Unique 350 experiment - 100 to 1000

Luca Fury · 10-29-12, 10:38 PM

Originally posted by mcduggly

He went negative units because of a few inches.

I'd much rather lose due to a rip off, than being on the clearly wrong side like you were in your losses. Accurate handicapping that loses simply due to bad luck is perfectly fine, because sharp players out run bad luck in the long-term. I suffered a tiny loss due to dumb luck but I'm still way up the past few days. Meanwhile, you lost all of your profit because your team lost by almost 30 points -- that's bad luck.

I'd much rather lose by a few inches and 4 points and keep almost all of my profit, than be like you and lose by a landslide and lose all profits. This is just more proof that my strategy and handicapping ability are far superior to yours.

Without that ripoff I would've been up 2 units. But even with an instance of horrible luck, I only lost .3 unit. Basically I risked .3 unit to win 2 unit. Worst case scenario, I take a tiny loss; Best case scenario, I make a nice profit. Obviously my handicapping was accurate and I should've made the profit, but even with the bad luck, I only took a tiny loss. That is far superior to laying juice upwards of -500 in a 12-15 team parlay where if one bet loses, you lose ALL your profit.

So you can sit here and laugh at me all you want, but this loss actually proves that my strategy is better than yours more than a win would have. Also the fact that you admitted I lost due to a rip off, just goes to show that my capping was indeed accurate. You inadvertently admitted it.

Luca Fury · 10-29-12, 10:41 PM

Originally posted by mcduggly

I said inches, not centimeters.

I've been calling you immature this whole thread, but I take that back. There's no way you're immature. You just must be like 14. Even immature adults don't make jokes like that. You must be a kid.

That would also help to explain why your decision making is so poor -- your brain hasn't fully developed yet

swordsandtequila · 10-30-12, 07:10 AM

Dude, let it go. You profess to not caring what others think. Prove it. You said your piece, now get lost. You offered your advice, the problem is it was unsolicited. If you need the attention, start a thread posting your plays. If you win, you'll get followers. My advice.

Erock87 · 10-30-12, 08:18 AM

I echo swords. You gave your advice, great, now you can sleep well at night knowing you tried to help a fellow gambler.

Right now you're just being a troll. When you first popped into this thread, my initial thought was "Hmm, maybe I'll follow him on twitter, because I'm always open to other people's opinion's on games." That has rapidly diminshed to "What is wrong with this guy where he has the need to justify himself, and attack others who are down?" It comes off as you are intimidated by others who might be successful. Regardless of your intentions, that's how it comes off.

You're up alot, great (on unposted plays). McD is up, too, on his posted plays. He is placing bets for himself, and tracking his plays. No one here follows him exclusively, and if they do, it's survival of the fittest in the gambling realm. Those who blindly tale will fizzle out, while those who put in the time to cap a game, will likely last a bit longer.

mcduggly · 10-30-12, 10:58 AM

Originally posted by Erock87

I echo swords. You gave your advice, great, now you can sleep well at night knowing you tried to help a fellow gambler.

Right now you're just being a troll. When you first popped into this thread, my initial thought was "Hmm, maybe I'll follow him on twitter, because I'm always open to other people's opinion's on games." That has rapidly diminshed to "What is wrong with this guy where he has the need to justify himself, and attack others who are down?" It comes off as you are intimidated by others who might be successful. Regardless of your intentions, that's how it comes off.

You're up alot, great (on unposted plays). McD is up, too, on his posted plays. He is placing bets for himself, and tracking his plays. No one here follows him exclusively, and if they do, it's survival of the fittest in the gambling realm. Those who blindly tale will fizzle out, while those who put in the time to cap a game, will likely last a bit longer.

I agree with everything you say.

rcyoder · 10-30-12, 11:40 AM

HELLO mcduggly will u be posting your system plays on nba/?? and if so where is the thread??

Thblur7 · 10-30-12, 02:55 PM

Luca Fury is acting like the 2k followers make him something special. 43% of your followers are inactive/fake.

Luca Fury · 10-31-12, 02:59 AM

Originally posted by Thblur7

Luca Fury is acting like the 2k followers make him something special. 43% of your followers are inactive/fake.

