St. Louis Democratic Central Committee Opposes Missouri Sports Betting
We're just days away from a vote that could lead to residents of Missouri gaining access to some of our best sports betting sites.
Amendment 2 will be put forth to Missouri residents on Nov. 5, Election Day. It will legalize Missouri sports betting if passed. There have been plenty of opinions on both sides of the debate, and just days away a new voice has entered the ring in opposition to the bill.
The St. Louis Democratic Central Committee has voiced opposition to the legalization of sports betting in the state. The Central Committee serves as the governing body of the St. Louis County Democratic Party. It consists of local Democrats voters elected to represent each of the 28 county townships, along with partisan-level Democratic elected officials and nominees who participate as Ex Officio Officers.
The issues
The committee released a statement earlier in the week that it was supporting all city and state ballot questions, except Amendment 2.
The organization's chair, Sean Fauss, reported issues with the language in the amendment, namely as it relates to taxes that would flow into needy state and local offers. Estimates for revenue range from $0 to $28.9 million due to how taxes will be applied to potential operators. Other opponents of the Amendment have also raised this issue.
Elad Gross, the Democratic candidate for AG, also expressed concerns for how tax revenues would be applied to problem gambling resources.
Amendment 2
The push to legalize sports betting in Missouri gained traction in January when the state’s professional sports teams launched a petition to bring the issue to the November ballot. Winning for Missouri Education had collected 340,000 signatures come August—more than twice the required 170,000.
Gambling giants DraftKings and FanDuel have contributed approximately $43 million to Winning for Missouri Education, positioning themselves to secure one of Missouri's two online sports betting licenses if the measure passes.
On the other side, the opposing group, Missourians Against the Deceptive Online Gambling Amendment (MADOGA), has received around $14 million in funding from Caesars, which also operates its own sportsbook. Though Caesars generally supports sports betting, it opposes the specifics of Amendment 2. MADOGA spokesperson Brooke Foster emphasized concerns that the state's financial gains might fall short of expectations.
“We are building a broad coalition and are prepared to wage a vigorous campaign to educate voters across the state and ensure the measure is defeated,” Foster stated.