The NFL God is Back

[ScottLocke]

SSK is just begging for attention.

If you track all of his bets, you will see he bets mainly on money line favorites and won't count the losses where a player gets hurt on the team he bets on. He also edits his plays after game time.

I shouldn't say bets because he doesn't even wager on the games.

Selections is a better description.

I can't believe this thread has grown to 39 pages long.

SSK, you need to find a job that pays you to irritate people (i.e. tax auditor, tow truck operator, etc) as you are incredibly good at it.

As far as his claims concerning sports handicapping, don't believe a word of it as his claims of 70% winners is completely fabricated.

LOL everyone is catching on the SSK doesn't even wager on his own picks.

[ssk13809]

LOL its really amazing how dumb you are. Are you sure you made it through 3rd grade? Worst case scenario is I could be 5x on 20 plays and 1x on the other 80... get it now. 60% will make more over 100 plays than 70% over 20 if you manage your money right. Nope. I'm sure you are still gonna be ignorant. Oh well.

And what if you can't differentiate between a 70% and a 60%? What if all you knew was this play was a 70% play, and the other play is unknown (so say 50%).

Because that's the way it is with me. I only know 70% plays. I don't know 60% plays. Therefore, your strategy wouldn't work with me (the one who can find 70% plays) or you (the one who can't find 70% plays)


Fail again

[ScottLocke]

1. I bet ML favorites? The avg ML of the teams I bet on so far is -103 and last year it + something.

Strike 1

2. I've counted every loss I had regardless of injury

Strike 2

3. It's been proven and documented that I actually do put real money on games (though it's not clear how much) and the 70% is also documented



Strike 3!
You're out!



One of the biggest fail posts I've seen

Where has this been proven. Link please. Or else post a screen shot of a bet you have made.

Or.... GTFO

[ScottLocke]

And what if you can't differentiate between a 70% and a 60%? What if all you knew was this play was a 70% play, and the other play is unknown (so say 50%).

Because that's the way it is with me. I only know 70% plays. I don't know 60% plays. Therefore, your strategy wouldn't work with me (the one who can find 70% plays) or you (the one who can't find 70% plays)


Fail again

Hmm, maybe you need to go check out my POTW selections from last year.

[andywend]

SSK:
There has NEVER been any proof or documentation of your ficticious 70% win rate.

I'll never understand why you feel the need to outright lie to everyone posting in this forum in a pathetic attempt to build yourself up.

You have serious self-esteem issues.

If you're willing to bet using regular spreads, I would be willing to wager up to $10,000 that you can NOT pick 60% winners let alone 70% if you're willing to make at least 100 selections over say a 12 month period. I would trust either Bill Dozer or Lou to hold the funds.

If you can truly pick 70% winners as you claim, then you should jump all over this.

[ScottLocke]

SSK:
There has NEVER been any proof or documentation of your ficticious 70% win rate.

I'll never understand why you feel the need to outright lie to everyone posting in this forum in a pathetic attempt to build yourself up.

You have serious self-esteem issues.

If you're willing to bet using regular spreads, I would be willing to wager up to $10,000 that you can NOT pick 60% winners let alone 70% if you're willing to make at least 100 selections over say a 12 month period. I would trust either Bill Dozer or Lou to hold the funds.

If you can truly pick 70% winners as you claim, then you should jump all over this.

10k is pocket change to him. Same reason he doesn't enter the Hilton contest, cause it isn't a challenge for him and the 200k first place is just pocket change for someone of his caliber.

[ssk13809]

SSK:
There has NEVER been any proof or documentation of your ficticious 70% win rate.

I'll never understand why you feel the need to outright lie to everyone posting in this forum in a pathetic attempt to build yourself up.

You have serious self-esteem issues.

If you're willing to bet using regular spreads, I would be willing to wager up to $10,000 that you can NOT pick 60% winners let alone 70% if you're willing to make at least 100 selections over say a 12 month period. I would trust either Bill Dozer or Lou to hold the funds.

If you can truly pick 70% winners as you claim, then you should jump all over this.

Of course I would take that bet. I bet someone last year I could hit 70%. And I did hit 70%. And guess what, the person also said yes you hit 70%.

But why the f*uck would I take that bet with you? You are outright saying I didn't hit 70% last year when I did, so what makes me think that this time when I hit 70% again you will admit I hit 70%? At the end, after I hit 70% or 80%, you will just say I lie and say I didn't.


Bottom-line, I don't bet with people who lie. As far as taking bets to hit 70%? Did so last year, and won it.

[ssk13809]

Hmm, maybe you need to go check out my POTW selections from last year.

Okay so let me get this straight. You are saying you can hit 70% long-term on your POTW selections?
Do you understand the logic coming from you? 1st you say it's impossible to hit 70% long-term. And now, when arguing between a selective 70% long-term rate vs. a less-selective 60% long-term rate, you are using your POTW selections as an argument?


Contradiction at its finest

Come on Scott, smarten up

[ScottLocke]

Still waiting for that screen shot...

