Nba road system 2010 - 11

[SOLAMAN]

NBA ROAD SYSTEM
HALVES / ATS
STARTING 2/7
UPDATE THRU 2/13
NET UNITS (-12.8)

PLAN A : SINGLE PLAY OPTION (-110)

LINE 1 / 3 LINE LABBY / P1/P4
6. 02/14 ...2.2 - 2.2 - 4.4 - 4.4 - 4.4 - 4.4 ..??????? (if no 1h/gm2 cover)
5. 02/13 ...2.2 - 2.2 - 4.4 - 4.4 - 4.4 ....6.6 TO WIN 6.0 (mia @ bos /1h)...LOSS (-6.6 UNITS)
4. 02/12....2.2 - 2.2 - 4.4 - 6.6 ......8.8 TO WIN 8.0 (sa @ wa /1h)... LOSS (-8.8 UNITS)
3. 02/11....2.2 - 2.2 - 4.4...............6.6 TO WIN 6.0 (por @ tor /1h) ..LOSS (-6.6 UNITS)
2. 02/09.....2.2 - 2.2 .....................4.4 TO WIN 4.0 (dal @ sac / 1h).. LOSS (-4.4 UNITS)
1. 02 /07....2.2 - 2.2 - 2.2 - 2.2 ...4.4 TO WIN 4.0 (chi @ por / 1h)...WIN / 4 UNITS

LINE 2 / 3 LINE LABBY / P2/P5
4. 02/13....2.2 - 2.2 - 4.4 - 4.4 ...6.6 TO WIN 6.0 (mia @ bos)...WIN / 6 UNITS
3. 02/12....2.2 - 2.2 - 2.2 - 2.2........4.4 TO WIN 4.0 (sa @ wa /2h)...LOSS (-4.4 UNITS)
2. 02/11....2.2 - 2.2.......................4.4 TO WIN 4.0 (por @ tor /2h)..WIN / 4 UNITS
1. 02/09....2.2 - 2.2 . 2.2 - 2.2 .....4.4 TO WIN 4.0 (dal @ sac / 2h)..WIN / 4 UNITS

LINE 3 / 3 LINE LABBY / P3/P6
1. 02-14....2.2 - 2.2 - 2.2 - 4.4 ........6.6 TO WIN 6.0 (sa @ nj /1h/gm2)

*P = PLAY OF SERIES

Comments:
LINE 1... 2.2 - 2.2 - 4.4 - .4.4 - 4.4 - 6.6
LINE 2 .. 2.2 - 4.4 -4.4
LINE 3....2.2 - 2.2 - 2.2 - 4.4


LINE ADJUSTMENT/ CONVERSION TO:

LINE 1... 2.2 - 2.2 - 4.4 - .4.4 - 4.4 - 4.4
LINE 2 .. 2.2 -2.2 - 4.4 -4.4.
LINE 3....2.2 - 2.2 - 2.2 - 4.4


PLAN B : MULTIPLAY OPTION
NET UNITS (-11.6)

LINE 1 / 3 LINE LABBY / P1/P4
9. 02/14....1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2 - 3.3 - 3.3 - 3.3..??? (if no 1h/gm2 cover)
8. 02/13 ...1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2 - 3.3 - 4.4....5.5 TO WIN 5.0 (lal @ orl /1h)..WON / 5 UNITS
7. 02/13....1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2 - 3.3 - 4.4....5.5 TO WIN 5.0 (mia @ bos/1h) ..LOSS (-5.5)
6. 02/13....1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2 - 3.3 - 4.4 ...5.5 TO WIN 5.0 (den @ mem/1h)..LOSS (-5.5)
5. 02/12....1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2 - 3.3 ......4.4 TO WIN 4.0 (phi @ mn / 1h)....LOSS (-4.4)
4. 02/12....1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2 - 3.3 ......4.4 TO WIN 4.0 (sa @ wa / 1h)....LOSS (-4.4)
3. 02/11....1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2...............3..3 TO WIN 3.0 (por @ tor /1h)....LOSS (-2.2)
2. 02/09.....1.1 - 1.1 .....................2.2 TO WIN 2.0 (dal @ sac / 1h).. LOSS (2.2)
1. 02 /07....1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 ...2.2 TO WIN 2.0 (chi @ por / 1h)...WIN / 2

