-
Comment -
nice hit. was gonna tail DAL but fell asleep. woke up and got over 205 in
Comment -
anyone know where to find single game flagrant fouls/technical fouls on a box score/team stats page besides espn?Comment -
Comment -
haven't seen this Yogi cat much, is he the real deal or one hit wonder?
thanks for the effort, should've been more clear, i'm looking for only individual game technical fouls/flagrant fouls.
scraping espn box scores/individ game team stats page but they are missing a game. was trying to scrape a secondary source that has TF/FF but hard to find one. i guess i'll have to go through the play by play and update the missing records manually
if you try to click this game, it takes you nowhere
Tue, Nov 20 @ Philadelphia L106-98
Comment -
Yogi is a shooter, not much defense, Indiana U hotshot, he'll be an OK pro, probably nothing more, think Lin when he was in New York, burst on the scene, then settled into just an OK pro.haven't seen this Yogi cat much, is he the real deal or one hit wonder?
thanks for the effort, should've been more clear, i'm looking for only individual game technical fouls/flagrant fouls.
scraping espn box scores/individ game team stats page but they are missing a game. was trying to scrape a secondary source that has TF/FF but hard to find one. i guess i'll have to go through the play by play and update the missing records manually
if you try to click this game, it takes you nowhere Tue, Nov 20 @ Philadelphia L106-98
http://www.espn.com/nba/team/schedul.../tor/year/2013Comment -
Griz money line +167
Even without Gasol on the bench and 74 year old Vince Carter in the starting line up.
T-Wolves hate playing for Tibs, bang the +4.5 and hammer the +167
Comment -
whistle wetting with wiz o216.5, boston PLComment -
Wiz are always my go to bet the over team.
Whole team is under rated.
Wall is a top 5 point guard (sorry I don't consider the Greek Freak and Harden point guards)
Beal is a rock solid SG, I love the Polish Hammer in the middle and you better put a man on Otto or he'll scorch you all night.
I got a small play on that over myself.
Go get some Grape-man!Comment -
OT is comingComment -
trying to run up acct before all-in play on pats
4-1 toronto oh shitComment -
looking like an "it's only money" type of nightComment -
Comment -
Comment -
Comment -
Comment -
only one thing is guaranteed in lifeComment -
... patriots victory
Comment -
Comment -
when is the best time to bet NE? this line isn't budging
Comment -
No timing this one grapes, just get it if you want it.
Took a trip to Nevada, Tahoe area, for Hoops. I didn't get a chance to keep writing about golf, but you can see one of those pairs pairs (Hun An) in the lead, a clear dog, with a favorite golfer in Matsuyama threatening.
This has significance.
On Friday, One of my golfers and one of those pairs was in the lead, I would have had the sharks out if I were posting.
So from the looks of things, we see a lot of dogs winning and covering and top teams losing yesterday. One thing you don't have the benefit of knowing from yesterday, the single best day to bet hoops all year (Sat before the Super Bowl), are how the forecasts did. I wasn't around to post them.
We have a long shot golfer in the lead Saturday night and put it all together we see a lot of underdog "persuasion" in the marketplace.
Golf is still not decided, and because that golfer has a 2 stroke leas early in the round, it's worth watching further. The moment we think we know the answer, it is likely not the answer.
I feel a bit rushed, I haven't had a chance to go over those pairings and golf positions with the thread. Either way, the picture I was painting in those last posts is showing a bit.
And right now, it looks like an underdog in golf. Mickelson may still inject himself into the picture.
I took some UNDER for the Superbowl in Tahoe, but the trading account is down to 57.5. I haven't given a bold play for the Superbowl, but I'll try to talk something out here.
It's tough to see Atlanta AND the UNDER coming in this game.
Comment -
So many know the Tiger Woods effect as him being so favored in golf tourneys that the other golfers were all at great “value.”
But I’m talking about a different, related effect. I’m talking about how many professional bettors, and those who analyze the market to bet, often find themselves rooting for the UNDER, or even against the public “darlings.”
Many bets were lost trying to go against Tiger Woods, and some could say that’s one of the reasons he did so well. Likewise, pro bettors and analyists have often found themselves on the wrong side of history. It’s a characteristic of the marketplace.
Whether you are trying to get the Browns to win a game or the Patriots to lose a game, market signals send bettors that way week after week, only to see history being made against them. Those riding those streaks only rarely become a long term threat to the markets, mostly because of their decision making process.
I can see bettors this SuperBowl hoping for Atlanta and the UNDER, only to find a late splash of the pile with NE and an OVER.
While everyone cheers on the Greatest of All Time with one of the best games of all time, the long term bettors may just be grumbling a little, knowing they had the numbers, but just chalking it up to a loss.
It seems to happen that away a lot, it’s a behavior of the marketplace.
Truthfully, this topic deserves more detail and evidence for the thread, but time is short and it’s something I wanted to get out as something to think about.
Comment -
I do want to say something about the stacking forecast and it’s TOTAL prediction. While I use any discrepancy when measuring against the line, it’s a strict method.
The stacking forecast, at 49, or even the potential 52 is still a very high score. And when an algorithm may try to determine whether or not there is a bet, it may pass on the UNDER here.
It’s similar to the sharp forecast being high, but the line being too high to trigger a bet. Because of the nature of the 50’s and low 50’s, evidence doesn’t always show many advantage plays here. If the stacking forecast was predicting 47.5, on the other hand, buying would clearly be triggered.
So even though the stacking forecast is low, it certainly doesn’t reflect the kind of buying that it seems. I think we’ve seen this same principle earlier in the thread with spread, where a 14 point win shows much more than a 13, 11 or even 10 point win…maybe it was the National Championship game.
The line movement, down to 57.5, has not, in my opinion, been significant here, and what I’m saying is that I think the UNDER could be a good buy here given the lack of enthusiasm, if you will, for the bet.
Comment -
Comment -
It's not going to budge either.
It opened at 3 flat, remained 3 flat midweek, it's still 3 flat, and it will close at 3 flat.
It's the sharpest betting line in the history of bookmaking.
Having said that, certain books are juicing certain sides.
Look for a book that offers NE -3 (-105)Comment -
At one point we have to wonder whether New England just wins this thing by a field goal or less. Can you see why?
Comment -
Comment -
I'm about to be on the receiving end of a brutal up the ass backdoor cover without prison lube too.Comment
