Originally posted by packerd_00

OK descendant of a war criminal.


The guy who is broke and lets Muslim leaders pay for him

The guy who is broke and lets Muslim leaders pay for him

"Der Untergang Dresdens" by David Irving was first published in 1963. He always speaks about 135.000 deaths there. Why? He based in on Hans Voigt, member of the city government of Dresden who said there where ~35.000 deaths. Wait, 35.000? Yep, exactly. To justify his 135.000 Irving just made up the story that the first number disappeared. Yeah right, simply disappeared, like magic. Without having the slightest backup for this story (Hans Voigt always said 35.000, even when asked). Later, in the mid-60's, Irving "found" an alleged document "Der Höhere SS und Polizeiführer Dresden: Tagesbefehl Nr. 47, Luftangriff auf Dresden", short TB47, in which the Nr of deaths was 202.040. So in his next edition of "Der Untergang Dresdens" of 1967, Irvings new number was 202.040. But, unfortunately for him, the whole TB47 was a hoax, without any stamps or legit anything. In fact it was a manual copy of a manual copy of a faked Tagesbefehl, done way after the war. Ooooops. Irving had to admit that he was dead-wrong and did so later. In the same edition of 1967 Irving speaks of 69.000 people whose dead bodies were burned on the Altmarkt of Dresden. However, in the exact same book, just a few pages later, he suddenly speaks of 9000 bodies.In fact the German police counted 18.375 deaths until March 10 1945. The number was later corrected by them and the new Nr was ~38.000 for the whole city. And for both, unfortunately for you and Mr Irving are real documents available (f.e. Lagebericht 1404 of the same day as the fake TB47), and real people from that time said it again under oath. Götz Bergander proved without the slightest doubt left, that the TB47 was a bloody bad fake. Irving still continued in his next edition (1985) to speak of way way more deaths, so his publisher printed ROMAN (how embarassing for Irving
) on this edition.
"Der Untergang Dresdens" by David Irving was first published in 1963. He always speaks about 135.000 deaths there. Why? He based in on Hans Voigt, member of the city government of Dresden who said there where ~35.000 deaths. Wait, 35.000? Yep, exactly. To justify his 135.000 Irving just made up the story that the first number disappeared. Yeah right, simply disappeared, like magic. Without having the slightest backup for this story (Hans Voigt always said 35.000, even when asked). Later, in the mid-60's, Irving "found" an alleged document "Der Höhere SS und Polizeiführer Dresden: Tagesbefehl Nr. 47, Luftangriff auf Dresden", short TB47, in which the Nr of deaths was 202.040. So in his next edition of "Der Untergang Dresdens" of 1967, Irvings new number was 202.040. But, unfortunately for him, the whole TB47 was a hoax, without any stamps or legit anything. In fact it was a manual copy of a manual copy of a faked Tagesbefehl, done way after the war. Ooooops. Irving had to admit that he was dead-wrong and did so later. In the same edition of 1967 Irving speaks of 69.000 people whose dead bodies were burned on the Altmarkt of Dresden. However, in the exact same book, just a few pages later, he suddenly speaks of 9000 bodies.In fact the German police counted 18.375 deaths until March 10 1945. The number was later corrected by them and the new Nr was ~38.000 for the whole city. And for both, unfortunately for you and Mr Irving are real documents available (f.e. Lagebericht 1404 of the same day as the fake TB47), and real people from that time said it again under oath. Götz Bergander proved without the slightest doubt left, that the TB47 was a bloody bad fake. Irving still continued in his next edition (1985) to speak of way way more deaths, so his publisher printed ROMAN (how embarassing for Irving
) on this edition.

I'll ignore you bitches from now on.

I'll ignore you bitches from now on.
When Russia Occupied Poland in 1939 The Jewish population was mainly from Russia, and Poles never fully accepted them. When Russia invaded Poland the Jews were like hungry dogs in front of a butcher shop, and now the shop door was open. This wasn't about Communism, or Bolsheviks, it was simply shipping off the intelligentsia, and wealthy Poles to Siberia, and grabbing their possessions. |
What was it really like? Only recently, on the pages of Rzeczpospolita, did there appear a lengthy article by Professor Tomasz Strzembosz, a distinguished researcher of recent Polish history and especially the period 1939-54. Strzembosz's article demonstrates the actual role of the Jewish population in eastern Poland in the years of the first Soviet occupation . The discussion to date, declares Strzembosz, "overlooks the most important fact: what happened in Jedwabne after the German army entered the area, i.e. who, when and in what circumstances carried out the mass murder of the Jewish population of Jedwabne." Strzembosz analyzes in depth the behavior of the Polish and Jewish populations in the years 1939-41, especially the initial and final periods of the first Soviet occupation. <center>
|
Organizers of the red terror
Torture in Jedwabne Strzembosz proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that events took precisely the same course in Jedwabne itself. Here is one account from a resident of Jedwabne, Józef Rybicki, summing up what happened in the town after it fell to the Soviets:
The description of the tortures inflicted upon Polish conspirators by the NKVD in Jedwabne is shocking. The following is an account by Corporal Antoni B., a member of the anti-Soviet underground who was turned in to the NKVD by Jews: "they took me for interrogation, the investigating judge and the NKVD commander and one torturer came, and they sat me on a stool next to a brick wall, then I look over and one in civilian clothes took a stick from behind the stove like the kind in the walls of our tents, that long and thick, and suddenly they threw me on the floor and stuffed my cap in my mouth and started to beat me, I couldn't cry out because the judge sat on my legs and the second one held me by the head and held the cap in my mouth, and I fought back until I tore the cap to bits, and the third torturer beat me the whole time, I got that stick more or less 30 times, and they stopped beating me and sat me on the stool by the wall. I had long hair, and the senior lieutenant grabbed me by the hair and started to beat my head against the wall, I thought that nothing would be left of my head, he tore the whole clump of hair from my head . they threw me on the ground and started to beat me with a hazel stick, they turned me from side to side and beat me, and in addition two of them were still sitting on me and suffocating me and said that they would finish me off. They kept beating me until they probably knew that I couldn't take anymore, so at last they let me go. They beat me like a cat in a sack, and at the end they sat me on the stool and beat me with the stick on the arms." (from W czterdziestym nas matko na Sybir zesłali [In 1940, Mother, They Sent Us to Siberia],published by the Solidarity Interfactory Structure, p. 82). I took this text from a collection of accounts prepared years ago for print by Professor Jan T. Gross. When writing his book about Jedwabne, Gross skips over the description of Antoni B.'s arrest and torture, although he quotes other fragments of this account. Why? The facts leave no room for doubt: the |
||||||
