-
Comment -
it's not about comparing dicks...it's about helping each other (and ourselves) out by adhering to the knowledge and wisdom that...
anything posted about a match AFTER it's started about "what should have been easy to know" and how the "stupid books were giving away free money"...is absolute crap
once something starts happening it creates the illusion that
you really knew it was going to happen all along...and posting "wow, i hope you guys all know now what I (like to think that I) have known all along"...helps no-one...and actually hurts yourself, because it deludes you into thinking your powers of PRE-diction are far far sharper than they really are...POST-diction is easy...PRE-diction is hard...and confusing the two is VERY dangerous)
___________
IF you PRE-post a play...then you have the right to chirp "Wow, i told you guys the books screwed up again...etc...etc.""...otherwise post your "wow" if you want to, but leave out the implication that we somehow "shoulda' known" and that you somehow "did know"...
capiche...PRE-posting a play is the ticket you gotta show in order to praise yourself for your insight...if you haven't pre-posted a play, drop all the "I knew" or "we shoulda' known" crap from your commentary...cuz that's the stuff that just makes you come off like a pretend-to-know-it-all 13-year-oldLast edited by fitguy67; 04-07-14, 03:46 PM.Comment -
Wasn't trying to show off lol those picks were common knowledge no upsets but fisherComment -
That +250 upset was a better player both nobody'sComment -
You thought Simon was losing to a shit player -180 he'll no and who the fuk is crivoi -350 everyone prob hit the dog since they both suckComment -
Capping start a thread so we can see your pregame picks and benefit from your in-depth knowledge. But now you are the worst poster everComment -
I bet if you painted a grass-court red and put Karlovic on it he'd suck Dodig's poopie-juice.Comment -
Nice call on Sock!!Comment -
Should have put some on RL much better payoutComment -
-
Stop f.cking spam, cappin. You are an idiot loser, deal with it.Comment -
Ahh it's all good, just need a solid roll from here. Baggy does this a lot. I actually think baggy was trying hard to he just came across a guy that's made decent strides in the right direction this yearComment -
Play #328
Olivo ML 2.30 x 10 unitsComment -
Play #329
Volandri 2-1 sets 3.75 x 5 unitsComment -
Play #330
Simon 1st set ML 1.91 x 10 unitsComment -
Matt, the biggest problem I have is that I don't believe you.
Please, prove me wrong in front of the entire forum and post a CLEAR screenshot of your 40 Unit Fischer bet that you placed yesterday. According to you that's $2000. It should take you about 3-5 minutes.
I have a huge problem with compulsory liars. So please make me look like a clown and post the screenshot.
Don't just ignore the question. Like I said it will take a few minutes.
I can post a screenshot of anything and everything I've posted on this forum. Including my $830 on Switzerland @ 10's to win the Davis Cup.
And lastly I've been betting for a while now. Exclusively on tennis and motorsport. And I'm telling you right now, that with your discipline (a MAX 2K bet on a mug to win a qualifying match when there were clear signs to stay away... just one example) there's no way you're profiting much, if at all, long term.Comment -
Dude, you don't have a clue on my bankroll size or how much I'm making/losing on live wagers right? So why do you bother trying to look stupid here?? Why don't you find one of my old threads from around September last year and you will see some of my crazy ass wagers that have won.... You might even find one that had 5,000.00 on Isner to win the First set.... Which panned out. Or a 500$ Almagro wager at 4.00 odds.... Buddy that 2000$ lost sucks, but I don't need to be told how to spend my cash. Go ahead and look, I don't have time for these childish games. Like Losschaser said, I'm starting to wonder if I should even post anymore.Last edited by matt1216; 04-08-14, 05:59 AM.Comment -
Play #331
Pella G + Gonzalez 1.60 x 10 unitsComment -
Matt, you're avoiding the question.
I said you're full of shit in front of everyone. It would take you 2 minutes to prove me wrong. Less time that your reply above.
You said your units are $50. You've previously said you back everything you post in here. You said you backed Fischer for 40 units/$2,000.
Prove that you're not a liar and post a screenshot Matt.
Otherwise what you're doing is very wrong. You may be trying to "help" people but if you're not being honest about bets like the Fischer one than you're screwing with people who follow you on here.
