Unique 350 experiment - 100 to 1000

[Luckycharms2012]

I actually have a new idea that I am going to implement for the college basketball and NBA thread.

We'll bounce back in no time!

[mcduggly]

hey! its alright- glad i didnt take the last bet but mcduggly keep doing what your doing! ignore the haters - this is by far the most entertaining thread on this forum

The NBA one will be better. I've made a lot more money doing that and there will be a lot less time between picks. Then we can do some college football on Saturdays.

[last-1-2-know]

Drew Breeze really let us down tonight. I started with $50 on Friday made it to $575 and now with this loss i have $175. Personally i like your method but i have one suggestion. Maybe you should set your end goal a bit lower than $1000 just to ensure more steady earnings. For instance, start with $100 Monday, let it ride until you get to $650-$750 and then reset. Maybe even considering stopping once you get over $600, cashing out $500 and $100 to start over. This is something i was considering doing for myself, just thought i'd share.

u can quite and start all over with whatever value is good for u....if u have on a few hundred in ur account then $500 is alot....if u have $8000 then $1000 is a better stopping point.....or if ur not really feeling a bet u can skip that particular one....mcduggly gonna play games he gonna play.....i suggest no one give him anymore suggestions.....he's a smart man and has his mind set and games ava....if we start fukin with him it may throw him off...if u got suggestions then start ur own thread....i say all this with peace.....

[pokerwhiz90]

Money!

[Luca Fury]

[Luca Fury]

Drew Breeze really let us down tonight. I started with $50 on Friday made it to $575 and now with this loss i have $175. Personally i like your method but i have one suggestion. Maybe you should set your end goal a bit lower than $1000 just to ensure more steady earnings. For instance, start with $100 Monday, let it ride until you get to $650-$750 and then reset. Maybe even considering stopping once you get over $600, cashing out $500 and $100 to start over. This is something i was considering doing for myself, just thought i'd share.

Whoa, whoa, whoa, wait…

Are you saying doing nothing but 12 to 15 team parlays is NOT a good idea? Who would've ever guess that? I'm stunned at this sudden discovery...

[Brutus84]

Congrats on being up 700. I'm up 2400 if SF loses or up 2600 if SF wins. I don't have to go all in every play either and sweat if my-400 favorite will win or not

[Luca Fury]

Congrats on being up 700. I'm up 2400 if SF loses or up 2600 if SF wins. I don't have to go all in every play either and sweat if my-400 favorite will win or not

I'm up 2,400 as well and I only had to bet 2-5% of my bankroll per bet. That's because you and I, you know, gamble the proper way. The way that has been proven to work long-term.

It amazes me that people think they can come up with some brand-new, unique strategy that's never been done before, and it will somehow clean house. People really are so dense that they don't think somebody else had already thought of it before them and failed, causing them to stop using that strategy. They think nobody uses their strategy because it some brilliant, ingenious new approach.

[Bdolan33]

Berried

[Luca Fury]

The thread starter is trying to act like the 700 they've made so far is good, but when you actually do the math, it's horrible.

He has done 4 of these parlays so far and risked a total of over $4,500 on the last one that won. So doing the math here, and assuming on average it takes $4,500 for each one, in total thats $18,000 risked so far. And the profit? Only $700 for a return on investment of just 3%.

Dividing that out to get an average per parlay, you get $175 in profit each time. So, on average, you're risking $4,500 to win $175.

That is garbage. That is the same as betting one moneyline at -2600. So, you might as well just ditch this strategy, and find one moneyline in the -2000-3000 range that you like and go huge on it. Funny thing is, doing that is a terrible idea, which is more proof that the thread starter's strategy is not a good one.

But hey, let's not trust the guy with the proven track record. Let's trust the random guy with the ass-backwards-fukk strategy. Err, um... Excuse me... I mean the "unique" strategy.

Because remember, everyone. I'M the idiot. The guy who tried to warn you yesterday, before this thread lost you money today. All that math I just wrote out, that's just some dumb nonsense, right? There is no logic or sense to anything I just said, is there? Of course not! Like the thread starter set, I'M the idiot here......

[tj0421]

Hey Luca where is your thread showing your plays?

[vincanity15]

This lucas a real clown, how do u ignore people on here?

[mcduggly]

This lucas a real clown, how do u ignore people on here?

That poor phaggot is still posting on this thread? He considers himself "proven" because he has followers on Twitter.

[nbk]

The thread starter is trying to act like the 700 they've made so far is good, but when you actually do the math, it's horrible.

He has done 4 of these parlays so far and risked a total of over $4,500 on the last one that won. So doing the math here, and assuming on average it takes $4,500 for each one, in total thats $18,000 risked so far. And the profit? Only $700 for a return on investment of just 3%.

Dividing that out to get an average per parlay, you get $175 in profit each time. So, on average, you're risking $4,500 to win $175.

