[nash13]

sorry.. have deleted it

[JMon]

total play on the redsox

H and 10 >= total >= 8 and po:runs <= 4 and ppo:runs <= 4 and pppo:runs < 4 and op:L and op:margin = -1 and 2010<=season and rest = 0 and month!=8

Anyone got a situation to add assurance to my Braves +157 and ov 7.5 plays

[JMon]

hi figue. i gave you the RL in the other forum i got this from here
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX
bcap888 is a good analyst. has a nice trend sstem going.

looks like a tout in the making after posting his twitter over there; be careful posting links, especially to that place

[nash13]

ok i will delete it. did not want to advertise anything, just for answering his question

[19th Hole]

looks like a tout in the making after posting his twitter over there; be careful posting links, especially to that place

ok i will delete it. did not want to advertise anything, just for answering his question

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``

I get adware, malwre from that site.

[figue]

ok i will delete it. did not want to advertise anything, just for answering his question

i got it ,thanks nash

[figue]

sorry.. have deleted it

that guy is really good too

[Mako-SBR]

Man MLB is a roller coaster, you feel like you hit the lotto just managing to go 2-2...

You were right JMon, preserve that bankroll for a nice long season boys.

[JMon]

Total situation..4 going today gl

H and total<=7 and 9 * tS(o:earned runs - starter earned runs) / tS(9 - starter innings pitched) <= 3.75 and tA(walks)>=4 and 2010<=season and SG<4

Home team with good BP that takes 4 or more walks a game.

[cash$bro91]

H and total<=7 and 9 * tS(o:earned runs - starter earned runs) / tS(9 - starter innings pitched) <= 3.75 and tA(walks)>=4 and 2010<=season and SG<4

Thanks, JMon. I noticed that the under for CWS/KC is 6-1 when Sale starts at KC and Shields starts at home vs the CWS.

starter=Chris Sale and A and o:team=Royals

starter=James Shields and H and o:team=White Sox and season>2012

[JMon]

Thanks, JMon. I noticed that the under for CWS/KC is 6-1 when Sale starts at KC and Shields starts at home vs the CWS.

starter=Chris Sale and A and o:team=Royals

starter=James Shields and H and o:team=White Sox and season>2012

[bignick410]

Hello all I actually just stared using SDQL about a few weeks ago a had been tinkering with it I was really looking forward to trying to learn to use SDQL more effectively and then found this so Ill e subbed trying to pick up what I can along the way.
I also stumbled on this earlier and was looking for someone's opinion on this one I don't know u guy do run line plays but

D and ou streak = 3 and p :runs> = 3 and STDSWHIP<1.5

[cash$bro91]

Total situation..4 going today gl

H and total<=7 and 9 * tS(o:earned runs - starter earned runs) / tS(9 - starter innings pitched) <= 3.75 and tA(walks)>=4 and 2010<=season and SG<4

Home team with good BP that takes 4 or more walks a game.

[Mako-SBR]

Total situation..4 going today gl

H and total<=7 and 9 * tS(o:earned runs - starter earned runs) / tS(9 - starter innings pitched) <= 3.75 and tA(walks)>=4 and 2010<=season and SG<4

Home team with good BP that takes 4 or more walks a game.

Cashed!

Might actually have a winning MLB day today, lol. Thanks J

[green7]

Good job guys.

[JMon]

[JMon]

Sunday total action..

Sunday we want to play over on a NL conf home team with a start whip of <=1.05. Dodgers have filled this role nicely going 5-1 O/U during the span of the situation. team=Dodgers

H and total<=7 and day=Sunday and STDSWHIP<=1.05 and conference=NL and SG>2

Since this is a Sunday night game, might as well see how they do... parameter NGT

H and total<=7 and day=Sunday and STDSWHIP<=1.05 and conference=NL and 20092 and NGT

Above we see a mark of 6-1 since '11; raping the total by an average of four runs. Dodgers 2-0 O/U here.

