Mike Postle = Biteme?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrSink
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 12-30-08
    • 8087

    #71
    hahaahha
    Comment
    • blankoblanco
      SBR MVP
      • 11-18-11
      • 3499

      #72
      I like the idea that at the very beginning Postle thought it'd probably blow over if he just stayed out of the spotlight, hey, nobody has any 100% hard evidence, it'll all be fine, etc. etc. And each day he's slowly realizing more and more the magnitude of what he's done and how completely f**ked he is. Great job ruining your own life because you're too stupid to even cheat properly, you thieving scumbag. Couldn't have happened to a bigger piece of shit
      Comment
      • TwitchySeal
        SBR Hustler
        • 08-08-19
        • 72

        #73
        Originally posted by blankoblanco
        I like the idea that at the very beginning Postle thought it'd probably blow over if he just stayed out of the spotlight, hey, nobody has any 100% hard evidence, it'll all be fine, etc. etc. And each day he's slowly realizing more and more the magnitude of what he's done and how completely f**ked he is. Great job ruining your own life because you're too stupid to even cheat properly, you thieving scumbag. Couldn't have happened to a bigger piece of shit
        It also turns out he is very likely banned from Caesers due to not paying his markers (Caesers named him in Bankruptcy documents). So the whole 'I don't play in Vegas where all the money is because of my daughter' could be BS.

        Also, he's been arrested for:

        Nevada 2009
        BATTERY ON A POLICE OFFICER/SCHOOL EMPLOYEE, DISMISSED PER NEGOTIATIONS
        DISORDERLY CONDUCT - PLED TO THIS REDUCED CHARGE

        California 2016
        TELEPHONIC HARASSMENT




        These things don't prove he was cheating. But they are very relevant because they contradict the picture he was painting of himself during the interview.
        Comment
        • mpaschal34
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 02-04-13
          • 12087

          #74
          Originally posted by Buzz Kill
          Nice nips...
          Comment
          • Optional
            Administrator
            • 06-10-10
            • 61549

            #75
            There is a clip with his brother in the booth talking about Postle.

            Says he will find any any angle he can and always has.

            Described how their father taught him how to cheat people running a some sort of carnival game where they weighted the wheel.


            Anyone recall that vid and can post it?
            .
            Comment
            • Buzz Kill
              SBR Wise Guy
              • 04-10-18
              • 555

              #76
              Here is the clip: What Mike Postle's own brother said about him.

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=4dHt8yhhXuk

              Commentator: I wanna go back to the wheel of destiny.

              Mike Postle's brother: The wheel ... so....there is always different things. So usually you spin this wheel for 50 cents or 1 dollar, so my brother had the wheel perfectly lined up and my brother put some quarters behind the wheel....so when you would spin it you would always get close to a $5 bill. So most of time when you rolled, like 90% of time it would stop just before the $5 dollar. And he would say "oo you were so close". And it would be the worst prize ever, so my brother would win half the winnings from what it gave out so my brother would make $30-40 bucks . So if there is an angle -- -my brother would do it. He will do it.
              Comment
              • Buzz Kill
                SBR Wise Guy
                • 04-10-18
                • 555

                #77
                Comment
                • cincinnatikid513
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 11-23-17
                  • 45360

                  #78
                  According to one poster on TwoPlusTwo, in 69 sessions on Stones Live, Postle has won in 62 of them, for a profit of over $250,000 in 277


                  the goat 62 of 69 winning sessions wow
                  Comment
                  • mpaschal34
                    SBR Posting Legend
                    • 02-04-13
                    • 12087

                    #79
                    Originally posted by cincinnatikid513
                    According to one poster on TwoPlusTwo, in 69 sessions on Stones Live, Postle has won in 62 of them, for a profit of over $250,000 in 277

                    the goat 62 of 69 winning sessions wow
                    Also heard he threw some of the later sessions when there were rumors he was being investigated. So the number could have been better.
                    Comment
                    • cincinnatikid513
                      SBR Aristocracy
                      • 11-23-17
                      • 45360

                      #80
                      Originally posted by mpaschal34
                      Also heard he threw some of the later sessions when there were rumors he was being investigated. So the number could have been better.
                      he got greedy, shouldn't of won so much he might of got away with it
                      Comment
                      • TwitchySeal
                        SBR Hustler
                        • 08-08-19
                        • 72

                        #81
                        Spread sheet with tons of data the internet sleuths have gathered. (check the tabs on the bottom): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=2044248290
                        Comment
                        • Buzz Kill
                          SBR Wise Guy
                          • 04-10-18
                          • 555

                          #82
                          Originally posted by TwitchySeal
                          Spread sheet with tons of data the internet sleuths have gathered. (check the tabs on the bottom): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=2044248290
                          Comment
                          • MrSink
                            SBR Hall of Famer
                            • 12-30-08
                            • 8087

                            #83
                            Originally posted by Optional
                            There is a clip with his brother in the booth talking about Postle.

