outstanding guys!..This is gonna be a shit load of fun!
Comment
Alfie B
SBR Sharp
03-12-08
488
#37
I'm in there. Been waiting since February. In Prickies thread starter it said a $50 deposit must be made to DSI, am I missing something due to Pricksters marbles in his mouth or do I need $200 there as some posters suggested. . I've never used DSI but have an account due to BTP last year, how much do I need to send?
Comment
pavyracer
SBR Aristocracy
04-12-07
82839
#38
Originally posted by SBR_John
I thought I made that clear. If you open & fund a DSI account you play for cash...if you dont you play for points. And the split is $10k a week. You win cash if you have an account or points if you dont.
It wasn't all clear. I think you still need to separate the records of the ones who fund with cash with the ones who don't. Only the records of the ones funding with cash should count vs The Prick's record and the same should be done with the ones playing for points (non-funded accounts).
Comment
tltaylor89
SBR Posting Legend
06-19-09
19610
#39
So John are you still taking point bets on the top 100 ?
Comment
capitalist pig
SBR MVP
01-25-07
4998
#40
Originally posted by SBR_John
I thought I made that clear. If you open & fund a DSI account you play for cash...if you dont you play for points. And the split is $10k a week. You win cash if you have an account or points if you dont.
Its very clear, and this is a much better way to play the contest, unlike last year requiring accounts @ multiple books ,JMO. Kudos to the Cris family for sponsering the contest alone.
later
Comment
8550937
SBR Wise Guy
09-11-06
671
#41
dont understand cash does it mean cash you can take right away or cash in the account with rollovers?thanks.
Comment
BigDaddy
SBR Hall of Famer
02-01-06
8378
#42
Originally posted by pavyracer
It wasn't all clear. I think you still need to separate the records of the ones who fund with cash with the ones who don't. Only the records of the ones funding with cash should count vs The Prick's record and the same should be done with the ones playing for points (non-funded accounts).
yeah i don't think he understood your post.
i know i did and i see it the same way as you do
10k will not be paid out every week that is a fact.
more points then cash will be paid out would be my guess for the entire year
Comment
pavyracer
SBR Aristocracy
04-12-07
82839
#43
Originally posted by BigDaddy
yeah i don't think he understood your post.
i know i did and i see it the same way as you do
10k will not be paid out every week that is a fact.
more points then cash will be paid out would be my guess for the entire year
Yeah I saw your post earlier and tried to add my own spice. The amount of cash and points awarded each week should be fixed. Cash funded accounts win the fixed amount of cash and non-funded accounts win the fixed amount of points.
Comment
Dark Horse
SBR Posting Legend
12-14-05
13764
#44
Originally posted by pavyracer
$200 funding with DSI.
Between all the expletives I was able to get this. This is a good rule. It eliminates all the free loaders as well as the ghosting that was rampant last year. I guess you can ghost now but it's gonna cost you an extra $200.
I'm assuming someone has to verify the $200 deposit before your name enters the contest.
Good rule. Leaves more money on the table, plus it looks like weekly prize money was doubled.
Now if only we could get some DSI guy in here, and 'connect'.
Comment
BigDaddy
SBR Hall of Famer
02-01-06
8378
#45
DH
read the thread again
Pavy yes you said everything i was trying so say but you put it in words much better than i did.
Comment
losturmarbles
SBR MVP
07-01-08
4604
#46
you guys are mixing the freeroll players and buyin players
you should have 2 different groups
cash group
points group
otherwise the prize pool will be watered down by a bunch of freerollers, even though the weekly prize has doubled, the average payout will be less than last year.
Comment
poker_dummy101
Restricted User
11-03-08
6395
#47
so basically, less cash will be paid out than last year and more points will be paid out
edit: yea marbles posted exactly what i was referring to.
it wont actually be a 10k prize... we will have over double more people this year with less than half havin a real money account.. meaning less than 5k per week will actually be given out
im not complaining, i love btp, im just saying that is the case
Comment
THEGREAT30
SBR Hall of Famer
10-04-08
8970
#48
so, is DSI gonna be the only sponsor or the big sponsor?
