Unique 350 experiment - 100 to 1000

[playr101]

I got on Boise St. only because I was busy earlier and knew I wouldnt be able to place a bet....
liking it so far...

-playr101

[Erock87]

Bovada doesn't have the line since it's too high - GL though!

[playr101]

BG is up 21-3 in the 4th.. and they are about to score again.. so... those on that are not too worried...

-playr101

[mcduggly]

I got on Boise St. only because I was busy earlier and knew I wouldnt be able to place a bet....
liking it so far...

-playr101

[mcduggly]

Bovada doesn't have the line since it's too high - GL though!

Too high? The line is -525. You need an account at 5dimes. Bovada blows, I was with them when I first started betting and extremely happy I switched.

[playr101]

ya Bodog or Bovada or whatever always has shit lines...

-playr101

[nic9212]

Too high? The line is -575. You need an account at 5dimes. Bovada blows, I was with them when I first started betting and extremely happy I switched.

yeah I had a bovada account. Lines were always higher than other books and not many ml's.

[Cutler'sThumb]

yeah I had a bovada account. Lines were always higher than other books and not many ml's.

Bovada used to be BoDOG. They were/are good for getting value on dogs, so not good at all for this kind of system.

[Luca Fury]

, winning in streaks is unrealistic? You're an idiot. Especially when -350 favorites and lower are hitting at over an 80% win rate, there are obviously long winning streaks that are going to happen.

Oh, now we're resorting to throwing out petty insults for no reason? LOL at you saying I'M the idiot!

Winning in streaks isn't unrealistic, what's unrealistic is relying on winning 12 to 15 in a row ever time.

I was being polite, but since you've decided to be a douche, I'll speak my mind: You are retarded and know very little about gambling if you think you can win 12 bets in a row on a consistent basis long-term. Anyone who knows anything about gambling is laughing at you right now.

EDIT: Damn speech-to-text keeps messing up.

[mcduggly]

Oh, now we're resorting to throwing out petty insults for no reason? LOL you saying I'M the idiot!

Winning in streaks is an unrealistic, what's unrealistic is relying on winning 12 to 15 that's in a row every time.

I was being polite, but since you've decided to be a douche, I'll speak my mind: You are retarded if you think you can win 12 that's in a row on a consistent basis long-term. Anyone who knows anything about gambling is laughing at you right now.

This isn't my sole betting strategy. I also have models for spreads and do those outside of this thread. With that said, I am up over $8,000 using this system the past 2 years alone (betting with professional and college basketball and football), so laugh all you want little guy.

[Erock87]

Is 5D open to Americans?

[mcduggly]

#1. San Jose State over Texas San Antonio - $100 to win $21.05 - WIN
#2. Alabama over Tennessee First Half - $121.05 to win $20.18 - WIN
#3. Houston Texans over Baltimore Ravens - $141.23 to win $44.13 - WIN
#4. New England Patriots over New York Jets First Half - $185.36 to win $57.93 - WIN
#5. Clemson Tigers over Wake Forest Demon Decons - $243.29 to win $59.34 - WIN
#6. Northern Illinois over Western MIchigan - $302.63 to win $94.57 - WIN
#7. Boise State over Wyoming - $395.09 to win $68.71 - WIN



Boise took control early and never looked back. Next play coming up soon.

[mcduggly]

Is 5D open to Americans?

Yes.

[AceKingHigh]

Well done by boise state.

[Luca Fury]

This isn't my sole betting strategy. I also have models for spreads and do those outside of this thread. With that said, I am up over $8,000 using this system the past 2 years alone (betting with professional and college basketball and football), so laugh all you want little guy.

You can claim to be up all you want but was no proof that means nothing. Guess what, I'm up $70 million using my strategy of parlaying 20 underdogs over the past five years. See how that works?

Also, in your thread that you made about this strategy just four weeks ago, said this:

He guys, I get bored betting the same way day after day, so I'm going to start something different. I'm going to take $100 and try to turn it into $1,000 by betting on NCAA and NFL games that are at least -350 favorites.