Added insurance, Dodgers have been historical good on the over, in the month of April, facing a divisional right handed stater.

team=Dodgers and HF and month=4 and DIV and o:STR and 20080423<=date

We can see how well the over fares against their divisional oppt. Giants. Looks like 4-1 ov during the time of the situation..

team=Dodgers and HF and month=4 and DIV and o:STR and 20080423<=date and o:team=Giants

nothing is for certain, but I will be on the over...gl if you play

[JMon]

Hello all I actually just stared using SDQL about a few weeks ago a had been tinkering with it I was really looking forward to trying to learn to use SDQL more effectively and then found this so Ill e subbed trying to pick up what I can along the way.
I also stumbled on this earlier and was looking for someone's opinion on this one I don't know u guy do run line plays but

D and ou streak = 3 and p :runs> = 3 and STDSWHIP<1.5

Welcome..we also have a NBA sdql thread going!

Your sdql is very nice! Good on both dog ml and RL. Something I will work with for sure.

[JMon]

Hello all I actually just stared using SDQL about a few weeks ago a had been tinkering with it I was really looking forward to trying to learn to use SDQL more effectively and then found this so Ill e subbed trying to pick up what I can along the way.
I also stumbled on this earlier and was looking for someone's opinion on this one I don't know u guy do run line plays but

D and ou streak = 3 and p :runs> = 3 and STDSWHIP<1.5

you can increase your ROI by roughly 9% by adding the following...

180>=line>=115 (limit high and low dogs)
conference=o:conference (only conference play)
SG<4 and month<9 (limit months 10/9 and higher than series game of 4 or higher

Looks like the month of may is where this situation is prominent.

[19th Hole]

Total situation..4 going today gl

H and total<=7 and 9 * tS(o:earned runs - starter earned runs) / tS(9 - starter innings pitched) <= 3.75 and tA(walks)>=4 and 2010<=season and SG<4

Home team with good BP that takes 4 or more walks a game.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
WOW...missed this 4 bagger under!!
Nice work Jmon!

[bignick410]

you can increase your ROI by roughly 9% by adding the following...

180>=line>=115 (limit high and low dogs)
conference=o:conference (only conference play)
SG<4 and month<9 (limit months 10/9 and higher than series game of 4 or higher

Looks like the month of may is where this situation is prominent.

Thanks for the help defiantly cleans it up a lot.. that's why I came here because you guys are on another level!

anyway I also found this a little while back I figured Ill post it im sure my newbie eyes missed something u maybe able to clean that up a bit too

p :site=home and site=away and p :line <-105 and p :runs op :run and playoffs=0

[bignick410]

p:site=home and site=away and p:line < -105 and p:runs < po:runs and op:runs < =3 and p:runs > op:runs and playoffs=0

this is the query I cant get it to post right for some reason

[figue]

Total situation..4 going today gl

H and total<=7 and 9 * tS(o:earned runs - starter earned runs) / tS(9 - starter innings pitched) <= 3.75 and tA(walks)>=4 and 2010<=season and SG<4

Home team with good BP that takes 4 or more walks a game.

nice

[figue]

Sunday total action..

Sunday we want to play over on a NL conf home team with a start whip of <=1.05. Dodgers have filled this role nicely going 5-1 O/U during the span of the situation. team=Dodgers

H and total<=7 and day=Sunday and STDSWHIP<=1.05 and conference=NL and SG>2

Since this is a Sunday night game, might as well see how they do... parameter NGT

H and total<=7 and day=Sunday and STDSWHIP<=1.05 and conference=NL and 2009<season and SG>2 and NGT

Above we see a mark of 6-1 since '11; raping the total by an average of four runs. Dodgers 2-0 O/U here.

Added insurance, Dodgers have been historical good on the over, in the month of April, facing a divisional right handed stater.

team=Dodgers and HF and month=4 and DIV and o:STR and 20080423<=date

We can see how well the over fares against their divisional oppt. Giants. Looks like 4-1 ov during the time of the situation..

team=Dodgers and HF and month=4 and DIV and o:STR and 20080423<=date and o:team=Giants

nothing is for certain, but I will be on the over...gl if you play

[19th Hole]

Jmon...Sunday of wonder...

[Mako-SBR]

JMon got us back healthy again in MLB in a HURRY...

