How long until POTUS Trump gets sports betting legalized nationwide?
Donald Trump's US President Odds Improving!!
Collapse
X
-
LockAureliusSBR Rookie
- 01-25-17
- 11
#16801Comment -
inZaneSBR MVP
- 11-13-13
- 1206
#16802I agree that transporting the oil by pipeline is safer than by rail, but it's still not foolproof. The fact remains that this oil is owned by a private foreign company that is using eminent domain to take American people's land and ranches from them for profit. That's not what eminent domain was designed for, and I thought all of you conservatives were against gov't abuse of power.Originally posted by RoyBaconDoesn't it take the same effort to learn the correct facts as the fake ones?
Obama's own 5 year study stated the pipeline would reduce pollution and be safer than rail.
Liberals are downright owned on this one. The one person that will be harmed and paid(donated) millions of dollars to prevent it is democratic mega donor William Buffet.(railroad owner)
Isn't everyone smart enough to know that a pipeline is safer than railroad cars for transporting oil????????????????????????? I'll bet even chico is, maybe even kelly too.
You do know that this crude, after refinement, just goes on the open market. It's not like the US is getting anything out of the deal, other than having to deal with the inevitable spills.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16803Not a trick question. Does usa make more money of canadian oil or american oil?Originally posted by RoyBaconIt's not a trick question Chico...you can do this; I'll cut a few words out to make it easier....
Is the transportation of oil safer by rail or pipe?Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16804You can't explain to some of these kids. They believe in trickle down economics. That some how the money that is in a rich person pocket is going to trickle down into their pockets.Originally posted by inZaneI agree that transporting the oil by pipeline is safer than by rail, but it's still not foolproof. The fact remains that this oil is owned by a private foreign company that is using eminent domain to take American people's land and ranches from them for profit. That's not what eminent domain was designed for, and I thought all of you conservatives were against gov't abuse of power.
You do know that this crude, after refinement, just goes on the open market. It's not like the US is getting anything out of the deal, other than having to deal with the inevitable spills.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16805Roy I'm still waiting for you to answer the question if Reagan was so great then how did he lose the senate?Comment -
RoyBaconBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-21-05
- 37074
#16806Thnks for answering the question. Chico and kelly burned up their mouse running from the question.
So what about railroads use of eminent domain? Because I have never heard of democrats puffing up to Warren Buffet on this. You understand that with or without the pipe the oil is still sent south? It just goes by rail.
The same oil is still going to move as it is right now as we type. It's moving on rail cars that used eminent domain to be built in the first place. The only real argument is this pipe would damage Burlington Northern, a mega donor to liberal causes. It's really past time to put Americans first and stop this nonsense.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16807Thanks for answering the question about reagan. Also thanks for not being smart. Right now that oil is being processed in alberta. So they take a train to ALBERTA. Next time you ask a question google it brother.Originally posted by RoyBaconThnks for answering the question. Chico and kelly burned up their mouse running from the question.
So what about railroads use of eminent domain? Because I have never heard of democrats puffing up to Warren Buffet on this. You understand that with or without the pipe the oil is still sent south? It just goes by rail.
The same oil is still going to move as it is right now as we type. It's moving on rail cars that used eminent domain to be built in the first place. The only real argument is this pipe would damage Burlington Northern, a mega donor to liberal causes. It's really past time to put Americans first and stop this nonsense.
So will the usa be harmed if the train to alberta crashes . But thanks again for playing I was the sheep of the month club.Comment -
RoyBaconBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-21-05
- 37074
#16808And how does the Dakota oil make it to market Mr Einstein? Does it A) Fly or B) take an expensive rail trip on board a liberal mega donor rail car?Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16809Is Alberta south of the tar sand basin? The reason they want to send it to be refined in usa is because it is cheaper to refine. Also alberta can't handle the refining capacity that they can in usa. But to be honest with you I knew about this years ago talking to familyComment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16810Is dakota in canada? I have no problem with american oil. But dakota is processed in minn ,okla and alberta. But dakota has nothing to do with the keystone pipeline. But nice try to confuse someone. By the way e.t.e. is the one the is doing dakota and i invested in it over a year ago. If you would of bothered to read stocks in here then you would of seen I gave that out there. But please keep the argument to one subject at a timeOriginally posted by RoyBaconAnd how does the Dakota oil make it to market Mr Einstein? Does it A) Fly or B) take an expensive rail trip on board a liberal mega donor rail car?Comment -
JIBBBYSBR Aristocracy
- 12-10-09
- 83476
#16811A oil pipe break is nothing like a rig leak in the Ocean.. . This is really a none issue.. Pipelines work, do break but are easily and quickly detected and fixed... Pipe lines are environment friendly for the most part.
