sounds good
John morrison 2010 mlb system
Collapse
X
-
peterpan19Restricted User
- 11-02-08
- 3377
#2031
After Wednesday's extra-inning loss in Arizona, Mets manager Jerry Manuel said that he planned to sit Carlos Beltran, Jason Bay and Rod Barajas for the series opener against the Dodgers on Thursday night.
sounds goodComment -
dukiplSBR Sharp
- 04-08-09
- 376
#203222.07
LAD [a bet] vs. NY Mets odd 1,56 @ pinnacle - play MLComment -
pollitoRestricted User
- 02-17-10
- 347
#2033Yes, the difference is .026, the RPI difference is so close to .025 that you should pass on this series...if Arizona wins tonight SF won't be a v3.0 play tomorrow because the RPI diff. will go below .025.
The only play tonight is LA Dodgers (A Bet)
GL to AllComment -
stevexSBR Hall of Famer
- 05-02-10
- 5122
#2034San Fran will win tonight
stevexComment -
cloroSBR High Roller
- 07-15-10
- 162
#2035Good Luck to everyone today!
Comment -
pollitoRestricted User
- 02-17-10
- 347
#2036What I posted above is sctrictly from JM system point of view.
I also like San Francisco tonight, plus it is Power Play's POD and they've been on fire!
Anything you guys decide to do, BOL.Comment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#2037Originally posted by pollitoWhat I posted above is sctrictly from JM system point of view.
I also like San Francisco tonight, plus it is Power Play's POD and they've been on fire!
Anything you guys decide to do, BOL.
Do u post powerplay picks somewhere?Comment -
Kev the BritSBR MVP
- 10-25-09
- 2027
#2038Yes, the instantaneous RPI differential between the 2 teams is only 1 factor (although large). I have recently been researching RPI "convergence" to see if any lessons can be learned and games avoided due to declining form in the selected team and/or improving form in the opposing team.
I 've been examining the RPI movement of both teams over their last 10 games (I print and keep the daily RPI sheets) and if the combined RPI movement indicates convergence (ie the differential is reducing in favour of the opponent) of more than an average of .001 per game, over the 10 games, I disregard the play. This would have saved me 2 large lost bets this season. It would also have reduced the action but thats not important.
So, SFO tonight is solid. The RPI differential over the last 10 games has slightly increased in SFO's favour. Although there is a possibility of SFO losing the A bet and dipping to .025 differential, a B or C bet should prove successful.
Regards
Kev the StatComment -
jphilSBR Wise Guy
- 07-12-09
- 757
#2039
It cracks me up how most of this season a lot of us have tried to pick this sys. to pieces, & twist it around this way & that like a pretzel, along w/ the shoulda, coulda, woulda's, while some others just sit back & continually ask what the plays are for each day, when they were just posted 1 post back. I'm not really knockin 'em; as a matter of fact, they're just laid back, playin every damn play that's mentioned, & probably makin out like bandits. 
I just think it's comical how this HYPNOTIST f--k jm can get some people so caught up, while he just breezes along, changing every damn rule of his,at any time he so desires; & we somehow adjust accordingly till he fudges something else down the road; then it's back to the drawing board boyz.
Chinese Torture!!
Another v3 possibility down the drain for us system die hards. Congrats again to the faders w/ tonights sf win.
Come on dodgers!!
Comment -
stevexSBR Hall of Famer
- 05-02-10
- 5122
#2040No plays this weekend as far as JM Systems go.....someone correct me if I'm wrong?
I'm sure there will be something official coming up on Monday, congrats on the Dodger and San Fran (for those that played them) win!
stevexComment -
dukiplSBR Sharp
- 04-08-09
- 376
#2041With the Dodgers win thats 16-1 for the JM v1 system plays.Comment -
harrySBR Sharp
- 10-15-09
- 273
#2042That 1 is a 2Originally posted by dukiplWith the Dodgers win thats 16-1 for the JM v1 system plays.Comment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#2043Anyone playing the unofficial play B bet tonight!Comment -
h00diniRestricted User
- 09-17-09
- 659
#204416-2. he has along ways to go before calling this a winning season.Comment -
pollitoRestricted User
- 02-17-10
- 347
#2045According to my records, this season is 18-2, not 16-1Comment -
dlunc3SBR Hall of Famer
- 10-31-09
- 9129
#2046Just wanted to throw my two cents in here real quick...
