Derailer AKA BuffaloNickle is no longer a pro! SBR isnt messing around! Kudos

[RudyRuetigger]

Is it possible IAG was told about contests by derailer

And derailer and Danica are same person?

And IAG is separate?

If only this was suggested earlier

Oh wait....

[RockBottom]

so did IAG get paid?

or did she not get paid due to suspicion?? I'm honestly asking because I didn't follow the bart simpson analogy.

did Derailer get any punishment due to suspicion? as in banning, stripping of Pro status, limiting contests in future?

seems odd to be willing to do anything punitive if its really only on Suspicion but not willing to actually let the paying pro members be made Whole and think its fair to them to not get paid the amount they deserve instead of a cheater?

She declined it not to be an issue, told them they could reassign it or donate it to Big Day.

[Alright Alright]

Where is "across the street?" Why can't we refer to them by their real name? Yes, I am a dumbass!

[playersonly69]

Well we have finally got down to the ROCK BOTTOM of all of this.


We cant say the othrr forums nane, but dont worry there are only about 15 different posters there and another 40 ghosts.

[5mike5]

Enough with the IAG “living saint” spiel. There was a connection, SBR wasn’t comfortable making rulings on anything that in their mind was less than 100.00% guilty.

Also considering they (all 3) did this starting with the 9 month nascar contest too there is no maybe about any of it.

[RockBottom]

Well we have finally got down to the ROCK BOTTOM of all of this.


We cant say the othrr forums nane, but dont worry there are only about 15 different posters there and another 40 ghosts.

Rock bottom was about my place in BTP.

[RudyRuetigger]

i really think she was an innocent party to this

but i just wonder why they all 3 entered this contest back to back to back?

surely at that point she knew something fishy was going on?

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3514720-deal-no-deal-contest-p3.html#post28278008

also think sbr did the right thing by paying

there is no rule that you cant tail someone's picks ((((this year)))

[Chi_archie]

Is derailer giving her picks a crime? The only crime I see is derailer using a ghost.

exactly

I don't think multiple posters having super correlated plays can be considered cheating.

a) The damn plays still have to win

b) Making the same plays does not mean the accounts are the same person (although it sounds as though SBR determined Derailer and Danica were linked)

c) The damn plays could just come from some tout that a few posters buy from. (don't we have a tout forum where plays are shared?)
- https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/service-plays/

d) The damn plays could come from some forum chat, skype, email, text, Denny's syndicate meeting between posters that have weekly roundtable discussions and break down various segments of the NFL. No reason people can't pool their knowledge in capping and come to the consensus on the 3-5 best plays of the week, and again, the plays have to WIN.


e) Its basically a free contest from SBR I find this whole situation intriguing but not at all outrageous. Can't be mad at people looking for angles. but its just a hobby and past time for me and I didn't win any bitcoin in this thing so I guess its just easy for me to say that. Tricks are for kids

[RockBottom]

i really think she was an innocent party to this

but i just wonder why they all 3 entered this contest back to back to back?

surely at that point she knew something fishy was going on?

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3514720-deal-no-deal-contest-p3.html#post28278008

also think sbr did the right thing by paying

there is no rule that you cant tail someone's picks this year

Derailer sent a PM about it.

[Chi_archie]

i really think she was an innocent party to this

but i just wonder why they all 3 entered this contest back to back to back?

surely at that point she knew something fishy was going on?

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3514720-deal-no-deal-contest-p3.html#post28278008

also think sbr did the right thing by paying

there is no rule that you cant tail someone's picks this year

let's say i'm texting or talking to you on phone because we are friends off forum.

I say,
1) "hey there's another interesting contest, but you gotta confirm you are in. here i'll send you the link. "

2) I go sign up and then I sign my ghost up.

3) the person I sent the link to signs up

its not rocket brain surgery science

[RudyRuetigger]

Derailer sent a PM about it.

are you guessing again like the derailer 'not banned here' post?

it sounds like im being a smartass, but im not..just asking

THANKS

[RudyRuetigger]

let's say i'm texting or talking to you on phone because we are friends off forum.