I just used the app and it says 6% of mine are fake and 37% are inactive. So what? That's the same for basically everyone.

Not surprising that some spam accounts followed me. Everybody has between 5-10% listed as fake, so 6% is fine. 94% real and only 4% spam is a great ratio considering all the spambots on Twitter.

As for inactive, that app says everyone has 30-50% inactive. I think there is something wrong with the way it determines what accounts are "inactive." No way EVERYONE can have that many inactive followers. I can understand 10-25%, but I've never seen anyone with less than 30% listed as "inactive" ones. The app must be flawed, but even if it's accurate, not my fault some of my followers either don't tweet or stopped using Twitter. They still followed me at some point.

khaden · 10-31-12, 07:54 AM

Can we stop with this bullshit and get back to business and make some $$$$$!!!!

solk7 · 10-31-12, 10:29 AM

Playing the NBA tonight? Dal is 1.227 @ Utah

tb1984 · 10-31-12, 11:39 AM

Luca, we all already know that you are smart and handsome, so can you leave us alone?

last-1-2-know · 10-31-12, 04:46 PM

Mcduggly....u gonna play bball???? u talked about it...am I missing something or did u start NBA plays in bball thread or u waiting for ncaa???

mcduggly · 10-31-12, 06:09 PM

Sorry everyone, I've just been waiting for college basketball. I will start a thread over in the college basketball section but will more than likely start it with playing some college football. The NBA is too risky to bet right away, as seen last night in the Lakers game where they were like -450 favorites. I know because I was tempted to start with them but managed to stay away because Dallas actually has a great roster this year.

haserfauld · 11-01-12, 12:15 AM

Originally posted by mcduggly

Sorry everyone, I've just been waiting for college basketball. I will start a thread over in the college basketball section but will more than likely start it with playing some college football. The NBA is too risky to bet right away, as seen last night in the Lakers game where they were like -450 favorites. I know because I was tempted to start with them but managed to stay away because Dallas actually has a great roster this year.

I wouldn't ever bet the Lakers when they've favored by more than 4.5

This coming from a huge Lakers fan. They are THE biggest "play to your competition" team in professional sports. The only thing they're consistent about is their inconsistency.

Brutus84 · 11-01-12, 12:26 AM

"Dallas actually has a good roster" Lol this guy is a fraud

Eagles27 · 11-01-12, 12:41 AM

Originally posted by Brutus84

"Dallas actually has a good roster" Lol this guy is a fraud

Dallas actually does have a pretty solid roster. Once Kaimen gets back they will be pretty solid, add Dirk and you have a playoff team

Parligod · 11-01-12, 01:46 AM

Fun thread I hope it keeps going on football side too.

mcduggly · 11-01-12, 06:12 AM

Originally posted by Brutus84

"Dallas actually has a good roster" Lol this guy is a fraud

Are you kidding me? Collison, Dorell Wright, OJ Mayo, Dirk, Brand, Beaubois, and Kaman are all solid pieces.

biggedge · 11-01-12, 06:23 AM

Originally posted by mcduggly

Are you kidding me? Collison, Dorell Wright, OJ Mayo, Dirk, Brand, Beaubois, and Kaman are all solid pieces.

Agreed on Dorell Wright. He plays for the 6ers, though. Brendan Wright? Not so sure about that guy yet...

whtsox13 · 11-01-12, 07:11 AM

Originally posted by Luca Fury

I just used the app and it says 6% of mine are fake and 37% are inactive. So what? That's the same for basically everyone.

Not surprising that some spam accounts followed me. Everybody has between 5-10% listed as fake, so 6% is fine. 94% real and only 4% spam is a great ratio considering all the spambots on Twitter.

As for inactive, that app says everyone has 30-50% inactive. I think there is something wrong with the way it determines what accounts are "inactive." No way EVERYONE can have that many inactive followers. I can understand 10-25%, but I've never seen anyone with less than 30% listed as "inactive" ones. The app must be flawed, but even if it's accurate, not my fault some of my followers either don't tweet or stopped using Twitter. They still followed me at some point.

