John morrison 2010 mlb system

**monostereo** · 07-28-10, 02:24 AM

Originally posted by Betting-Eye

When following a system you must do excactly as the the system demands. So it be 28% on my bank on the Angels. But if it loses then i have enough to continue and make it up as I have other systems i bet on. So if one system drops the ball the others can pick it up but i have to bet about 2-4% though. Most are 2% though. Nope being stretched aint nice but its part of it. So next bet is 560 pounds on the
angels.

Hey confident are we all on the C bet?

Yea i hear you on this one mate ! I will push it and make a prayer!

Guess im gonna need suggestions on how to recover this if the shit hits the fan!

**Matweizman** · 07-28-10, 02:25 AM

Pack your bags and flee the country

**Betting-Eye** · 07-28-10, 02:32 AM

I learned now that I must be ready to fight back if a series does lose. Which it does once in a while. But hey its still cool with the C bet and we get the run line i think . I wonder what my email will say with Morrison. Anyone think that C bet is the most likely to win compared to A and B?

**stevex** · 07-28-10, 02:49 AM

Just to let everyone aware of what's going on there is going to be an official C bet on the Angels today, but make sure you take the ALT RL at +1 1/2 because the Angels opened at -106. Good luck!

stevex

**SpookyFellow** · 07-28-10, 03:27 AM

LA Angels are underdogs, so just take the regular RL. Good Luck!

**SportsPicks3434** · 07-28-10, 03:40 AM

Whats the record of this craziness so far this season?

**Simba** · 07-28-10, 04:53 AM

J.Weaver did well up to top 7th two out...just Angels batters should have supported him much more than that.
I will make my wager this series to be push not to be making profit. In my opition, Josh Beckett would make something different this time..to bounce back to his position. No.1 starter in Boston previously. Meanwhile Angels batters are seemingly not good at all..Personally think under the total is quite tempting.. anyway good luck to all you guys on this [C] bet. 3 losses in a year is highly unlikely as I believe.

**darkdracos** · 07-28-10, 07:30 AM

Wow... Glad I missed out on the A-bet this time. Juice is WAY high on the RL at my book (BetUS unfortunately). Hope everyone else gets tonight's bet for a good price. Any suggestions for a good book that allows U.S. play?

**Betting-Eye** · 07-28-10, 08:08 AM

No Runline?

I use Bet365 and they are the Favourites so its the Money line for me . I hope they do win though.

**monostereo** · 07-28-10, 08:27 AM

ML on angels or what? Unibet says 1,90 on both

**Betting-Eye** · 07-28-10, 08:33 AM

Yes. The teams changed from being joint 1,96 Favs to in the end Angels becoming Favs once the Run lines opened. How is it with you guys. Did some of you get the run line that early on. I wasnt able to. So I hope the Angels win just like Morrison says in his email: "I have absolutely no doubt that the Angels will pull it away today!"
So lets see. A 3rd loss already in his system? And it being undefeated before this season? What is happening now? Crazy!

**Betting-Eye** · 07-28-10, 08:33 AM

Conviction

I hope this will give us a no worries win for us all. Fingers crossed. Are we convinced?

**monostereo** · 07-28-10, 08:43 AM

I go ML! Got a very bad feeling but hey, fu** it

Lets get retarded !

**Grecdogg** · 07-28-10, 08:47 AM

LOL Im with ya Mono, ML was at -110 for both teams... Im heavy on it! BOL to us, and hopefully we dont get retarted!

**rickbo528** · 07-28-10, 08:58 AM

This system sucks. I'm done with it. If you think Angels will magically start hitting today you are living in the land of Oz. There were much better options last night. I almost split B bet between White Sox and Blue Jays. Both over early. Jays 8-2 and Sox 11-0. But others say follow the system. Well the system is headed for it's bankroll destroying 3rd loss today. I will try other games today to try getting it back. You can't chase a team that CAN't HIT when there are others that can hit. I'm down big now and if I had followed my gut I would be up big. MUCH better options out there than paying ungodly high juice on a +1.5 RL only to see Angels lose by 2 or more. Never again will I trust this system.

**harry** · 07-28-10, 09:14 AM

Originally posted by monostereo

ML on angels or what? Unibet says 1,90 on both

Anything above 1.85 ish is dodgy ground for playing the ML.

JM will just say they were dogs even if they weren't if your not careful.
Play the systems your own way anyway... playing it JM's way over the last year (NBA and MLB) would not be very good on your cash flow!

**harry** · 07-28-10, 09:20 AM

Originally posted by rickbo528

This system sucks. I'm done with it. If you think Angels will magically start hitting today you are living in the land of Oz. There were much better options last night. I almost split B bet between White Sox and Blue Jays. Both over early. Jays 8-2 and Sox 11-0. But others say follow the system. Well the system is headed for it's bankroll destroying 3rd loss today. I will try other games today to try getting it back. You can't chase a team that CAN't HIT when there are others that can hit. I'm down big now and if I had followed my gut I would be up big. MUCH better options out there than paying ungodly high juice on a +1.5 RL only to see Angels lose by 2 or more. Never again will I trust this system.

