what was the record yesterday?
NCAA First Half Bets.....
Collapse
X
-
The SeerSBR Posting Legend
- 10-29-07
- 10641
#141Comment -
Joe SharpSBR MVP
- 06-01-09
- 3011
#1425 Games fit the system yesterday.....
Syracuse Lost both halves
Purdue Lost the 1st but Covered the 2nd
VTech, Arizona and South Florida all Covered the 1st half
Single Play Record: 4-3
Chase: 4-1
Either way your looking at about +.7 Units.
If you were lucky enough to miss the Syracuse game you would have had a very nice day.Comment -
daneault23SBR MVP
- 09-08-09
- 3871
#143So why is it so important that there is no ML for the 1st half? If all of the other criteria are met, but there is a ML for 1st half, technically it would be a no play. Does that really matter?Comment -
daneault23SBR MVP
- 09-08-09
- 3871
#144For example, at my book 5Dimes, the only plays that would qualify are Michigan State and Louisville. But Louisville has a 1st half ML, and Michigan State doesn't. I checked other books and there is no 1st half ML for the Louisville game. I will probably play both, but was just asking because my book offers the ML, while others do not.Comment -
Joe SharpSBR MVP
- 06-01-09
- 3011
#145The biggest indicator and most important factor is the percentage of the 1st H ML to the game ML. Divide the 1st half ML by the game ML and this number must be under 32%. If it passes this criterion then you have a play. If it is under 32% that is the threshold for statistical relevancy as related to our current knowledge what is the success rate? The answer is two fold. This play (remember only in NCAA bb) has historical data success rate of 70%. The other component is this. We are talking about potential blowout games and in nearly every case if the underdog does cover the 1st half resulting in a loss, the favored team covers the 2nd half at such a high percentage that posting the number here might make heads explode. Yes, occasionally you will lose both halves but the percentages are in your favor.
See Post #1Comment -
Joe SharpSBR MVP
- 06-01-09
- 3011
#146No 1st Half ML was part of the 'original' system and works for MOST. If you consistently get 1st half ML's... You should use the method described above (dividing the ML's).
Please feel free to share your Math here!!Comment -
Joe SharpSBR MVP
- 06-01-09
- 3011
#147Potential Plays
Louisville
Michigan State (absurd line)
Missouri StateComment -
HOOKEMcnhSBR High Roller
- 09-14-10
- 164
#148Is anyone taking Mich. State? I have them at -18 for 1H!Comment -
ebbearsfb1SBR Posting Legend
- 12-07-08
- 18815
#149when will they be said whats official?Comment -
ACoochySBR Posting Legend
- 08-19-09
- 13949
#150On Louisville and M.State here and am prepared to chase if necessary. Il only wager a total of 3% of BR when chasing this early in season as too many unknown factors to take into account...GLComment -
ebbearsfb1SBR Posting Legend
- 12-07-08
- 18815
#151which m state? is that missouri or mich?Comment -
ACoochySBR Posting Legend
- 08-19-09
- 13949
-
ebbearsfb1SBR Posting Legend
- 12-07-08
- 18815
#153o okay sounds good... lousville and mizz state it isComment -
daneault23SBR MVP
- 09-08-09
- 3871
-
daneault23SBR MVP
- 09-08-09
- 3871
#155Missouri State is only -8.5 so its not a play cuz its not -9.5 for 1st half.Comment -
ebbearsfb1SBR Posting Legend
- 12-07-08
- 18815
#158so no play on mizz state.. back to mich state?Comment -
ebbearsfb1SBR Posting Legend
- 12-07-08
- 18815
#159winner on the villeComment -
daneault23SBR MVP
- 09-08-09
- 3871
#160Louisville cashesComment -
ebbearsfb1SBR Posting Legend
- 12-07-08
- 18815
#161mizz state would have also...
ne one playing michigan state -18.5?Comment -
ACoochySBR Posting Legend
- 08-19-09
- 13949
#163Looks like we have a 2nd hald play on Mich St. Personally pounding the number hard if its 17 or under, anything over and its the normal 'double up'.....GLComment -
Strange DesignSBR Sharp
- 10-06-10
- 251
#166Good luck to everyone on the chase.Comment -
HOOKEMcnhSBR High Roller
- 09-14-10
- 164
#167Chimawhatever was throwing up ridiculous shots, hopefully izzo will light a fire under them.Comment -
jgraySBR MVP
- 09-06-09
- 3599
#169If I'm not mistaken, MSU is the third team in the past five days to fail in both halves.
MSU, Cuse and Boston College.
That's three times in the last 5 days. I'm not saying the system is a failure and should be abandoned. I'm just hoping that everyone coming into this thread now understands blindly tailing a system can lead you to ruins. And again, as I've said earlier. It's very early. Go very easy on these plays until teams get sorted out. Good luck everyone.
On to the next one.Comment -
ACoochySBR Posting Legend
- 08-19-09
- 13949
#170If I'm not mistaken, MSU is the third team in the past five days to fail in both halves. MSU, Cuse and Boston College. That's three times in the last 5 days. I'm not saying the system is a failure and should be abandoned. I'm just hoping that everyone coming into this thread now understands blindly tailing a system can lead you to ruins. And again, as I've said earlier. It's very early. Go very easy on these plays until teams get sorted out. Good luck everyone. On to the next one.
My calcuations had this figure at 48% (-26000 Michigan St 1st half ML/-54000 MIchigian St FG ML from 5 dimes)....
Can someone please confirm this for me....Hope i am wrong....GLComment -
Strange DesignSBR Sharp
- 10-06-10
- 251
#171EDIT: Nevermind, I'm wrong here.Comment -
illarytotSBR High Roller
- 11-09-10
- 153
#172I agree, later in the season more predictableComment -
BigMamaSBR Sharp
- 01-28-10
- 439
#173Great day for allComment -
Joe SharpSBR MVP
- 06-01-09
- 3011
#174This was successful for quite some time. I am sure books have adjusted a bit. We have to follow the guidelines strictly. Judging by that math MSU shouldn't be a play but its tough to check all books for the necessary #'s.
When "potential" plays are posted & you happen to see ML's - Please post them here. Looks like we'll have less plays but I'm sure it'll improve our success rate.
We are looking for 32%.... 48% is not acceptable.Comment -
jgraySBR MVP
- 09-06-09
- 3599
#175Good point. Went a little silly today as already 5-1 for the day using similar system to this (no chase)...After revising im not sure if the Michigan State play actually fit the criteria re 'The biggest indicator and most important factor is the percentage of the 1st H ML to the game ML. Divide the 1st half ML by the game ML and this number must be under 32%.'
My calcuations had this figure at 48% (-26000 Michigan St 1st half ML/-54000 MIchigian St FG ML from 5 dimes)....
Can someone please confirm this for me....Hope i am wrong....GLComment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code