The NFL God is Back

[ssk13809]

Wow, that's incredibly gracious of you... after posting a bogus Eagles line that hasn't been available for days

Good job not posting your teasers after kickoff this week, tiger

Let's not look to hard into this. Eagles will win by 4+, Chargers will win by 3+, Vikkings will not lose period ,and Ravens will win at worst close loss.

Most likely we don't have to worry about any of this. At least the lines I posted now were accurate, if something close happens, we can decide later, but most likely nothing will happen.

[SportsPedagogy]

What happened to your bookie that you email???

Or you could just screen shot it and black out any personal info.

Come on man, he emails bookmaker ... obviously. I made a 4 digit bet to today, BTW. $10.00

[Sports Scientist]

Let's not look to hard into this. Eagles will win by 4+, Chargers will win by 3+, Vikkings will not lose period ,and Ravens will win at worst close loss.

Most likely we don't have to worry about any of this. At least the lines I posted now were accurate, if something close happens, we can decide later, but most likely nothing will happen.

Trust me, no one is worried.

But if you want to miraculously resurrect your "reputation," start with posting lines that actually exist before games begin, instead of posting lines that don't exist saying you'll figure it out later

Go Vikkings

[phillybadboy]

thanks for plays, u da man

[ttrace35]

PhillyFaggBoy

[ssk13809]

Trust me, no one is worried.

But if you want to miraculously resurrect your "reputation," start with posting lines that actually exist before games begin, instead of posting lines that don't exist saying you'll figure it out later

Go Vikkings

Um pretty sure the lines I posted right now were the actual lines right now...but like I said, I bet differnet lines. But lines posted are actual right now.

[Sports Scientist]

Um pretty sure the lines I posted right now were the actual lines right now...but like I said, I bet differnet lines. But lines posted are actual right now.

ummm pretty sure the teaser you posted about an hour ago had a bogus eagles line and we already talked about it
ummm die in a greasefire

[SportsPedagogy]

Guys sorry I'm in jail right now, posting through my IPhone 5. Won't be able to posts tonite therefore too much typing. I'll be out soon though when my bail team rescues me.

I got some good plays though. Tomorrow for sure. At least 2 ATS plays, some teasers, and more. Going to be a big weekend. I predict 20+ unit profit.

Of course all in a new thread. Not this one, too many haters here.

.... im sure the University of Washington would frown upon that kind of behavior.

[SportsPedagogy]

And lol? Though I'm not going to prove how much I bet (It's in the 4-5 digits), because of security reasons, its already established I have a Bookmaker account with some real money in it. This has been established many times. Ask posters around you. Get over it.

Alot of money for a guy who buys his school books second hand.

[SportsPedagogy]

It's kinda gay that you mud wrestle another man half-naked.

that means its also KINDA straight and we are HALF dressed.

[ScottLocke]

And lol? Though I'm not going to prove how much I bet (It's in the 4-5 digits), because of security reasons, its already established I have a Bookmaker account with some real money in it. This has been established many times. Ask posters around you. Get over it.

Can you please name some of these posters I can ask?? Really doubt you bet real money on these games. Real money being >100 bucks a game.

Also, Bengals and Vikings MLs are horrendous bets IMO. Not that I don't like the teams this week, because I do. But I think Bengals +3 and Vikings -2.5 is a much better price.

[mstone897]

Let's not look to hard into this. Eagles will win by 4+, Chargers will win by 3+, Vikkings will not lose period ,and Ravens will win at worst close loss.

if something close happens, we can decide later

WTF does this mean? Gambling is pretty black and white. You either win, lose, or push. Post the lines you claim you got and we will go by those.

[ssk13809]

ummm pretty sure the teaser you posted about an hour ago had a bogus eagles line and we already talked about it
ummm die in a greasefire

Go read again. I posted the right line, and commented on the line I bet on, but the line I posted was correct to the time right when I posted it

Why are people so stupid?
'This is how I get people saying I cheated or this or that, when people themselves are making mistakes

[ssk13809]

WTF does this mean? Gambling is pretty black and white. You either win, lose, or push. Post the lines you claim you got and we will go by those.