They look at "40 units" and think "Oh my Matt is super confident putting $2,000 down", and then they back you accordingly.
Anyway you're evading the question and I think it's pretty obvious why.Comment -
When I see a thread with a 40 Unit bet a bell rings in my head. Who bets 40 units anyway. I made a selection not long ago and posted a ticket in advance to win 5,000. I would never say an amount like that without being able to back it up.
I too would like to see a copy of this bet. Also who takes 2 dimes on Challenger's anyway. I have a hard time getting 2 or 3 dimes on regular matches without going to a few books.Comment -
It was a qualifying match. But they're similar in limits, so I hear you.
The problem I have here is that Matt is saying he turned $600 into $40,000+ and then posts $2000 bets on mug matches. So a fair few people would believe they should too because 'that's how Matt plays to be successful'.
So if he didn't actually put $2000 or anywhere close to that on the Fischer bet, then it's wrong to lead people that follow him into thinking he did.
Which brings me back to the simple request of a screenshot. If someone calls you a liar and you can prove otherwise in 2 minutes, you do it.
Unless of course..Comment -
I think he may have well done that but the concept of bankroll building (starting with a small amount of money and making it big money in a relatively short time) the way it can be done in online poker is inapplicable to sports betting imo. In poker, you bet on an enormous amount of events (up to several thousand hands per day), while here, if you make 5-10 bets every day you are already someone who puts in huge volume (am I wrong here?). Of course, it is fully possible to "build" a bankroll that way betting on sports but you need to have very good knowledge of these sports and it will still bear an enormous risk of ruining and having to redeposit... meaning it will be minus EV.
I don't think there is anything strange or impolite in your request to see a screenshot of his bet. In my opinion, careful tracking of bets and trust should always be of highest priority when it comes to posting picks on a regular basis.Comment -
The problem on any Sports Forum is that some people are playing with "Monopoly" money and others are using hard cash. Without some proof it is hard to decipher who is who.Comment -
Good luck today Matt. Heading out to RO, hit me up later. Peace out!Comment -
Guys this isnt anything new about Matt, Hes not betting 2k on tennis matches, this is somewhere he goes and hides behind a computer and writes up some good points and some picks we have asked him to show screen shots for over a year and wont do it for the simple fact that hes not got that kind of money. I have already had my fair share arguments with this MATT guy to the point i just went aganist his picks last year and made money. So you decideComment -
i once build 50$ to 5000$ via agressive live betting
si i think it is managable but you must know when to stop and lower your stakes after succesful run...because after every good run, there is also bad run...
Comment -
It makes you wonder...
If someone comes and tries to make me a liar in that case, I would not waste even one second on responding to him.
I just would go straight to my ticket - do screenshot - post it,and closes his mouth with three pounds of shit.
But for now, you can say that you kinda feel uncomfortable doing it, and the only reason for such a thing would be only if you really can not achieve it.
And if we are honest, it's really funny how you bet lately,esp after your Babos\Gov bet,it seems that it was the point that caused you to be on tilt,you lost 25u and than just when it end, you searched for how to chase the painful loss (because really what was going on there was disgusting) so you play big on F* Jasik,30U play! and what was your explanation for that,"Not sure I'm just hoping Ivanovic takes jasic a bit easy....", not a really good reason to put 30u just after you lost 25u.
Than you put 40u play on fvcking ATP250 quly!!! I was like,what happens to this guy?!?! so after you lost 55u in two bets,you put 40u wager and before it even finished you already adding more 25u bets,than you lost also the 40u play,you was down 95u in three stright bets and than you won 13u+- back on CB,so if we thought the Large wagers going to stopped we wrong big time,you just keep to bomb on plays.
I've been following your threads for a long time, but I've never seen you bet this way, in last four pages you posted so many "large wager"...It makes you think that you are laughing at everyone..you alwayes bet 2u here ,4u there,from time to time you was play "large wager" of 10-20u and everthing look reasonable,but now,from play #301 until play#331, over 31 bets,you risked 428u!!! its 13.8u for each bets you placed(L30),and it's too weird if you ask me, something wrong here, it sure.Comment