                            Says he will find any any angle he can and always has.

                            Described how their father taught him how to cheat people running a some sort of carnival game where they weighted the wheel.


                            Anyone recall that vid and can post it?
                            yes heard that too. cannot find video though . it is for sure in one of doug polk videos
                            Comment
                            • Buzz Kill
                              SBR Wise Guy
                              • 04-10-18
                              • 555

                              #84
                              Comment
                              • sweep
                                SBR Posting Legend
                                • 10-09-10
                                • 16753

                                #85
                                Postle hired a lawyer.....his statement was comical. "I lose everytime I gamble so I know streaks are possible."

                                LOL
                                Comment
                                • Optional
                                  Administrator
                                  • 06-10-10
                                  • 61549

                                  #86
                                  Originally posted by sweep
                                  Postle hired a lawyer.....his statement was comical. "I lose everytime I gamble so I know streaks are possible."

                                  LOL
                                  Does that mean he wasn't gambling when he won? (ie he knew cards)


                                  Here is a question I still have.

                                  The knowledgeable people analyzing this seem to talk like Postle does not seem to know anything advanced. Can't explain his hand logic and is basically a bit poker dumb.


                                  If that is true, how come I also keep hearing how he manages to play perfect strategy and use the perfect size bets "every time".

                                  Between juggling the cheating and analyzing the situation and potential play out, he must be fairly sharp to keep making "perfect" calls and bet sizings all the time?


                                  Unless the sharp analyst is giving him the best plays to make remotely, instead of just the cards possibly?
                                  .
                                  Comment
                                  • ArunSh
                                    SBR Hall of Famer
                                    • 09-24-07
                                    • 6801

                                    #87
                                    Originally posted by Optional
                                    Does that mean he wasn't gambling when he won? (ie he knew cards)


                                    Here is a question I still have.

                                    The knowledgeable people analyzing this seem to talk like Postle does not seem to know anything advanced. Can't explain his hand logic and is basically a bit poker dumb.


                                    If that is true, how come I also keep hearing how he manages to play perfect strategy and use the perfect size bets "every time".

                                    Between juggling the cheating and analyzing the situation and potential play out, he must be fairly sharp to keep making "perfect" calls and bet sizings all the time?


                                    Unless the sharp analyst is giving him the best plays to make remotely, instead of just the cards possibly?
                                    Well "perfect" strategy and bet sizing is not a clear concept, certainly in some situations two very good players might disagree about what the optimal play is

                                    Even so, it's a heck of a lot easier to make a play which is close to optimal when you know the other players' cards! Perfect information is quite useful!

                                    When they had that super user cheating scandal on Ultimate Bet all those years ago, one of the players interviewed on 60 minutes succinctly said "If you can see everyone's cards in poker you could be the worst poker player in the world up against the best poker player in the world, and you're going to beat him almost every time"

                                    Key is though, when you have that perfect information you will never make a play which is outright bad so it's easy for it to seem that you are playing perfectly since the smaller mistakes are often somewhat a matter of opinion.
                                    Comment
                                    • MrSink
                                      SBR Hall of Famer
                                      • 12-30-08
                                      • 8087

                                      #88
                                      Originally posted by Optional
                                      Does that mean he wasn't gambling when he won? (ie he knew cards)

                                      Here is a question I still have.

                                      The knowledgeable people analyzing this seem to talk like Postle does not seem to know anything advanced. Can't explain his hand logic and is basically a bit poker dumb.


                                      If that is true, how come I also keep hearing how he manages to play perfect strategy and use the perfect size bets "every time".

                                      Between juggling the cheating and analyzing the situation and potential play out, he must be fairly sharp to keep making "perfect" calls and bet sizings all the time?


