I may be a little wrong, but I think that what labby players ideally need is a winning percentage of at least fiftyish, with odds averaging not much higher than around -125.
Right now I'm looking at certain propositions which may be capable of accomplishing this. For example, the White Sox to win a game before their opponent on any homestand or road trip. I go a,b,c, no runlines, and stop after either a win or c-bet loss. The White Sox went 12-6 home and 11-7 road in 2010, but with better odds on the road, of course. It's all just a matter of selecting the right team and deciding whether to play them home, road, or both.
Here are some stats with other teams, although they're incomplete: pit 12-4 road reverse, 11-5 home regular in 2010, 11-6 home in 2009, 9-11 home in 2008, 10-9 home in 2007, 11-7 home in 2006, swept at end. 12-7 road reverse in 2006.
ny yankees 2010: 11-5 home, crazy odds on a few. 11-10 road, like home odds for a fair team
bos 2010: 11-14 home, bad odds alot, 11-9 road. They had injuries last year though. 11-8 home in 2009, swept by tor at end of season. 11-1 road.
The twins were 12-5 at home with mostly decent odds in 2010, and the KC road reverse was also like 12-5. Road reverse odds are often very high, however.
It seems like anyone who understands many of the teams can make fair money playing like this, especially with a labby, yet if the wrong team is ridden, things could go the opposite way. Please be careful, anybody who might consider playing with this strategy.
Take a look here: JM MLB sys, along with b and c only, in 2010 (by division)
bal 9-10, 2-7
bos 4-0, 2-0
tb 2-0. 0-0
nyy no plays in 2010
tor 4-2, 1-1
division total: 19-12, 5-8
chw 1-0
cle 4-0
kc 2-5, 2-2
min 1-0
det 3-2, 1-1
Division total: 11-7 system, 3-3 with b and c only
laa 2-11, 1-7
oak 2-4, 1-3
sea 4-9, 2-3
tex 3-1, 1-0
Division total: 11-25, 5-13
American League totals: 41-44, 13-24
fla 3-0
atl 3-3, 2-1
nym 2-1, 1-0
was 1-0
phi 2-0
Division total: 11-4, 3-1
pit 6-12, 6-4
cin 2-1, 1-0
hou 4-6, 2-2
mil 4-8, 3-2
stl 4-3, 1-1
chc 2-2, 1-1
Division total: 22-32, 14-10
az 6-10, 1-5
col no plays in 2010
lad 4-4, 2-2
sf 3-4, 1-2
sd 1-1, 1-0
division total 14-19, 5-9
National league total: 47-55 in sys gms, 22-20 b and c only
Grand total: 88-99 system games, 35-44 b and c only. I didn't use Rpi filters or runlines in my testing. The runlines make for some extra wins, but I didn't feel they were worth the greatly increased odds. I also forgot to stop on September 1. These results reflect the whole season. I can't be sure of how many wins and losses would have been eliminated by stopping early, but I get the impression it wouldn't have made a genuinely significant difference in the actual W/L percentage. Hopefully I'm not wrong there.
As far as playing JM baseball the traditional way, it's not my personal preference, but I respect everyone's right to play how they wish. Everyone here wants to win, that's what matters.
Right now I'm looking at certain propositions which may be capable of accomplishing this. For example, the White Sox to win a game before their opponent on any homestand or road trip. I go a,b,c, no runlines, and stop after either a win or c-bet loss. The White Sox went 12-6 home and 11-7 road in 2010, but with better odds on the road, of course. It's all just a matter of selecting the right team and deciding whether to play them home, road, or both.
Here are some stats with other teams, although they're incomplete: pit 12-4 road reverse, 11-5 home regular in 2010, 11-6 home in 2009, 9-11 home in 2008, 10-9 home in 2007, 11-7 home in 2006, swept at end. 12-7 road reverse in 2006.
ny yankees 2010: 11-5 home, crazy odds on a few. 11-10 road, like home odds for a fair team
bos 2010: 11-14 home, bad odds alot, 11-9 road. They had injuries last year though. 11-8 home in 2009, swept by tor at end of season. 11-1 road.
The twins were 12-5 at home with mostly decent odds in 2010, and the KC road reverse was also like 12-5. Road reverse odds are often very high, however.
It seems like anyone who understands many of the teams can make fair money playing like this, especially with a labby, yet if the wrong team is ridden, things could go the opposite way. Please be careful, anybody who might consider playing with this strategy.
Take a look here: JM MLB sys, along with b and c only, in 2010 (by division)
bal 9-10, 2-7
bos 4-0, 2-0
tb 2-0. 0-0
nyy no plays in 2010
tor 4-2, 1-1
division total: 19-12, 5-8
chw 1-0
cle 4-0
kc 2-5, 2-2
min 1-0
det 3-2, 1-1
Division total: 11-7 system, 3-3 with b and c only
laa 2-11, 1-7
oak 2-4, 1-3
sea 4-9, 2-3
tex 3-1, 1-0
Division total: 11-25, 5-13
American League totals: 41-44, 13-24
fla 3-0
atl 3-3, 2-1
nym 2-1, 1-0
was 1-0
phi 2-0
Division total: 11-4, 3-1
pit 6-12, 6-4
cin 2-1, 1-0
hou 4-6, 2-2
mil 4-8, 3-2
stl 4-3, 1-1
chc 2-2, 1-1
Division total: 22-32, 14-10
az 6-10, 1-5
col no plays in 2010
lad 4-4, 2-2
sf 3-4, 1-2
sd 1-1, 1-0
division total 14-19, 5-9
National league total: 47-55 in sys gms, 22-20 b and c only
Grand total: 88-99 system games, 35-44 b and c only. I didn't use Rpi filters or runlines in my testing. The runlines make for some extra wins, but I didn't feel they were worth the greatly increased odds. I also forgot to stop on September 1. These results reflect the whole season. I can't be sure of how many wins and losses would have been eliminated by stopping early, but I get the impression it wouldn't have made a genuinely significant difference in the actual W/L percentage. Hopefully I'm not wrong there.
As far as playing JM baseball the traditional way, it's not my personal preference, but I respect everyone's right to play how they wish. Everyone here wants to win, that's what matters.