Reasons to stop following Luca Furious on Twitter:
(A) bad picks
(B) he's annoying

Brutus84 · 11-01-12, 07:52 AM

Originally posted by Eagles27

Dallas actually does have a pretty solid roster. Once Kaimen gets back they will be pretty solid, add Dirk and you have a playoff team

Read his post.... then figure out what I was referring to. He was going to bet the Lakers then saw Dallas has a very good roster. When you place a bet and Dirk and Kaman aren't playing don't you factor that into the equation....lmao. I wish he had taken the Lakers tho since this "strategy" is stupid.

Brutus84 · 11-01-12, 07:56 AM

Originally posted by mcduggly

Are you kidding me? Collison, Dorell Wright, OJ Mayo, Dirk, Brand, Beaubois, and Kaman are all solid pieces.

Dirk and Kaman aren't playing. Your post had to do with the Lakers vs Dallas game for that night. I think Miami has a solid roster but if Lebron and Wade were out I wouldn't say "I decided not to take OKC against the Heat because I noticed the Heat have a good roster" You are a fraud man. Plus you will lose people money in the long run because they are going to lose one then start playing with more money especially when you win a few games. My guess is you are on the Chargers tonight. GL

tubguy · 11-01-12, 08:34 AM

where do u stand

tb1984 · 11-01-12, 10:10 AM

Originally posted by Brutus84

Dirk and Kaman aren't playing. Your post had to do with the Lakers vs Dallas game for that night. I think Miami has a solid roster but if Lebron and Wade were out I wouldn't say "I decided not to take OKC against the Heat because I noticed the Heat have a good roster" You are a fraud man. Plus you will lose people money in the long run because they are going to lose one then start playing with more money especially when you win a few games. My guess is you are on the Chargers tonight. GL

Brutus, come on, man. Why is mcduggly a fraud? Are we paying him anything for picks? Is he forcing people to play his picks? I think you should focus on your own thread, and stop bashing other people.

mcduggly · 11-01-12, 10:52 AM

Originally posted by Brutus84

Dirk and Kaman aren't playing. Your post had to do with the Lakers vs Dallas game for that night. I think Miami has a solid roster but if Lebron and Wade were out I wouldn't say "I decided not to take OKC against the Heat because I noticed the Heat have a good roster" You are a fraud man. Plus you will lose people money in the long run because they are going to lose one then start playing with more money especially when you win a few games. My guess is you are on the Chargers tonight. GL

Who won the game? Exactly. Even without Dirk and Kaman.

And no, I am not playing the chargers. They have looked awful the past several weeks and are unbettable at this point. One of the most inconsistent teams in the league right now.

Brutus84 · 11-01-12, 10:56 AM

I didn't have the Lakers either. But without dirk and kaman there roster is not good. The no play was good but reasoning was bad.

Eagles27 · 11-02-12, 12:32 AM

Originally posted by Brutus84

Read his post.... then figure out what I was referring to. He was going to bet the Lakers then saw Dallas has a very good roster. When you place a bet and Dirk and Kaman aren't playing don't you factor that into the equation....lmao. I wish he had taken the Lakers tho since this "strategy" is stupid.

Funny you should mention that, I was going to take Dallas initially, then saw they were missing Kaman (already knew dirk was out). Figured they would have Howard pound the ball all night. Come to find out, Phil Jackson isnt coaching anymore and I forgot to factor that in and lost my ass betting on the lakers lol

FreddDS · 11-02-12, 11:59 AM

Look at any early lines for tomorrows college football games, mcduggly?

mcduggly · 11-02-12, 03:39 PM

Originally posted by FreddDS

Look at any early lines for tomorrows college football games, mcduggly?

Yes, Louisville first half moneyline at -400 is the strongest one of the day and is in the first group of games.

tj0421 · 11-02-12, 04:02 PM

What do you think about Oklahoma?

Luca Fury · 11-03-12, 04:31 AM

Originally posted by whtsox13

Reasons to stop following Luca Furious on Twitter:
(A) bad picks
(B) he's annoying

"Bad picks" LOL! Coming from the guy who is so bad at gambling, he's resorted to scavenging the square internet forums for picks, then tailing some random guy's 15 team parlays because he thinks they will win longterm. You have no idea what bad picks are. Your opinion is worthless.