Oil leaks on dry ground are much more manageable then breaks or leaks in water..
The facts - http://cla.auburn.edu/ces/energy/oil...es-and-spills/Comment -
rkelly110BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-05-09
- 39410
#16812Originally posted by Auto Donkwow.... i just finally figured this photo out, and what the f'k she's wearing....

given the shaven approach 99% of women use today, the furry looking black shit at the top of her costume threw me for a loop.....
Dude, you need to start eating twat with your eyes open and with the lights on.
Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16813Originally posted by JIBBBYA oil pipe break is nothing like a rig leak in the Ocean.. . This is really a none issue.. Pipelines work, do break but are easily and quickly detected and fixed... Pipe lines are environment friendly for the most part.
Oil leaks on dry ground are much more manageable then breaks or leaks in water..
The facts - http://cla.auburn.edu/ces/energy/oil...es-and-spills/
tell that to people that had gas spills in alabama. Funny thing is when was the last time we heard of spills from train but I know there was a spill in gas. I have no problem with dakota pipeline but do have problem with keystone. Jibby say the govt. decide they wanted to take 3 of you properties because they wasnted to expand the highway. Also say they wanted to give you what THEY thought it was worth not what appraised at. You wouldn't have a problem with it?Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16814Jibby why are you comparing apple and oranges? The canadian oil goes to alberta. It doesn't come here.Originally posted by JIBBBYA oil pipe break is nothing like a rig leak in the Ocean.. . This is really a none issue.. Pipelines work, do break but are easily and quickly detected and fixed... Pipe lines are environment friendly for the most part.
Oil leaks on dry ground are much more manageable then breaks or leaks in water..
The facts - http://cla.auburn.edu/ces/energy/oil...es-and-spills/Comment -
RoyBaconBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-21-05
- 37074
#16815Chico if a Republican mega donor owned the railroads you guys would be crying to high heaven. Imagine if Trump owned them? This Soros and Buffet crap is out. It is Buffet's largest investment but you guys will be ok and thousands will be employed to build it.
As a great man once said "Elections have consequences" -Barack Obama. And one of those consequences is this pipeline is going to get built.Comment -
rkelly110BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-05-09
- 39410
#16816Why are you calling me out? Yes, transporting oil through a pipeline is cheaper and safer than by train.Originally posted by RoyBaconThnks for answering the question. Chico and kelly burned up their mouse running from the question.
So what about railroads use of eminent domain? Because I have never heard of democrats puffing up to Warren Buffet on this. You understand that with or without the pipe the oil is still sent south? It just goes by rail.
The same oil is still going to move as it is right now as we type. It's moving on rail cars that used eminent domain to be built in the first place. The only real argument is this pipe would damage Burlington Northern, a mega donor to liberal causes. It's really past time to put Americans first and stop this nonsense.
There are many pipelines in the US. The problem is foreign eminent domain, going through aquifers and indian land. It also takes the SOS to approve since it's from Canada. Under Obama, he dragged out approval by running environmental impacts and since both SOS's were Dems, it wouldn't be approved.
