bookmaker.eu bug cost me $1300

[Thefix13]

What a fun thread, after getting roasted the guy decides to accept an outcome that he was adamantly arguing was a mistake by the book. I know I always concede victory when I've done nothing wrong. That or maybe someone realizes that he might have burned his bridge down and made a mistake.

[bruloc]

After thinking more about it, I think it's better for me to just accept this outcome.

But, be aware, after placing a player's prop bet, check your open bets tab and make sure that the player's name is correct.

[2Sweeet]

So who is this 2sweet dude? The arbiter of all sportsbook glitches?

Just a bum talking shit. I do it all for show and clicks.

[2Sweeet]

There was not live betting, mate. They don't have live betting for props.

And I'm not requesting to be paid for the win. The bets should have been cancelled when I reported it, that would be fair.

But if with that people would think I'm a cheater, forget about it. Better lose this money than be called that.

Ok, I misunderstood. I sent this thread to ppl who can fix this if everything you say is true and wtf would you only want a refund? If you bet Hield it should be a winner if u ask me.

[Barrakuda]

So who is this 2sweet dude? The arbiter of all sportsbook glitches?

[bruloc]

Buddy just know the ppl who run these places they don't listen to me. I sent the thread b4 we all started arguing and me talking shit. If you didn't do anything wrong they will make it right. I 100% think a glitch happened cuz it's the dumbest thing anyone would say cuz others would of had it happen also. I'm just shocked there isn't more bitching about this? Maybe I have to much Money on BM? This is a get out NBA game on a Wed? Yet no1 is bitching but you 2? Hopefully u r both being honest.

That line was opened very close to the game time I believe. I was already inside the match page when that happened. Like ~10 minutes to the start.

[bruloc]

Then they will do you right I believe, I think it was a mistake but I believe you knew. I don't type English good myself but when i smell something shitty I type. Again if they no 100% there was a glitch I believe u will all be paid for Hield. Again u can't be the only 2. The live betting and 29 mins with u makes u guilty to me until proven innocent but that means nothing trust me.

There was not live betting, mate. They don't have live betting for props.

And I'm not requesting to be paid for the win. The bets should have been cancelled when I reported it, that would be fair.

But if with that people would think I'm a cheater, forget about it. Better lose this money than be called that.

[2Sweeet]

Buddy just know the ppl who run these places they don't listen to me. I sent the thread b4 we all started arguing and me talking shit. If you didn't do anything wrong they will make it right. I 100% think a glitch happened cuz it's the dumbest thing anyone would say cuz others would of had it happen also. I'm just shocked there isn't more bitching about this? Maybe I have to much Money on BM? This is a get out NBA game on a Wed? Yet no1 is bitching but you 2? Hopefully u r both being honest.

[2Sweeet]

Than, they will do you right I believe, I think it was a mistake but I believe you knew. I don't type English good myself but when i smell something shitty I type. Again if they no 100% there was a glitch I believe u will all be paid for Hield. Again u can't be the only 2. The live betting and 29 mins with u makes u guilty to me until proven innocent but that means nothing trust me.

[bruloc]

Bro go raid your neighbors candy when they say just take one. You 100% exposed a glitch Live.

What that means?


You are not being reasonable with me, mate. Srly, calm down.

[SirtySree]

The OP 100000% took a shot. I'd distance myself from him as fast as I could. You said you put your bets in pre-match and contacted them b4 it started. BM will make it right if it was a glitch and you did that.

That's fair. I'll stop now until your contact gets back to you regarding the issue.

At the end of the day, I want my account with BM to be in good standing and have no issues. If they agree there was a glitch and void the bets, great. Otherwise if not, so be it as I don't want any issues with my account there and would rather just cop the loss.

[2Sweeet]

You didn't understand it. I did bet on Hield, the bet slip displayed the confirmation on Hield, but the actual bet was not on Hield, it was on Moody.

I wasn't talking to u chico.

[2Sweeet]

How tf Moody was dead w/ 6 points and 2 minutes into the second quarter? He had almost 3 quarters to score 8 points.

