I look back and she guts it out to get back to 4-3.
3 double faults a piece so far.
Comment
SirtySree
SBR MVP
12-19-13
2370
#177
Originally posted by SCI
I look back and she guts it out to get back to 4-3.
3 double faults a piece so far.
Obviously this is the first time you have betted on a WTA match.
Just wait till the match is actually over. No scoreline is safe in WTA.
Comment
SCI
SBR Sharp
12-09-05
423
#178
4 doubles and 1/8 (12%) on 2nd serves and she's still up 5-3!
Comment
SCI
SBR Sharp
12-09-05
423
#179
Originally posted by SirtySree
Obviously this is the first time you have betted on a WTA match.
Just wait till the match is actually over. No scoreline is safe in WTA.
Nope, I just like talking my way through Women's matches. I try to stay away, but they pull me back in.
Comment
SCI
SBR Sharp
12-09-05
423
#180
I can usually tell when it's bad news in any tennis match. The biatch was getting away with murder for most of the 1st set. She finishes with 9 doubles and 5/27 (18%) on 2nd serves. Needless to say, she needs to go work that out if she wants to ever get into the top 100.
Comment
felix_felicus7
SBR High Roller
04-19-13
175
#181
$300 on Kichenok in the qualifier? You must have seen a significant edge there Matt to go so big.
Comment
Hardcoar
SBR Posting Legend
02-17-13
15606
#182
Naw it's nothing but change to Matt.
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#183
Hey guys, poor pick on my part above. I wager according to my bankroll. Lately I have been hitting the live plays more often than my posted plays. Will update record later today
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#184
Paire ML + Andujar/Omarch 2.02 x 5 units
Comment
unlearn
SBR Hall of Famer
03-22-14
9030
#185
Originally posted by matt1216
Hey guys, poor pick on my part above. I wager according to my bankroll. Lately I have been hitting the live plays more often than my posted plays. Will update record later today
It must be nice to have an unlimited bankroll. ETA on new thread?
Comment
felix_felicus7
SBR High Roller
04-19-13
175
#186
Originally posted by matt1216
Hey guys, poor pick on my part above. I wager according to my bankroll. Lately I have been hitting the live plays more often than my posted plays. Will update record later today
Yeah, I reckon you've been more restrained with the parlays (apart from that last Paire chaser), but at approx -35 units you'd certainly wanna be hitting a higher % of live plays comparatively. Also, everyone wagers according to their bankroll - just some are more degen about it. At the start of the thread you mentioned a 0.5 unit, but you've scarcely even used it for any dogs. Actually, if you'd employed the Constanza Principle since last year you'd be up +250 units ;-)
Actually, if you'd employed the Constanza Principle since last year you'd be up +250 units ;-)
felix, can you elaborate on this? (or is a cultural reference i'm not hip to?)
Comment
felix_felicus7
SBR High Roller
04-19-13
175
#188
Fitguy! Yep, sorry to hijack the thread btw Matt, its a Seinfeld reference where you literally just do the opposite of what your natural instincts tell you. Woulda saved me a lot of cash ;-)
Comment
SirtySree
SBR MVP
12-19-13
2370
#189
Originally posted by felix_felicus7
Fitguy! Yep, sorry to hijack the thread btw Matt, its a Seinfeld reference where you literally just do the opposite of what your natural instincts tell you. Woulda saved me a lot of cash ;-)
Matt's already done the fade himself strategy in one of his earlier threads.
Comment
BennyBigNuts
SBR Hall of Famer
04-16-12
8700
#190
Originally posted by unlearn
It must be nice to have an unlimited bankroll. ETA on new thread?