[ScottLocke]

Okay so let me get this straight. You are saying you can hit 70% long-term on your POTW selections?
Do you understand the logic coming from you? 1st you say it's impossible to hit 70% long-term. And now, when arguing between a selective 70% long-term rate vs. a less-selective 60% long-term rate, you are using your POTW selections as an argument?


Contradiction at its finest

Come on Scott, smarten up

Last year it was 70%, it won't always be that good for me. But then, you won't finish over 70% either every year. I HIGHLY doubt you would hit >60% over 50 plays.

[ssk13809]

Still waiting for that screen shot...

We've gone through this before in the NBA threads. I don't post screen shots because the FBI might figure out who I am and come after me for real.

[ssk13809]

Last year it was 70%, it won't always be that good for me. But then, you won't finish over 70% either every year. I HIGHLY doubt you would hit >60% over 50 plays.

I'll be sure to play at least 30 plays this year and combined with last year I should be not only over 60%, but over 70%.

[ScottLocke]

We've gone through this before in the NBA threads. I don't post screen shots because the FBI might figure out who I am and come after me for real.

Gotta love the BS

Nobody will ever respect you.

[andywend]

Your fairy tales are indeed entertaining and you are very persistent in spinning them, hence the size of this thread.

"I don't post screen shots because the FBI might figure out who I am"

SSK, if spinning these fairy tales of you picking 70% winners and calling yourself a "God" makes you feel better about yourself, then have at it.

However, NOBODY on this forum will ever take you seriously.

[mstone897]

So SSK went from wanting respect for about a 24 hour period, back to his delusional self. He just can't stay away.

[BetterBizness]

Who in their sane mind would let this thread get lost in the second page...

Worthless haters...

[cant call it]

wtf is going on here? I wasted 5 minutes went back 5 pages of garbage and no picks, no record, whats is the deal here?

Does anyone post plays anymore?

ssk you need to send me some points for compensation.

[ssk13809]

No this thread is done. I will make a new thread soon (today or tomorrow), and be focusing on picks instead of all this hater BS. It's time to make some $$$

[Tree Rollins]

Did you make any plays this past week?

[ssk13809]

Did you make any plays this past week?

Yeah. Hit my debut ATS play picking off from last year (So 100% so far this season)
But lost my teaser/parlay thanks to Brady's 4 picks and Vick's injury (How can you cap that?)

[ehp6737]

We've gone through this before in the NBA threads. I don't post screen shots because the FBI might figure out who I am and come after me for real.

Stupidest post I've read in a month

[SportsMushroom]

Did you make any plays this past week?

yes he was 1-2 for the week, -3.5 units

he is 5-8 for the year and -7.5 units

[ssk13809]

yes he was 1-2 for the week, -3.5 units

he is 5-8 for the year and -7.5 units

Once again, Teaser/Parlay records are meaningless. How many times do we have to go through this? The only records that are meaningful?


1-0 ATS
3-1 ML (Avg. odds of -103)


Thats why they call me the ATS ATM & ML Machine

[ssk13809]

Maybe I should make seperate threads for ATS and ML, so then there will be no reason to post 5-8 and only great records like 100% ATS or 75% ML will be posted

[BetterBizness]

Stupidest post I've read in a month

clearly you haven't been here, in this thread, very long....

[BetterBizness]

Maybe I should make seperate threads for ATS and ML, so then there will be no reason to post 5-8 and only great records like 100% ATS or 75% ML will be posted

I think each ssk team member needs a personal thread... Just 1 mans opinion....

[boeing power]

ssk 2011 record

38%

down over 300 units if you include nba

and phillybadboy has given ssk at least 300 blowjobs

[ochenta y cinco]

Thats why they call me the ATS ATM & ML Machine

Now that's a bit redundant isn't it?

ATS Automatic Transfer Machine and ML Machine?

[SportsMushroom]

Once again, Teaser/Parlay records are meaningless. How many times do we have to go through this? The only records that are meaningful? 1-0 ATS 3-1 ML (Avg. odds of -103) Thats why they call me the ATS ATM & ML Machine

5-8 -7.5 units

if you dont want something to count towards your record then dont post it

[cant call it]

Yeah. Hit my debut ATS play picking off from last year (So 100% so far this season) But lost my teaser/parlay thanks to Brady's 4 picks and Vick's injury (How can you cap that?)

100% on the season

[cant call it]

[quote=boeing power;11622119]ssk 2011 record 38% down over 300 units if you include nba and phillybadboy has given ssk at least 300 blowjobs[/quote]
Funny how phillybadbody only backs scrubs like ssk, henryhill, crustyme airbetting style posters.

[ssk13809]

5-8 -7.5 units

if you dont want something to count towards your record then dont post it

It's fine to display net units. But no one keeps track of their parlay or teaser record. 1-100 record of a parlay could be better than a 100-1 record. So what does a teaser/parlay record really indicate?


And it's even worse when you mix it with ATS and ML



Like I said, pure stupid. But no way can you include a parlay/teaser record in a thread dedicated to ATS. So please don't force me to make a separate thread for just ATS or ML.

[boeing power]

you would include them if they were winning

now shut the fuk up

[hawley]

SSK you are burying me

[ssk13809]

you would include them if they were winning

now shut the fuk up

Kind of hard to win major underdog parlays dumbass