Bro go raid your neighbors candy when they say just take one. You 100% exposed a glitch Live.

[bruloc]

I agree but if you had Hield and bet b4 the match as u said and there was a glitch u should win Hield. Wtf is Podz was it a parlay? and did Podz not get there? U mean Brandin?

You didn't understand it. I did bet on Hield, the bet slip displayed the confirmation on Hield, but the actual bet was not on Hield, it was on Moody.

[2Sweeet]

The OP 100000% took a shot. I'd distance myself from him as fast as I could. You said you put your bets in pre-match and contacted them b4 it started. BM will make it right if it was a glitch and you did that.

[SirtySree]

I agree but if you had Hield and bet b4 the match as u said and there was a glitch u should win Hield. Wtf is Podz was it a parlay? and did Podz not get there?

Podz is Podziemski. They mixed up two players/different bets. They wrote Hield but it showed up as Moody in the open bets and they wrote Kuminga instead of Podziemski. OP just had the mix up with Hield but I had the mix up with another player too.

[bruloc]

Do you think these books are morons? You reported it cuz you thought Hield was dead and you knew Moody was also dead. Plz stfu bro.

How tf Moody was dead w/ 6 points and 2 minutes into the second quarter? He had almost 3 quarters to score 8 points.

[2Sweeet]

Average line for Moody and Podz would've been about what BM had. They simply just mixed up the names of the players.
My post from earlier in case it was missed.
"I asked for the bets to be voided as they clearly weren't correct after I checked the numbers.
Even though at the time of placing the bets I didn't believe they were bad lines, the lines were clearly meant for Moody and Podz as they were in line with other books after checking.
The bets should be voided, not graded as wins (or losses)."

I agree but if you had Hield and bet b4 the match as u said and there was a glitch u should win Hield. Wtf is Podz was it a parlay? and did Podz not get there? U mean Brandin?

[bruloc]

They def allow rebets up to a certain amount depending who you are. I believe you 10000% took a shot knowing it was a glitch. That's just my opinion. Do u honestly think bm gives a fck about 5 300 bets? I've been doing this over 30 years and the answer is no. I believe there may of been a glitch, if u keep betting into it then call foul after your scam loses that my friend is called a shot taker. They should refund you then show you the door if there was a glitch.

Sorry, my english is not that good and maybe I didn't understand you, but are you saying I knew I was betting on Moody and did keep betting it anyway? And after that I decided to report it when those bets were in a good pace to win? This don't make any sense, mate.

Relax and try to think more about it. Not everyone is dishonest and is trying to scam a book, some are honest and have no bad intentions. I believe I already proved it.

And, yes, I believe BM don't give a f*** about $1300. I already made thousands of bets with them. They are honest and a good and reputable book. But that doesn't mean they can't be wrong sometimes.

[SirtySree]

Sirty what was Moodys o/u b4 the game plz

Average line for Moody and Podz would've been about what BM had. They simply just mixed up the names of the players.
My post from earlier in case it was missed.
"I asked for the bets to be voided as they clearly weren't correct after I checked the numbers.
Even though at the time of placing the bets I didn't believe they were bad lines, the lines were clearly meant for Moody and Podz as they were in line with other books after checking.
The bets should be voided, not graded as wins (or losses)."

[2Sweeet]

Sirty what was Moodys o/u b4 the game plz

[2Sweeet]

4 bets, mate.

I reported it as soon as I could. Moody had 6 and Hield had 0 or 2, I don't know for sure. It was early into the second quarter, as I said. Moody made almost half of the points needed to win the bet just in the first quarter and I reported it anyway (while Hield's was off the pace). This proves my honesty and good intentions.

How can this be called "taking a shot"? Like, wtf?

They had more than enough time to void a -EV bet for them and they didn't.

Do you think these books are morons? You reported it cuz you thought Hield was dead and you knew Moody was also dead. Plz stfu bro.

[2Sweeet]

This was a prematch bet, not live and I reported it instantly and before the match started.

I feel like you are trying to talk to two different people at once as what OP did differently was reported it when the match started.

I actually believe you I don't believe the OP. I 100% think there was a glitch. It's how you bet and act after what counts.

