John Morrison 2010 NBA

[chilidog]

if the above records are correct it seems as though you have lost money at -15 units per loss, good luck!

Well, I run a labby on the plays, and I'm up plenty.

[stevex]

chili you buying the 3 points?

[krzychu78]

JM's NBA V3 system:
12/22/2010 Chicago @ Washington - V3, A bet - WIN

V3 record so far (finished series): 24-1
(A): 14-11
(B): 9-2
(C): 1-1

Next V3 plays:
12/25/2010 Boston @ Orlando - V3, A bet
12/25/2010 Portland @ Golden State - V3, A bet

[atari5200]

In your face!!

Easiest win this season

we're on this thread to discuss plays, thoughts, strategies for this system. Don't get personal with me Knugen. I'm not here to play some kindergarden s hit with you. keep it clean man, and stay focused on making good money.

Wilba, you're absolutely right, these filters are clouding our judgments at times and its straying from the original strength of this system. I wanted us to ignore the ML favs filter and you make a good point to ignore the injury filter. Lines are adjusted accordingly. Let's keep this up.

The bulls cashed in large for me, i didn't miss out much on the bucks, my face is fine

BOL everyone and enjoy your xmas.

[knugen]

Merry christmas people, cant Wait until tomorrow to win more money....!

[million2one]

Sixers should be a solid play as well on the 26th.
They take this west coast trip every year after Christmas and always cover at least one of the first three.

And don't forget the other Philadelphia team, the Flyers, will also be making a west coast trip. And they are off a loss, I love this one.

[bauerranch]

Merry Christmas to everyone

[lajolla sundevil]

Merry Christmas to everyone

You too!

[R6MC]

Fact 1: In order to break even using Morrison's system you have to win 95% of the series that you wager on. Fact 2: There are all sorts of exceptions to Morrison's system and all of these exceptions were added on the rare occassions when the system failed. Fact 3: When compiling the overall win loss record for the system, the lines being used are very often not available as I read over and over again postings from system followers saying they lost a game when Morrison counted it as a win due to Morrison using a more favorable line than what was really available. This is a system that requires a bare minimum of a 95% success rate just to break even and when you factor in all these exceptions that were implemented to cover up system losses along with the problem of questionable lines being used to inflate the record of the system makes this system totally worthless. Systems like this one become very popular because it wins so often (remember the 95% win rate required just to break even). Finally, the only book that will let you buy 3 points at the fair rate of -170 is BetUs which is shaky financially and also skews the lines offered on the Morrison games. In the world of sports betting, there just isn't any shortcuts to making profits. On the rare occassion where a real +EV system comes along (i.e. correlated parlays being one example), the books are very quick at making the proper adjustment to render the system worthless. I'll never understand why so many bettors continue to bang their heads against the wall trying to make money betting into well-handicapped lines when there are so many easier ways to make profits betting on sports. Anyone who is planning on following this Morrison system for the upcoming NBA season should tread very carefully.

bingo

[juice050]

Originally Posted by andywend
Fact 1: In order to break even using Morrison's system you have to win 95% of the series that you wager on. Fact 2: There are all sorts of exceptions to Morrison's system and all of these exceptions were added on the rare occassions when the system failed. Fact 3: When compiling the overall win loss record for the system, the lines being used are very often not available as I read over and over again postings from system followers saying they lost a game when Morrison counted it as a win due to Morrison using a more favorable line than what was really available. This is a system that requires a bare minimum of a 95% success rate just to break even and when you factor in all these exceptions that were implemented to cover up system losses along with the problem of questionable lines being used to inflate the record of the system makes this system totally worthless. Systems like this one become very popular because it wins so often (remember the 95% win rate required just to break even). Finally, the only book that will let you buy 3 points at the fair rate of -170 is BetUs which is shaky financially and also skews the lines offered on the Morrison games. In the world of sports betting, there just isn't any shortcuts to making profits. On the rare occassion where a real +EV system comes along (i.e. correlated parlays being one example), the books are very quick at making the proper adjustment to render the system worthless. I'll never understand why so many bettors continue to bang their heads against the wall trying to make money betting into well-handicapped lines when there are so many easier ways to make profits betting on sports. Anyone who is planning on following this Morrison system for the upcoming NBA season should tread very carefully.




shut up damm!!!