65 posts and nothing but trolling
Stay the fukk out of the thread if you dont like it you fukkin punk pussie
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#191
Yeah, I'm going to start being a bit more dicipline here. im down units, but I usually do very well live wagering do to my "cashout" theory at B E T 365... I've already noticed a ton of fixes at the ITF level
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#192
Originally posted by matt1216
Yeah, I'm going to start being a bit more dicipline here. im down units, but I usually do very well live wagering do to my "cashout" theory at B E T 365... I've already noticed a ton of fixes at the ITF level
Fitguy, if I used less units for huger odds I would be way up. Unfortunately I have used the go big or go home theory to many times. Time to step up my game here
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#193
46-54 -31.3
Comment
HatersGonnaHate
SBR Wise Guy
09-10-12
876
#194
Originally posted by matt1216
46-54 -31.3
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA i am super jelly of that record BRAH good thing all your live bets that you dont post magically win
Comment
HatersGonnaHate
SBR Wise Guy
09-10-12
876
#195
Originally posted by HatersGonnaHate
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA i am super jelly of that record BRAH good thing all your live bets that you dont post magically win
Now all we can do is wait for Matts picks Version 72 "the new Plan"
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#196
I'm not sure why you care. Lol. You bored today?
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#197
Hogenkamp ML 1.83 x 1.5 units
Mattek-Sands ML 1.57 x 2 units
Rogers ML 2.62 x 1.5 units
Comment
JC1186
SBR MVP
02-21-14
1070
#198
Originally posted by matt1216
Paire ML + Andujar/Omarch 2.02 x 5 units
A challenger final with Paire of all people + a doubles match.
= 5 units?
Seriously man wtf.
Even if they didn't both lose, you're again demonstrating inferior mental discipline when you're down.
Would have you placed such a bet early in the thread?
Of course not.
And that right there is the problem.
Comment
matt1216
SBR Posting Legend
10-27-11
14683
#199
Originally posted by JC1186
A challenger final with Paire of all people + a doubles match.
= 5 units?
Seriously man wtf.
Even if they didn't both lose, you're again demonstrating inferior mental discipline when you're down.
Would have you placed such a bet early in the thread?
Of course not.
And that right there is the problem.
Yeah, I'll admit that was a bad one. Paire in a parlay with a doubles match was just ugly no matter how man units
Comment
pattymayo
SBR Posting Legend
05-19-09
10221
#200
Originally posted by JC1186
A challenger final with Paire of all people + a doubles match.
= 5 units?
Seriously man wtf.
Even if they didn't both lose, you're again demonstrating inferior mental discipline when you're down.
Would have you placed such a bet early in the thread?
Of course not.
And that right there is the problem.
save your breath JC
matty is gonna do what matty does
GET EM MATTY
Comment
HatersGonnaHate
SBR Wise Guy
09-10-12
876
#201
It would be interesting to look back at all his threads the last year and tally up the units he is down. Guessing 2-500 units down but don't worry the live bets make up for it. Matt would be a millionaire if it weren't for all those tennis fixes
Comment
fitguy67
SBR Hall of Famer
03-13-11
5082
#202
matt, there is a way out of all this unnecessary torture...a two-sport solution to all your gambling-related issues...
NHL and MLB...fraak everything else...ESPECIALLY tennis...it ain't for you...cuz the round' the clock opportunities for "getting revenge" from previous bets is a vicious circle for you...
with nothing but NHL/MLB to get you thru the year there's 20 hours of down time and 4 hours of game time (365 days a year, of course so plenty of opportunities to ply your craft...more importantly, there IS time for sobre thought before and after each batch of plays...something that tennis never gives you)
tennis is a compulsively-abusive woman lookin' for a masochistic man...you are that masochistic man...
turn your attention back to the woman that'll treat you right...the one-man esteem-building sex-kitten tag-team of NHL/MLB...
______________
i tried this intervention once before, but the tennis-jones you're suffering was too strong...
the team-sport guys have maintained a special prayer group for some time now to save your gambling soul...
matt's 2015 one single thread for the whole year & nothin' but NHL/MLB==>sanity for you, profits for all
Matt stick around. You do add insight to matches but keep on thread not 15 and stop complaining about fixes or mentioning how much your unlisted live plays make you and then everything will be good. Just good honest picking like your thread used to be