I say,
1) "hey there's another interesting contest, but you gotta confirm you are in. here i'll send you the link. "

2) I go sign up and then I sign my ghost up.

3) the person I sent the link to signs up

its not rocket brain surgery science

derailer isnt the real person either

she should just give up who derailer is to clear her name

[Chi_archie]

derailer isnt the real person either

she should just give up who derailer is to clear her name

I'd think that she's not a snitch and what's a clear name on a dirty forum that a person is not really invested in mean anyways?

I'd guess that would be her thinking.

knowing her. I think she has thought about that whole contest and this situation about 100x less than all of us that have posted in this and the other thread.

[RudyRuetigger]

I'd think that she's not a snitch and what's a clear name on a dirty forum that a person is not really invested in mean anyways?

I'd guess that would be her thinking.

knowing her. I think she has thought about that whole contest and this situation about 100x less than all of that have posted in this and the other thread.

i think she cares. shes been a mod at thex and many other forums

im sure shes met tons of sharps across them all


































my point is with the 3 in a row posts, if shes not derailer (and i dont think she is), then she knows derailer

and since shes been across all sports betting forums, i think she also knows the main online screen name of the real poster

[Chi_archie]

she cares at other forums maybe.

not here. I doubt she gives a shit about what anyone at SBR thinks about her. I don't....Do you?

again

why is it against the rules to KNOW someone else in a contest? or use from the same picks pool?

of course she knows him and knows derailers original or most known handle

but why the fuk should she snitch?

i'd lose respect for her if she did. that's real e forumville cred.

[RockBottom]

are you guessing again like the derailer 'not banned here' post?

it sounds like im being a smartass, but im not..just asking

THANKS

She told me.

[RudyRuetigger]

she cares at other forums maybe.

not here. I doubt she gives a shit about what anyone at SBR thinks about her. I don't....Do you?

again

why is it against the rules to KNOW someone else in a contest?

of course she knows him and knows derailers original or most known handle

but why the fuk should she snitch?

i'd lose respect for her if she did. that's real e forumville cred.

this is the point i was addressing

so maybe she isnt innocent if she knows that line to be true

[Chi_archie]

this is the point i was addressing

so maybe she isnt innocent if she knows that line to be true

and the point i'm addressing is.

why does it matter if she knows him or who others know him as?

is RudyRuetigger your first SBR user name?


just because she knows who was behind Derailer, doesn't mean she knows that same person was behind Danica or any other name

[RockBottom]

A lot of misinformation here, of course much of it by Rudy. She was never a rx mod.

Rudy, you’re trying way too hard to be relevant here. Why don’t you go across the street and ask her? Doesn’t mean she’ll return the courtesy since you are accusing her.

[RudyRuetigger]

and the point i'm addressing is.

why does it matter if she knows him or who others know him as?

is RudyRuetigger your first SBR user name?


just because she knows who was behind Derailer, doesn't mean she knows that same person was behind Danica or any other name

you probably shouldve read the whole thing

lets pretend this cheating is a family tree in 5th grade

derailer isnt the tip top where your great great grandparents

theyve been caught before, most recently under buffalo nickel

[RudyRuetigger]

A lot of misinformation here, of course much of it by Rudy. She was never a rx mod.

Rudy, you’re trying way too hard to be relevant here. Why don’t you go across the street and ask her? Doesn’t mean she’ll return the courtesy since you are accusing her.

sorry

mod at SPORTS PRESCRIPTION

[RockBottom]

Why do you care so much about who derailer is? As long as its not IAG, that’s all that matters?

[RudyRuetigger]

Why do you care so much about who derailer is? As long as its not IAG, that’s all that matters?

the better question is, why are you here worried about it when you have 869 posts in 10 years

[playersonly69]

At the end of the day, it appears that no one in the top 10 even cares. And they woukd be the only ones to actually win very much more money.


