No you haven't, because even the first Protestant heretics believed in the Real Presence.
The argument was between consubstantiation or transubstantiation, not the Real Presence.
Also, in your resistance to what bobbywaves said, you're wrong again, because God the Father
does allow temptation as a trial. That much is terribly clear throughout all the Scriptures, Old and
New Testaments, the oldest book of the Holy Bible is based on one man's trial, Job. He was tempted
and afflicted. Jesus was tempted and afflicted. Jesus told us to pray to the Father, asking not to be
put to the trial, to be led away from temptation. God allows temptation to happen. In Eden, Adam
and Eve were tempted. Satan was already on Earth before Man was created, God knew what would
happen. He knew Satan would tempt them.
Lastly, your statement above is patently ridiculous, to claim that the Holy Apostles needed the
books we have today - based on their teachings directly, what are you talking about ? You worship
the New Testament so much that you actually believe the Apostles needed the books ? How ridiculous.
It was not until the end of the Apostolic Age that writing occurred. John in his epistles clearly
favors face-to-face contact. The vast majority of peoples did not read. Christ wanted His
teachings delivered through the Apostles and disciples by mouth and spirit. Their authority
is essential, He appointed them to preach and do works, not once in the entire Gospel does
he tell them to write down what He said. He never wrote anything but a single line in the sand.
What books we have in the New Testament and in all Patrology are only those which survived the
many persecutions and confiscations. They are sufficient, but they are incomplete. Even the
writings of Jews and Pagans are incomplete. It was policy of multiple Roman emperors and
Jewish leaders to destroy the writings of Christians and to paint reference of them in a negative way.
The argument was between consubstantiation or transubstantiation, not the Real Presence.
Also, in your resistance to what bobbywaves said, you're wrong again, because God the Father
does allow temptation as a trial. That much is terribly clear throughout all the Scriptures, Old and
New Testaments, the oldest book of the Holy Bible is based on one man's trial, Job. He was tempted
and afflicted. Jesus was tempted and afflicted. Jesus told us to pray to the Father, asking not to be
put to the trial, to be led away from temptation. God allows temptation to happen. In Eden, Adam
and Eve were tempted. Satan was already on Earth before Man was created, God knew what would
happen. He knew Satan would tempt them.
Lastly, your statement above is patently ridiculous, to claim that the Holy Apostles needed the
books we have today - based on their teachings directly, what are you talking about ? You worship
the New Testament so much that you actually believe the Apostles needed the books ? How ridiculous.
It was not until the end of the Apostolic Age that writing occurred. John in his epistles clearly
favors face-to-face contact. The vast majority of peoples did not read. Christ wanted His
teachings delivered through the Apostles and disciples by mouth and spirit. Their authority
is essential, He appointed them to preach and do works, not once in the entire Gospel does
he tell them to write down what He said. He never wrote anything but a single line in the sand.
What books we have in the New Testament and in all Patrology are only those which survived the
many persecutions and confiscations. They are sufficient, but they are incomplete. Even the
writings of Jews and Pagans are incomplete. It was policy of multiple Roman emperors and
Jewish leaders to destroy the writings of Christians and to paint reference of them in a negative way.
