Cousin Gabe's picks for UFC on FX 5 and other sh!t
Collapse
X
-
NunyaBidnessSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-26-09
- 9345
#106Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#108
Manuwa and Nelson were both locks. I was afraid one of them would be too good to be true. I got Manuwa at -180 and I thought that was a STEAL. Had him capped closer to -380.Comment -
NunyaBidnessSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-26-09
- 9345
#111Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#113UFC ON FX 5
#1) Jacob Volkmann -185 > Shane Roller
Feels too easy. I cap Volkmann closer to -500 than I do -200. Shouldn't have trouble taking Roller down, and controlling him for an easy 30-27 UD. I have a feeling he might submit a gassed Roller in the 3rd. We'll see. I'm taking him straight, not by decision.
#2) Jeremy Stephens -220 > Yves Edwards
There is value in Stephens by KO. He got whooped by Cerrone, this is his bounce back fight. Should make it look easy. Worst case scenario, he wins a hard fought decision.
#3) Josh Neer -280 > Justin Edwards
I think Justin might be related to Yves. Not sure. Anyway, both are going to lose. Neer is the better fighter, and has many paths to victory. He will probably take one, since he can't take two. I can't predict how he'll win, but he'll win.
too st0ned off the indica dominant kush my main russki defacto hooked me up with, i'll be back with the rest later...
Might want to hold back and see if he falls to +110 or better... Really good chance this becomes a dryhump clinic. If he avoids sub attempts from Prater's guard, he should be fine.
#5) Bart Palaszewski +160 > Diego Nunes
Diego is a technical striker, and Bart likes to brawl. He will get on the inside, and do damage to Nunes.
#6) Aaron Simpson +140 > Mike Pierce
I was hoping money would come in on Pierce rather than Simpson, but oh well. I believe Simpson is the more talented, versatile fighter. He is also a lot smarter than Pierce. He should be able to get a win here.
Rest, soon...Comment -
PunisherINDSBR MVP
- 02-24-11
- 4983
#115
but again, i havent been following the race too closely, so i could be completely off base.Comment -
PunisherINDSBR MVP
- 02-24-11
- 4983
#116actually, i could be completely wrong. i thought the next debate was exclusively foreign policy, but apparently its foreign and domestic policy. and it takes place in liberal NY. so on second thought, obama might actually do better than romney in the next one.Comment -
NunyaBidnessSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-26-09
- 9345
#117Also, its a town hall format, which should fit Obama's style better.Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#119PARLAY (3 TEAMS)
[306] UTAH +14½-120 (B+½)
[362] AUBURN -8½-130 (B+1)
[370] STANFORD -7-160 (B+2)
18/76
PARLAY (3 TEAMS)
[306] UTAH +16-150 (B+2)
[362] AUBURN -7-160 (B+2)
[370] STANFORD -7-160 (B+2)
15/51
PARLAY (6 TEAMS)
[302] STL RAMS +2½-110
[418] NY GIANTS -370
[419] TEN TITANS +195
[434] NO SAINTS -200
[4455] K. NISHIKORI +3½-135
(K. NISHIKORI vrs T. BERDYCH)
[4054] J. TSONGA -260
(M. YOUZHNY vrs J. TSONGA)
15/372
STRAIGHT BET
[302] STL RAMS +3½-170 (B+1)
510/300Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#120Let's start with the other sh!t...
PARLAY (3 TEAMS)
[4409] J. TIPSAREVIC -150
(J. TIPSAREVIC vrs G. SIMON)
[4424] J MONACO -155
(G. DIMITROV vrs J MONACO)
[4044] J. TSONGA -360
(N. DAVYDENKO vrs J. TSONGA)
400/1000
STRAIGHT BET
[4424] J MONACO -155
(G. DIMITROV vrs J MONACO)
155/100Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#121PARLAY (5 TEAMS)
[302] STL RAMS +1-110
[4440] M. RAONIC -350
(V. TROICKI vrs M. RAONIC)
[4445] K. NISHIKORI -320
(K. NISHIKORI vrs T. ROBREDO)
[4044] J. TSONGA -400
(N. DAVYDENKO vrs J. TSONGA)
[4709] N. LI -450
(N. LI vrs S. PENG)
32/125
I think Raonic -350 is a lock. Nishikori -320 is as good as a lock, too.Comment -
DirtyXSBR Wise Guy
- 06-05-11
- 686
#123Romney has a stiff jab and superior Jits. If the fight stays on the feet, I think he has the advantage. If it goes to the ground, he is dangerous off his back.