LINE 2 / 3 LINE LABBY / P2/P5
6. 02/13....1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2....3.3 TO WIN 3.0 (mia @ bos/2h) ..WIN / 3UNITS
5. 02/13....1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2 ...3.3 TO WIN 3.0 (den @ mem/2h)..WIN / 3
4. 02/12....1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 ......2.2 TO WIN 2.0 (phi @ mn / 2h)....LOSS (-2.2)
3. 02/12....1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 ......2.2 TO WIN 2.0 (sa @ wa / 2h).....LOSS (-2.2)
2. 02/11....1.1 - 1.1.......................2.2 TO WIN 2.0 (por @ tor /2h)..WIN / 2
1. 02/09....1.1 - 1.1 . 1.1 - 1.1 .....2.2 TO WIN 2.0 (dal @ sac / 2h)..WIN / 2

LINE 3 / 3 LINE LABBY / P3/P6
1. 02/14 ......1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2 .....3.3 TO WIN 3.0 (sa @ nj / 1h gm2)

*P = PLAY OF SERIES

LINE 1: 1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2 - 3.3 - 4.4 - 5.5
LINE 2: 1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1
LINE 3: 1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1

LINE ADJUSTMENT / CONVERSION TO:

LINE 1: 1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2 - 3.3 - 3.3 - 3.3
LINE 2: 1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 -2.2
LINE 3: 1.1 - 1.1 - 1.1 - 2.2

[jas19illini]

Based on the current set-up, we need more 1st play covers. As mentioned several times this season when we were hitting at a 70% first play clip any system will work. I am not satisfied with the labby experiment after the first few days.

I will try to continue the labby updates until the allstar break. I just wanted to give it a trial run and show how it works. The labby requires more early covers than this month has provided based on its current set-up but I have noticed that if the first line was for the 1st and 2nd play , the second line was for the 3rd and 4th play and the third line was for the 5th and 6th play that the single option would be plus units. Also this set-up would make the multiplay option easier to use.

Thats a very good idea actually.

[oklahoma]

sounds good solaman. and it seems february was a tough month for this system anyway, after the break though games are already looking better
LAC @ OKC (2/22
UT @ DAL (2/23)
SAC @ ORL (2/23)

[thelimit0310]

We'll have to see how the labby ends up at the end of the season. Perhaps it is better all along to include the 1st and 2nd plays on line 1, 3rd and 4th on line 2, etc. I do not know because I have not been trailing the system, only watching. It could very well be that the limited progression method described in the first few posts is the best way to run this system...

However if your dividing your losses right (this is different from how solaman is doing it) I don't see how in the long run the labby won't work.

Still, where's JW Cash when ya need him!! He's been running the labby since season start and we could use his insight now more than any other time! Help JW!

[thelimit0310]

Also Solaman, I am very interested in your Parlay experiment, did you explain how it worked earlier in this thread? I would love to hear about it. Thanks

[Newbie1825]

NJ sucks ass they can score but they don't know how to defend!

[dogs1972]

This system is what sucks ass

[jphil]

gee, i wonder if the spurs are close to gettin fatigued yet.

[oklahoma]

This system is what sucks ass

we all appreciate your constructive opinions. dont hold back on your wonderful insight.

[stickbit]

I mentioned this before...you can split your losses and ADD them in to your last number...on line 1 and line 2. this is the 'aggressive labby' style... it takes a strong bankroll but you will recoup losses faster and clear lines quicker.


line 1: 10-10-10-10
line 2: 10-10-10-10
line 3: 10-10-10-10

if you lose a play today for example you take your $22 loss and split it - then ADD it onto your last line 1 and 2 numbers ....so

line 1: 10-10-10-21
line 2: 10-10-10-21
line 3: 10-10-10-10

[jas19illini]

I mentioned this before...you can split your losses and ADD them in to your last number...on line 1 and line 2. this is the 'aggressive labby' style... it takes a strong bankroll but you will recoup losses faster and clear lines quicker.


line 1: 10-10-10-10
line 2: 10-10-10-10
line 3: 10-10-10-10

if you lose a play today for example you take your $22 loss and split it - then ADD it onto your last line 1 and 2 numbers ....so

line 1: 10-10-10-21
line 2: 10-10-10-21
line 3: 10-10-10-10

What happens when you lose more than one game on the same line? Does the last number keep increasing, or do you split it up somehow?

