Ron Paul for President???

[rkelly110]

Borderline obsessive compulsive if you ask me, Mr Sanchez.

[wtf]

chinese in texas, love it

[ABEHONEST]

Is that black Chinese?

[Salmon Steak]

Ron Paul is going to need a major boost in donations. You hear that Justin7? Time to pony up.

[PhillyFlyers]

Ron Paul Packs the Great Hall in Countdown to Caucus

Ron Paul Packs the Great Hall in Countdown to Caucus

http://urbandale.patch.com/articles/ron-paul-counts-down-to-the-caucus

[ABEHONEST]

Ron Paul Packs the Great Hall in Countdown to Caucus http://urbandale.patch.com/articles/...-to-the-caucus

Keep 'em coming ABE...I mean PAUL!

[PhillyFlyers]

Ron Paul Warns That ‘War Drums Are Beating’ on Iran

Ron Paul Warns That ‘War Drums Are Beating’ on Iran

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/ron-paul-warns-that-war-drums-are-beating-on-iran/

[Dirty Sanchez]

[Dirty Sanchez]

[ABEHONEST]

Paul was the Ohio high school state champ in the 220 yard dash. Now, he wants to kick Dirty's ass!

[Bluehorseshoe]

Ron Paul highlights from last night. Rick Perry thanks Paul for teaching him about the Federal Reserve. lol

[PhillyFlyers]

Ron Paul clobbers Gingrich, Romney in Drake University straw poll

http://www.thestatecolumn.com/texas/ron-paul-clobbers-gingrich-romney-in-drake-university-straw-poll/

Ron Paul supporters to collect 5 tons of food for charity





Debate: Ron Paul stresses need for new financial policy

[PhillyFlyers]

Scarborough: Like Beck, I'd Consider Third-Party Ron Paul Over Gingrich

Scarborough: Like Beck, I'd Consider Third-Party Ron Paul Over Gingrich

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2011/12/13/scarborough-beck-id-consider-third-party-ron-paul-over-gingrich

Ron Paul 2012: Why He is Right on Foreign Policy

http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/265912/20111213/ron-paul-2012-right-foreign-policy.htm

Joe Scarborough, Glenn Beck Agree: Ron Paul Better Than Newt Gingrich

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/13/joe-scarborough-glenn-beck-newt-gingrich-ron-paul_n_1145785.html

[PhillyFlyers]

Ron Paul vs. Obama Issue By Issue Video

[PhillyFlyers]

Ron Paul gains Ground, Further Stirring Republicans

Ron Paul gains ground, further stirring Republicans

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/14/us-usa-campaign-paul-idUSTRE7BD1TN20111214

[PhillyFlyers]

Ron Paul A Force To Be Reckoned With

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ron-paul-the-alternative-candidate-is-a-force-to-be-reckoned-with/2011/12/01/gIQAKDYouO_story_2.html

[Glitch]

Ron Paul gains ground, further stirring Republicans

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...7BD1TN20111214

how can you preach to everyone about how much of a chance he has and then make posts saying and showing that he is "stirring republicans"

dont even have to click your links to develop this question.

[PhillyFlyers]

how can you preach to everyone about how much of a chance he has and then make posts saying and showing that he is "stirring republicans"

dont even have to click your links to develop this question.

So you're just going to make a blatantly bad comment without even reading the article. Perhaps you should read the article before you speak. He's stirring up republicans because he's going to win.

[Glitch]

if the definition-usage of "stirring" here is more synonymous with bother than gather then my statement remains true despite whether or not i read the article. that is irrelevant. if my guess at your usage of the word in the article's title is incorrect then that is a different story.

its not a bad comment, just a comment. his strategy of making the wrong type of enemies is counter-productive to his quest for the office and it is making wide-eyed dreamers like yourself waste votes.

just because its a flash of the reality light on your precious savior Dr. Paul, that does not mean the comment is bad.

being the most honest guy running and telling all his plans without the political BS does NOT make him the best man for the job.

[PhillyFlyers]

if the definition-usage of "stirring" here is more synonymous with bother than gather then my statement remains true despite whether or not i read the article. that is irrelevant. if my guess at your usage of the word in the article's title is incorrect then that is a different story.

its not a bad comment, just a comment. his strategy of making the wrong type of enemies is counter-productive to his quest for the office and it is making wide-eyed dreamers like yourself waste votes.

just because its a flash of the reality light on your precious savior Dr. Paul, that does not mean the comment is bad.

being the most honest guy running and telling all his plans without the political BS does NOT make him the best man for the job.

You twisted the term "stirring up". It doesn't mean bother. You're commenting without even knowing in what context the term is being used. Read the article. He's not making enemies he's gaining ground and gathering momentum. Being truthful and sincere is what all politicians should be but so few are. Dr. Paul is the exception. He is the best man for the job not because he's honest and sincere. He is the best man for the job because he is right. They don't challenge him on the issues, they try to smear and lie about him. Anyone who can only be fought through lies is truly the leader this country needs.

[PhillyFlyers]

[Tully Mars 63]

Well to be fair any could make a career out of correcting Bachmann's facts.

The GOP has spent months tying not to select Mitt, at some point you'd think they'd come around to Paul.