Comment
SBR_John
SBR Posting Legend
07-12-05
16471
#49
Originally posted by capitalist pig
Its very clear, and this is a much better way to play the contest, unlike last year requiring accounts @ multiple books ,JMO. Kudos to the Cris family for sponsering the contest alone.
later
Thank you. It is much simplier this year.
We will go down the list of winners and deposit cash(rollover required) into the winners that have DSI accounts and award points to those who don't. Any way you cut it its a lot of cash and a lot of points and it will be a lot of fun.
Comment
SBR_John
SBR Posting Legend
07-12-05
16471
#50
Originally posted by THEGREAT30
so, is DSI gonna be the only sponsor or the big sponsor?
Yes.
Comment
Dark Horse
SBR Posting Legend
12-14-05
13764
#51
Originally posted by poker_dummy101
so basically, less cash will be paid out than last year and more points will be paid out
edit: yea marbles posted exactly what i was referring to.
it wont actually be a 10k prize... we will have over double more people this year with less than half havin a real money account.. meaning less than 5k per week will actually be given out
im not complaining, i love btp, im just saying that is the case
I don't think so. Dozer said 160K in total prize money. So that looks like about 10K per week. Divided over far fewer contestants than last year. Basically, this is a step towards the old BTP.
Comment
BigDaddy
SBR Hall of Famer
02-01-06
8378
#52
Originally posted by Dark Horse
I don't think so. Dozer said 160K in total prize money. So that looks like about 10K per week. Divided over far fewer contestants than last year. Basically, this is a step towards the old BTP.
please read the thread again
Comment
poker_dummy101
Restricted User
11-03-08
6395
#53
Originally posted by Dark Horse
I don't think so. Dozer said 160K in total prize money. So that looks like about 10K per week. Divided over far fewer contestants than last year. Basically, this is a step towards the old BTP.
read post number 27
Comment
Dark Horse
SBR Posting Legend
12-14-05
13764
#54
Originally posted by SBR_John
BD if there are 5 winners and only 1 has an account, that guy with a DSI account would get $2,000 and the other 4 would get 2,000 points each. Not a bad scoop of points for those without an account. If all 5 have a DSI account then they would get $2,000 each. Thats the way the sponsor wants it.
Ok, post #27 copied above. So 160K in prize money, but most of it may not be paid out, depending on ratio between paying and free players.
Oh well, 200 bucks gets you an entry in the Carib contest, and the winner there should take home about 70K. BTP was fun and cool. Now it's just fun.
May I add that this much heralded system of free points is hereby actually costing winning BTP players money? Not a criticism. I just love irony.
Comment
ronjon619
SBR MVP
09-06-09
3675
#55
so it's $10,000 / points. If no weekly winners made a deposit only points will be awarded. So 10k is getting divided by the number of winners and each winner will get their cut in either points or cash depending if they made a deposit or not. Why not have 2 standings one for 10k in cash and one for 10k in points.
Comment
ronjon619
SBR MVP
09-06-09
3675
#56
Originally posted by losturmarbles
you guys are mixing the freeroll players and buyin players
you should have 2 different groups
cash group
points group
otherwise the prize pool will be watered down by a bunch of freerollers, even though the weekly prize has doubled, the average payout will be less than last year.
same thought........i agree 100%
Comment
Dark Horse
SBR Posting Legend
12-14-05
13764
#57
Originally posted by ronjon619
so it's $10,000 / points. If no weekly winners made a deposit only points will be awarded. So 10k is getting divided by the number of winners and each winner will get their cut in either points or cash depending if they made a deposit or not. Why not have 2 standings one for 10k in cash and one for 10k in points.
Good idea. SBR John would be kind of guy to agree. Why should the popularity of the contest, and of SBR forum, work against people who make the contest possible by depositing at DSI?
Comment
Richkas
SBR Posting Legend
02-03-08
19396
#58
Bottom line, same as last year, but you get points instead of cash if you dont fund the account SBR says. If you do deposit cash, you can still be phucked by the people who dont. I'll play for points thank you.
Comment
ronjon619
SBR MVP
09-06-09
3675
#59
Fu(k online books. I make my bets at a casino.