[Wilba]

Thanks Wilba for your response. Another question, Am I correct in assuming that I need to research the best available line and buy the points off of that? Also I am new to using Covers, so when I go to past performances, what line is that W-L against? Thanks for any help.

I believe the covers line displayed is the closing line, but not too sure really.

As far as I am concerned, I just use the available Pinnacle line whenever I log on for all JM bets. Pinnacle lines are always true (unlike someone like Betus) and are never swayed by JM system bets. Doing it this way has (thus far) never failed me

[Wilba]

if the above records are correct it seems as though you have lost money at -15 units per loss, good luck!

if u play the system like a dumb chump rather than using your brain, (eg how JW uses the system plays etc) then yes, you probably are down this season thus far

[Wilba]

we're on this thread to discuss plays, thoughts, strategies for this system. Don't get personal with me Knugen. I'm not here to play some kindergarden s hit with you. keep it clean man, and stay focused on making good money.

Wilba, you're absolutely right, these filters are clouding our judgments at times and its straying from the original strength of this system. I wanted us to ignore the ML favs filter and you make a good point to ignore the injury filter. Lines are adjusted accordingly. Let's keep this up.

The bulls cashed in large for me, i didn't miss out much on the bucks, my face is fine

BOL everyone and enjoy your xmas.

good on you and I totally agree with everything that you say. And you are right, there is no need for personal stuff in this thread, we are all here to work together and help each other! And whether you think they are right or wrong, everyone is entitled to voice their opinion.

Best wishes everyone, hope you all have a merry and safe xmas

[Wilba]

Originally Posted by andywend
Fact 1: In order to break even using Morrison's system you have to win 95% of the series that you wager on. Fact 2: There are all sorts of exceptions to Morrison's system and all of these exceptions were added on the rare occassions when the system failed. Fact 3: When compiling the overall win loss record for the system, the lines being used are very often not available as I read over and over again postings from system followers saying they lost a game when Morrison counted it as a win due to Morrison using a more favorable line than what was really available. This is a system that requires a bare minimum of a 95% success rate just to break even and when you factor in all these exceptions that were implemented to cover up system losses along with the problem of questionable lines being used to inflate the record of the system makes this system totally worthless. Systems like this one become very popular because it wins so often (remember the 95% win rate required just to break even). Finally, the only book that will let you buy 3 points at the fair rate of -170 is BetUs which is shaky financially and also skews the lines offered on the Morrison games. In the world of sports betting, there just isn't any shortcuts to making profits. On the rare occassion where a real +EV system comes along (i.e. correlated parlays being one example), the books are very quick at making the proper adjustment to render the system worthless. I'll never understand why so many bettors continue to bang their heads against the wall trying to make money betting into well-handicapped lines when there are so many easier ways to make profits betting on sports. Anyone who is planning on following this Morrison system for the upcoming NBA season should tread very carefully.

Hi Andywend - come back at seasons end and see the final results for how both I and JW/Stevex/Chili did this seasons with our methods of playing the system. I guarantee you that we are both in the +, considerably

[c-fut]

Have a safe and Merry Xmas everyone. Lets get those "A's"

[Wilba]

Also - to all these doubters - if the system is so crap, then why don't you just fade it and make a fortune

I think you already know the answer to that question - coz u would get killed!

[SkivChef]

Merry xmas!!!!

[shermanator]

boston and portland are plays?

