Just a Minion trying to make it on his own now

[ThisGuy]

Your teaser looks good. If you want to consider one different game, maybe magic +9.5.

I like where you're heads at ... I now unveil the power trio

Orl +9.5
Lal +10
Mil -2

I coulda thrown Denver +12.5 but nahhhh i already have em at +4.5 and you never know with their weakened bench a blowout could worsen, I considered NO +14

[Gio21]

Vegas doesnt determine the winners just because they moved the line to 2 doesnt mean anything

[andrea_jean]

wow LA +2 ??? sound trap......

[masr]

LAKERS straight out win!!

[lakerfan420]

i think lakers will only win if its a team effort.. everyone knows kobe never wants to lose even if they have secured he wants to win win win

[Lakers714]

Phil has stressing the importance of winning the 1st game of road trips. Win or lose, I think well see a laker team that is ready for the spurs tonight.

[cecbo]

If I remember correctly, the last time they faced the Spurs as the first game of a road trip, they lost to the Spurs by 20. Lost a little back then on LA, but the next game at Dallas, I won big!

[colts]

I like where you're heads at ... I now unveil the power trio

Orl +9.5
Lal +10
Mil -2

I coulda thrown Denver +12.5 but nahhhh i already have em at +4.5 and you never know with their weakened bench a blowout could worsen, I considered NO +14

I like your new power 8pt. teaser even better. If you still like char -1.5 and indy -.5 and want to do another teaser, I would suggest OKC pk. Good luck to you tonight.

[MidgetTossers]

Anyone liking Toronto +3.5 tonight against utah?

[Chango]

I'll telling you MT, since denver has lost a few games in a row, this is a MUST WIN for Utah and they know it

[$Burm$]

Anyone liking Toronto +3.5 tonight against utah?

ik LB had put out a tip on another thread last night saying he likes toronto to win SU possible

[fly fisher]

Anyone liking Toronto +3.5 tonight against utah?

I am going with the jazz or I won't bet. If the line was 7 or more, I might not take jazz. Trap or not Jazz are the team most likely to cover. Cuz that is what they do, play the game till the end. It is the "Jerry Sloan" factor.

[ThisGuy]

Tor is 23-11 at home and Utah is 17-17 away. I'm taking the points w a small play on ML maybe. Toronto's bigs have length, athleticism, and can stretch a defense. Bosh>Boozer & Bargnani>Okur.

[shawnkang]

good luck tonight boys, im liking the raps, hawks, and maybe the lakers

[Chango]

Utah has also beat toronto 10 straight times

[ThisGuy]

^^^^ well that slows my roll. Definitely good to know thanx. Still happy with the points though

[Chango]

Look at the UTAH / TOR under as well -- Toronto averages 90.9 points a game against Utah in the last 9

[ThisGuy]

Are you looking to break down venue? Home vs away can skew individual score stats wildly

[mlb]

good luck tonight boys, im liking the raps, hawks, and maybe the lakers

Exactly who i am on

[shawnkang]

Exactly who i am on

hopefully we cash

[colts]

Utah has also beat toronto 10 straight times

Actually I found it at 9-1 SU with it being 9 straight, last nine. Still a great trend for SU. Utah is also 8-1 ATS last 9 against Toronto.

[lyon804]

I have been reading thru the thread a little and I am troubled to read about all the trends I am hearing about. I see stats for this, stats for that, just about any stat you can think of people here have them.. keep in mind all this has been accounted for in the line. Doesn't mean that the stats that support your plays will not work it just means its not the end all be all to sports gambling. With all that being said I personally don't feel tonites card very good. at least not near as much as some people do. Generally, I don't make it a practice of fading the public blindly or soley but I am considering the approach at the moment. Below, are the plays if the strategy is actually implemented.


Spurs -2
Atl -1.5
Toronto +3
NJ Nets +1.5
Hornets +6
Boston -4.5

Now, I realize that does not look appealing to the readers and contributors to this thread but the cool thing about these games is they are all home teams and they are getting no respect. none whatsoever. Problem with this strategy is there is no mm logic behind it. There is 6 games there and most likey 3 will win and 3 will lose, but if 4 comes off then you have had a nice nite... I don't see the public hitting more than 3 of these games tops. just my 2 cents.. good luck to you fellas tonite.

[Lakers714]

I have been reading thru the thread a little and I am troubled to read about all the trends I am hearing about. I see stats for this, stats for that, just about any stat you can think of people here have them.. keep in mind all this has been accounted for in the line. Doesn't mean that the stats that support your plays will not work it just means its not the end all be all to sports gambling. With all that being said I personally don't feel tonites card very good. at least not near as much as some people do. Generally, I don't make it a practice of fading the public blindly or soley but I am considering the approach at the moment. Below, are the plays if the strategy is actually implemented.