[JR007]

[green7]

This one is not great as it only seems to work in June and April and not as good on Mondays. I played the two teams involved but as always, use your own discretion.

division=o:division and month and SG = 1 and p:runs<=3 and AD and DAY


These two are probably more statistically sound.

p:runs<=3 and division!= o:division and conference=o:conference and SG=1 and month=4 and op:runs<=3 and H and line<-120

p:runs<=3 and division!= o:division and conference=o:conference and SG=1 and month=4 and op:runs<=3 and H and line>=-120

Good fortune.

[JMon]

perhaps a low total and line overreaction due to two offenses not putting a lot runs early in the season (<=3.3 and <=3.8 respectively) and the two starters meeting up earlier.

total <= 7 and tA(runs) <= 3.3 and oA(runs) <= 3.8 and conference = NL and o:conference = NL and rest = 0 and 2011<=season

Below we see the Reds as a dog playing an opponent revenging a same season starter loss. Filtering their oppt o:team=Cardinals, looks rather interesting.

team = Reds and D and oS:L and oS:season = season and 20100724 <= date

[JR007]

early on which approach is working best, the trends on the sides or the trends on the totals ??? thanks

[hyahya]

month<5 and line>0 and p:margin<3 and o:WP>=40 and p:runs>0

[figue]

perhaps a low total and line overreaction due to two offenses not putting a lot runs early in the season (<=3.3 and <=3.8 respectively) and the two starters meeting up earlier.

total <= 7 and tA(runs) <= 3.3 and oA(runs) <= 3.8 and conference = NL and o:conference = NL and rest = 0 and 2011<=season

Below we see the Reds as a dog playing an opponent revenging a same season starter loss. Filtering their oppt o:team=Cardinals, looks rather interesting.

team = Reds and D and oS:L and oS:season = season and 20100724 <= date

Reds over 6.5

[Mako-SBR]

This one is not great as it only seems to work in June and April and not as good on Mondays. I played the two teams involved but as always, use your own discretion.

division=o:division and month and SG = 1 and p:runs<=3 and AD and DAY


These two are probably more statistically sound.

p:runs<=3 and division!= o:division and conference=o:conference and SG=1 and month=4 and op:runs<=3 and H and line<-120

p:runs<=3 and division!= o:division and conference=o:conference and SG=1 and month=4 and op:runs<=3 and H and line>=-120

Good fortune.

perhaps a low total and line overreaction due to two offenses not putting a lot runs early in the season (<=3.3 and <=3.8 respectively) and the two starters meeting up earlier.

total <= 7 and tA(runs) <= 3.3 and oA(runs) <= 3.8 and conference = NL and o:conference = NL and rest = 0 and 2011<=season

Below we see the Reds as a dog playing an opponent revenging a same season starter loss. Filtering their oppt o:team=Cardinals, looks rather interesting.

team = Reds and D and oS:L and oS:season = season and 20100724 <= date

Nice guys, all 3 of those are excellent. Especially like that total play for a variety of reasons JMon, very cool.

[superbowl3056]

Hey guys, kind of ignorant and excuse me if you have posted before, but exactly how do these queries work? I ran them through the site, and saw the obvious over in the Reds game... But for the other queries listed, what side should I play? I ran the two queries green7 listed, and saw the stat summary on the top of the page and todays game listed on the bottom, but am confused as to what side to play... For the first query, I see Red Sox -160 listed on the bottom of the result page. Does this mean Red Sox ML and/or RL are the play? thanks

[JMon]

Hey guys, kind of ignorant and excuse me if you have posted before, but exactly how do these queries work? I ran them through the site, and saw the obvious over in the Reds game... But for the other queries listed, what side should I play? I ran the two queries green7 listed, and saw the stat summary on the top of the page and todays game listed on the bottom, but am confused as to what side to play... For the first query, I see Red Sox -160 listed on the bottom of the result page. Does this mean Red Sox ML and/or RL are the play? thanks

superbowl..I haven't ran his queries yet, but I am assuming it's a dog play. After querying you need to review where the profits are coming in at (for (playon) or against (fade)) and also one can filter ' and season ' at the end of the query to see how it's preformed in the previous years.