-
Comment -
Some people don't seem to get it.
They call the OP a dumbass for revealing how BP were allowing correlated parlays, yet BP already KNEW about the correlated parlays and that's how the whole mess started in the first place. He hasn't "let the cat out of the bag" at all.
So, unless BP knew about this issue and were STILL going to allow people to place these correlated parlays (which I highly doubt - unless they are thick as shit), then he made a +EV move in going for his $300 back.Comment -
The question remains if those who were making them and winning, and most importantly getting paid there was a great travesty on this information spilling out. If BP on the other hand "doesn't allow these bets" after they win only, and were not paying winners then they were in fact freerolling this "opportunity" By the sounds of it I'd say it was the former.
Not sure J-E-T-S understands either way, guess you can only spell so much out for him. But honestly he just doesn't know any better. Still what BP was wrong changin his bet, but he obviously would've kept his mouth shut if he knew how to win with this strategy.Comment -
Most posters realize that BP is a top five book in operation right now.Comment -
Firts of all jets you are a dumbass for 2 reasons. The first being the way you wagered on correlated game lines when it is clearly against the rules on their website and everybody elses. The second is for fishing for negative publicity with yout thread title instead of just calling Richard and dealing with this like a man instead of dealing with some rep working late at night who has no stroke to do anything but follow the rules. That being said I do believe that if the wagers were against the rules your wagers should be cancelled and you should have your 400 credited to your account as well as the next deposit you sent. Remember that when players find glitches on software and break the rules it causes problems for everybody and eventually you will get caught. Cheaters never win and winners never cheat. Call Richard and fix this. SBR never had to even follow up on your complaint. Richard would probably do the right thing and give you all your money because thats the right thing to do. Good luck and play fair if you want to be played fair with.Comment -
I made my post before I sifted through all this and realized you got your money. I am glad you got it but you really should email Richard@betphoenix.com if he is not who you dealt with and he probably will reverse the plays alltogether and give you back your 400 because if the plays were illegal they never should have existed.Comment -
Jets,
How many correlated if-bets have you won at BP?
You did know what you were doing was wrong, regardless if their software accepted the wager correct?
A few weeks ago, Bookmakers software erroneously allowed wagers of Teams on the ML parlayed with the same teams on the pointspread. I wouldn't doubt if BM still went ahead and paid them- at least if it was for smaller amounts. But you will definitely be known as a shot taker, and they could, and rightfully so, close your account.
Comment -
You should get a reward for bringing this to BP's attention, but then again they could say, you were exploiting it (even though you lost). The most common correlated parlay we all know about is one where the spread is 33% or more of the game total. Like todays Boise St game, BST -46, total 58, a whopping 79%.Comment -
Comment -
reward the shot taker?
if they do that it would make me sick.
unreal thinking.Comment -
Hey BigDaddy,
You were trying to tell him that he was killing his own Golden Goose, but from his post above he states that he really didn't know it wasn't allowed, and that he was still losing his azz doing them. So maybe there is some truth to that.Comment -
BetPhoenix operates a first rate shop, they do not need shottakers.Comment -
BigDaddy- you are showing how low your IQ is so please save u and ur family the embarrasement and stop posting. You have no clue....stop jerking off to kiddie porn and go do something productive with ur unproductive life. Spend some time with ur wife........god knows every other guy in the neighborhood isComment -
The are a good book. If anyone has looked at my previous books, I had them as an A book up until yesterday. NO WHERE on the website does it mention taking team totals with game over..........
So LittleDaddy and the rest can take your "shot taking" and shove it up ur fat azz
If it's against the rules post it............And if its not ALLOWED DONT ACCEPT THE WAGERComment -
-
BP handled it .. as usual these guys respond to feedback and player issues better than any book out there.
Done threadComment -
Never asked anyone to investigate it.........facts are facts
1) My balance was 400.
2) I placed a wager with a max bet of $400
3) I clearly lost the bet- no big deal
4) I deposit 300 more
5) They tell me I don't get the 300 becasue my previous bet was inadvertantly accepted for $880
That was the issue ......it had nothing to do with the wager itself........but the reason I was given by the clerk was "our system inadvertantly took the bet for $880 even though you only had $400" SO when you deposited additional money we took it to pay for the previous bet...........your bet was really not a legal bet anyway so you got what you deserved.......
That was my issueComment -
BP realized they were wrong and credited back the 300- they did what was right- it was their screw up. No need for additional investigation.
I will not push to have the original bet refunded like some have suggested. I bet/ I lost that's fine...they keep my 400 on an "illegal bet"..........i just hope if it won they would have paid since they accepted it.Comment -
First of all The clerck should had been fired for being rude
second if it was a glitch is thier blame, and I am happy they gave you the $300 back
Third Clerks should be train to see when you are making corelated parlays, we are customers, we expect respect, and trained clerks!!!Comment -
I agree. That said BP made good on the mistake. Richard from BP is a class act and SBR is always a big help.
The situation was handled to my satisfaction. In my previous posts on this forum I have only reco'd 2 books: greek and BP. I still feel the same but was dissapointed with the customer service. Maybe it was just a night clerk who didnt have a clue.
Thank you Richard and thank you SBR!Comment
not Costa Rica