants OVER 7.5 1 UNIT



    4 WAY ML PARLAY +5.43

    Giants-275 ML
    Metropolitans-170 ML
    Rays-170 ML
    Twinkies-110 FF ML

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Alright now that that's out the way-I will need s a few hours to see how the lines materialize for today's sides and totals

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    I must be out of my mind...

    Today's CRUMBS POD is

    Cubs(Rea) 0%

    I mean I drafted him for situations like this one so I must use him since I have him on my roster. And what's good about it-he is likely to get the 5/1/3/K/W against the Buccos

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Wanderers have left the bases loaded twice-once with one out and once with no outs and only have 1 run-that's what I mean by collateral damage-a game and outcome like this i will just throw it out and move on. It was the right call with bad luck which happens

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Blasting away on

    Lakers-5.5

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Damn...I was just noticing something. The only team that has given me the double losses for my system are the Rays i this series vs the Royals, Very strange-they are a .500 team with a middling offense and middling pitching staff and yet they are blasting the Rays into submission in this series as big underdogs each night. That's awesome!

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Oh man!

    Tomorrow's CRUMBS POD will obviously be my draft choice

    Cubs (Rea) 0%

    I got so much of a return off of his last performance I was embarrassed to mention it here on the thread because it would look like I was bragging.

    This man has 0% rostership, which means that only I and the Commish would split the return if he gets the 5/3/1/K/W. We all know that Skenes is gonna get his for sure, but who wants to split a 99% guy's return? You're getting pennies on the dollar and it's basically not worth mentioning

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    My MLB Record Update (Monitored at The Action Network)

    148-143-10 (51%) +7.13 UNITS ROI +1.96

    This is about to explode with what I am doing now tho. grecycle's thing is cool-there's just a whole lot more risk involved and one bad day can kill you betting all of that juice with 5 units at stake sometimes on a line that's -275 for instance.
    Anyone who watched the Billy Walters interview clearly heard the man say that one of the worst issues for novice bettors is that they surrender too much vigorous. He is looking to make each move at the best odds and most of them at less than -110.

    This plays into me going with the RL instead of the ML; and I will be upping the straight on the RL favorite side to 3 units soon. the total will stay at 1 unit because inmost cases I can only find a half or a point advantage at the most for those. As far as the sides are concerned I am seeing a +3.3 advantage for those. I am testing this system of mine out so I am taking it slow at first here. Y'all will know when make the switch to 3 units. If the ML's are to be involved use those specifically ONLY in ML parlays boys

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    My CRUMBS POD is

    Halos (Tyler Anderson#10) garnering only 18% of ownership this guy is the king of streaming and can easily get through 5 frames against a Sailors offense that is good but not great. It's puzzling that Hancock is such a prohibitive favorite for this one because the ceiling is too dang low for a guy ho hasn't perfected command of his offerings effectively; he needs to get that sinker inside and lean on the slider and changeup often. That's neither here nor there as it's not really the objective to get a team win in streaming-it's very individualized/ I can see Anderson getting through 5 and I don't see Hancock as is with eh plans that he exhibits on the bump getting through the Halos for 5 frames. An 82% share profit split is there for the money!

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    NBA did me wrong yesterday, however my newfound MLB strategy is working pretty good. Are you guys seeing the type of scores that are happening?

    Anyway here's today's list of my stuff

    Rot.#924 Rays-1.5 +110 RL Rasmussen 2 UNITS
    Rot.#923 Royals/Rays OVER 8.5 1 UNIT
    Rot.#912 Blunts-1.5 -110 RL Sanchez 2 UNITS
    Rot.#911 Nats/Blunts OVER 8.5 1 UNIT
    Rot.#928 Wanderers-1.5 +140 RL Eovaldi 2 UNITS
    Rot.#927 A's/Wanderers OVER 8 1 UNIT

    ALSO Just to get it out of your systems

    3 WAY ML PARLAY +264 I ODDS

    Rays-185
    Wanderers-150
    Blunts-240

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    For those who like NBA I am

    Pistons/Knicks OVER 214.5
    Clippers ML (Prices vary)

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Oh I almost forgot

    Hard Rock Sportsbook Backed

    SIDES

    Buccos+120
    Snakes+120
    Twinkies+115 (See I knew something was up)
    Jays+120

    TOTALS

    Nats/Blunts OVER 8.5
    Giants/Fathers UNDER 6.5
    Twinkies/Guardians OVER 8.5

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Originally posted by takethepnts

    GREAT INFO. Thanks for the post . Here's to continued profit. All the best and thanks for sharing
    No problem! I wish to make this season an enjoyable one for those following my thread-I saw that I was taking too many one run losses and that i had to make a change. I was making life miserable for those who aren't streaming. Those who are streaming have made so much money that they may want to quit while this far ahead. My CRUMBS are 26-7 and a lot of those are on some wild 99% profit shares that pay WAY MORE than a conventional move unless you stake some high cheddar.

