I remember a poster, we called him Doves, this is for him...
Watched this a few weeks ago, forgot to write the reaction post.
Quantum simulation seems like the most feasible application. Also machine learning or forecasting for special overly complex problems to solve. Not sure about the cryptography applications, companies always cheap out on security. They haven't even secured traditional computers successfully.
The mechanics of the computer sounds crazy, was barely understanding the overviews of the different types of computers.
Not sure if this is going to be a major disruptor in the business world or make countries with the biggest quantum computers more of a superpower. Scientific discovery to further man's understanding of the UNIverse seems like a more realistic outcome.
Machine learning has a rich ecosystem of libraries with traditional computers. Who's going to program these quantum computers? Now you have to know quantum mechanics to program a quantum computer? I guess that's expected for scientists to know, but you don't have to know science and math to program traditional computers. It would be cool if software libraries separated the underlying entanglement and nature of the quantum computer from the programmer to make certain use cases easier. You just define the problem and the library takes care of the low level programming. Will there be a rich open source ecosystem for quantum computers? Right now people around the world can contribute to open source with traditional computers, requiring a quantum computer would make it more of an obstacle. Maybe you can simulate quantum computers for testing and development with traditional computers to get around the obstacle of being able to work on one.
Computer processors are becoming simpler which makes sense for most circumstances. I think the software revolution will be more impactful on humanity than quantum computers at this point.
It's always funny to read the wrong predictions Bill Gates made about computers in the early days. I wonder how quantum computers will turn out and if an unexpected use case becomes popular.
It ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors
It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em
- Dr. Dre on quantum computers, circa 2001
Comment
wolfmanmeadows
SBR Wise Guy
12-29-20
915
#152219
Comment
DiggityDaggityDo
SBR Aristocracy
11-30-08
81450
#152220
Originally posted by Bostongambler
Plus she made the best coconut 便 cream pie.
Remember all the times she tried to fuk Gilligan even though she had a fiance back home?
She was naughty.
Comment
DiggityDaggityDo
SBR Aristocracy
11-30-08
81450
#152221
Lost two fumbles at the goaline.
What ya gonna do?
Comment
stevenash
Moderator
01-17-11
65755
#152222
Originally posted by Bostongambler
Plus she made the best coconut 便 cream pie.
Poppie peed on the sofa.
Comment
Optional
Administrator
06-10-10
61951
#152223
Originally posted by wolfmanmeadows
Machine learning has a rich ecosystem of libraries with traditional computers. Who's going to program these quantum computers? Now you have to know quantum mechanics to program a quantum computer? I guess that's expected for scientists to know, but you don't have to know science and math to program traditional computers. It would be cool if software libraries separated the underlying entanglement and nature of the quantum computer from the programmer to make certain use cases easier. You just define the problem and the library takes care of the low level programming. Will there be a rich open source ecosystem for quantum computers? Right now people around the world can contribute to open source with traditional computers, requiring a quantum computer would make it more of an obstacle. Maybe you can simulate quantum computers for testing and development with traditional computers to get around the obstacle of being able to work on one.
This was a similar objection that some people would bring up when talking about commercialization of the internet in the early 90s.
QM seems a lot more complex than the internet and web but there was the same lack of widespread knowledge, resources and tools to make it accessible at first. But a decade later all that was more than resolved. I'd think it would evolve similarly if an evolutionary quantum computer solution suddenly became accessible to the masses.
.
Comment
DwightShrute
SBR Aristocracy
01-17-09
103591
#152224
Comment
DiggityDaggityDo
SBR Aristocracy
11-30-08
81450
#152225
That kid was like “Ohh Fawk” as soon as he realized it was HHH’s house.
Instead of captioning it I will just show you what happened 30 seconds later.
Comment
KVB
SBR Aristocracy
05-29-14
74817
#152228
Originally posted by Optional
If two objects travel toward each other at the speed of light what is their collision velocity?
Originally posted by stevenash
That's a trick question, you can't have a collision because the objects have no mass at the speed of light.
(I learned this from a science professor who was big on Sir Isaac Newton, his three laws of motion and all that)
For argument sake, suppose both objects did have mass at the speed of light both objects (if they indeed have mass) colliding both would be driven backwards at the speed of the light...
Actually, Einstein's special relativity sort of rewrites Newton's Laws when it comes to these extremes. Take this little lesson back to your science professor...
To get a mass to move at the speed of light would require basically infinite energy as it accelerates to the speed of light.
But remember, E = M C^2 ("e" equals "m" "c" squared) and the C is constant.
That means an object moving at the speed of light would actually have mass, it has by definition, according to Einstein, infinite mass. This is why things can't move at the speed of light, because to approach that speed would increase the energy needed which would increase the mass of the object, which in turn requires yet more energy to continue to accelerate towards the speed of light.
To preserve the fact that the speed of light ("C") is constant the energy and mass go to infinity and as far as momentum and force are concerned, we are again dealing with infinity.
As far as what would happen when they collide, Newton might think (assuming the molecules have held up and our masses are still intact) that the objects would bounce back with proportionate energy, and they might.
But Albert E would likely say that there would be an infinited release of energy, one huge ass muthafukkin explosion of infinite energy.
Crazy, but this is how we view it.
Comment
KVB
SBR Aristocracy
05-29-14
74817
#152229
Tried to give Jerky a point for the tunes, but couldn't do it.
No Mesage Me box either.
Jerky?