[MartinBlank]

Paul's comments last night abour Iran and their nuclear capability made him look extra-looney.

I like Paul, and I can understand the libertarian approach. But common sense has to be part of the equation, and why he refuses to acknowledge that Iran is trying to develop a nuclear weapon is scary, and it won't go away no matter how deep Paul buries his head in the sand.

[Tully Mars 63]

A lot of the problems I have with Paul involve his logic of it's either this crazy option or my crazy option... thee are no other options. Usually that logic produces rather odd fallacies.

[Bluehorseshoe]

Well to be fair any could make a career out of correcting Bachmann's facts.

The GOP has spent months tying not to select Mitt, at some point you'd think they'd come around to Paul.

It's amazing how she gets away with making things up. Every debate she says something that's completely untrue.

[Bluehorseshoe]

Paul's comments last night abour Iran and their nuclear capability made him look extra-looney.

I like Paul, and I can understand the libertarian approach. But common sense has to be part of the equation, and why he refuses to acknowledge that Iran is trying to develop a nuclear weapon is scary, and it won't go away no matter how deep Paul buries his head in the sand.

Because what he's really saying (but can't say) is let Israel deal with it. We shouldn't get involved.

[ABEHONEST]

Bachmann lives in her own world of naivety.

[PhillyFlyers]

Paul's comments last night abour Iran and their nuclear capability made him look extra-looney.

I like Paul, and I can understand the libertarian approach. But common sense has to be part of the equation, and why he refuses to acknowledge that Iran is trying to develop a nuclear weapon is scary, and it won't go away no matter how deep Paul buries his head in the sand.

How is it common sense to start another war when the USA is bankrupt financially? How are you going to pay for it?

Ron Paul is right. This is nothing more than more war propaganda. Just like Iraq. We were told they have "weapons of mass destruction". Total bullshit.

Now, Iran is a threat because they might try to build a nuke and now we have to bomb them and start another war? Here's an idea. Let israel fight their own battles instead of having the USA do it.

Far from common sense, this is insanity.

[PhillyFlyers]

Ron Paul Debate Highlights

[Tully Mars 63]

Now, Iran is a threat because they might try to build a nuke and now we have to bomb them and start another war? Here's an idea. Let israel fight their own battles instead of having the USA do it.

So the only two options are either we start a war with them or let Israel deal with the problem alone? More "it's either this option or that option logic" in my opinion when the reality is they are a many possible ways to deal with it.

[PhillyFlyers]

So the only two options are either we start a war with them or let Israel deal with the problem alone? More "it's either this option or that option logic" in my opinion when the reality is they are a many possible ways to deal with it.

No, I didn't say that. I said I support Ron Paul's position that we don't need another war.

I would leave Iran alone since they aren't a threat to the USA. If israel thinks they are a threat then let them deal with it.

[Tully Mars 63]

Sorry I quoted what you said because I thought that's what you were saying. Rereading I could see how what you wrote could be taken more then one way.

So the US should simply stay out of it even if Iran is building a Nuke?

[Glitch]

No, I didn't say that. I said I support Ron Paul's position that we don't need another war.

I would leave Iran alone since they aren't a threat to the USA. If israel thinks they are a threat then let them deal with it.

but do you support ron paul's position that we need to bring All the Troops home from hostile territories right now???

THAT is the question. hes no general or friend of the general. how the F*ck does he even have the audacity to pretend like he knows whats going on?

i like Dr. Paul as a person. he is a dreamer. some of his policies are extreme, ignorant, dangerously presumptive.

he wants to get rid of all these programs and departments but he doesn't seem to understand that there is an infrastructure in place. things are as simple as he thinks.

but at least he's honest. no body can take that away from him. hes the only guy speaking his mind but that doesnt make him the best guy for the job.

[PhillyFlyers]

Sorry I quoted what you said because I thought that's what you were saying. Rereading I could see how what you wrote could be taken more then one way.

So the US should simply stay out of it even if Iran is building a Nuke?

Yes. First, we can't afford another war. We have no money.

Secondly, there are many nations that have nuclear weapons, should we bomb them all?

Third, Iran is not threat to the USA.

[PhillyFlyers]

but do you support ron paul's position that we need to bring All the Troops home from hostile territories right now???

THAT is the question. hes no general or friend of the general. how the F*ck does he even have the audacity to pretend like he knows whats going on?

i like Dr. Paul as a person. he is a dreamer. some of his policies are extreme, ignorant, dangerously presumptive.

he wants to get rid of all these programs and departments but he doesn't seem to understand that there is an infrastructure in place. things are as simple as he thinks.

but at least he's honest. no body can take that away from him. hes the only guy speaking his mind but that doesnt make him the best guy for the job.

Please stop with the nonsense. There is nothing Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, or Rick Santorum knows better than Ron Paul.

As far as your question if I support bringing all the troops home from hostile territories, the answer is yes.

How is having over 900 bases in over 130 countries a benefit to us?

How is having troops on, say, the Korean border helping us in any way?

How can we continue to afford to pay for over 900 bases in over 130 countries around the world?

How can we afford to keep these wasteful, massive, departments of government that do nothing positive?

If you think Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, Mitt Romney or Michele Bachmann can solve these problems better than Ron Paul could than I would say it's you who is the dreamer.