Hm, now that sure sounds like this is a brand-new strategy. You said you got bored doing the same strategy, so you're going to try something new. Yet here, you claim that you've been using the strategy for two whole years. What's like you been caught in a lie, nice job!

Besides, every square on this forum claims to be up so big with their unique strategies, yet when they make a thread where they post their picks ahead of time, they lose 99% of the time.

And LOL at you calling me "little guy." You made a thread on this forum because it's your only outlet. That's right, an internet form is your only outlet to voice your opinion. That's sad. You are the little guy.

[Luckycharms2012]

You can claim to be up all you want but was no proof that means nothing. Guess what, I'm up $70 million using my strategy of parlaying 20 underdogs over the past five years. See that works?

Every square on this forum claims to be up so big with their unique strategies, yet when they make a thread where they post their picks ahead of time, they lose 99% of the time.

Man why do you care if he's up or not, bottom line he's giving winners, let the man be. Why do you feel the need to pour cold water on the party???? Either follow the picks or don't.

[mcduggly]

You can claim to be up all you want but was no proof that means nothing. Guess what, I'm up $70 million using my strategy of parlaying 20 underdogs over the past five years. See how that works?

Every square on this forum claims to be up so big with their unique strategies, yet when they make a thread where they post their picks ahead of time, they lose 99% of the time.

And LOL at you calling me "little guy." You made a thread on this forum because it's your only outlet. That's right, an internet form is your only outlet to voice your opinion. That's sad. You are the little guy.

1. I know I have no proof, but I know that I am and that's all that matters.
2. I (we) am up over $800 on my posted plays using this strategy.
3. You're on the same forum I am, and I bet you're 20 years older than me.
4. I'm 6'3 220.

Get off the thread if you don't agree with it, nobody here cares. I am blocking you posts now so I won't be able to see anything you post after this. Thanks for your input little guy.

[mcduggly]

Man why do you care if he's up or not, bottom line he's giving winners, let the man be. Why do you feel the need to pour cold water on the party???? Either follow the picks or don't.

[Luca Fury]

Man why do you care if he's up or not, bottom line he's giving winners, let the man be. Why do you feel the need to pour cold water on the party???? Either follow the picks or don't.

Normally I wouldn't, but I was just trying to give this guy some polite, helpful advice and he replied by insulting me. Then he claimed to be up $8000 on the system after using it for 2 years, when his last thread, he said this is something brand-new. I would've just moved on and not said anything else, but he decided to be a douche bag, so I decided to call him out for being liar.

[mcduggly]

Attempt #2 - Bet #8 :
Texas A&M over Auburn @-500
Bet $463.80 to win $92.76


Auburn has looked awful so far this season and Texas A&M are 3-0 on the road. I'm keeping it short and sweet so you guys have time to lock it in if you want. Good luck, guys!

[Luca Fury]

1. I know I have no proof, but I know that I am and that's all that matters.
2. I (we) am up over $800 on my posted plays using this strategy.
3. You're on the same forum I am, and I bet you're 20 years older than me.
4. I'm 6'3 220.

Get off the thread if you don't agree with it, nobody here cares. I am blocking you posts now so I won't be able to see anything you post after this. Thanks for your input little guy.

How about you post this proof then? You're the typical SBR square who claims "Oh, I have proof... but I'm just not to show it."

As for the height issue, I have you trumped there as well, as I'm 6'8". Nice fail again! As I said before, you are the little guy.

[mcduggly]

Normally I wouldn't, but I was just trying to give this guy some polite, helpful advice and he replied by insulting me. Then he claimed to be up $8000 on the system after using it for 2 years, when his last thread, he said this is something brand-new. I would've just moved on and not said anything else, but he decided to be a douche bag, so I decided to call him out for being liar.

It's brand new to this forum, because like you said, if it isn't documented, it doesn't count. With that said, nothing I did before starting this last year "counted". And maybe if you didn't say "streaks aren't realistic" or whatever the hell you said, I wouldn't have called you an idiot (which is hardly insulting).