Wasn't really around yesterday but just read some of his posts, something about being banned elsewhere. Jerky how on earth could you get banned there?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A mass brawl broke out at the Mi Sueño restaurant in Providence, R.I. on Sunday. <a href="https://t.co/VBjWCZsmZp">pic.twitter.com/VBjWCZsmZp</a></p>— Andy Ngô ️* (@MrAndyNgo) <a href="https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1569484682882084865?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >September 13, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Comment
jackpot269
SBR Posting Legend
09-24-07
12842
#152237
Originally posted by KVB
Actually, Einstein's special relativity sort of rewrites Newton's Laws when it comes to these extremes. Take this little lesson back to your science professor...
To get a mass to move at the speed of light would require basically infinite energy as it accelerates to the speed of light.
But remember, E = M C^2 ("e" equals "m" "c" squared) and the C is constant.
That means an object moving at the speed of light would actually have mass, it has by definition, according to Einstein, infinite mass. This is why things can't move at the speed of light, because to approach that speed would increase the energy needed which would increase the mass of the object, which in turn requires yet more energy to continue to accelerate towards the speed of light.
To preserve the fact that the speed of light ("C") is constant the energy and mass go to infinity and as far as momentum and force are concerned, we are again dealing with infinity.
As far as what would happen when they collide, Newton might think (assuming the molecules have held up and our masses are still intact) that the objects would bounce back with proportionate energy, and they might.
But Albert E would likely say that there would be an infinited release of energy, one huge ass muthafukkin explosion of infinite energy.
Crazy, but this is how we view it.
I dont have as much education as you guys, but my question would have been
At that speed would an object not be under a lot of pressure and could it hold up?
Comment
DiggityDaggityDo
SBR Aristocracy
11-30-08
81450
#152238
Originally posted by DwightShrute
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A mass brawl broke out at the Mi Sueño restaurant in Providence, R.I. on Sunday. <a rel="nofollow" href="https://t.co/VBjWCZsmZp">pic.twitter.com/VBjWCZsmZp</a></p>— Andy Ngô ��️*�� (@MrAndyNgo) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1569484682882084865?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >September 13, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I spotted the low hanging titty 10 seconds into the video
It continues throughout the video too
Comment
stevenash
Moderator
01-17-11
65755
#152239
Just bought Cooper "The Wonder Dog" his first box of adult doggy diapers.
Sad day for your pal Nasher.
When my pup turns 20 this up coming summer (July) I promise you this, Ally and I are going to throw the greatest 20th birthday dog party in the history of doggy parties.
Cooper "The Wonder Dog" an hour ago walking off his chicken and salmon dinner.
[IMG][/IMG]
Comment
Optional
Administrator
06-10-10
61951
#152240
Originally posted by KVB
Tried to give Jerky a point for the tunes, but couldn't do it.
No Mesage Me box either.
Jerky?
Wasn't really around yesterday but just read some of his posts, something about being banned elsewhere. Jerky how on earth could you get banned there?
Is Jerky banned here too?
Signed,
Confused Poster
Yes. BMR reached out to admin and requested it. Accused him of making death threats and running some sort of scam both there and here. Hard to believe, but was done above my head. Email forum@sportsbookreview.com to ask about it if you red this BTJ.
.
Comment
DiggityDaggityDo
SBR Aristocracy
11-30-08
81450
#152241
Jerky getting banned everywhere
Dayum
Comment
KVB
SBR Aristocracy
05-29-14
74817
#152242
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Well Well Well this is <a href="https://twitter.com/BrunaBrasilMMA?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Bru naBrasilMMA</a> THE SPECIAL ONE <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DWCS?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw"># DWCS</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ufc?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#u fc</a> <a href="https://t.co/qkNUOqB1Ko">pic.twitter.com/qkNUOqB1Ko</a></p>— Ivan Jatobá (@ivanjatoba) <a href="https://twitter.com/ivanjatoba/status/1569869596320202755?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >September 14, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Comment
KVB
SBR Aristocracy
05-29-14
74817
#152243
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Praise doesn't get much higher than this from The Boss <br><br>Congrats Bruna Brasil! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DWCS?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw"># DWCS</a> <a href="https://t.co/qMtN7MnpCB">pic.twitter.com/qMtN7MnpCB</a></p>— UFC (@ufc) <a href="https://twitter.com/ufc/status/1569875087259484160?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >September 14, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Comment
DiggityDaggityDo
SBR Aristocracy
11-30-08
81450
#152244
Hey guys, I can’t find my keys.
Have you seen them laying around anywhere?
Comment
DiggityDaggityDo
SBR Aristocracy
11-30-08
81450
#152245
Comment
DiggityDaggityDo
SBR Aristocracy
11-30-08
81450
#152246
Google always fukkin with people
Comment
DiggityDaggityDo
SBR Aristocracy
11-30-08
81450
#152247
I gave a homeless man $5 and an old lady behind me told me he’s just going to spend it on drugs
So I went up to him and asked where I could also get drugs for $5
I gave a homeless man $5 and an old lady behind me told me he’s just going to spend it on drugs
So I went up to him and asked where I could also get drugs for $5
Blonde walks into a doctor's office and says: "Doctor, what’s the problem with me? When I touch my arm, ouch! It hurts... When I touch my leg, ouch! it hurts... When I touch my head, ouch! It hurts... When I touch my chest, ouch! it really hurts!" The Doctor replies: "Your finger is broken."