                                      Unless the sharp analyst is giving him the best plays to make remotely, instead of just the cards possibly?
                                      a) this game was 1/3 $ game with bunch of random players

                                      b) his 'perfect ' strategy is fairly simple :
                                      - when noone has a real strong hand, bluff with the highest sizing possible, often all in to apply maximum pressure
                                      - not bluff until you have seen all cards and are 100% sure of the outcome
                                      - moderate sizings vs slightly weaker hands
                                      - calling backdoors and weak hands preflop because you always know what to do even in multiway pots because you know hole cards
                                      - folding 2nd best hands , often by leading small and folding to any resistance so minimizing losses

                                      thats basic poker things Optional . nothing suprising there
                                      Comment
                                      • fried cheese
                                        SBR MVP
                                        • 09-17-13
                                        • 4461

                                        #89
                                        Originally posted by Optional
                                        Does that mean he wasn't gambling when he won? (ie he knew cards)


                                        Here is a question I still have.

                                        The knowledgeable people analyzing this seem to talk like Postle does not seem to know anything advanced. Can't explain his hand logic and is basically a bit poker dumb.


                                        If that is true, how come I also keep hearing how he manages to play perfect strategy and use the perfect size bets "every time".

                                        Between juggling the cheating and analyzing the situation and potential play out, he must be fairly sharp to keep making "perfect" calls and bet sizings all the time?


                                        Unless the sharp analyst is giving him the best plays to make remotely, instead of just the cards possibly?
                                        he doesnt play anything close to perfect strategy. he calls preflop double all ins with 54. its easy to have correct bet sizing when you can see their cards. he bets a large amount when he wants a fold or a call from a strong hand and he bets a small amount when he wants a call from a weak hand.
                                        Comment
                                        • Optional
                                          Administrator
                                          • 06-10-10
                                          • 61549

                                          #90
                                          Sounds like you guys don't think he needed to be too sharp to make all his plays.

                                          Still, I think there is some possibility there was an exploit on the live stream server or card reader system, and someone off site completely was relaying advice and cards.
                                          .
                                          Comment
                                          • Optional
                                            Administrator
                                            • 06-10-10
                                            • 61549

                                            #91
                                            Originally posted by fried cheese
                                            he doesnt play anything close to perfect strategy.
                                            Joey Ingram said many times that he thinks Postle always plays perfect strategy, for someone who knows the cards.

                                            Seems like a big part of the reason he is sure of guilt (outside the math).
                                            .
                                            Comment
                                            • fried cheese
                                              SBR MVP
                                              • 09-17-13
                                              • 4461

                                              #92
                                              Originally posted by Optional
                                              Joey Ingram said many times that he thinks Postle always plays perfect strategy, for someone who knows the cards.

                                              Seems like a big part of the reason he is sure of guilt (outside the math).
                                              i thought you meant good strategy for someone who didnt know the cards.
                                              Comment
                                              • MrSink
                                                SBR Hall of Famer
                                                • 12-30-08
                                                • 8087

                                                #93
                                                it is not possible to play like that. you can be no1 player in the world. Even those players are making mistakes , even those players win hands not in the optimal way . it is 100% sure he knew cards

                                                and for me , game host is in it as well considering his commentary , as well as comments on allegations .

                                                and in my eyes someone watched stream in real time and pass informations to postle , on phone , via audio etc
                                                Comment
                                                • Auto Donk
                                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                                  • 09-03-13
                                                  • 43558

                                                  #94
                                                  so, have they figured out the exact means of the scam?

                                                  he have this guy dealing for him, or what?:





                                                  for the record, there are dealers that are that good..... my lovely wife was present at underground trny I was at, run by a "friend" of ours....

                                                  the friend, not knowing my wife played holdem, told the dealer of the final table during the second break "deal to the one" (one seat, another "friend" of ours) within earshot of my wife, not having a clue she heard him.....

                                                  called the fukker out on it after "the one" won the trny, and got my buyin back plus some other "goodies" not to blow the whole f'n thing out of the water.... never played another trny or cash game run by those f'n crooks.... but it's that bad everywhere......
                                                  Comment
                                                  • ArunSh
                                                    SBR Hall of Famer
                                                    • 09-24-07
                                                    • 6801

                                                    #95
                                                    Originally posted by Optional
                                                    Sounds like you guys don't think he needed to be too sharp to make all his plays.

                                                    Still, I think there is some possibility there was an exploit on the live stream server or card reader system, and someone off site completely was relaying advice and cards.