I have been following JM baseball the last few years. What I do, and has worked very well for me, is created my own filters within his filters. The games that fall under my filters, I bet A LOT more on then the normal v1 bets. To meet my filters, I look at the team that meets the V1 filters of JM. If this team has #1: a higher RPI rating then the team they are playing, and #2: is playing at home, they would then meet my filters. An upcoming series that looks like will be falling under my filters is the Mets vs the Dbacks on the 29th. The mets will be a V1 play, but they will also be at home and will also have a better RPI rating then the Dbacks. I will be on them big! So just wanted to let you guys in on what I have found to be profitable and as close to a lock as I can find.... good luck the rest of the season..Comment -
cmdyrdsSBR Wise Guy
- 08-20-09
- 522
#2047thanks for sharing the insight.Originally posted by dlunc3Just wanted to throw my two cents in here real quick...
I have been following JM baseball the last few years. What I do, and has worked very well for me, is created my own filters within his filters. The games that fall under my filters, I bet A LOT more on then the normal v1 bets. To meet my filters, I look at the team that meets the V1 filters of JM. If this team has #1: a higher RPI rating then the team they are playing, and #2: is playing at home, they would then meet my filters. An upcoming series that looks like will be falling under my filters is the Mets vs the Dbacks on the 29th. The mets will be a V1 play, but they will also be at home and will also have a better RPI rating then the Dbacks. I will be on them big! So just wanted to let you guys in on what I have found to be profitable and as close to a lock as I can find.... good luck the rest of the season..Comment -
CatPulpSBR Sharp
- 11-13-09
- 265
#2048Thanks for sharing, dlunk3, it makes a good deal of sense (at least to me).Comment -
hockey1980SBR Sharp
- 04-15-10
- 365
#2049Never to early to have JM plug his NFL football Sh!t.... got the email this morning....a new system last year, don't remember his season record & if it was a money making.....
Is anyone playing the WNBA chase,.....it had a loss or two last yearComment -
SpookyFellowSBR MVP
- 08-01-09
- 1687
#2050I will try this filter. If JM is reading this thread, maybe he will sell this filter as version 4.
Comment -
stickbitSBR Sharp
- 03-09-08
- 265
#2051Does anyone know if it's worth it to do a 2 game reverse on the official games if the 'a' bet covers? For example take nym tonight since lad won the a bet?Comment -
pollitoRestricted User
- 02-17-10
- 347
#2052Just wait for the next play, be intelligent and pacient.Originally posted by stickbitDoes anyone know if it's worth it to do a 2 game reverse on the official games if the 'a' bet covers? For example take nym tonight since lad won the a bet?Comment -
calinalex2008SBR Rookie
- 05-30-10
- 18
#2053By the way ,when is the next game ?Comment -
pollitoRestricted User
- 02-17-10
- 347
#2054mondayComment -
cloroSBR High Roller
- 07-15-10
- 162
#2055next play 26.07
FLA @ Sfo
BOL!Comment -
pollitoRestricted User
- 02-17-10
- 347
#2056...and LA Angels vs. BostonComment -
pollitoRestricted User
- 02-17-10
- 347
#2057Mets vs. Arizona will be friday 30th. and if you all do this you will minimize the loses, this is actually a very smart move!Originally posted by dlunc3Just wanted to throw my two cents in here real quick...
I have been following JM baseball the last few years. What I do, and has worked very well for me, is created my own filters within his filters. The games that fall under my filters, I bet A LOT more on then the normal v1 bets. To meet my filters, I look at the team that meets the V1 filters of JM. If this team has #1: a higher RPI rating then the team they are playing, and #2: is playing at home, they would then meet my filters. An upcoming series that looks like will be falling under my filters is the Mets vs the Dbacks on the 29th. The mets will be a V1 play, but they will also be at home and will also have a better RPI rating then the Dbacks. I will be on them big! So just wanted to let you guys in on what I have found to be profitable and as close to a lock as I can find.... good luck the rest of the season..Comment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#2058What is this RPI means?Comment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#2060Thx, but what does the numbers means?Comment -
pollitoRestricted User
- 02-17-10
- 347
#2061It meassures the efficiency of each team, day by day.
In order to be official, the RPI of the team you are betting on must be not lower than .015 than its opponent.Comment -
jose21_usSBR MVP
- 05-24-10
- 3844
#2062Is his football shit any good?Comment -
pollitoRestricted User
- 02-17-10
- 347
#2063Last year 21-0 (15 won in the A Bet, 5 in the B Bet and only 1 in the C Bet)Originally posted by jose21_usIs his football shit any good?
Don't even think about buying the system, you can get it for free here easily.Comment -
Exodus52SBR Rookie
- 03-19-10
- 30
#2064I was wondering does the RPI start at 0 when its the start of the baseball season or do they use the old season rating and continue from there?
does the opponents's opponents weightage carry over too?Comment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#2065But the difference between mets and diamondbacks are much more Tham 015, mets 509 and diamondbacks 478, or i'm i wrong?Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