Obama is slick everywhere but I expect this fight to go to the judges, where it favors him. He makes this an ugly fight and wins with a few takedowns and stalling out the end of each round in top position.
Obama UD 50-49, 50-49, 50-49
I thought the line would have moved after last night, but on my book it remained unchanged after the debate. I had to throw down on Romney (not a fan of either one) because I cap this fight at evens, maybe a slight edge to Obama.
Ticket#:75487133
Nov 06 08:00 AMINTERNET / -1 Oct 04 11:03 AM PROP U.S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS - WINNER
[70202] REPUBLICANS +275
$100 / $275
Comment -
PunisherINDSBR MVP
- 02-24-11
- 4983
#124Last bit about the election, I promise. So I just read about a study that compared poll movement the week before the first debate with the week after the last debate, from 1960 to 2008. Every time except one, there was no substantial change in the polls. In the one outlier year, the candidate who performed better in the debates actually lost ground in the polls. So the study concluded that the debates have little, if any, impact on the election itself.
In light of this, one has to assume the jump from -520 to -275 was an overreaction. Im going to pull the trigger here. If the line improves I will just add more.Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#125I don't see how Obama loses
Cant imagine Romney as president, and I've got a pretty great imagination.Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#126If volkmann wins, I'm buying a volkmann 4 prez shirtComment -
NunyaBidnessSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-26-09
- 9345
#127Last bit about the election, I promise. So I just read about a study that compared poll movement the week before the first debate with the week after the last debate, from 1960 to 2008. Every time except one, there was no substantial change in the polls. In the one outlier year, the candidate who performed better in the debates actually lost ground in the polls. So the study concluded that the debates have little, if any, impact on the election itself.
In light of this, one has to assume the jump from -520 to -275 was an overreaction. Im going to pull the trigger here. If the line improves I will just add more.
Overreaction is one of the best ways to make money in sports betting. As far as elections you can usually follow the bumps up and down before and after conventions, debates etc. It also carries through to other sports, injuries, missed weight, etc; hitting them before they get factored into the price is valuable, but just as valuable is hitting the other side once it gets overreacted too.Comment -
NunyaBidnessSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-26-09
- 9345
#129Last bit about the election, I promise. So I just read about a study that compared poll movement the week before the first debate with the week after the last debate, from 1960 to 2008. Every time except one, there was no substantial change in the polls. In the one outlier year, the candidate who performed better in the debates actually lost ground in the polls. So the study concluded that the debates have little, if any, impact on the election itself.
In light of this, one has to assume the jump from -520 to -275 was an overreaction. Im going to pull the trigger here. If the line improves I will just add more.
Comment -
PunisherINDSBR MVP
- 02-24-11
- 4983
#130If you enjoy being bored to death, read Nate Silver's blog. He was a poker player switched to sabremetrics switched to election forecasting.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/Comment -
BIGDAYSBR Aristocracy
- 02-17-10
- 48245
#131Gabers!!!!!!!!
Volkman/Roller is the only fight we disagree on... This could be a first pal. Let's kill it.Comment -
DirtyXSBR Wise Guy
- 06-05-11
- 686
#132They're not, if you're the average person, but they are if you're me. Most people rarely hit them, if ever, whereas I hit them regularly. I would have easily hit a couple 6 team MMA parlays this past weekend, but my current books don't allow MMA parlays. Need to find one that does.
Dude your stats are inflated and exaggerated. Anyone who can even get 55% of their picks correct is doing extremely well. You are claiming to be 20 and 6 or whatever the hell you posted and then 19-6 in Strikeforce.. LOL. Damn cousin, why don't you just quit you fawking job and do this skill full time? Anyways Mr. Great Gabers, I think you are full of shit, and Jesus would put you to shame as far as this skill goes. You are a parlay chaser, and you are only lying to yourself cousin. Do you know your MMA, sure, do I read your opinions, yes indeed, but don't try and claim that you are getting 75% of your picks correct. Because if that is true, then you are a dumbass for not quitting your job and going pro bro.Comment -
CrassusSBR MVP
- 01-08-12
- 1538
#133Dude your stats are inflated and exaggerated. Anyone who can even get 55% of their picks correct is doing extremely well. You are claiming to be 20 and 6 or whatever the hell you posted and then 19-6 in Strikeforce.. LOL. Damn cousin, why don't you just quit you fawking job and do this skill full time? Anyways Mr. Great Gabers, I think you are full of shit, and Jesus would put you to shame as far as this skill goes. You are a parlay chaser, and you are only lying to yourself cousin. Do you know your MMA, sure, do I read your opinions, yes indeed, but don't try and claim that you are getting 75% of your picks correct. Because if that is true, then you are a dumbass for not quitting your job and going pro bro.Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#134Dude your stats are inflated and exaggerated. Anyone who can even get 55% of their picks correct is doing extremely well. You are claiming to be 20 and 6 or whatever the hell you posted and then 19-6 in Strikeforce.. LOL. Damn cousin, why don't you just quit you fawking job and do this skill full time? Anyways Mr. Great Gabers, I think you are full of shit, and Jesus would put you to shame as far as this skill goes. You are a parlay chaser, and you are only lying to yourself cousin. Do you know your MMA, sure, do I read your opinions, yes indeed, but don't try and claim that you are getting 75% of your picks correct. Because if that is true, then you are a dumbass for not quitting your job and going pro bro.