                                                    I really doubt that lol - why on earth would you go through all that trouble? If you are going to pull a scam off like this with someone like Postle, and he isn't good enough to win by himself even with knowing everyone else's cards (when 99.9% of poker players would be able to), then you really ought to find a better scam partner haha.
                                                    Comment
                                                    • Optional
                                                      Administrator
                                                      • 06-10-10
                                                      • 61549

                                                      #96
                                                      Originally posted by ArunSh


                                                      I really doubt that lol - why on earth would you go through all that trouble? If you are going to pull a scam off like this with someone like Postle, and he isn't good enough to win by himself even with knowing everyone else's cards (when 99.9% of poker players would be able to), then you really ought to find a better scam partner haha.
                                                      There are 60 odd sessions they say he cheated in. Hundreds of hours avoiding detection and always making the right move and picking the perfect bet size.

                                                      It is not just Ingram harping on about the always perfect strategy and bet sizing in every session they audited. Veronica the whistleblower says the same thing is what tipped her over the edge. Never getting it wrong. And I don't think they are just exaggerating. They keep pointing it out. And Joey is auditing every hand and logging it in a spreadsheet. It would be weird if he was saying that when he knows otherwise.


                                                      Maybe I am under estimating my own ability to get the info, analyze it and act on it fast and NEVER get it wrong over so many hours. But it opened up the idea that he was not doing the analysis himself in my mind.
                                                      .
                                                      Comment
                                                      • MrSink
                                                        SBR Hall of Famer
                                                        • 12-30-08
                                                        • 8087

                                                        #97
                                                        Originally posted by Optional
                                                        There are 60 odd sessions they say he cheated in. Hundreds of hours avoiding detection and always making the right move and picking the perfect bet size.

                                                        It is not just Ingram harping on about the always perfect strategy and bet sizing in every session they audited. Veronica the whistleblower says the same thing is what tipped her over the edge. Never getting it wrong. And I don't think they are just exaggerating. They keep pointing it out. And Joey is auditing every hand and logging it in a spreadsheet. It would be weird if he was saying that when he knows otherwise.


                                                        Maybe I am under estimating my own ability to get the info, analyze it and act on it fast and NEVER get it wrong over so many hours. But it opened up the idea that he was not doing the analysis himself in my mind.
                                                        I dont get it. What is your point ?
                                                        Comment
                                                        • Auto Donk
                                                          SBR Aristocracy
                                                          • 09-03-13
                                                          • 43558

                                                          #98
                                                          Originally posted by Buzz Kill
                                                          best part of this vid is where the guy says "or, he had the buzzer inside of him", indicating a vibrating device tipping him off up his ass.....

                                                          sounds like waves' kind of game.....
                                                          Comment
                                                          • blankoblanco
                                                            SBR MVP
                                                            • 11-18-11
                                                            • 3499

                                                            #99
                                                            Originally posted by Optional
                                                            There are 60 odd sessions they say he cheated in. Hundreds of hours avoiding detection and always making the right move and picking the perfect bet size.

                                                            It is not just Ingram harping on about the always perfect strategy and bet sizing in every session they audited. Veronica the whistleblower says the same thing is what tipped her over the edge. Never getting it wrong. And I don't think they are just exaggerating. They keep pointing it out. And Joey is auditing every hand and logging it in a spreadsheet. It would be weird if he was saying that when he knows otherwise.


                                                            Maybe I am under estimating my own ability to get the info, analyze it and act on it fast and NEVER get it wrong over so many hours. But it opened up the idea that he was not doing the analysis himself in my mind.
                                                            Dude, you are really overthinking this. Nobody is saying that he made the absolute perfect bet sizes in every spot (how would you even determine that?)

                                                            When they were bluffing he would either hero call knowing he was better or rebluff if his hand was worse or if it would look too fishy as a hero call. When they had weak holdings, he would bluff. When he had them coolered, he would bet big. When they had the same hand, he would overbet huge to get them off the chop. When he had a better hand vs a middling hand, he would try to bet an enticing amount where they would call

                                                            He didn't do anything special. Literally put everything I just said on a note card, memorize it, then do that. You're underestimating how absurdly easy that is when you can see the cards. The above is what he did

                                                            I mean, the guy's not amazing at poker, but he's been playing for well over a decade and I believe did actually make a legitimate living from it for years. Doing this stuff with full knowledge of the cards is pretty damn basic
                                                            Comment
                                                            • Optional
                                                              Administrator
                                                              • 06-10-10
                                                              • 61549

                                                              #100
                                                              Originally posted by MrSink

                                                              I dont get it. What is your point ?
                                                              Just that it may not be simply him and JFK.