[krzychu78]

JM's NBA V3 system:
12/25/2010 Boston @ Orlando - V3, A bet
12/25/2010 Portland @ Golden State - V3, A bet

V3 record so far (finished series): 24-1
(A): 14-11
(B): 9-2
(C): 1-1

[imotiv8]

Anyone think boston wins straight up?

[stickbit]

Wilba / Stevex / JW / Chili - question for any of you playing this on a two line labby... what are you up for the season in units? Getting a late start here and wondering how you have done in terms of units so far. Thanks in advance and Happy Holidays!

[JW Cash]

Do you believe in Santa Claus...............

[Wilba]

Wilba / Stevex / JW / Chili - question for any of you playing this on a two line labby... what are you up for the season in units? Getting a late start here and wondering how you have done in terms of units so far. Thanks in advance and Happy Holidays!

sorry can't help on that one - I do things differently to those guys. I just 'flat' bet each V1 B bet for ~6.5% and each B for ~18.5% of my JM dedicated bankroll.

I'm sure one of them will answer soon, however, with labby's the results you get are not definitive, if that makes sense - What I mean is each person may choose differently when to tack a loss onto the end of A line, or B line, or spread the loss evenly over the A line, the B line, or over both lines etc. Too many variations of how u use labby for definitive results

[Wilba]

Do you believe in Santa Claus...............

I do now!

What a comeback from Jameer Nelson and my Magic!

[stickbit]

not looking for definitive results...just a rough idea what one of you has made in units using a 2 line labby.

[JW Cash]

I do now!

What a comeback from Jameer Nelson and my Magic!

I know...


The Magic was another System WIN for SBP.....

[EasyHustlin]

Also - to all these doubters - if the system is so crap, then why don't you just fade it and make a fortune I think you already know the answer to that question - coz u would get killed!

Actually Wilba, there have been people who have faded the system and managed to make a nice profit. I will look for the link but I remember it from last year. Not to mention Solamon's system is basically fading JM except he is betting 1H and 2H instead of the whole game, and he is up over 30 units so far this year. I'm not a "doubter" I'm just letting you know the system can be faded successfully.

[jphil]

i'd be interested in the fading after a jm A bet win, for us B & C only bettors. Not sure if profitable or not.

And sol. sys. involves too much monitoring. Just not for me; yet i'm not doubting the sys., but would rather concentrate my efforts on TPS sys. if anything.

[imotiv8]

What's the link to solamons system?

[jphil]

Link is not working- Removed-)

[jphil]

12/26: V1-Philly-A bet? open to opinions.

12/27: V1-Tor.-A bet. V3-Port.-B bet.

12/28: V3-Bost.-B bet.

[shermanator]

there a line yet?

[hagball52]

12/26: V1-Philly-A bet? open to opinions.

12/27: V1-Tor.-A bet. V3-Port.-B bet.

12/28: V3-Bost.-B bet.

Philly is not a true system bet because they are continuing on a prev started road trip but they do have 3 games against the opposing conf. Personal choice but the way Philly's been playing lately it looks like a decent play. They've been covering a lot lately.

[krzychu78]

JM's NBA V3 system:
12/25/2010 Boston @ Orlando - V3, A bet - LOSS
12/25/2010 Portland @ Golden State - V3, A bet - LOSS

V3 record so far (finished series): 24-1
(A): 14-11
(B): 9-2
(C): 1-1

Next V3 plays:
12/27/2010 Portland @ Utah - V3, B bet
12/28/2010 Boston @ Indiana - V3, B bet
12/29/2010 Memphis @ Sacramento - V3, A bet

[million2one]

Philly is not a true system bet because they are continuing on a prev started road trip but they do have 3 games against the opposing conf. Personal choice but the way Philly's been playing lately it looks like a decent play. They've been covering a lot lately.

Good point about Philadelphia and it being game 4 of an 8 game road trip, but I see this as a great v1 play.
They have had four days off and were home for the holidays so to the players it is like a new road trip heading west.

Just my thoughts,

Good luck if your gonna get down on the sixers.