Originally posted by hostile takeover
Greaser owes Brooks 20,000 bet points
Collapse
X
-
Andy117SBR Hall of Famer
- 02-07-10
- 9511
#71The biggest stiff in board history was a conservative.Comment -
bigbubbafadeSBR Wise Guy
- 08-15-17
- 644
#72Wow. This is startling. I guess there's one more snowflake you just can't trust.Comment -
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39847
#73Trump and Fox News said it, so of course they believe it. No need for independent thought from these sheeple.Originally posted by grease lightninhttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...on-with-russia
What I would love to know is how many of you retards actually think the Trump campaign has been cleared here?
I know some are just trolling but multiple idiots in here actually believe it.Comment -
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39847
#74Although at the end of the day, this is still going to be ambiguous because the word collusion is never going to be used. It's not a legal term and has no legal definition. Is it conspiracy? Is it cooperation? What exactly is it? Moreover, are we only talking about Trump personally, or are we talking about his campaign? And who in the campaign? Anyone? Certain people?
There will be no clean resolution to this.
But either way, we are clearly not at the end yet. Mueller himself has not said a single word and is still working. As far as we know, he hasn't even interviewed Trump yet.Comment -
jtolerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-17-13
- 30982
#75Greaser, Brooks pm'ed me and told me to tell you that if you go to the Justin Bieber concert with him he'll forget about the bet.Comment -
Clutchut12SBR MVP- 09-20-16
- 3632
#76Pay that man his points!!! This stupid ass shit is overComment -
thechaozSBR Posting Legend
- 10-23-09
- 12154
#77Pay your penetrating debtsComment -
HurryUpAndDrinkSBR Posting Legend
- 08-23-13
- 13017
#78Tough spot for Greaser, put he should know a bet is a bet regardless.
That said I reserve what I think he should do to myself. Meddling in other men business aint drinker business,Comment -
Plaza23SBR Hall of Famer
- 12-29-13
- 7392
#79Brooks owns every libtard on this site. It's excellence in action. Highly entertaining..
Comment -
Clutchut12SBR MVP- 09-20-16
- 3632
#80He lost needs to just pay it and get it over with. Bad look but thats what he gets for listening to CNN over these dumbass theorys.Originally posted by HurryUpAndDrinkTough spot for Greaser, put he should know a bet is a bet regardless.
That said I reserve what I think I should do to myself. Meddling in other men business aint drinker business,Comment -
gauchojakeBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-17-10
- 34131
#81I wouldn't think the bet concludes until Mueller's investigation is complete. I know there are a lot of guys on SBR who like to try and cash tickets before the game is over but settle down.
Non pros shouldn't even be allowed to comment on points bets. Embarrassing.Comment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16096
#82I am truly shocked at the high number of dumbfukks in this thread
I really thought we were better than this.
I might start a mentorship program to help solve this problem of dumbfukkery here at SBRComment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16096
#83It is simple and clear, really.Originally posted by d2betsAlthough at the end of the day, this is still going to be ambiguous because the word collusion is never going to be used. It's not a legal term and has no legal definition. Is it conspiracy? Is it cooperation? What exactly is it? Moreover, are we only talking about Trump personally, or are we talking about his campaign? And who in the campaign? Anyone? Certain people?
There will be no clean resolution to this.
But either way, we are clearly not at the end yet. Mueller himself has not said a single word and is still working. As far as we know, he hasn't even interviewed Trump yet.
The campaign is any any member of the campaign.
If Mueller doesn’t publicly state that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia before or at the conclusion of his investigation, I win.
Brooks made a bet he cannot win.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44644
#84lol truly enjoy how long this thread as got since I first saw it. Watching you squirm is great.Originally posted by grease lightninIt is simple and clear, really.
The campaign is any any member of the campaign.
If Mueller doesn’t publicly state that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia before or at the conclusion of his investigation, I win.
Brooks made a bet he cannot win.
He already did publicly state it.
verb (used with object), stated, stating.
20. to set forth formally in speech or writing
now pay upComment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16096
#85Originally posted by brooks85lol truly enjoy how long this thread as got since I first saw it. Watching you squirm is great.