I don't have a job. I can't quit what I don't have lol
Dude, I was liking you up til now, and didn't say anything the numerous times you've said retarded shit. Even when others were shitting on you. You are a real idiot. I'm done with your dumb ass.Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#135PARLAY (3 TEAMS)
[306] UTAH +14½-120 (B+½)
[362] AUBURN -8½-130 (B+1)
[370] STANFORD -7-160 (B+2)
18/76
PARLAY (3 TEAMS)
[306] UTAH +16-150 (B+2)
[362] AUBURN -7-160 (B+2)
[370] STANFORD -7-160 (B+2)
15/51
PARLAY (6 TEAMS)
[302] STL RAMS +2½-110
[418] NY GIANTS -370
[419] TEN TITANS +195
[434] NO SAINTS -200
[4455] K. NISHIKORI +3½-135
(K. NISHIKORI vrs T. BERDYCH)
[4054] J. TSONGA -260
(M. YOUZHNY vrs J. TSONGA)
15/372
STRAIGHT BET
[302] STL RAMS +3½-170 (B+1)
510/300
PARLAY (5 TEAMS)
[302] STL RAMS +112
[418] NY GIANTS -370
[306] UTAH +14½-110
[362] AUBURN -8-110
[370] STANFORD -9-110
17/301
got em straight 100 to win 107 and 100 to win 112Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#136$4.00 $138.89 Pending 10/5/12 8:30pm UFC Fighting 1202 Josh Neer -290* vs Justin Edwards Pending 10/5/12 7:30pm UFC Fighting 1401 Jeremy Stephens -235* vs Yves Edwards Pending 10/5/12 6:00pm UFC Fighting 1702 Jacob Volkmann -210* vs Shane Roller Pending 10/5/12 5:30pm UFC Fighting 1801 Bart Palaszewski +175* vs Diego Nunes Pending 10/5/12 4:30pm UFC Fighting 1951 Marcus LeVesseur -125* vs Carlo Prater Pending 10/5/12 4:00pm UFC Fighting 1975 Aaron Simpson +155* vs Mike Pierce Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#137having some fun with 5dimes lol$3.25 $5.04
Pending 10/5/12 4:00pm UFC Fighting 1975 Aaron Simpson +155* vs Mike Pierce Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#138PARLAY (3 TEAMS)
[306] UTAH +14½-120 (B+½)
[362] AUBURN -8½-130 (B+1)
[370] STANFORD -7-160 (B+2)
18/76
PARLAY (3 TEAMS)
[306] UTAH +16-150 (B+2)
[362] AUBURN -7-160 (B+2)
[370] STANFORD -7-160 (B+2)
15/51
PARLAY (6 TEAMS)
[302] STL RAMS +2½-110
[418] NY GIANTS -370
[419] TEN TITANS +195
[434] NO SAINTS -200
[4455] K. NISHIKORI +3½-135
(K. NISHIKORI vrs T. BERDYCH)
[4054] J. TSONGA -260
(M. YOUZHNY vrs J. TSONGA)
15/372
STRAIGHT BET
[302] STL RAMS +3½-170 (B+1)
510/300
Rams win 17-3, easy $
hit em straight too at +107 and +112Comment -
gabeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-12-11
- 7405
#139up huge so far this week... lookin forward to the FX card... gonna play around with these too:
STRAIGHT BET
[4455] K. NISHIKORI +225
(K. NISHIKORI vrs T. BERDYCH)
220/490
STRAIGHT BET
[4052] Z. ZHANG +375
(F. MAYER vrs Z. ZHANG)
200/750Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code