[c-fut]

I thought we had a chance with NJ... but they let it slip away in the 1st half and then the 2nd also

[oklahoma]

What happens when you lose more than one game on the same line? Does the last number keep increasing, or do you split it up somehow?

ill have a go at your question, im pretty tired so apologies if i got it dead wrong.
if we lost 4 halves today(2 full games, and they were all at the same time) i imagine our lines would look like this.
line 1: 10-10-10-32
line 2: 10-10-10-74
line 3: 10-10-10-52
at this point the lines are a lot larger than hoped so you could add the last numbers in each line 32+74+52, subtract the original three 10's and see that we'd be down $128. now take the $128 and divide it so that its a reasonable number worth betting.
ex. 128/8 = 16 or 128/12 = 10.66(11)
these sums will be the bet amounts in your new lines. 8 bets of $16 or 12 bets of $11. of course now you have several extra lines to clear in whatever way you want.

[JW Cash]

Based on the current set-up, we need more 1st play covers. As mentioned several times this season when we were hitting at a 70% first play clip any system will work. I am not satisfied with the labby experiment after the first few days.

I will try to continue the labby updates until the allstar break. I just wanted to give it a trial run and show how it works. The labby requires more early covers than this month has provided based on its current set-up but I have noticed that if the first line was for the 1st and 2nd play , the second line was for the 3rd and 4th play and the third line was for the 5th and 6th play that the single option would be plus units. Also this set-up would make the multiplay option easier to use.

Ideally...you should have the following set up...

Line 1 1st Play 4th Play
Line 2 2nd Play 5th Play
Line 3 3rd Play 6th Play

And you should have your play weighted to plays that
have a higher pct to win....

Technical...if the First play doesnt win....the second play
should have a little more chance to cover....so you could
divide the First play loss and leave 40% on Line 1 and put
60% on Line 2....

Also do the same thing if 3rd Play loses...

A successful labby with this Road system isnt dependant on more
First play Wins...even though that would be beneficial.....

You can be in profit with a 50% Win pct.....of course, the higher that
pct...the bigger the profit......


.........................

[JW Cash]

Solamon.....

what is the actual W/L record of the system this year........Not the Series record
but the record of all the games that were played....

[JW Cash]

We'll have to see how the labby ends up at the end of the season. Perhaps it is better all along to include the 1st and 2nd plays on line 1, 3rd and 4th on line 2, etc. I do not know because I have not been trailing the system, only watching. It could very well be that the limited progression method described in the first few posts is the best way to run this system...

However if your dividing your losses right (this is different from how solaman is doing it) I don't see how in the long run the labby won't work.

Still, where's JW Cash when ya need him!! He's been running the labby since season start and we could use his insight now more than any other time! Help JW!

I havent run it since season's start...I only started the system on Jan 1...

Its important for Solamon NOT to judge the labby on just a few plays....and without looking at the season long results if it were used all along....

[bauerranch]

The cold streak is my fault- I just jumped on board. It always happens that way

[jphil]

make that a double whammie on my end.

[Crazygamble]

good luck keep up good work

[jas19illini]

Ideally...you should have the following set up...

Line 1 1st Play 4th Play
Line 2 2nd Play 5th Play
Line 3 3rd Play 6th Play

And you should have your play weighted to plays that
have a higher pct to win....

Technical...if the First play doesnt win....the second play
should have a little more chance to cover....so you could
divide the First play and leave 40% on Line 1 and put
60% on Line 2....

Also do the same thing if 3rd Play loses...


A successful labby with this Road system isnt dependant on more
First play Wins...even though that would be beneficial.....

You can be in profit with a 50% Win pct.....of course, the higher that
pct...the bigger the profit......


.........................

I had this same thought as well. Good feedback guys. Good core of people we have contributing in this thread. I'm excited to toy with my labby lines and try these new ideas out.

