Trump Legal Cases

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • getaloadoffatso
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    its just gets better LOL

    This dude is ridiculous.

    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Joy Reid is not coping well <a rel="nofollow" href="https://t.co/qK5Nxael9P">pic.twitter.com/qK5Nxael9P</a></p>&mdash; Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1807841097743581693?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >July 1, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
    This looks like a patient in a psychiatric hospital trying to make an internet video

    Leave a comment:


  • Mac4Lyfe
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Watching liberals having a meltdown is glorious ������ <a rel="nofollow" href="https://t.co/mjhU6AZAQt">pic.twitter.com/mjhU6AZAQt</a></p>&mdash; I Meme Therefore I Am ���� (@ImMeme0) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/ImMeme0/status/1807812441729839486?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >July 1, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    These people are insane. It should have been 9-0 ruling.
    Just wait until Trump is murdered by Navy Seals.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    its just gets better LOL

    This dude is ridiculous.

    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Joy Reid is not coping well <a href="https://t.co/qK5Nxael9P">pic.twitter.com/qK5Nxael9P</a></p>&mdash; Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) <a href="https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1807841097743581693?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >July 1, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jt315
    And he cites the dumbest of the bunch Sotomayor with her hypothetical idiocy .

    I picture that is what Hareeballs looks and sounds like if he was 40 years younger

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Watching liberals having a meltdown is glorious ������ <a rel="nofollow" href="https://t.co/mjhU6AZAQt">pic.twitter.com/mjhU6AZAQt</a></p>&mdash; I Meme Therefore I Am ���� (@ImMeme0) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/ImMeme0/status/1807812441729839486?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >July 1, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    These people are insane. It should have been 9-0 ruling.

    And he cites the dumbest of the bunch Sotomayor with her hypothetical idiocy .

    Leave a comment:


  • getaloadoffatso
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Watching liberals having a meltdown is glorious ������ <a rel="nofollow" href="https://t.co/mjhU6AZAQt">pic.twitter.com/mjhU6AZAQt</a></p>&mdash; I Meme Therefore I Am ���� (@ImMeme0) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/ImMeme0/status/1807812441729839486?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >July 1, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    These people are insane. It should have been 9-0 ruling.
    Not only is he a whiny little dork liberal, he is a compulsive liar as well

    Nothing he said is true

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jt315
    The senile POS is on TV whining about today’s Supreme Court decision .

    He actually said the American people have a right to know about Jan 6 before the election .

    Oh what a couple of days it’s been.


    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Watching liberals having a meltdown is glorious ������ <a href="https://t.co/mjhU6AZAQt">pic.twitter.com/mjhU6AZAQt</a></p>&mdash; I Meme Therefore I Am ���� (@ImMeme0) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImMeme0/status/1807812441729839486?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >July 1, 2024</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    These people are insane. It should have been 9-0 ruling.

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    The senile POS is on TV whining about today’s Supreme Court decision .

    He actually said the American people have a right to know about Jan 6 before the election .

    Oh what a couple of days it’s been.

    Last edited by jt315; 07-01-24, 06:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by Mac4Lyfe
    Dwight - where has Melania been? When was the last time she was with her husband? I heard that if Trump won that she would not make Penn Ave her home. She's going to live out of NY. What's up with that?

    Mac, why do you care where she is?

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    Originally posted by Mac4Lyfe
    Dwight - where has Melania been? When was the last time she was with her husband? I heard that if Trump won that she would not make Penn Ave her home. She's going to live out of NY. What's up with that?
    Mac. Wherever Melania is, she is in a much better place then Lying Jill and her brood of degenerates. All of a sudden, the lefties are worried about Melania. She is more woman than Jill, Michelle, Hillary and any other Leftie slob you want to throw in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Itsamazing777
    replied
    Originally posted by Mac4Lyfe
    Dwight - where has Melania been? When was the last time she was with her husband? I heard that if Trump won that she would not make Penn Ave her home. She's going to live out of NY. What's up with that?
    Heard from who? Some quack writer on the internet who makes up fake stories like he interviewed her or something you believe everything you read?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mac4Lyfe
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    Dwight - where has Melania been? When was the last time she was with her husband? I heard that if Trump won that she would not make Penn Ave her home. She's going to live out of NY. What's up with that?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mac4Lyfe
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    You do this quite often. You make up shit and you repeat the lies over and over as if by doing so it will magically become a reality. Trump backers are all racists you forgot. Never any evidence. Just lies.
    Biden backers have small penises. Most of them actually dream about having anal sex with Obama. Some have said it in this forum.
    How quickly you forgot the guys in this forum blowing Putin. We had guys saying out loud that they wanted Russia to invade the US. Weren't you blowing Putin being interviewed by Tucker?