That is garbage. That is the same as betting one moneyline at -2600. So, you might as well just ditch this strategy, and find one moneyline in the -2000-3000 range that you like and go huge on it. Funny thing is, doing that is a terrible idea, which is more proof that the thread starter's strategy is not a good one.

But hey, let's not trust the guy with the proven track record. Let's trust the random guy with the ass-backwards-fukk strategy. Err, um... Excuse me... I mean the "unique" strategy.

Because remember, everyone. I'M the idiot. The guy who tried to warn you yesterday, before this thread lost you money today. All that math I just wrote out, that's just some dumb nonsense, right? There is no logic or sense to anything I just said, is there? Of course not! Like the thread starter set, I'M the idiot here......

Hey Luca,

It's interesting you are counting the individual risk amount each time. It was my understanding this system is equivalent to an open parlay so the thread starter would be risking only 100 each time. He just completed his third or fourth attempt as far as I know. The first one was successful cashing at 1100, the second ended because of some personal matter, and then he started a new thread where he has had two attempts. Anyway, the point is that's $400 dollars total risked. Yes he placed them individually, but he's going all in each time so it's the same as a parlay. Now, only playing parlays or lines with high juice as your strategy is another matter, and yes it is risky. But you are doing some crazy math up there. So far he's made $700 off of an investment of $400. That's like a return of 175%.

[shift_knob]

where do you guys go on 5dimes to get those huge + lines?

[Broxbomber]

McDuggly - this has a been a great thread. Don't listen to the haters (this Luca Fury seems to be a joke). They are just jealous of the positive attention you have been getting. Looking forward to your NBA picks.

Just one thought on the system, I think that pro sports is tougher on this system. The disparity between pro teams is less than the disparity between college teams which leads to less upsets. All pro teams have quality coaching staffs and players. You don't always see quality staffs in college and some teams have no depth to help them compete.

In your previous win, you won a lot on college football. For basketball, did you find yourself more successful with NBA or NCAA?


Good luck with your future bets.

[Broxbomber]

Hey Luca,

It's interesting you are counting the individual risk amount each time. It was my understanding this system is equivalent to an open parlay so the thread starter would be risking only 100 each time. He just completed his third or fourth attempt as far as I know. The first one was successful cashing at 1100, the second ended because of some personal matter, and then he started a new thread where he has had two attempts. Anyway, the point is that's $400 dollars total risked. Yes he placed them individually, but he's going all in each time so it's the same as a parlay. Now, only playing parlays or lines with high juice as your strategy is another matter, and yes it is risky. But you are doing some crazy math up there. So far he's made $700 off of an investment of $400. That's like a return of 175%.

This sounds much more realistic. The previous calcs were obviously way off.

[Luca Fury]

Hey Luca where is your thread showing your plays?

LOL! Why would I waste the time? I have more followers on Twitter than this subforum has users.

[tj0421]

Prove it or STFU!

[mcduggly]

Hey Luca,

It's interesting you are counting the individual risk amount each time. It was my understanding this system is equivalent to an open parlay so the thread starter would be risking only 100 each time. He just completed his third or fourth attempt as far as I know. The first one was successful cashing at 1100, the second ended because of some personal matter, and then he started a new thread where he has had two attempts. Anyway, the point is that's $400 dollars total risked. Yes he placed them individually, but he's going all in each time so it's the same as a parlay. Now, only playing parlays or lines with high juice as your strategy is another matter, and yes it is risky. But you are doing some crazy math up there. So far he's made $700 off of an investment of $400. That's like a return of 175%.

Exactly. Kid obviously isn't a math major. Another attempt to try to convince us he's something noteworthy.

Like I said before, he's an idiot, regardless of what he tries to say.

[Luca Fury]

Exactly. Kid obviously isn't a math major. Another attempt to try to convince us he's something noteworthy.

Like I said before, he's an idiot, regardless of what he tries to say.

Yeah, I'm the idiot because I predicted your loss the day before happened. Okay…

[mcduggly]

McDuggly - this has a been a great thread. Don't listen to the haters (this Luca Fury seems to be a joke). They are just jealous of the positive attention you have been getting. Looking forward to your NBA picks.

Just one thought on the system, I think that pro sports is tougher on this system. The disparity between pro teams is less than the disparity between college teams which leads to less upsets. All pro teams have quality coaching staffs and players. You don't always see quality staffs in college and some teams have no depth to help them compete.

In your previous win, you won a lot on college football. For basketball, did you find yourself more successful with NBA or NCAA?


Good luck with your future bets.

Thank you. I should have stuck with my college football picks throughout all attempts, but it sucks waiting a whole week to get 3 or maybe 4 picks in. In terms of basketball, I have a had monumental success with college basketball in this system, but also insert a pro basketball bet every so often that I feel comfortable with.

[tj0421]

Hey mcdug when and where are you going to start your next thread?