And good, don't follow me. I couldn't care less. Weather you follow me and make money, or don't follow me and miss out, makes no difference to me. It's your loss or gain either way, not mine. I'll keep stacking money and you can keep tailing the losing threads on here. Pretty obvious who gets the better end of that deal...

Luca Fury · 11-03-12, 04:43 AM

Originally posted by Brutus84

Read his post.... then figure out what I was referring to. He was going to bet the Lakers then saw Dallas has a very good roster. When you place a bet and Dirk and Kaman aren't playing don't you factor that into the equation....lmao. I wish he had taken the Lakers tho since this "strategy" is stupid.

No point in trying to use logic with the guys on here. They are far too dense to understand proper, logical analysis. The only language they speak is the kind that loses money.

mcduggly · 11-03-12, 09:32 AM

Originally posted by Luca Fury

"Bad picks" LOL! Coming from the guy who is so bad at gambling, he's resorted to scavenging the square internet forums for picks, then tailing some random guy's 15 team parlays because he thinks they will win longterm. You have no idea what bad picks are. Your opinion is worthless.

And good, don't follow me. I couldn't care less. Weather you follow me and make money, or don't follow me and miss out, makes no difference to me. It's your loss or gain either way, not mine. I'll keep stacking money and you can keep tailing the losing threads on here. Pretty obvious who gets the better end of that deal...

I haven't had a "15 team parlay" yet, fukking idiot. Can't even count. And according to your Twitter, you haven't been doing good at all lately because you keep getting "ripped" hahahahaha. Another phaggot who says he gets "ripped" every time he loses a bet. Grow the fukk up, shit happens in sports and when it goes in your favor you will be saying how you're a "genius" for predicting it right. Nobody on this forum likes you so stop posting, especially in my a thread that isn't even continuing anymore.

tj0421 · 11-03-12, 03:02 PM

What else looks good for this afternoon mcdug?

Luca Fury · 11-05-12, 01:18 AM

Originally posted by mcduggly

I haven't had a "15 team parlay" yet, fukking idiot. Can't even count. And according to your Twitter, you haven't been doing good at all lately because you keep getting "ripped" hahahahaha. Another phaggot who says he gets "ripped" every time he loses a bet. Grow the fukk up, shit happens in sports and when it goes in your favor you will be saying how you're a "genius" for predicting it right. Nobody on this forum likes you so stop posting, especially in my a thread that isn't even continuing anymore.

Yeah, this week went bad, but guess what? I still made $500 profit. You should know that, since you apparently look at my tweets.

$500 isn't bad by itself, but compared to what I usually make, it is. It's simply below my expectations, which is why I considered it to be bad.

I had a bad week, yet in those disappointing 7 days, I still made almost as much as you made in the entire past 2 months combined! A bad week for me is is about as profitable as a typical 8 week span for you.

A bad week for me = $500

An amazing week for you = $500

Not to mention, I made well over 2k last week. And the week before that. And over 1k the week before that, etc. Those are my typical week profits, which is why only making $500 is bad by my standards.

By the way, why were you looking at my tweets anyway? You say I'm soooo annoying and am such an idiot (even though the opposite has been proven true), yet you've gone out of your way to go to another website and search for my account to see what I'm saying? Hm, that's interesting, considering you supposedly can't stand me. You probably tail my bets on there since you can't win yourself, LOL!

Originally posted by mcduggly

I haven't had a "15 team parlay" yet, fukking idiot.

It takes you 12-15 teams to reach your goal of 100 into 1000, depending on the lines. Your only winning one took 12 and didn't even quite make the 1,000 mark, so it would have actually taken you 13 to win it. Besides, a 12 team parlay is just as as bad as 15 team one, LOL! Same thing basically -- just as dumb, but a slightly different number

. Anyone who knows anything about gambling would laugh at a strategy consisting of a dozen or more teams in parlays. It's a joke of an approach! Keep on defending it, though. The people tailing you will be angry at you in due time after it proves to lose money in the long run.

I've done what I wanted here, no need to waste anymore time in this thread. I tried to help you, then you reacted by bashing me for no reason . You started a shitstorm and I crushed you, outing you for the fool that you are. You can call me names all you want but at the end of a day my bets make money and yours don't. Nothing else to accomplish or prove here, Shutting you down was easy and fun. Mission complete, game over.