                                                              What do you think I am trying to say that's getting you so bothered?
                                                              .
                                                              Comment
                                                              • TwitchySeal
                                                                SBR Hustler
                                                                • 08-08-19
                                                                • 72

                                                                #101
                                                                Originally posted by Optional
                                                                Does that mean he wasn't gambling when he won? (ie he knew cards)


                                                                Here is a question I still have.

                                                                The knowledgeable people analyzing this seem to talk like Postle does not seem to know anything advanced. Can't explain his hand logic and is basically a bit poker dumb.


                                                                If that is true, how come I also keep hearing how he manages to play perfect strategy and use the perfect size bets "every time".

                                                                Between juggling the cheating and analyzing the situation and potential play out, he must be fairly sharp to keep making "perfect" calls and bet sizings all the time?


                                                                Unless the sharp analyst is giving him the best plays to make remotely, instead of just the cards possibly?
                                                                I don't think anyone that's been pouring over the videos actually thinks he plays perfect strategy considering he knows all the cards.

                                                                I can see how a lot of Joeys comments (and other people) can seem like that's what they mean, but it's not. People are just overly dramatic sometimes. I'm sure if we went and analyzed what the actual best play would be, considering you know everyones cards, we'd find tons of mistakes on his part - Even when he wasn't drinking or overly focused on sports.

                                                                Considering the way he discussed hands and the way he reacted when he was publicly accused I find it very hard to believe he's capable of playing poker at a high level in general.
                                                                Comment
                                                                • Buzz Kill
                                                                  SBR Wise Guy
                                                                  • 04-10-18
                                                                  • 555

                                                                  #102
                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • MrSink
                                                                    SBR Hall of Famer
                                                                    • 12-30-08
                                                                    • 8087

                                                                    #103
                                                                    Originally posted by Optional
                                                                    Just that it may not be simply him and JFK.

                                                                    What do you think I am trying to say that's getting you so bothered?
                                                                    just was lost what was your point there thats why I ve asked.

                                                                    agree ,it could be more people involved . However many people investigating this thing said the more people are getting involved the harder is is to keep it as a secret as well as the more people the less share they are getting. so just them two is also possibility

                                                                    yes , fully agree with blankoblanco. nothing unusual there. Especially , considering his session when JFK was not available and he played bad poker.
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • Auto Donk
                                                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                                                      • 09-03-13
                                                                      • 43558

                                                                      #104
                                                                      I'm just glad that we've now confirmed JFK survived that nasty full frontal labotomy the cia gave him in dallas and found his way into the shady as fuk casino world.....
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      • Optional
                                                                        Administrator
                                                                        • 06-10-10
                                                                        • 61549

                                                                        #105
                                                                        Originally posted by TwitchySeal

                                                                        I don't think anyone that's been pouring over the videos actually thinks he plays perfect strategy considering he knows all the cards.

                                                                        I can see how a lot of Joeys comments (and other people) can seem like that's what they mean, but it's not. People are just overly dramatic sometimes. I'm sure if we went and analyzed what the actual best play would be, considering you know everyones cards, we'd find tons of mistakes on his part - Even when he wasn't drinking or overly focused on sports.

                                                                        Considering the way he discussed hands and the way he reacted when he was publicly accused I find it very hard to believe he's capable of playing poker at a high level in general.
                                                                        Thanks. Glad you can see where I am coming from.

                                                                        I may be wrong, but a partner in a calm private location not just passing on the cards, but helping make decisions would not shock me.

                                                                        Maybe JFK just needs to be there to facilitate the connection to that person. Maybe just rebroadcasting the feed he gets at his desk, rather than a trojan on the server as an example.

                                                                        I dunno. The way the guy and his brother do seem sly but not particularly bright does not gel 100%.

                                                                        Although on the flip side, I guess playing "perfect" every hand if you do know the cards and know its on video is also a pretty dumb strategy...

                                                                        Less greed and more careful hand selection and this guy could have done this forever by the looks. He killed the cow that produced the milk!
                                                                        .
                                                                        Comment
                                                                        SBR Contests
                                                                        Collapse
                                                                        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                        Collapse
                                                                        Working...