[SirtySree]

I never once said anything about a bad line? I said you knew it was a glitch seen 6 pts on Moody and jumped.

You may get your chump change back but your going to lose a great book and be considered as a shot taker? Was it worth it? I don't even have to talk to BM and know what you did.

This was a prematch bet, not live and I reported it instantly and before the match started.

I feel like you are trying to talk to two different people at once as what OP did differently was reported it when the match started.

[2Sweeet]

I never once said anything about a bad line? I said you knew it was a glitch seen it called your buddy and jumped on the Glitch.

You may get your chump change back but your going to lose a great book and be considered a shot taker? Was it worth it? I don't even have to talk to BM and know what you did.

[2Sweeet]

No it doesn't

[SirtySree]

This is out of my pay grade now. Optional, Tell both these guy's how fos they are. So everyone was taking under? Yet u both took over on good ole' Buddy coming off the bench with 2 points? Bottom line here BM will answer me so we will all no real soon.

People were taking unders on 17.5 driving it down. Getting 13.5 on overs is still good value by a point or two as the average line likely would've been 15.5. Plus Warriors have been running a deep rotation playing bench players big minutes. Just because people are taking unders doesn't mean I can't take over.

I don't understand why you are getting so worked up over this part. Bad line or not, it is irrelevant to what we are discussing here.

[bruloc]

The waiting 29 mins and all that bs makes me feel like you took a shot also. If u bet Hield and it was a mistake they have to no and you deserve to win. Waiting 29 mins when it looked like Hield was dead in the water sparks up debate. Yet he ends up with 21 pts and only has 2 when you report it? Moody had 6. A refund is all I'd give but it has to be more than just you 2 who know this happened. The op doesn't notice its Moody in one of his 6 bets until 29 mins later? Oh yea everyone Moody only ended up with 8 pts. hmmmm. If he got 14 does this thread happen?

4 bets, mate.

I reported it as soon as I could. Moody had 6 and Hield had 0 or 2, I don't know for sure. It was early into the second quarter, as I said. Moody made almost half of the points needed to win the bet just in the first quarter and I reported it anyway (while Hield's was off the pace). This proves my honesty and good intentions.

How can this be called "taking a shot"? Like, wtf?

They had more than enough time to void a -EV bet for them and they didn't.

[2Sweeet]

This is out of my pay grade now. Optional, Tell both these guy's how fos they are. So everyone was taking under? Yet u both took over on good ole' Buddy coming off the bench with 2 points? Bottom line here BM will answer me so we will all no real soon.

[SirtySree]

So you both bet 6 bets on Hield and never realized it's Moody? What was Hields o/u b4 the game? I don't have that? Does anyone else?

OP did 4 on Hield. I bet 6 on Hield and 6 on Kuminga.

I only realised because I went into my 'My Open Bets' to check how much I had on both. It's not possible to realise instantly as the wager gets accepted with the correct player like in OPs screenshot. All my bet were in quick succession as well.

The lines everywhere was opened so close to tip off and varied a lot. All I remember was Pinnacle opening as one of the first at 17.5 for Hield and got instantly hammered a lot. Not sure what it closed at but both Hield and Kuminga ended up coming off the bench which is why everyone was hitting the unders.

[2Sweeet]

So you both bet 6 bets on Hield and never realized it's Moody? What was Hields o/u b4 the game? I don't have that? Does anyone else?

[2Sweeet]

What? Did you quote the right message? Of course BM allow re-bets.

They def allow rebets up to a certain amount depending who you are. I believe you 10000% took a shot knowing it was a glitch. That's just my opinion. Do u honestly think bm gives a fck about 5 300 bets? I've been doing this over 30 years and the answer is no. I believe there may of been a glitch, if u keep betting into it then call foul after your scam loses that my friend is called a shot taker. They should refund you then show you the door if there was a glitch.

[SirtySree]

1? Sirty how many bets did you place on moody?

6 bets on each

[bruloc]

Total bs

What? Did you quote the right message? Of course BM allow re-bets.

[2Sweeet]

1? Sirty how many bets did you place on moody?