Trump can sign any exe order he wants. It will take his SOS to approve of which I'm sure he will, but don't expect it to go quietly.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16817Your right elections do have consequences. Just as the herbert hoover led that r never held everything until w. And now trump. There are a shitload of governors job open. Rep have enjoyed the redefining districts, That is gonna happen again in 2020 and with the help of trump the dems. will be redefining the districts. But as I said before which you didn't read I am for dakota access. I have a problem with keystone because I am not a globalist. WE OWE NOTHING TO CANADA! The keystone pipeline adds 50 jobs that are permanent. I think we can open something up with our money that benefits the usa. As far as who owns those railcars ;I don't give a shit because it isn't coming out of my taxes. Also the eminent domain with rail cars happened before I was born so once again I don't give a shit. Also I served my country and live in Texas. We don't allow liberals in texas.Originally posted by RoyBaconChico if a Republican mega donor owned the railroads you guys would be crying to high heaven. Imagine if Trump owned them? This Soros and Buffet crap is out. It is Buffet's largest investment but you guys will be ok and thousands will be employed to build it.
As a great man once said "Elections have consequences" -Barack Obama. And one of those consequences is this pipeline is going to get built.Comment -
Auto DonkSBR Aristocracy
- 09-03-13
- 43572
#16818i'm confused.....Originally posted by rkelly110
Dude, you need to start eating twat with your eyes open and with the lights on.
is there any other way?Comment -
JIBBBYSBR Aristocracy
- 12-10-09
- 83476
#16819It's called economic expansion and growth...Originally posted by chico2663http://wjhl.com/2016/09/16/massive-l...-ga-sc-and-nc/
tell that to people that had gas spills in alabama. Funny thing is when was the last time we heard of spills from train but I know there was a spill in gas. I have no problem with dakota pipeline but do have problem with keystone. Jibby say the govt. decide they wanted to take 3 of you properties because they wasnted to expand the highway. Also say they wanted to give you what THEY thought it was worth not what appraised at. You wouldn't have a problem with it?
If the government came in legally and needed my land properties and paid me fair market value for them I wouldn't be happy but I would accept it, understand it and move on..
The need of the many out weigh the need of the one.. Star Trek Spock quote...Comment -
RoyBaconBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-21-05
- 37074
#16820Thanks kelly. I just think some of these common sense issues should not divide us. That pipeline was simply held up to filter money to Buffet and the Democratic party. Too many backs are getting scratched at the expense of our country. Both sides of the aisle.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16821but when did canada anex usa? The company is domiciled in canada. The tsar sand are in canada. The oil will be sold to china. We don't need the business. Instead of using our money to build this pipe that doesn't help the usa . Give the money to us companies to get more shale oil. That way we will get the tax moneyOriginally posted by JIBBBYIt's called economic expansion and growth...
If the government came in legally and needed my land properties and paid me fair market value for them I wouldn't be happy but I would accept it, understand it and move on..
The need of the many out weigh the need of the one.. Star Trek Spock quote...Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16822You still haven't told me how a train crash in alberta is going to effect the usa. It would be different if that oil was already being processed here but it isn't . Is this another question your going to ignore?Originally posted by RoyBaconThanks kelly. I just think some of these common sense issues should not divide us. That pipeline was simply held up to filter money to Buffet and the Democratic party. Too many backs are getting scratched at the expense of our country. Both sides of the aisle.Comment -
RoyBaconBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-21-05
- 37074
#16823Chico you are just dodging the issue. You can't even answer a simple question because of partisanship.
The pipeline will be built and Buffet's stranglehold on moving crude will be drastically reduced. That's good for America.
This one is easy. Fcck Buffet, America first. Trump needs to make the same call when a decision comes up that will hurt a Republican activist.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#16824Roy you can't comprehend that america makes nothing off the keystone pipeline. Yes it is cheaper to use a pipeline. But what your are failing to realize that KEY STONE PIPELINE DOES NOTHING FOR USA. The tsar sand are not being processed in USA at this time! So a canadian company gets eminent domain over americans. Because of that china gets cheaper oil from canada. HOW THE penetrate DOES THAT HELP THE USA,ROY? That is what is wrong with people they put party before country. Also this is going to raise the price of gas at the pump. Because they have a problem getting the oil to the gulf then what happens is they have a surplus. But once they get the oil to the refineries esier that they are not going to have the surplus because they will be able to ship it easier taking away the advantage of the usa consumer.Originally posted by RoyBaconChico you are just dodging the issue. You can't even answer a simple question because of partisanship.