[chris440]

good luck! my bookie doesn't offer college money lines or I would like to give it a shot.

[mcduggly]

How about you post this proof then? You're the typical SBR square who claims "Oh, I have proof... but I'm just not to show it."

As for the height issue, I have you trumped there as well, as I'm 6'8". Nice fail again! As I said before, you are the little guy.

Honestly, it isn't even worth it. I can post it and you will still say I photoshopped it or something, which is understandable because half the people here do it and it's very easy to do.

[pokerwhiz90]

keep on making money man!

[Luca Fury]

It's brand new to this forum, because like you said, if it isn't documented, it doesn't count. With that said, nothing I did before starting this last year "counted". And maybe if you didn't say "streaks aren't realistic" or whatever the hell you said, I wouldn't have called you an idiot (which is hardly insulting).

I said winning 12 to 15 bets in a row every time long-term is unrealistic, because IT IS! Your logic is retarded but I was polite and didn't insult you. Instead I politely shared my two cents and you responded by becoming aggressive and insulting me for no reason. Do you insult everyone who disagrees with you?

[playr101]

Just ignore him... I am having fun tailing you... fuk it..

-playr101

[playr101]

mcduggly... whats your opinion on Oklahoma over ND?

-playr101

[Luca Fury]

Just ignore him... I am having fun tailing you... fuk it..

-playr101

Yeah, ignore the dude who actually knows something about gambling and has a proven track record, and is trying to warn people of a strategy that is going to surely lose them money. Sounds good.

One of the biggest reasons people lose at gambling is because they're concerned with only the short term, but not the long term.

Oh well, going go ahead and tail him all you want, but I guarantee you won't be tailing him for too long, because he'll start losing. Not because he's bad at analyzing games, but because this strategy is simply bad.

There are 4 parts to being a successful gambler: analysis, strategy, discipline and money management. The strategy is clearly missing the latter 3 parts, and will therefore not succeed long-term.

[p19101]

Yeah ignore the dude who actually knows something about gambling and is trying to warn people of a strategy that is going to surely lose them money. One of the biggest reasons people lose at gambling is because they're concerned with only the short term, but not the long term.

Oh well, going go ahead and tail him all you want, but I guarantee you won't be telling them for too long, because he'll start losing. Not because he's bad at analyzing or anything, but because this strategy is simply bad.

Just because you tail his bets you're not forced to follow his strategy.

[mcduggly]

mcduggly... whats your opinion on Oklahoma over ND?

-playr101

Honestly, I have no idea why Oklahoma is a -400 something favorite. I would not touch that game, as anything can happen. Notre Dame has a great defense and could easily come away with this game. I actually see value in taking ND at +405 if you're into picking value plays. With that said though, I would not bet either side and just watch them on TV.

[mcduggly]

Yeah, ignore the dude who actually knows something about gambling and has a proven track record, and is trying to warn people of a strategy that is going to surely lose them money. Sounds good.

One of the biggest reasons people lose at gambling is because they're concerned with only the short term, but not the long term.

Oh well, going go ahead and tail him all you want, but I guarantee you won't be tailing him for too long, because he'll start losing. Not because he's bad at analyzing games, but because this strategy is simply bad.

A proven track record.

[playr101]

Kewl thx bro...

And to Luca Fury....

why are you even in this thread? To troll?

-playr101

[playr101]

Ya... proven track record in your 5 months at SBR? Your a troll so you must be from Covers..
Join Date: 05-10-12

[Luca Fury]

Just because you tail his bets you're not forced to follow his strategy.

True but that is irrelevant. I'm not saying his individual bets are bad, I'm saying the strategy is.

A proven track record.

Yeah, unlike you have my own podcast, betting website and over 2,000 Twitter followers. My bets are documented and my track record is proven. There is evidence of my success, whereas all you have is contradicting forum posts that prove that you are a liar.