how many businesses have you created ol bill?
-
Comment -
Trump in attendance at the UFC tonight in NY at Madison Square Garden and they are cheering him on. Loving it! Didn't see that happening in NY!
Last edited by JIBBBY; 11-11-23, 11:54 PM.Comment -
Of course the left is targeting him. They've been targeting anyone who disagrees with them since Hillary lost. This is how the American Democrat Party operates under the '' HIDDEN '' leadership of Obama and his puppet.
New York Post wonders if ‘targeting’ of NYC mayor is tied to recent Biden criticism
Adams was publicly humiliated when the feds approached him on the street to confiscate his electronic devices this week, an encounter that was later reported by The New York Times, an outlet that is Hizzoner’s biggest critic, and the once venerable newspaper’s top competitor smells a rat.
“The agents approached the mayor after an event in Manhattan on Monday evening and asked his security detail to step away, a person with knowledge of the matter said. They climbed into his S.U.V. with him and, pursuant to a court-authorized warrant, took his devices, the person said,” The New York Times reported.Comment -
Police found Felicia Franklin passed out drunk on the sidewalk in a fresh puddle. Now she's suing because she was fired as Board of Commissioners vice chair. She claimed she was drugged at a bar, but her toxicology report came back with only alcohol and THC. Camera footage and her receipt from the bar shows her alcohol consumption, which she denies. "I didn't drink five drinks."
Georgia lawmaker found allegedly passed out drunk in street is suing county for firing her
Comment -
Democrats calling for 14 billion dollars in the senate to shore up the Southern Border.
Republicans want to know what the money will be spent on.
The people want to know why the Biden Administration and Czar Kamala Harris created this problem in the first place.Comment -
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">"Put a pistol on a brace it turns it into a gun you can have a higher caliber weapon - higher caliber bullet - coming out of that gun." Joe Biden explaining how braces work. You can't make this level of stupid up. <a href="https://t.co/eZn3ORfQaE">pic.twitter.com/eZn3ORfQaE</a></p>— Military Arms (@MAC_Arms) <a href="https://twitter.com/MAC_Arms/status/1724828591622336992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >November 15, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Today in San Francisco<br><br>Biden and Xi take in the cultural sights around San Francisco.<br>�� <a href="https://t.co/P7MUiMEZ9g">pic.twitter.com/P7MUiMEZ9g</a></p>— Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) <a href="https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1724939985692852316?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >November 15, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
Comment -
Looks like joe picked the wrong week to start telling the truth.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Blinken's face after Joe Biden calls Chinese President Xi a "dictator" ������ <a href="https://t.co/XqjQU9FmZd">pic.twitter.com/XqjQU9FmZd</a></p>— Jason Howerton (@jason_howerton) <a href="https://twitter.com/jason_howerton/status/1725254297552933177?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >November 16, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
A few stern letters will be mailed to the current regime, but no charges for the mishandling of classified documents for the then VP. Selective prosecution on display....again.
Comment -
So out of 3,251,997 that voted for Trump in New YORK, you didn't think, enough Trump supporters, would show up to a Dana White event, to be heard at MSG? I would not think, it would that far-fetched. They definitely were well represented at the event.Joe Biden Donald Trump Democratic Republican Working Families Conservative Delaware Florida Kamala Harris Mike Pence 29 0 5,244,886 3,251,997 60.87% 37.74% Comment -
Probably should go to prison for it, and Trump too, but was he ever ask to give them back several times? I don't know if he was or not. Maybe that don't matter.Comment -
Us simple folk who believe in fairness would say that.
But we forget that Joe is POTUS right now and therefore can use the Jedi Mind Declassification powers we never knew about before. So obviously he can't be charged.
Or he could just pre-pardon himself anyway.
The people appeared to be pretty happy to have a POTUS do that in recent years..Comment -
Biden was never asked to give them back because they didn't know he had them. Just like when Pence came forward with his. Nobody knew he had them. Pence and Biden had limited constitutional powers dealing with classified documents as VP, unlike the president.
Not a fan of either or what their parties have become, but we never even had the full, factual story on either situation. The MSM omitted info, embellished and fabricated so much of the coverage of both. What we do know to be legally and constitutionally true is that one person did have the power to declassify documents, while one did not. Also, one person did take extensive measures, upon the advice, direction and oversight of gov't agencies, to secure the documents while the other had the documents in boxes stored in his home's garage with his corvette and in an office at Penn U. The punishment(s) should be administered according to the law, not opinion and public outrage based on MSM consumption.Comment -
Perfectly said!
The MSM is the leading influencer to so many people's lives and not surprisingly, those same individuals will repeat the same biased misleading information while simultaneously claiming they are fair minded.
Reasonable people can see it plain as day, but for some strange reason, they can't.
Comment -
Comment -
Prepare to be surprised, not getting on board, to build the rest of the Trump Southern wall was a mistake for the democrats. I have no idea how republicans would have spun the fact that the cartels would have still got all their drugs here, including, but not limited to fentanyl.
Why would the republicans care about 14 billion at the Southern Border, They had no questions when over 35 billion was spent on a 8 billion wall that was not completed? Price should not have mattered anyway if Mexico was going to pay for it and certainly not taking much needed funds from the military.
I am not sure of the amount taken from our military budget. Was it 10 billion?Comment -
Good post! I've got some constitutional questions you seem to have some knowledge:
1) Is POTUS the only person who can classify and declassify documents?
