Trump Legal Cases

[DwightShrute]

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson appears surprised the Constitution deals with potential criminality by the president differently than ordinary American citizens:

"I was concerned about a system that appeared to provide immunity for one individual, under one set of circumstances, when we have a criminal justice system that would ordinarily treat everyone the same."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Just a reminder that Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was who originally refused to define what a woman was during her confirmation hearing. <a href="https://t.co/yckqiH6ysG">pic.twitter.com/yckqiH6ysG</a></p>&mdash; Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) <a href="https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/1674511917044453382?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >June 29, 2023</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[DwightShrute]

Pelosi admits blame for ‘stupidity’ in Jan. 6 security failures in newly released video: ‘I take full responsibility’

she refused the National Guard. She wanted this to happen.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Nancy Pelosi admits regret at not calling in National Guard ahead of J6 in newly released video<a href="https://t.co/4Ec8BAI8Zw">https://t.co/4Ec8BAI8Zw</a></p>&mdash; The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) <a href="https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1828822405403263224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >August 28, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[slewfan]

Pelosi admits blame for ‘stupidity’ in Jan. 6 security failures in newly released video: ‘I take full responsibility’

[Hareeba!]

Just gotta love this:


Jack Smith is now offering Judge Aileen Cannon lessons in phonics and grammar in light of her wayward, illogical, and meritless dismissal ruling, which is sure to be reversed and remanded on appeal.

[jt315]

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson appears surprised the Constitution deals with potential criminality by the president differently than ordinary American citizens:

"I was concerned about a system that appeared to provide immunity for one individual, under one set of circumstances, when we have a criminal justice system that would ordinarily treat everyone the same."

[Hareeba!]

Trump: “Legal Scholars are extremely thankful for the Supreme Court’s Decision today to take up Presidential Immunity.”

No, they aren’t.

They have unilaterally condemned it, and rightfully so.

Once again for the people in the back: PRESIDENTIAL. IMMUNITY. IS. NOT. A. THING.

[jt315]

A grand jury has returned a superseding indictment against Donald Trump in Washington, D.C. retaining the same four core charges against him for trying to subvert the election.

Refined thanks to Supreme Court immunity decision. Yawn !

[Hareeba!]

A grand jury has returned a superseding indictment against Donald Trump in Washington, D.C. retaining the same four core charges against him for trying to subvert the election.

[jt315]

Doesn't it make you a little sad that the people seem to expect the judiciary to rule based on partisan politics instead of being unbiased and purely based on the law?

If it continues down that path eventually the whole idea of the rule of law will not be respected by anyone. eg anarchy.

When part of the Biden administration’s campaign strategy was to use political prosecution , tying Trump up in courts during election campaign season and hoping the phrase convicted felon would sway voters , I’m not saddened in the least .

[slewfan]

Doesn't it make you a little sad that the people seem to expect the judiciary to rule based on partisan politics instead of being unbiased and purely based on the law?

If it continues down that path eventually the whole idea of the rule of law will not be respected by anyone. eg anarchy.

Anarchy could be a viable/possible solution to the present Administrations dereliction of their duties. Their attempts to take over the Government and turn it into a world order communist government.

The FBI for starters. They hid the infamous LapTop and then claimed it was Russian Misinformation. This may not seem relevant by itself, but it did happen to help one party win an election. Which may have or may not have been legally attained to begin with. Meta was made to print there was no laptop that would have been damaging information to the Biden campaign. Would you consider that Anarchy.?.

Then you throw in the mismanagement from Biden/Harris policy. Division of Americans, the border, Afghanistan mistake, Wars around the globe and a leader who is totally incapable of decisions and leadership. Yes you may be right. The country has been set up for the possible ''anarchy'' you mentions. However unassumingly you mention.

What you mention about expected judiciary rule due to partisan politics has been done now for 4 years against a former President and the person running against the Leftist attempt to destroy American traditions and values. It actually started 8 years ago with Russian Collusion farces and phony impeachments.



If Trump does win the election, I predict Antifa and all radical groups will take to the streets fighting. Destroying cities and peoples lives.
I would call this Anarchy. Which one would only hope would be handled with brute force. To end this anarchy once and for all. To wipe out it's soldiers and leadership.

Michelle and Barach Obama spoke at the convention for an hour. Not one mention of ''policy''. Only destroying a candidate who is running against their Democrat candidate. All the hatred in America started with the Obama's. It continued vehemently after Trump beat Hillary. There is no denying the facts.

It's all like an 8 year bad dream.

[Optional]

Circuit assignments

• For the Eleventh Circuit - Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice
• (Alabama, Florida, Georgia)

lol

Doesn't it make you a little sad that the people seem to expect the judiciary to rule based on partisan politics instead of being unbiased and purely based on the law?

If it continues down that path eventually the whole idea of the rule of law will not be respected by anyone. eg anarchy.

[DwightShrute]

Only Trump cult members would have a Trump sex doll. They also have Trump dildos. Sick mutherfukkers

dude, my last blow up doll I had, I got pregnant. Don't act like you're not impressed. Never again though.

Also, Mr. Big Cream? What's up with that shit anyways? The directions said to run it on your unit and it will get bigger. Wouldn't your hands get bigger also? I don't understand that stuff.


That's all for today. Don't forget to tip your waitress.

[b1slickguy]

I would not have thought he could fly one.

Just because some democrats believe that black people can't get internet and ID's and don't know what a computer is, doesn't necessarily mean they aren't capable of flying drones.

[jt315]

Jack Smith has appealed the loose Cannon's dismissal of Trump's classified documents case

Circuit assignments

• For the Eleventh Circuit - Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice
• (Alabama, Florida, Georgia)

lol

[slewfan]

[Mac4Lyfe]

is that you?

Only Trump cult members would have a Trump sex doll. They also have Trump dildos. Sick mutherfukkers

[Hareeba!]

Jack Smith has appealed the loose Cannon's dismissal of Trump's classified documents case

[jt315]

Judge Chutkan REJECTS Trump's motion to dismiss the Jan 6 case on vindictive prosecution grounds, says there is no evidence to support Trump's claims of political targeting.


A J6 trial of Trump before the election is highly unlikely.

Because SCOTUS delayed it to make it so.

BUT

A trial of Trump before inauguration is much more likely.

And so JDV as VP and de facto POTUS becomes a real possibility.

The sight and feel of desperation oozing from the left .

[slewfan]

Judge Chutkan REJECTS Trump's motion to dismiss the Jan 6 case on vindictive prosecution grounds, says there is no evidence to support Trump's claims of political targeting.


A J6 trial of Trump before the election is highly unlikely.

Because SCOTUS delayed it to make it so.

BUT

A trial of Trump before inauguration is much more likely.

And so JDV as VP and de facto POTUS becomes a real possibility.

You wish.

[Hareeba!]

Judge Chutkan REJECTS Trump's motion to dismiss the Jan 6 case on vindictive prosecution grounds, says there is no evidence to support Trump's claims of political targeting.


A J6 trial of Trump before the election is highly unlikely.

Because SCOTUS delayed it to make it so.

BUT

A trial of Trump before inauguration is much more likely.

And so JDV as VP and de facto POTUS becomes a real possibility.

[jackpot269]

~~~

Really?
This is all that you have?

Go back to your street conner. Make you some crack money.

You have no understanding of sarcasm.

[19th Hole]

I would not have thought he could fly one.

~~~

Really?
This is all that you have?

[jackpot269]

Obama killed American citizens in drone strikes. Should he have immunity or be prosecuted?

I would not have thought he could fly one.

[DwightShrute]

Obama killed American citizens in drone strikes. Should he have immunity or be prosecuted?

Like I said before, the president has always had immunity just as your example shows. Everyone know this. Immunity has always been a given, like so many things. And like so many things, they apparently don't apply when Trump is added into the mix. Intellectually honesty and logic are a couple others.

[gauchojake]

Obama killed American citizens in drone strikes. Should he have immunity or be prosecuted?

[jt315]

Following the MAGA Supreme Court's disastrous immunity ruling:

I'm introducing the No Kings Act.

This bill would reaffirm that the President is not immune to legal accountability and remove the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction to hear appeals related to presidential immunity.

Chuck Schumer

[khicks26]

is that you?

[DwightShrute]

is that you?

[khicks26]

Amazing that you actually believe this.

[DwightShrute]

Who is no one? They could be a lot of things that are not murder, that there could be questions about. Since this weak-minded court gave no guidance on what is and is not official acts. That way they can crawfish, depending on who is POTUS in the future. Most politicians are like Trump and would push 1 inch a mile.

Amazing that you actually believe this.

[jackpot269]

No one is saying a president can go kill anyone or doing anything like that. Those are pathetic fear tactics which only demonstrate how Trump has broken people's brain.

Presidents have always had immunity but like so many other things since June 2015, its only a problem if it applies to Trump somehow.

Who is no one? They could be a lot of things that are not murder, that there could be questions about. Since this weak-minded court gave no guidance on what is and is not official acts. That way they can crawfish, depending on who is POTUS in the future. Most politicians are like Trump and would push 1 inch a mile.

[DwightShrute]

No, are you? With this SCOTUS, who would ultimately make the call, you never know, what they will do. Most political SCOTUS in memory. Completely depends on who it would help at the time. To hell with the constitution with this court.

No one is saying a president can go kill anyone or doing anything like that. Those are pathetic fear tactics which only demonstrate how Trump has broken people's brain.

Presidents have always had immunity but like so many other things since June 2015, its only a problem if it applies to Trump somehow.

[jackpot269]

you are fukking with me right?

No, are you? With this SCOTUS, who would ultimately make the call, you never know, what they will do. Most political SCOTUS in memory. Completely depends on who it would help at the time. To hell with the constitution with this court.

[slewfan]

the division all began when Obama rose to power.





Obama was 8 years old in 1970 .
Kent State. The Vietnam war division was massive politically.
Four dead in Ohio when the National Guard opened fire on the student protesters.

It all basically ended there at Kent State. The division was over the War and nothing else. Since Obama, race relations have been used as a tool to divide America for Obama's fundamental change.

You make a good case, but you missed the point.

[jackpot269]

that's silly. Kamala helped raise bail for he guy and once he got out he murdered someone. I bet if he killed someone you knew, you wouldn't attempt to defend it.

Its political I was saying. Not the defendants caring about politics. Meaning, as an example ... the 574 riots and arrests the summer before J6 where dozens were killed, businesses burned and looted, hundreds of police injured and thousands of people injured in the name of a career criminal. Kamala and celebrities helped raise bail money for those who were arrested. They said there is no reason for them to stop. Now look at the hundreds of non violent people who were charged and went to prison from simply walking around the Capitol. That is where the politics comes in. The dems will prosecute their political rivals along with their supporters while helping free actual criminals who burned down businesses and attack police.

Not defending anything, just stating facts, something you have a problem with.

'The dems will prosecute their political rivals along with their supporters while helping free actual criminals who burned down businesses and attack police.[/QUOTE]''

He got life in jail for the murder. Tell me a district, in the USA with a GOP judge, and DA that want let you out on bail for a misdemeanor?

''Its political I was saying. Not the defendants caring about politics. Meaning, as an example ... the 574 riots and arrests the summer before J6 where dozens were killed, businesses burned and looted, hundreds of police injured and thousands of people injured in the name of a career criminal.''
The guilty should have been jailed and had their day in court. Remind me who the POTUS was then.


Again, they raised money in 2020. He was jailed and bailed in 2022.


Was it not you complaining about j6 criminals not getting bail and a lot of them was felonies. They should have gotten bail also. Most in the USA can get bail while waiting for court.

How many delay tactics you think Trump would have used if not released while waiting on court?