He already did publicly state it.
No he didn’t and you know it.
Rosenstein said there were no allegations that any American was involved with regard to this specific indictment, and in the same sentence, that the investigation is ongoing.
I know you’re smarter than that, you are just showing that you are a dishonest scumbag.Comment -
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39847
#86Which part of "ongoing investigation" does brooksy not comprehend?
These last indictments are but one piece of a much larger pie.
For example, it didn't have anything to do with the DNC hacking, wikileaks, etc.Comment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16096
#87Originally posted by d2betsWhich part of "ongoing investigation" does brooksy not comprehend?
These last indictments are but one piece of a much larger pie.
For example, it didn't have anything to do with the DNC hacking, wikileaks, etc.
He knows. He is just a scumbag.
The most likely reason no Americans were involved in this indictment is because Mueller doesn’t want to show his hand until the investigation is complete.Comment -
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39847
#88He might not know it. Trump and Fox News told him it's over. His limited brain cells may be unable to overcome that.Originally posted by grease lightninNo he didn’t and you know it.
Rosenstein said there were no allegations that any American was involved with regard to this specific indictment, and in the same sentence, that the investigation is ongoing.
I know you’re smarter than that, you are just showing that you are a dishonest scumbag.Comment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16096
#89Show me where he stated it.Originally posted by brooks85lol truly enjoy how long this thread as got since I first saw it. Watching you squirm is great.
He already did publicly state it.
verb (used with object), stated, stating.
20. to set forth formally in speech or writing
now pay upComment -
PittsburghPlayerSBR Hall of Famer- 01-11-10
- 6760
#90Not reading thread closely, leaned Brooks some days ago (he slowed me down on the drinking, I owed him one)Originally posted by grease lightninI am truly shocked at the high number of dumbfukks in this threadI really thought we were better than this. I might start a mentorship program to help solve this problem of dumbfukkery here at SBR
Now leaning Greaser is a f a g
will not testify to that, but it is trueComment -
Clutchut12SBR MVP- 09-20-16
- 3632
#91Pay him 10k and call it a day, brooks get them points homey!! It mighy be time to break some fingersComment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16096
#92Originally posted by Clutchut12Pay him 10k and call it a day, brooks get them points homey!! It mighy be time to break some fingers
Learn to read.
I wagered 2000 points at +1000.
If I win, brooks pays me 20k, if I lose, I pay him 2k.Comment -
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39847
#93Grease: Mueller and Co. will not conclude beyond a shadow of doubt that there was no collusion with Russia.
Brooks: Bet is on, mueller will rule this is not collusion and there will be no charges.
What if Mueller never mentions the word collusion? I guess grease wins because he will not have ruled no collusion. GIven that collusion is not a legal term and not a crime, it seems unlikely that he would mention it.
And then brooks adds "there will be no charges." No charges against whom? And for what?
I don't understand this bet, but I guess I don't need to.
Comment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16096
#94Yea, I don’t know what he means by that but it doesn’t matter because he agreed to the terms I presented with his statement “bet is on”.Originally posted by d2bets
And then brooks adds "there will be no charges." No charges against whom? And for what?
Comment -
BigOrangeSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-13-09
- 6745
#95Seems like Greaser is trying to use the ambiguity that some scumbag sportbooks use on their prop bets.
Greaser should offer to pay 1,000 in a buyout and Brooks should be man enough to accept it.Comment -
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39847
#96Seems like you're clueless. Bet is expressly based on Mueller's *conclusions*, and Mueller clearly has not concluded. This game is in the 3rd quarter. Can't grade either way until the game is over. Next time my team is winning in the 3rd quarter I'll see if they'll grade it for me as a win. See how that goes.Originally posted by BigOrangeSeems like Greaser is trying to use the ambiguity that some scumbag sportbooks use on their prop bets.
Greaser should offer to pay 1,000 in a buyout and Brooks should be man enough to accept it.Comment -
qwertvtSBR MVP
- 12-04-09
- 1419
#98What happens if Trump fires Mueller? Push?Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