They got one over on the posters here

[pavyracer]

I remember a long time ago maybe 10-12 years ago someone won BTP, when the prizes were peanuts compared to now, by using picks from a paid service (which costed more than the 1st prize money) and it was still within the rules. If you want to spend $2000 to win $1000 for example SBR is not going to stop you.

It is quite possible this 4-5 individuals are different posters who pulled in their money together to buy picks from a service and they got good picks from them. So they may have invested $5,000 to win $10,000 and then split the profits. It was a risky decision but it paid off.

Now the moral of the story is "Is this fair for the other SBR Pros who didn't pay for picks?" Probably not.

"Does SBR prohibit paying for picks and then sharing them on multiple accounts to win a contest?" No, it's not in the rules of the game.

SBR is not going to stop some individuals who want to burn $5,000 of their money for a chance to win $10,000.

If some individuals pool their money to buy $5,000 lottery tickets for a ruffle with the prize being $10,000 the organizer of the ruffle is not going to care. Same with SBR.

[Chi_archie]

theyve been caught before, most recently under buffalo nickel

I've read about the Buffalo Nickel connection.

did he cheat? or get banned for having multiple user names?


I don't know seems like a lot of digging and suspected collusion.

didn't know SBR had so many uptight liberal cuckwad posters that get offended so easily in contests.

[RockBottom]

the better question is, why are you here worried about it when you have 869 posts in 10 years

I know right from wrong whether it’s 864 posts or 86.400 posts.
How many should I have? I have 100k roughly in 18 years if it matters.

[RudyRuetigger]

I remember a long time ago maybe 10-12 years ago someone won BTP, when the prizes were peanuts compared to now, by using picks from a paid service (which costed more than the 1st prize money) and it was still within the rules. If you want to spend $2000 to win $1000 for example SBR is not going to stop you.

It is quite possible this 4-5 individuals are different posters who pulled in their money together to buy picks from a service and they got good picks from them. So they may have invested $5,000 to win $10,000 and then split the profits. It was a risky decision but it paid off.

Now the moral of the story is "Is this fair for the other SBR Pros who didn,t pay for picks?" Probably not.

"Does SBR prohibit paying for picks and then sharing them on multiple accounts to win a contest?" No, it's not in the rules of the game.

SBR is not going to stop some individuals who want to burn $5,000 of their money for a chance to win $10,000.

If you some individuals pool their money to buy $5,000 lottery tickets for a ruffle with the prize being $10,000 the organizer of the ruffle is not going to care. Same with SBR.

except you actually burn $0 here since you can keep cashing out points

most posters would multi account even if there wasnt a BTP contest

[RudyRuetigger]

I know right from wrong whether it’s 864 posts or 86.400 posts.
How many should I have?

i said they should be paid

i said shes probably not guilty of the main situation

i agree she shouldnt say who it is

[5mike5]

Funny to be innocent and be involved in 2 diff cash contests doing same thing with the same ghost accounts of derailer/danica

Come on

[pavyracer]

except you actually burn $0 here since you can keep cashing out points

most posters would multi account even if there wasnt a BTP contest

How do you know the picks they entered were free? That was my point. They may have paid thousands for the picks that won the contest. If they were taking shots why not use different picks for each account that they didn't pay for.

[RudyRuetigger]

How do you know the picks they entered were free? That was my point. They may have paid thousands for the picks that won the contest. If they were taking shots why not use different picks for each account that they didn't pay for.

1st part is off topic, but you can make up much more just by being a pro if you are that desperate for money


2nd part dealing with different picks...sbr moves slow lines because they first have to change at the book. im sure i could pick out many that only place wagers before a line moves........i said sbr should have software dealing with people that are too stupid in sportsbetting but have the time to create multiple accounts

[RudyRuetigger]

didn't know SBR had so many uptight liberal cuckwad posters that get offended so easily in contests.

i was banned during the contest anyway so i dont really care

make a picks thread and lets talk about them instead

[Fishhead]

BigDEEM closed this case long ago.

Let's move on.

Great contest!

[BigDeem5]

Rudy got buried here.