It's not pointless, it proves I'm right. Your argument has changed from the 1800s were a terrible time for the average person in America, to yes some had it better than anyone else but that's because of westward expansion, slavery, and killing off indigenous tribes, to the argument is pointless. The fact is that the free market created the highest standards of living for the average person up to that point in history.
How? Cut the power of government, you also cut the need to control it.
That's not the point, the point is I won't be better off by hiring people I don't need and giving them tens of thousands of dollars a year. That's just the politicians trying to cover for their failures and pass the blame onto me. Can you explain how India would implement an economic bill of rights when their GDP per capita is $2,485 annually for 2023, or $6.81 a day? Do you think cavemen could have lived in mansions had they just passed a few living wage laws?
I believe Walz when he says that he doesn't think the 1st Amendment doesn't cover what he deems hate speech and misinformation. I believe Hillary Clinton when she said we need civil penalties and in some cases criminal penalties for misinformation or hate speech. I believe the democrats when they want to remove the filibuster, pack the court, and add states so they can never lose power. Bernie and Liz are both rich. What's the proper net worth to control the government? Are you okay with homeless people running government?
You never know, good thing you have insurance and don't mind waiting months to get a check. In the meantime, I guess you can live at the YMCA.
No, it wasn't, it was not having enough employees and having to hike prices to slow demand.
If the politicians did a good job with the money we sent, this wouldn't be a problem. We spend $170,000 per student over 13 years so kids can work at BK, and the left is blaming corporate greed for not hiring everyone and paying them way more than they produce.
I'm in favor of cutting unnecessary spending and programs, but this isn't close to An-Cap, it isn't even Min-Cap. I've given you numerous examples over the year of countries that have moved right on economics and had their people see massive standard of living increases, and you've ignored all of them. I have no reason to believe any good Trump does will be acknowledged by you.
Here's the thing, I'm not against what you want in principle. If we could tax the top 1 tenth of 1% at 1 tenth of 1% of their income and guarantee every person on the planet an upper middle class American lifestyle, sign me up! The problem is we can tax every person 100% and everyone will be in dire poverty by American standards, and you're unfazed by that.I didn't watch it, but it's a lie to say I'm against pollution laws. There are market failures, the problem is when the government gets involved, it is normal to create a government failure bigger than the market failure or the politicians to use the failure to empower themselves.
How? Cut the power of government, you also cut the need to control it.
That's not the point, the point is I won't be better off by hiring people I don't need and giving them tens of thousands of dollars a year. That's just the politicians trying to cover for their failures and pass the blame onto me. Can you explain how India would implement an economic bill of rights when their GDP per capita is $2,485 annually for 2023, or $6.81 a day? Do you think cavemen could have lived in mansions had they just passed a few living wage laws?
I believe Walz when he says that he doesn't think the 1st Amendment doesn't cover what he deems hate speech and misinformation. I believe Hillary Clinton when she said we need civil penalties and in some cases criminal penalties for misinformation or hate speech. I believe the democrats when they want to remove the filibuster, pack the court, and add states so they can never lose power. Bernie and Liz are both rich. What's the proper net worth to control the government? Are you okay with homeless people running government?
You never know, good thing you have insurance and don't mind waiting months to get a check. In the meantime, I guess you can live at the YMCA.
No, it wasn't, it was not having enough employees and having to hike prices to slow demand.
If the politicians did a good job with the money we sent, this wouldn't be a problem. We spend $170,000 per student over 13 years so kids can work at BK, and the left is blaming corporate greed for not hiring everyone and paying them way more than they produce.
I'm in favor of cutting unnecessary spending and programs, but this isn't close to An-Cap, it isn't even Min-Cap. I've given you numerous examples over the year of countries that have moved right on economics and had their people see massive standard of living increases, and you've ignored all of them. I have no reason to believe any good Trump does will be acknowledged by you.
Here's the thing, I'm not against what you want in principle. If we could tax the top 1 tenth of 1% at 1 tenth of 1% of their income and guarantee every person on the planet an upper middle class American lifestyle, sign me up! The problem is we can tax every person 100% and everyone will be in dire poverty by American standards, and you're unfazed by that.I didn't watch it, but it's a lie to say I'm against pollution laws. There are market failures, the problem is when the government gets involved, it is normal to create a government failure bigger than the market failure or the politicians to use the failure to empower themselves.
I would say there is help for you .... but the ACLU shut that down.... carry on!