I posted the lines at the time of my post. And I later commented upon the lines I actually bet on (when I posted saying I was going to bet). Most likely there will be no conflict


Here they are again, with in parantheses the actual lines when I bet.


Bears -6.5
Risk 5.5 to Win 5

Falcons -4.5
Risk 5.5 to Win 5


Yep 2 ATS plays from someone who hits 70% ATS long-term.



2 Team Teaser (6 points)
Chargers -1 (-1.5)
Eagles -3.5 (-2.5)
Risk 5.5 to Win 5


3 Team Teaser (10 points)
Vikkings +7 (+8.5)
Ravens +6.5 (+7)
Packers -2
Risk 3.6 to Win 3


Bengals +135
Risk 3 to Win 4.1

Vikkings -150
Risk 3 to Win 2

[SportsPedagogy]

Here was his 1st round of the playoff picks from last year .... 50% ATS ...


Colts -2.5
Risk 55 units to Win 50

Ravens -3
Risk 20 units to Win 20

Colts -140 ML
Risk 24 units to Win 20

Seahawks +475
Risk 10 units to Win 47.5

2 Team Teaser
Colts +4
Ravens +3.5
Risk 24 units to Win 20

3 Team Teaser
Saints -0.5
Colts +7.5
Ravens +7
Risk 36 to Win 30

2 Team Round Robin Parlay
Ravens -3
Colts -2.5
Seahawks +10.5
Risk 10 units

He lost 37.5 units.

[phillybadboy]

u doin good work buddy

[mstone897]

u doin good work buddy

Yeah he sure is since NFL plays on saturday and all.

[mstone897]

I posted the lines at the time of my post. And I later commented upon the lines I actually bet on (when I posted saying I was going to bet). Most likely there will be no conflict


Here they are again, with in parantheses the actual lines when I bet.


Bears -6.5
Risk 5.5 to Win 5

Falcons -4.5
Risk 5.5 to Win 5


Yep 2 ATS plays from someone who hits 70% ATS long-term.



2 Team Teaser (6 points)
Chargers -1 (-1.5)
Eagles -3.5 (-2.5)
Risk 5.5 to Win 5


3 Team Teaser (10 points)
Vikkings +7 (+8.5)
Ravens +6.5 (+7)
Packers -2
Risk 3.6 to Win 3


Bengals +135
Risk 3 to Win 4.1

Vikkings -150
Risk 3 to Win 2

You realize why people don't like you right? You say we'll discuss whether or not you hit a play. Why post 2 numbers. Only post the number you have money on. You try and skew everything.

[Sports Scientist]

Why are people so stupid?
'This is how I get people saying I cheated or this or that, when people themselves are making mistakes

Which seems more likely:

a) everyone else is stupid and wrong, and i mean EVERYONE who posts in this thread

b) you are an idiot and everyone else is right

[ssk13809]

Which seems more likely:

a) everyone else is stupid and wrong, and i mean EVERYONE who posts in this thread

b) you are an idiot and everyone else is right

Sorry your the only idiot who thinks I posted the wrong Philly line last page. It's -9.5 right now, add 6, and it's -3.5, just like I posted.

[Sports Scientist]

Sorry your the only idiot who thinks I posted the wrong Philly line last page. It's -9.5 right now, add 6, and it's -3.5, just like I posted.

Posting lines 4 days after they move is posting the wrong line. Sorry, you lose.

[ssk13809]

Posting lines 4 days after they move is posting the wrong line. Sorry, you lose.

Wow this guy doesnt get it

The line is -9.5 RIGHT NOW. Not 4 days ago, right now. Add 6 and you get -3.5. Get it now?

[phillybadboy]

thats why they need you buddy

[Sports Scientist]

Wow this guy doesnt get it The line is -9.5 RIGHT NOW. Not 4 days ago, right now. Add 6 and you get -3.5. Get it now?