2) Is there a process or form (or any procedure at all) that POTUS is obligated to do when declassifying documents?
I would think there are other officials, that at some point, would need this information.
3) If there is no record, of change in status this could be a bad situation waiting to happen.
#3 brings own a lot more than just a couple of dumbazz that were elected to high office having them.
4)Back to your point about the one who could change the status, dose that end when the new guy, WHO EVER IT MAY BE, IS SWORN IN.Comment -
It was very well said. So, that means Biden could declassify ever document the government has 2morrow, well said, Dwight and I agree, the US constitution got it right!Perfectly said!
The MSM is the leading influencer to so many people's lives and not surprisingly, those same individuals will repeat the same biased misleading information while simultaneously claiming they are fair minded.
Reasonable people can see it plain as day, but for some strange reason, they can't.
Dwight and I are reasonable people, we see it clear as day.Last edited by jackpot269; 11-17-23, 06:44 PM.Comment -
1. No.
2. No, the procedure for the president is a simple declaration. Others in several agencies who have been given the ability to classify can also declassify.
3. The National Archives.
4. Once the president leaves office his broad, sweeping declassification powers are lost and remain only with the new president. Declassifying documents is not a retroactive power, though. The manner and timeline of events must follow the US Constitution, CFRs, US Codes and various EOs concerning the matter. Biden can't take the classified material illegally while VP and the declare them declassified when takes the office of president.Comment -
Fair enough, on your last point, I would agree that ''A'' VP that became POTUS, can at that time, declassify any document, but from when they were taken until he became POTUS, that status would remain unchanged. That makes perfect sense to me.
Like you said no retroactive POWER, I knew you're not saying he can't declassify them, just that from the time when he left office until he becomes POTUS that status cannot change.
After ''A'' POTUS has left office, it's too late to declassify, what he may have in his possession, and of course the VP never had those powers.
The simple declaration, you mentioned, that would leave a record of any documents that were declassified. I'm assuming.
Thank you, b1slickguy for helping me understand that a little better.Comment -
Comment -
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NEW: Sen. Mike Lee Calls for Investigation Into J6 Committee for Deceiving Public About Capitol Riots<a href="https://t.co/2xzb5jTp3n">https://t.co/2xzb5jTp3n</a></p>— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) <a href="https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1726047869763792910?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >November 19, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">While Senator Lee is calling for an investigation, others have seen enough and believe action should be taken.<br><br>Tim Pool remarked: "Everyone on the Jan 6 Subcommittee should be expelled from Congress. They lied, manipulated to steal political power."<a href="https://t.co/GR6CRitIXj">https://t.co/GR6CRitIXj</a></p>— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) <a href="https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1726048086831640713?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >November 19, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The police facilitated January 6th<br><br>This is why they withheld the tapes<br><br>The J6 committee should be censured and expelled for lying to the public<br> <a href="https://t.co/nO9tbNP4lH">pic.twitter.com/nO9tbNP4lH</a></p>— Tim Pool (@Timcast) <a href="https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1725656518484213771?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >November 17, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Release the J6 political prisoners.<a href="https://t.co/Gqccb53UAV">pic.twitter.com/Gqccb53UAV</a></p>— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) <a href="https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1725665621948698682?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >November 18, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
Can you footnote that for us, or at least me. Just tell me where that information came from. Im not saying its right or wrong but curious where you found it.
That means that Biden can declassify all classified documents 2morrow, and not tell the military or NASA, or anyone else that may need that information. That needs to be rethought and changed somehow. That assume you are right and b1slickguy was wrong.
I didn't think any more about his statement after I read it once. I guess the definition of ''simple declaration.''
''2. No, the procedure for the president is a simple declaration.''
Most national security legal experts dismissed the former president’s suggestion that he could declassify documents simply by thinking about it. But as an ABA Legal Fact Check posted Oct. 17 explains, legal guidelines support his contention that presidents have broad authority to formally declassify most documents that are not statutorily protected, while they are in office.
Fact check explores presidential authority to declassify (americanbar.org)
Under the U.S. Constitution, the president as commander in chief is given broad powers to classify and declassify such information, often through use of executive orders. Some secrets, such as information related to nuclear weapons, are handled separately under a specific statutory scheme that Congress has adopted under the Atomic Energy Act.
Damn congress, they get a few privileges too. If that's a true statement (above what I posted) I don't know, I do know that they rarely take away power from the POTUS. They are usually making that branch stronger. It has much more power today than the founding fathers wanted it to have.Comment -
There is no governmental authority above the President, in the sense that the POTUS, answers to no one. So if he takes a top secret document and walks up to a TV camera and says, "hey take a look at this..." that doc is declassified and doesn't need the okay from the top spook at the CIA.Comment -
Comment -
Biden turned 81 today. Damn he's old as fock!Comment -
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">When Ray Epps urged people to trespass inside the Capitol, he knew it was a crime because he had an outstanding warrant for criminal trespass in Pennsylvania from 2015.<br><br>He wasn’t the only one removed from the FBI suspects list - so what really happened on J6? <a href="https://t.co/oIbaklzqh5">pic.twitter.com/oIbaklzqh5</a></p>— Truth In Media (@Truth_InMedia) <a href="https://twitter.com/Truth_InMedia/status/1726680850220351620?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >November 20, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment