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    My goodness . What an absolute bitch slapping delivered to Jack Smith , the lower courts and the dissenters .

    << Whenever the President and Vice President discuss their official responsibilities, they engage in official conduct. Presiding over the January 6 certification proceeding at which Members of Congress count the electoral votes is a constitutional and statutory duty of the Vice President. Art. II, §1, cl. 3; Amdt. 12; 3 U. S. C. §15. The indictment’s allegations that Trump attempted to pressure the Vice President to take particular acts in connection with his role at the certification proceeding thus involve official conduct, and Trump is at least presumptively immune from prosecution for such conduct.>>

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    So "soil" plays an important factor in your opinion?

    Its almost as if the mere mention of Trump short circuits any logic, common sense, and intellectual honestly left in some people.
    Crimes that happen in other countries are their problem. You don't think that's logical?

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269
    The Obama counterterrorism operation you mention did not happen on American soil, so even in your twisted example he would not be charged here.

    I may be remembering wrong here but did congress not give the POTUS the power to go after terrorist after 911? If that is the case this would not apply.
    So "soil" plays an important factor in your opinion?

    Its almost as if the mere mention of Trump short circuits any logic, common sense, and intellectual honestly left in some people.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackpot269
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    This is the best Supreme Court maybe ever.
    - Abortion rights back to the States.
    - Affirmative Action is fukking racist.
    - A president cannot payoff student loans. Only congress can approve spending.
    - Chevron - removing power from unelected entities and back to congress.


    Of course a president is immune for many things. Duh. Otherwise Obama would have been charged for this and many other things ...

    President Barack Obama announced Thursday that a U.S. counterterrorism operation targeting an al Qaeda compound in January accidentally killed two innocent hostages, including one American.
    Multiple U.S. officials told CNN the hostages, Warren Weinstein, an American, and Italian national Giovanni Lo Porto, were killed by a U.S. military drone that targeted the al Qaeda compound.
    “As president and as commander in chief, I take full responsibility for all our counterterrorism operations including the one that inadvertently took the lives of Warren and Giovanni,” Obama said Thursday morning in the White House briefing room, where he apologized on behalf of the U.S. government.

    The Obama counterterrorism operation you mention did not happen on American soil, so even in your twisted example he would not be charged here.

    I may be remembering wrong here but did congress not give the POTUS the power to go after terrorist after 911? If that is the case this would not apply.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by getaloadoffatso
    I have similar dreams
    Are we talking about Barry or Michael Obama???

    Leave a comment:


  • getaloadoffatso
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    You do this quite often. You make up shit and you repeat the lies over and over as if by doing so it will magically become a reality. Trump backers are all racists you forgot. Never any evidence. Just lies.

    Biden backers have small penises. Most of them actually dream about having anal sex with Obama. Some have said it in this forum.
    I have similar dreams
    Are we talking about Barry or Michael Obama???

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    Despite the unprecedented nature of this case , and the very significant Constitutional questions that it raises, the lower courts rendered their decisions on a highly expedited basis .

    Chief Justice Roberts .



    To all the get Trump at all cost judges in the lower courts .

    A big FU !

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by Mac4Lyfe
    Trump backers believe in dictators. Most of them actually respect Putin. Some have said it in this forum.

    You do this quite often. You make up shit and you repeat the lies over and over as if by doing so it will magically become a reality. Trump backers are all racists you forgot. Never any evidence. Just lies.

    Biden backers have small penises. Most of them actually dream about having anal sex with Obama. Some have said it in this forum.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mac4Lyfe
    replied
    Originally posted by d2bets
    Do you Trump backers really like this decision?

    Do you think a President should be able to take a bribe in exchange for a pardon? He can now.
    Do you think a President should be able to use the military to assassinate a rival? He can now.
    Do you think a President should be able to order the Justice Department to prosecute his political rival? He can now.
    Trump backers believe in dictators. Most of them actually respect Putin. Some have said it in this forum.

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    Originally posted by d2bets
    That was never going to be held. But again, that case is about what Trump did after leaving office.

    Well if things worked according to their plan , they would have had Trump tied up in a courtroom from May ‘til Election Day with a possible prison sentence . You witnessed the reason why Thursday night . Now they’ll finish 1 for 4 . And a Trump win sends the remaining three to the trash can.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by d2bets
    OK, but so now it's cool then, right? No problem, perfectly allowed, right?
    ok so you honestly think ...

    a President can take a bribe in exchange for a pardon?
    a President can use the military to assassinate a rival?