Yeah, I get that you post plays 4 days after, then claim you actually bet them 4 days ago, so you get the good line. And count it as a win if you cover with the 4 day old line, even though you never posted it.
I also "get" that you don't think you should get a loss if a player gets injured in the game. You're a ******* moron. Get it?

[ssk13809]

Yeah, I get that you post plays 4 days after, then claim you actually bet them 4 days ago, so you get the good line. And count it as a win if you cover with the 4 day old line, even though you never posted it.
I also "get" that you don't think you should get a loss if a player gets injured in the game. You're a ******* moron. Get it?

Has any of what you said above actually ever happened? Really? Did I not count some injured player loss? Did I count a line 4 days ago?

Or is this all coming out of your ass and none of it actually happened. Yep that's right.


Tell me when any of what you said actually happens dumbass

[rsnnh12]

Has any of what you said above actually ever happened? Really? Did I not count some injured player loss? Did I count a line 4 days ago?

Or is this all coming out of your ass and none of it actually happened. Yep that's right.


Tell me when any of what you said actually happens dumbass

...

Vick injured

Didn't know
Void the Eagles bets

Still cost them the game, besides he got injured much earlier, had x-rays taken, came back PLAYING injured, was clearly not himself, they were WINNING then by 2 in NYG territory, and then he left for good.

I guess it counts toward my bankroll, a loss is a loss, but clearly this should be overlooked when judging me and my record

So when a star gets injured and his team loses, it shouldn't count against your record? What about the games you won where a guy on the opposing team gets hurt? Those shouldn't be viewed as wins, correct?

[ssk13809]

...






So when a star gets injured and his team loses, it shouldn't count against your record? What about the games you won where a guy on the opposing team gets hurt? Those shouldn't be viewed as wins, correct?

I counted the game
But I said it shouldn't count. There is a difference between shouldn't and not counting something. It shouldn't count, but I still counted it. Like every other game. What is so hard to understand about this people? I counted every game.

[Cap dat 4ss]

SSK, do you have a job other than professionally capping games?

[ssk13809]

SSK, do you have a job other than professionally capping games?

At least someone else believes me that I professionally cap games

[Cap dat 4ss]

Yes,but I'm also equally interested in whether you have another job. Just the field of work really.

[rsnnh12]

I counted the game
But I said it shouldn't count. There is a difference between shouldn't and not counting something. It shouldn't count, but I still counted it. Like every other game. What is so hard to understand about this people? I counted every game.

Go read Sport Scientist's post again. He said that you think games where the star gets hurt should not count against you... that's EXACTLY what you just posted here, so why are you saying he's wrong?

[ssk13809]

Go read Sport Scientist's post again. He said that you think games where the star gets hurt should not count against you... that's EXACTLY what you just posted here, so why are you saying he's wrong?

Read what I replied to him.

Has any of what you said above actually ever happened? Really? Did I not count some injured player loss? Did I count a line 4 days ago?

Has any of what "I think" actually happened? NO

I counted even the games my players got injured



What matters more, what I think should count, or what actually counted? I thought the later was more important but everyone seems to concentrate on the former.

[frizzelli]

God SSK is actually the biggest idiot on SBR and their are a lot of idiots on this site.

[ssk13809]

God SSK is actually the biggest idiot on SBR and their are a lot of idiots on this site.

70% ATS last year (documented) and 100% ATS this year (documented)

tell me when you hit those numbers smart guy

[rsnnh12]

Read what I replied to him.
Has any of what "I think" actually happened? NO

I counted even the games my players got injured



What matters more, what I think should count, or what actually counted? I thought the later was more important but everyone seems to concentrate on the former.

You honestly expect people to take someone seriously when that person believes an injury shouldn't affect their record? Are you kidding me? It shows a serious lack of logic on your part, and quite frankly makes you look like a moron. You may be a great capper, you may not be, but this line of thinking sure isn't helping people's opinions of you.

Just my 2 cents