No game today?
-
Comment -
I think, there are some unofficial plays tonight: Arizona (A), Pittsburgh (A), Baltimore (A), Seattle (B). Is that right?Comment -
Yes, all of them unofficial.
If Baltimore wins tonight, tomorrow Toronto will be an official v3.0 play, the same with Arizona, if they win tonight, tomorrow San Diego will be an official v3.0 play, and I believe that if Pittsburgh wins tomorrow Houston could be a v3.0 play as well.Comment -
where do you get this info from?Comment -
Baltimore, Arizona and Pittsburgh
Yeah all 3 have (Baltimore, Arizona, Pittsburgh)to win in order to have plays for tomorrow and this info comes from John Morrison's MLB system.Comment -
Looks like Un-officials are doing better the officials!Comment -
jm(unoff.) faders are tearin up.Comment -
So the unoff. record is 2 losses. Fine. Thankyou. That satisfies my & others' curiosity; irregardless of the fact that jm doesn't touch those stats, as far as i know.
V1 record is definately 2 losses. jm's record on his website is 1 loss (sf). Didn't get a v1 e-mail on july 16th for some reason(someone else seems to have had though, unless it was a v3 e-mail they were talkin about). Usually in his v1 e-mails(after clickin on the link for that day's plays) he lists at the bottom of the pg., his current win/loss record. That's what i'd like to see, if he ever decides to post those results again in his v1 e-mails. Basically, i'd like to see that 2nd verification that he didn't list pitt. as a loss so i have HIS stats straight, before i e-mail him w/my rebukes, concerning the pitt. falicy. For 1, when are we to receive his updated v1 stating, to quit in the middle of a series if the rpi should change for the worse? For 2, thanx again for the pitt. warning, you ...k!
V3 record seems to have no jm losses(courtesy of stevex's sharpness w/ the -115 or less rule, w/tor. series).
To whoever may receive jm's v3 e-mails:
-Does jm have the same "results listing" of current v3's, as he does in v1 mailings?
-If so, can someone post it next time?
Comment -
Compared to last year, his MLB system for this season sucks. The same goes with the NBA. Under these circumstances what would people do next year?Comment -
jphil:No. He simply gives the A Bet in an e-mail with an occasional statement about how the series is performing this season. So far, since the V3 "failure", he hasn't hasn't mentioned the stats in any e-mail (there hasn't been a V3 bet anyway). He doesn't send e-mails for the B and C bets. The subscriber is reminded to play the B and C bets if required.To whoever may receive jm's v3 e-mails:
-Does jm have the same "results listing" of current v3's, as he does in v1 mailings?
I'll post any e-mail he sends with his stats on, when it arrives.
Regards
KevLast edited by Kev the Brit; 07-17-10, 03:40 PM.Comment -
The next official bet I can see is for monday San Francisco @ LA Dodgers, Bet on SFC, Good RPI, SFC just .04 less as of today and seem to be playing well, any thoughts?Comment -
Are the dodgers an unoficial d bet tomorow?Comment -
Comment -
The only official play tomorrow is San Francisco, the RPI differential is only .001Comment -
Alright folks there will be an official A bet on San Fran tomorrow. Now here is the situation. San Fran will be going in as a low dog (+110 or around there) so we're going to have to play the +1 1/2 RL on them, BUT the juice is going to be ridiculous (-200 or even higher) so just seeing what everyone is going to do here tomorrow.....
1. **** it, just going to play the +1 1/2 with the high juice on the Giants.
2. Since the Rays swept the O's last series and have a .069 higher RPI do a reverse Version 3 bet on the Rays tomorrow (Juice is up there, but not as bad you can get it around -170).
3. I might actually take this route. The White Sox swept the Mariners last series and have a .035 higher RPI than them so you can also do a reverse version 3 bet on the White Sox tomorrow and the juice is excellent on them (-120 or even less).
Just some food for thought tomorrow, I know the official play is on San Fran, but just trying to see what everyone thinks with the other avenues you could also take.
stevexComment -
there seems to have been less bets this year as wellComment -
John Morrison is the man don't forget that
Comment -
John Morrison's Sports Betting Champ Official System Pick(s)
7/19 San Francisco [A]
LA Dodgers
My research tells me that this betting series is absolutely and literally 100% guaranteed to win!
Lol, what an idiot!Comment -
100% to win a game or cover a game at +1.5, what a complete jackass.Comment -
No, if Seattle wins tonight, Chixago White Sox will be an official v3.0 play tomorrow (RPI difference is .031) and if Baltimore wins tonight, Tampa Bay will be an official v3.0 play tomorrow (RPI difference is .069).
If Pittsburgh wins tonight, Milwaukee might or might not be a v3.0 play, the RPI difference right now is .028, so it could go below .025 not making it eligible, so I would stay away from this one.
The right way to go would be to play San Francisco in the +1.5 Run Line (-210) and Chicago White Sox in the ML (-110) and Tampa Bay in the ML (-175)Comment -
what is your opinion over the serie of arizona - san diego ?
v3 lost ! again !
am i wright or not ?Comment -
Arizona - San Diego were unofficial. It never became V3. It would be SD V3 if Arizona could win first play.Comment -
The White Sox are currently -115 or better, so I would advise the alternate (+1.5) RL if you decide to play the pre-emptive V3
Regards
KevComment -
Kev with the 'Reverse' version 3 you just take the ML on the first game because even if they lose by 1 it still becomes an official Version 3 the next day regardless....
stevexComment -
Pollito which direction are you going to take for tonights games?
stevexComment -
It's not really a "reverse" play, it's only to take advantage of something JM hasn't look at yet.
But I'm pretty sure he will throw a v4.0 soon with this "correction", which is to bet on the team that previously did the sweep when the RPI difference is higher than .025, that way you'll get 3 chances instead of the actual 2 you get with v3.0Comment -
I understand what you are both saying, but my advice is consistent with JM's rule regarding odds of/better than -115. Lets say that they lose tonight by 1 run on the ML. Sure, they will qualify for a V3 A bet on Tue but it is effectively a B Bet because there will only be one game left in the series (Wed) as a back up. The -115 rule represents the liklihood that the selected team might not win straight up and I believe it should be used at any time in a 3-game series, to increase the chance of winning the unit at the earliest opportunity. We suffered from this problem with a V3 bet a few weeks ago, didn't we?
I guess its up to everyone to decide for themselves how to play these marginal games.
Regards
KevComment
When i recouperate in a couple yrs., i'll have to sign up w/ v3. 
