Mathdotcom Industries releasing O8.5 Orioles/Jays +116

[No coincidences]

One of us needs to get our eyes checked. Last minute recorded shows -103 to 102 not -105 to 102. Unless by last minute you mean last 3 minutes.

Anyways unless something happened 6.57 until 7.07, all I see is late steam on the over. The line sat at +109 all day long and then in the last 10 minutes it dropped to +102.

My bad -- -103 to +102.

In any event, I don't know how you could argue the under wasn't hit late given Pinny and Matchy's numbers. How does a move from -105 to +111 at Matchbook on the over and -103 to +102 at Pinny indicate there was late steam on the over?

Bovada closed at -110/-110. Matchbook closed at +111/-113. 63% of the public was on the over. This was not a sharp play mathy. Under backers waited for someone like you to hit the over and then gobbled the under up at a much better number.

[ACoochy]

Unreal Mathy.

Even with Goldilocks touting you your still unable to get the numbers up...

We expect better...

[mathdotcom]

So you want me to stop posting picks that consistently beat the closing line...? OK

[ACoochy]

So you want me to stop posting picks that consistently beat the closing line...? OK

U act like ur the only one that can do it. Good on you pal

Mathy, we were referring to the response/view ratio...

[manny24]

[darkhat]

Obv nobody picks 100 percent. He's posted quite a few winners as well.

[ColdBeerHere]

[NYSportsGuy210]

Morrow will walk a handful and then a timely Orioles HR off a Morrow fastball will make this total seem very low.

OVERS at Skydome are golden anyhow

- mathy

Stop posting already you clown. You make Lakerboy look like Nostradamus.

[jjgold]

Someone told me Mathy is a high level math expert like Ganch

How about we compare lets say the top 15 guys at sbr bankrolls at sportsbooks and then put it up against mathy

who would win??

Its basically 15 vs 1

[billysink]

Always wondered why the fuk anyone would care what the next guy wins or loses, how much he bets, bankroll, win percentage. If some guy is anointed a "platinum capper, bets a gazillion a game, caps at 70% I could fukkin care less. Good for that fuk but means nothing to me or my business. My business will take care of itself regardless of what someone else is doing.

Now carry on with your dick measuring kids.

[mathdotcom]

Someone told me Mathy is a high level math expert like Ganch

How about we compare lets say the top 15 guys at sbr bankrolls at sportsbooks and then put it up against mathy

who would win??

Its basically 15 vs 1

Currently $400 in pinnacle, $54 matchbook, $15 CRIS

End of list

[jjgold]

Thats not much mathy, I guess your in transition

[thetrinity]

so this is how nocoin got nearly 36k posts in 28 months

[acl123]

So you want me to stop posting picks that consistently beat the closing line...? OK

Beating the closing line has nothing to do with picking winners. U math guys are unreal

[mathdotcom]

Beating the closing line has nothing to do with picking winners. U math guys are unreal

Worst post ever made on sbr

[acl123]

Worst post ever made on sbr

jj can i get my worst post award?

[acl123]

Mathy i hate to be the one to tell you this but just because you got the devils +114 and not+105 didnt mean they had a better cjance of winng.

[mathdotcom]

Mathy i hate to be the one to tell you this but just because you got the devils +114 and not+105 didnt mean they had a better cjance of winng.

Fukk you did it again

Now post above is 2nd worst ever made on sbr

[mathdotcom]

Let me know what bets you want to make today and I'll take them at 100c more juice.

Want the brewers -116? I'll give you -216 no questions asked.

[acl123]

My point is whether I take them minus -116 or -216 has no bearing on the outcome of the game

[jjgold]

If you know who is going to win the game then no difference between -170 and -210

[Sam Odom]

If you know who is going to win the game then no difference between -170 and -210

while we are at it.... "Winners dont pay juice" Right ?

[Kindred]

So you want me to stop posting picks that consistently beat the closing line...? OK

Keep posting..haters gonna hate. When you win they'll be silent

[mathdotcom]

Rockies -1.5 +182

[acl123]

Pass

[ACoochy]

Keep posting..haters gonna hate. When you win they'll be silent

No they wont. So long as the guy acts as though he is the jewish god is as long as ppl will rag on him...

JJ only pumps up losing gamblers anyway. Good for commissions...

[jmp]

Rockies -1.5 +182

Not tailing but you said you are going to redeem yourself from yesterday's play. Good luck. I want to see everybody win.

[mathdotcom]

I just picked a game randomly

[jmp]

I just picked a game randomly

I believe it %100.

[acl123]

Maybe if you beat the closing line the rockies will win.

[No coincidences]

Beating the closing number doesn't guarantee a damn thing. However, we're all "gambling" here, and the closest thing you have to a sure thing in gambling when all is said and done over the course of thousands of plays is locking in a better number than where said number ends up.

Beating the closer is a lot like RLM -- people who don't believe in it tend to think that if it doesn't work every time then it's worthless. It's a valuable tool and something that, over the course of time, will win more than it loses. You can't ask for much more than that. If you're looking for a "sure thing," well, like thebesthereis says, get inside information that no one else has. Otherwise settle for the next best thing, which is getting the best number possible.

[mathdotcom]

Good value on RL vs moneyline

acl you must lose so much gambling

[ZetaPsi808]

Rockies -1.5 +182

i like this play although i will have to watch late pinny steam on runline to be sure

[acl123]

You think tank guys are hilarious.
At the end of the day it's about picking winners.
put your calculator down and just pick winners.

[jmp]

You think tank guys are hilarious.
At the end of the day it's about picking winners.
put your calculator down and just pick winners.