    Yes let's strive to get paid

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Everyone be on standby. The Guardians may end up being a BET OUT situation. The good thing here is that since the RL was bet I can get BOTH moves at POSITIVE ODDS if I choose to get out of it. I won't take a loss on something when I can help it-sort of like last night. Currently the line is

    Guardians-128 which is LOWER than the OPENER of -130. As this thing goes along I will even more fine tune the BUY IN price by making an adjustment. it appears that -130 is fine if the number is a RISER, not a DROPPER. Oh well...carry on and check back later on.

    You guys this is what it looks like to do data mining

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    Be on standby. The Guardians may slide under -122, and if you took the RL at positive odds like me you can blast away on Twinkies with both moves at positive odds like a professional bettor. All of the other moves look smooth so far

    Leave a comment:


  • takethepnts
    replied
    Originally posted by atthehalf
    6:00 Rot.#966 Guardians-1.5 +148 RL Bibee 2 UNITS
    6:00 Rot.#965 Twinkies/Guardians OVER 8 -120 1 UNIT

    6:30 Rot.#956 Blunts-1.5 +113 RL Wheeler 2 UNITS
    6:30 Rot.#956 Nats/Blunts OVER 8.5 1 UNIT

    7:00 Rot.#970 Rays-1.5 +135 RL Bradley 2 UNITS
    7:00 Rot.#969 Royals/Rays OVER 8.5 -120 1 UNIT

    8:00 Rot.#974 Wanderers-1.5 -105 RL deGrom 2 UNITS
    8:00 Rot.#973 A's/Wanderers OVER 8.5 1 UNIT

    9:30 Rot.#978 Sailors-1.5 +130 RL Miller 2 UNITS
    9:30 Rot.#977 Halos/Sailors OVER 7.5 1 UNIT
    9:30 Rot.#978 Sailors Team Total OVER 4.5 +105 1 UNIT
    9:30 Rot,#978 Sailors (Miller) OVER 6.5 K's -140 1 UNIT

    10:00 Rot.#964 Dodgers-1.5 +105 RL 2 UNITS
    10:00 Rot.#963 Fish/Dodgers OVER 8.5 1 UNIT​

    And if it looks like I am using a system-I am. I took what I learned from my good source and then back tested it and recent tested it, and put my own spin on things by electing to take my lumps with the RL's instead of playing the bad odds associated with a heavy favorite. I got gamed up and learned a new way to align myself with the sportsbooks while still streaming.

    If you watched the Billy Walters interview with Joe Rogan (which you didn't) he touched on some things that I naturally do like line my own games that have spreads (NBA, MLB and FBALL) and also adding on a unit for each +0.5 point he can find in a matchup. The material is out there for realizing the amount a MLB team should win by according to the line. Of course there are hiccups-I just will be throwing those out-(such as the pitcher not having it that day, a managerial decision, bad baserunning etc) and look a those human errors as collateral damage and move on.

    For the situation that i am making moves on the teams that I am blasting away on should win by +3.3 runs on average and combined scoring should be in the range of 9 runs or so without the collateral damage I was speaking about. So if you as a reader want a better win percentage then you should just bet the ML. if you want sustained long term money management then do as i do.

    Lay these straight. Do not parlay these moves. The TOTAL move for 1 UNIT is for protection against the issues surrounding betting the RL instead of the ML
    GREAT INFO. Thanks for the post . Here's to continued profit. All the best and thanks for sharing

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    BTW my BUY IN price for these moves is -122 or MORE-so the further the line is from -122 the more likely i am to buy EARLY as i did today. Yesterday I caught a line move for the Guardians that was at the very end before the event and got caught with my pants down-that won't happen any more-any number that is close to the edit will have corresponding late moves on them as I adapt.

    As far as underdogs are concerned, I would use what i am doing as a guide to see if a number close to the buy in price goes south and closes BELOW my buy in price-the good underdog is easy to spot. Essentially I am performing in a such a manner as to if I was running a sportsbook. I see how it is now after yesterday with e Guardians. That shit ain't happenin again

    Leave a comment:


  • atthehalf
    replied
    My CRUMBS POD Streamer of the day is

    Cardinals (Mikolas) He can spin sliders a ton and get through six frames to give me my 5/3/1/K/W. Since he only has 2% ownership that gives me a chance to get a return share of the 98%. Now what can be better than that?

    Leave a comment:

SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...