Comment
jjgold
SBR Aristocracy
07-20-05
388179
#60
He looks like a fukkin Samoan, what a hick
Comment
pavyracer
SBR Aristocracy
04-12-07
82839
#61
If it is $10,000/points given out to winners depending on the ratio of cash funded to non-funded accounts winners then there is no incentive to fund an account. This does not make sense at all to me from a business point of view but I will let the accountants of SBR figure it out.
Comment
Dark Horse
SBR Posting Legend
12-14-05
13764
#62
This setup is going to create some annoyed winners. As in 1 real weekly winner and 9 point winners. That's 10K turned into 1K. Sure, it's a free 1K, but ... it belittles the contest.
Comment
Richkas
SBR Posting Legend
02-03-08
19396
#63
Originally posted by pavyracer
If it is $10,000/points given out to winners depending on the ratio of cash funded to non-funded accounts winners then there is no incentive to fund an account. This does not make sense at all to me from a business point of view but I will let the accountants of SBR figure it out.
Its just a scam. They make more if you deposit. It doesnt take a brain surgeon to figure it out. Anybody who deposits is a phucking idiot.
Comment
BigDaddy
SBR Hall of Famer
02-01-06
8378
#64
pavy i will still fund my account with $50 but i will not play it.
it will sit for 17 weeks
it would be dumb not to.
but i can see your point as well i have never understood why books even allow it.
like i said these forum contests where if you are not active you get 25% of the prize
what do books want active players or contest whores?
in reality all of the BTP contestants could deposit $50 and just let it sit for 17 weeks and never bet a game with deposited money. only use prize money that they win and always leave $50 in the account
Comment
MexicanStallion
SBR Posting Legend
09-08-08
20429
#65
Sounds good. Thanks SBR. So is it $50 or $200 deposit? Saw two different amounts.
Comment
ronjon619
SBR MVP
09-06-09
3675
#66
Originally posted by jjgold
He looks like a fukkin Samoan, what a hick
Hawaiian JJ. Close enough
Comment
pavyracer
SBR Aristocracy
04-12-07
82839
#67
Originally posted by Richkas
Its just a scam. They make more if you deposit. It doesnt take a brain surgeon to figure it out. Anybody who deposits is a phucking idiot.
As a player who funds accounts every year I would love the weekly cash payouts to go to the other fellow cash funding posters who support DSI (the sponsor) with their money. Like Dark Horse said if I was the only cash winner beating all the other free rollers and have my cash price being watered down with points awarded to other posters who did not cash fund the sponsor I would be extremely pissed off.
There is no need to keep the free rollers in the same pool with cash funding players. I'm not saying they shouldn't participate in the contest..they just need to keep their own points prizes separated from the cash funded players pot.
Comment
Richkas
SBR Posting Legend
02-03-08
19396
#68
Originally posted by pavyracer
As a player who funds accounts every year I would love the weekly cash payouts to go to the other fellow cash funding posters who support DSI (the sponsor) with their money. Like Dark Horse said if I was the only cash winner beating all the other free rollers and have my cash price being watered down with points awarded to other posters who did not cash fund the sponsor I would be extremely pissed off.
There is no need to keep the free rollers in the same pool with cash funding players. I'm not saying they shouldn't participate in the contest..they just need to keep their own points prizes separated from the cash funded players pot.
I agree. But they are not doing it that way. If they did, I would make the deposit. But I'll be goddamn if I'm going to deposit and lose 1 game and let 5 freeloaders beat me out of top prize with perfect records.
Comment
Dark Horse
SBR Posting Legend
12-14-05
13764
#69
I don't think the Prick got the message yet. His video is full of talk about real players. And now his prickly contest has been turned into the exact opposite.
What do you have to say about THAT, Kindergarten Prickster?!
Comment
pavyracer
SBR Aristocracy
04-12-07
82839
#70
Originally posted by Dark Horse
I don't think the Prick got the message yet. His video is full of talk about real players. And now his prickly contest has been turned into the exact opposite.
What do you have to say about THAT, Kindergarten Prickster?!
If you listen between 1:15 - 1:50 he is very specific in that only cash funded players will share the loot and free loaders can kiss his ass..