Spurs -2
Atl -1.5
Toronto +3
NJ Nets +1.5
Hornets +6
Boston -4.5

Now, I realize that does not look appealing to the readers and contributors to this thread but the cool thing about these games is they are all home teams and they are getting no respect. none whatsoever. Problem with this strategy is there is no mm logic behind it. There is 6 games there and most likey 3 will win and 3 will lose, but if 4 comes off then you have had a nice nite... I don't see the public hitting more than 3 of these games tops. just my 2 cents.. good luck to you fellas tonite.

Hey Lyon, you don't think the Lakers game opening this morning at +2 is an overreaction to Bynum's injury?

[lyon804]

Hey Lyon, you don't think the Lakers game opening this morning at +2 is an overreaction to Bynum's injury?

no, the people that moved that line were not fish bro. The Lakers will be fine without Bynum for this game.. that just means Odum gets more playing time and Gasol gets more touches. The truth here is the Lakers are a better team for sure, but the Spurs need this game more and its at home. Lakers prob. play it like just another game and the spurs bring it..

it all about the % i really have no clue about tonite as the Lakers might just whip Spurs... who knows. I was just making a point how so many people are on the 6 raod teams that i mentioned and gave no credit to the home teams in the other 5 games... for me its not about winning the spurs but hopefully squeeze 4 out of 6 winners out on the home teams. the reason i never employ this strategy as there is no mm to it. most likely i go 3-3 and lose the juice and what does that accomplish? Anyways, it about hitting your stronger plays and i have none now.

[Lakers714]

no, the people that moved that line were not fish bro. The Lakers will be fine without Bynum for this game.. that just means Odum gets more playing time and Gasol gets more touches. The truth here is the Lakers are a better team for sure, but the Spurs need this game more and its at home. Lakers prob. play it like just another game and the spurs bring it.. it all about the % i really have no clue about tonite as the Lakers might just whip Spurs... who knows. I was just making a point how so many people are on the 6 raod teams that i mentioned and gave no credit to the home teams in the other 5 games... for me its not about winning the spurs but hopefully squeeze 4 out of 6 winners out on the home teams. the reason i never employ this strategy as there is no mm to it. most likely i go 3-3 and lose the juice and what does that accomplish? Anyways, it about hitting your stronger plays and i have none now.

Thx for your input bro, it's always appreciated. I'm on Lakers big tonight, hoping I looked at the correct angle for this game. Good luck to you tonight.

[Gio21]

Hey Lyon, you don't think the Lakers game opening this morning at +2 is an overreaction to Bynum's injury?

Well bynum isn't a recent injusy he's been out for a few games if I'm correct I don't believe its a over reaction if it was don't you think the line would have opened at that number? Lb was right don't look at the percentages behind the lakers. They are always public plays regardless of the spread. If they were favored by 2 you would see them backed around the same percentages. Its kinda scarty that they gave them a extra point though.

[ThisGuy]

lot less likely for stupid fouls, 3 in the key calls (offense & defense), and travel calls. Woot Lakers sans Bynum. Lyon is 1000% correct though, Kobe plays the role of saboteur more than most realize.

[dmac2132]

cavs-6 tonite is the play

[lyon804]

Thx for your input bro, it's always appreciated. I'm on Lakers big tonight, hoping I looked at the correct angle for this game. Good luck to you tonight.

same to you friend. I hope the Lakers cover for you for sure.. I have no action tonite so I have no dog in the race at the moment. Def will root for a man that has big money on the game. Lakers should win but its on the road and how bad does the Lakers want it? I think the spurs want it but the lakers talent might just wipe that out. i expect it will be a very close game in the end. BOL!!!

[$Burm$]

cavs-6 tonite is the play

wats ur thoughts on y this is the play, i took new orleans and i was jw.

[linedrivr]

Anyone liking Toronto +3.5 tonight against utah?

I do and I like them +140 on the ML. playing it both ways.

[Gio21]

Maybe they moved the line to 2 so laker backers get worried and buy back? Lol I'm already on lakers since last night. I just don't get the why the line moved

[$Burm$]

pinny has O/U on the hawks/magic game at 196 while ive seen sum books as high as 200.5...wat do u guys think, i mean if ur leaning hawks youd prolly have to go with the over cuz the only way they win this one is in a high tempo game, but just curious

[$Burm$]

The only reason the line would move like this would be if heavy $$ would come in on the Spurs from sharps or if their was an injury not taken into account since the opening line came out

[Lakers714]

The only reason the line would move like this would be if heavy $$ would come in on the Spurs from sharps or if their was an injury not taken into account since the opening line came out

Line movement doesn't necessarily mean major money came in on the Spurs; especially for Laker games. Major money possibly coming in on the Spurs isn't the ONLY reason that could have caused the line movement.