I agree with you in some respects but baseball is unbelievably unpredictable.

You say teams that can hit... The Phillies have games where they can hit 10 runs a game, then 0 for long streaks. The Sox are one of the most unpredictable teams in the league... they won 25 out of 30 up to the allstar break... based on their start who would have had the guts to take them in half those games, the most random turn around!

This season has just been difficult

Maybe ready for NBA to come back!!!!

**million2one** · 07-28-10, 09:25 AM

Originally posted by Betting-Eye

Yes. The teams changed from being joint 1,96 Favs to in the end Angels becoming Favs once the Run lines opened. How is it with you guys. Did some of you get the run line that early on. I wasnt able to. So I hope the Angels win just like Morrison says in his email: "I have absolutely no doubt that the Angels will pull it away today!"
So lets see. A 3rd loss already in his system? And it being undefeated before this season? What is happening now? Crazy!

It wasn't undefeated before this season JM twists logic and alters his record to pretend it is undefeated, don't believe that one.
Three losses in one season does seem odd though, not sure if I have ever seen that.

**pollito** · 07-28-10, 09:58 AM

Originally posted by million2one

It wasn't undefeated before this season JM twists logic and alters his record to pretend it is undefeated, don't believe that one.
Three losses in one season does seem odd though, not sure if I have ever seen that.

Last sesason was 49-0, i played myself every single series.

**peterpan19** · 07-28-10, 10:04 AM

worst case if you got the line early, which you should:
Game 1 -110 down 1.1
Game 2 -130 (1+1.1)*1.3= 2.73
Game 3 -105 (1+2.73 (G2) +1.1 (G1))* 1.05 = 5.07
total loss: 1.1+2.73+5.07= 8.9 units
or if you skip the C bet today only 3.83 units down...

**ericc** · 07-28-10, 11:08 AM

Has anyone noticed that the Angels are a slight favorite on the moneyline but that most of the books are still giving the Angels +1½ on the runline?

**million2one** · 07-28-10, 11:18 AM

Im not just talking about last year, JM claims (before this season) that this system has not lost in six years. I've known about this for many years and it has suffered multiple losses in years past (yes last season was undefeated). But escaping last season with no losses just increased the chances of multiple losses for this season. What are the odds the system goes two years in a row with an undefeated record. Again I am looking at this over years and years, there seems to be a pattern like this.

**NIK kID** · 07-28-10, 11:42 AM

does florida v.s. sfco its a official game or not?????

**pollito** · 07-28-10, 12:23 PM

Originally posted by NIK kID

does florida v.s. sfco its a official game or not?????

No, the only official play tonight is LA Angels (C Bet).
BTW it's not a v2.0 play anymore, it's a v1.0 C Bet and it must be played on the +1.5 RUN LINE.

**NIK kID** · 07-28-10, 12:24 PM

ty pollito

**monostereo** · 07-28-10, 01:35 PM

Originally posted by ericc

Has anyone noticed that the Angels are a slight favorite on the moneyline but that most of the books are still giving the Angels +1½ on the runline?

Yeah this is very bothering! Well, i went for ML. I will probably be toast tonight....

Ricbo.... well i dont know what to say? Perhaps your right, maybe not... but yes i have a bad feeling...

Grecdogg - nice to see that someone is following me into the fires of mordor XD - Believe and you shall overcome! Hoah!

GL all!

**July1stNe** · 07-28-10, 01:41 PM

pollito u rock

**stevex** · 07-28-10, 01:42 PM

The juice is pretty high on the +1 1/2 for the Angels but at this point I'd rather break even then try to make profit from this series so taking the RL is just the way to go for this game, especially since the Angels bats have been dead for this series.

stevex

**Sultan** · 07-28-10, 02:02 PM

in my book the +1.5 it is for boston, should i take the ml of angels? or what to do?..

**hockey1980** · 07-28-10, 02:25 PM

lock-n-loaded for the "c" bet....BOL guys... played the run line +1.5...

**pollito** · 07-28-10, 02:26 PM

Originally posted by Sultan

in my book the +1.5 it is for boston, should i take the ml of angels? or what to do?..

Look for the ALTERNATE RUN LINE, it should be LAA +1.5 at somewhere around -180

**hockey1980** · 07-28-10, 02:27 PM

sultan... the play is rl +1.5 LAA....look at the alt lines...be wise juice could be rich....

**killer59** · 07-28-10, 02:30 PM

Lucky you - in bet365 I have to bet ML... Pretty sucks and I still doubt it!!!!

**dwendling** · 07-28-10, 02:31 PM

pinero is out for the angels

**Sultan** · 07-28-10, 02:33 PM

it sucks cause in the alternative rl it is the same boston +1.5, it doesnt change..

i think im gonna stay away, i dont want to play ml..

or do you think that i should play ml?.-