    I want to be absolutely clear.

    Leave a comment:


  • d2bets
    replied
    Originally posted by jt315

    Judge Cannon is still setting dates to hear motions and is almost certainly unlikely to set a court date before Jack Smith’s DC mess is straightened out .
    That was never going to be held. But again, that case is about what Trump did after leaving office.

    Leave a comment:


  • d2bets
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    I doubt he can the first 2, but the 3rd point is being done now to Trump. Were you in a coma for the lest couple years?
    OK, but so now it's cool then, right? No problem, perfectly allowed, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by d2bets
    Do you Trump backers really like this decision?

    Do you think a President should be able to take a bribe in exchange for a pardon? He can now.
    Do you think a President should be able to use the military to assassinate a rival? He can now.
    Do you think a President should be able to order the Justice Department to prosecute his political rival? He can now.
    I doubt he can the first 2, but the 3rd point is being done now to Trump. Were you in a coma for the lest couple years?

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jt315

    BOOM !


    What’s that sound you hear ?

    The sound of corrupt Jack the Jerkoff Smith’s chances of a trial reaching a verdict before Election Day coming to a screeching halt .




    Trump Immunity --

    Absolute immunity for core POTUS powers.
    PRESUMPTIVE IMMUNITY for "official acts."
    No Immunity for private acts.
    This is the best Supreme Court maybe ever.
    - Abortion rights back to the States.
    - Affirmative Action is fukking racist.
    - A president cannot payoff student loans. Only congress can approve spending.
    - Chevron - removing power from unelected entities and back to congress.


    Of course a president is immune for many things. Duh. Otherwise Obama would have been charged for this and many other things ...

    President Barack Obama announced Thursday that a U.S. counterterrorism operation targeting an al Qaeda compound in January accidentally killed two innocent hostages, including one American.
    Multiple U.S. officials told CNN the hostages, Warren Weinstein, an American, and Italian national Giovanni Lo Porto, were killed by a U.S. military drone that targeted the al Qaeda compound.
    “As president and as commander in chief, I take full responsibility for all our counterterrorism operations including the one that inadvertently took the lives of Warren and Giovanni,” Obama said Thursday morning in the White House briefing room, where he apologized on behalf of the U.S. government.

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    Originally posted by d2bets
    The Florida case is related to Trump's actions after he left office. I don't see how this would affect that.

    Judge Cannon is still setting dates to hear motions and is almost certainly unlikely to set a court date before Jack Smith’s DC mess is straightened out .
    Last edited by jt315; 07-01-24, 10:56 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • d2bets
    replied
    Originally posted by jt315
    ^^^^^^

    Jonathan Turley -

    The last two Supreme Court decisions have ripped the wings off the DC and Florida cases .

    The Florida case is related to Trump's actions after he left office. I don't see how this would affect that.

    Leave a comment:


  • d2bets
    replied
    Do you Trump backers really like this decision?

    Do you think a President should be able to take a bribe in exchange for a pardon? He can now.
    Do you think a President should be able to use the military to assassinate a rival? He can now.
    Do you think a President should be able to order the Justice Department to prosecute his political rival? He can now.

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied
    Originally posted by jt315
    Tick tick tick …


    That sound you hear is the clock running out against Team Lawfare .


    ^^^^^^

    Jonathan Turley -

    The last two Supreme Court decisions have ripped the wings off the DC and Florida cases .

    Leave a comment:


  • Itsamazing777
    replied
    Originally posted by jt315

    BOOM !


    What’s that sound you hear ?

    The sound of corrupt Jack the Jerkoff Smith’s chances of a trial reaching a verdict before Election Day coming to a screeching halt .




    Trump Immunity --

    Absolute immunity for core POTUS powers.
    PRESUMPTIVE IMMUNITY for "official acts."
    No Immunity for private acts.

    Leave a comment:


  • jt315
    replied

    BOOM !


    What’s that sound you hear ?

    The sound of corrupt Jack the Jerkoff Smith’s chances of a trial reaching a verdict before Election Day coming to a screeching halt .




    Trump Immunity --

    Absolute immunity for core POTUS powers.
    PRESUMPTIVE IMMUNITY for "official acts."
    No Immunity for private acts.

    Leave a comment:


  • getaloadoffatso
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Who did this <a rel="nofollow" href="https://t.co/zP55AIUY5i">pic.twitter.com/zP55AIUY5i</a></p>&mdash; �������� �������� ♛ ✡︎ (@NiohBerg) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/NiohBerg/status/1806658273623322832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >June 28, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
    LOL
    She makes way more sense than Biden

    Leave a comment:

SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...