[JW Cash]

I had this same thought as well. Good feedback guys. Good core of people we have contributing in this thread. I'm excited to toy with my labby lines and try these new ideas out.

I have done a lot of experimenting with Labourchere

I have kinda settled in to a slightly aggressive 2 Line Labby...

On one of my systems using this approach a 12-10 W/L record netted
me + 6.6 Units.....

I wouldnt say that is to shabby.........................








....for a labby.........

[leafsfan19]

so that 3 line with plays 1 and 4 on line 1, etc. isnt what you use for the road system?

[SkivChef]

my labby experiment has really sucked, there is no way i'm goin to catch up. back to the drawing board.

[SOLAMAN]

NBA ROAD SYTEM
HALVES / ATS
FEB 2011

POR @ DEN (2/2), IND (2/4), CLE (2/5)........................WIN (2/6)

DAL @ NY (2/2), BOS (2/4), CHA (2/5).........................LOSS (0/6)

CHI @ POR (2/7), UT (2/9), NO (2/12)...........................WIN (1/6)

DAL @ SAC (2/9), DEN (2/10), HOU (2/12).................WIN (2/6)

POR @ TOR (2/11), DET (2/13), MN (2/14).................WIN (2/6)

SA @ WAS (2/12), NJ (2/14), CHI (2/17).....................PENDING (extended to the 3rd gm)

PHI @ MN (2/12), MEM (2/15), HOU (2/16).................PENDING (extended to the 2nd gm)

DEN @ MEM (2/13), HOU (2/14), MIL (2/16)..............WIN (2/6)

MIA @ BOS (2/13), IND (2/15), TOR (2/16).................WIN (2/6)

LAL @ ORL (2/13), CHA (2/14), CLE (2/16)...............WIN (1/6)

Comments: Looking at the SA @ CHI on 2/17..........

Chi has covered at least one half 19 of the last 20 games at home going back to early Dec. for 95%. They covered the 2nd half 16 of these 20 games but only the first half 9 of 20.

During these 20 games they played the following top rated teams....ORL, DAL, MIA, BOS, LAL AND OKC and covered 9 of 12 halves plus Chi covered at least one half for each game (6 of 6). It seems that Chi plays its "A" game against quality opponents.

Also, great input on the labby. The last few days I gave my version with daily updates. This month has been rough and a tough time to do labby updates but I still believe the labby has potential.

[imotiv8]

thanks Soloman for your research!!

[jas19illini]

I have done a lot of experimenting with Labourchere

I have kinda settled in to a slightly aggressive 2 Line Labby...

On one of my systems using this approach a 12-10 W/L record netted
me + 6.6 Units.....

I wouldnt say that is to shabby.........................








....for a labby.........

I see what you did there.....

[jas19illini]

Ideally...you should have the following set up...

Line 1 1st Play 4th Play
Line 2 2nd Play 5th Play
Line 3 3rd Play 6th Play

And you should have your play weighted to plays that
have a higher pct to win....

Technical...if the First play doesnt win....the second play
should have a little more chance to cover....so you could
divide the First play loss and leave 40% on Line 1 and put
60% on Line 2....

Also do the same thing if 3rd Play loses...

A successful labby with this Road system isnt dependant on more
First play Wins...even though that would be beneficial.....

You can be in profit with a 50% Win pct.....of course, the higher that
pct...the bigger the profit......


.........................

I think im gonna try this with a 33/66% split between Lines. Starting tonight.

[madmiek]

Lets keep it going guys, 1 bad beat but lets keep them coming,

[JJV]

I don't think there's anyway pacers going to cover first half today, its like a massacre in the first quarter

[dlunc3]

why are you on the pacers?

[JJV]

don't know just want to give it a try

[Newbie1825]

I don't think there's anyway pacers going to cover first half today, its like a massacre in the first quarter

did I miss something? I did not know the Pacers were a bet today?

[jas19illini]

Give what a try???

[jas19illini]

Wonderful 1st Half cover tonight by our boys in Memphis.

[madmiek]

did I miss something? I did not know the Pacers were a bet today?

No pacers not a play today, the only play today was memphis i think.