[Luca Fury]

That poor phaggot is still posting on this thread? He considers himself "proven" because he has followers on Twitter.

I made over $2,000 the last two days alone, going 11-3 those 2 days. Also, I was 22-8 on the week. And the last 4 weeks combined, I'm up 62 units and have a record of 145-74 (66.2%).

Meanwhile, you're "system" is 1-3 (25%) the past 4 weeks combined and only made about 50x less than I made.


You and all the other morons here can try and say all the bullshit you want to make yourselves feel better, but the facts don't lie.

[Luca Fury]

Also, I predicted that 49'ers vs Cardinals would be 17-0 at half time for the 49ers. Also predicted the final scored be around 34.

Well, it's halftime and the score is 17-0 for the 49ers. Phase 1 is completed, and phase 2 is looking good. That's what's called real handicapping. Not just blindly betting huge favorites.

[homerbush]

Luca i guess I don't get why not start your own thread instead of hijacking Mcduggly's thread?

[Luca Fury]

Luca i guess I don't get why not start your own thread instead of hijacking Mcduggly's thread?

I didn't hijack his thread. I gave polite, friendly, helpful advice and he replied by insulting me and starting a shit storm. He hijacked his own thread.

I politely gave my advice and was just going to move on, but then he had to attack me for no god damn reason. He's obviously extremely insecure and immature. There is absolutely no reason to attack somebody and insult them because they politely tried to give you a word of advice and help you out.

I'm laughing hard at you guys trying to make ME look like the bad guy here

[mcduggly]

Hey mcdug when and where are you going to start your next thread?

I'm not sure if I want to start tomorrow when the NBA starts or in a week when the college games start since I will focus primarily on college basketball plays. I will let you guys know.

Luca i guess I don't get why not start your own thread instead of hijacking Mcduggly's thread?

Hahaha, he's STILL posting here? Must not have enough Twitter followers.

[flyboy]

look at fury's spread sheat, Thats some genius betting right there!

[flyboy]

Betting Spreadsheet

Luca Fury







League:

NFL

From: To:

<<	September|2012
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
26	27	28	29	30	31	1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30	1	2	3	4	5	6

	October|2012					>>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
30	1	2	3	4	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30	31	1	2	3

Bet Type:

	Side
	ML
	Total
	1st Half
	2nd Half
	Prop

Sportsbooks:

10/29/2012 06:18 PM	NFL	+7SF/U Teaser	-130	1.3	1
10/29/2012 05:57 PM	NFL	+7SF/O Teaser	-130	1.3	1

No data to display.

Risked:

Won:

Lost:

Net:

[Luca Fury]

Betting Spreadsheet

Luca Fury









League:

NFL

From: To:

<<	September|2012
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
26	27	28	29	30	31	1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30	1	2	3	4	5	6

	October|2012					>>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
30	1	2	3	4	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30	31	1	2	3

Bet Type:

	Side
	ML
	Total
	1st Half
	2nd Half
	Prop

Sportsbooks:

10/29/2012 06:18 PM	NFL	+7SF/U Teaser	-130	1.3	1
10/29/2012 05:57 PM	NFL	+7SF/O Teaser	-130	1.3	1

No data to display.

Risked:

Won:

Lost:

Net:

Picks Per Page: 10 20 50 100 All

2 Total Picks

I just started doing the SBR spreadsheet today. And guess what? Both of my bets are looking like winners right now.

SF PK teased with over 30.5 at -130 and SF PK teased with under 45 at -130.

Both ARE smart bets that are looking good, so keep on hating...

[mcduggly]

Betting Spreadsheet

Luca Fury







League:

NFL

From: To:

<<	September|2012
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
26	27	28	29	30	31	1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30	1	2	3	4	5	6

	October|2012					>>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
30	1	2	3	4	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30	31	1	2	3

Bet Type:

	Side
	ML
	Total
	1st Half
	2nd Half
	Prop

Sportsbooks:

10/29/2012 06:18 PM	NFL	+7SF/U Teaser	-130	1.3	1
10/29/2012 05:57 PM	NFL	+7SF/O Teaser	-130	1.3	1

No data to display.

Risked:

Won:

Lost:

Net:

Picks Per Page: 10 20 50 100 All

2 Total Picks

He went negative units because of a few inches.

[flyboy]

Thats what his girlfriend said!

[Luca Fury]

Wow, I got ripped of that teaser with the over by half a friggin yard! Turnover on downs while fourth and goal on the half yard line. That touchdown also would've made the final score be a total of 34 points, completing my prediction. Lame result, but capping was clearly very accurate.

Oh well, 1-1 and only a tiny loss of .3 unit. Really should've been 2-0 -- that was a rip. Good thing I'm not a dumbass who bets all of my previous profit on each bet. I'm still up over $2,000 the past three days.

[mcduggly]

Thats what his girlfriend said!

I said inches, not centimeters.