The pipeline will be built and Buffet's stranglehold on moving crude will be drastically reduced. That's good for America.
This one is easy. Fcck Buffet, America first. Trump needs to make the same call when a decision comes up that will hurt a Republican activist.Comment -
Sam OdomSBR Aristocracy
- 10-30-05
- 58063
#16825President Barack Obama had the worst record before the Supreme Court in modern history, losing half of the cases argued before the High Court in his two terms, according to a new study.Comment -
jtolerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-17-13
- 30982
#16826
Comment -
JIBBBYSBR Aristocracy
- 12-10-09
- 83476
#16827Did you know mostly all Countries have around a 20% import tax including Mexico.. Google it...
America is the exception.. Does a 20% Mexican import tax seem fair now? Trump didn't make that number up off the top of his head...
EVEN THE PLAYING FIELD!!!!! Hate Trump is backing out of this now..
Comment -
rkelly110BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-05-09
- 39410
#16828NAFTA. He needs to renegotiate before shooting his mouth off. Putting cart before the horse.Originally posted by JIBBBYDid you know mostly all Countries have around a 20% import tax including Mexico.. Google it...
America is the exception.. Does a 20% Mexican import tax seem fair now? Trump didn't make that number up off the top of his head...
EVEN THE PLAYING FIELD!!!!! Hate Trump is backing out of this now..
Comment -
Roscoe_WordSBR MVP
- 02-28-12
- 4005
#16829I think I can say for many Americans that we would like to see our southern neighbor prosper. I hope, for the Mexican people, that your president can "save" your country as depicted in a previous post.
The Mexican president must be ready for the return of the criminal element and gangs which have illegally entered the U.S. He doesn't really have a choice now. I heard his approval rating is around 12% and drug cartels and poverty reign supreme.Comment -
JIBBBYSBR Aristocracy
- 12-10-09
- 83476
#16830It is and he got bullied politically to cancel his meeting with Trump.. I feel bad for the guy as him and Trump got along well in their first meeting...Originally posted by Roscoe_WordI think I can say for many Americans that we would like to see our southern neighbor prosper. I hope, for the Mexican people, that your president can "save" your country as depicted in a previous post.
The Mexican president must be ready for the return of the criminal element and gangs which have illegally entered the U.S. He doesn't really have a choice now. I heard his approval rating is around 12% and drug cartels and poverty reign supreme.Comment -
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39847
#16831The one where he told Trump that Mexico wasn't going to pay for the wall and Trump didn't respond? He already told Trump no. He is insulting him by bringing it up constantly and saying he will agree to what he has said he never would. No respect. He didn't get bullied, he got disrespected by Trump.Originally posted by JIBBBYIt is and he got bullied politically to cancel his meeting with Trump.. I feel bad for the guy as him and Trump got along well in their first meeting...Comment -
Jayvegas420BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 03-09-11
- 28229
#16832Originally posted by d2betsThe one where he told Trump that Mexico wasn't going to pay for the wall and Trump didn't respond? He already told Trump no. He is insulting him by bringing it up constantly and saying he will agree to what he has said he never would. No respect. He didn't get bullied, he got disrespected by Trump.
Comment -
JIBBBYSBR Aristocracy
- 12-10-09
- 83476
#16833^^^Posted this on the other thread hear me out - try to read it all as it's a true story!!!
Let me break it down and it's like this -
Let's say you own a house and your Mexican neighbor is right next to you for years now with no fence.. It's been cool and friendly..
You get along and you help them out constantly while they raise their 10 young kids.. Years later you don't like the noise or neighbors dogs coming over and destroying your garden you just planted because there is no fence to stop them from coming over.... The roosters roosting every morning at the crack of dawn are driving you crazy too.
Your neighbor is use to getting away with murder and doesn't care because you are so nice and friendly... Your neighbors kids are now in their teens and gang banging and selling drugs out of the house.. The neighborhood and your property value is going to shiiit and it's now driving you crazy....
You got a court judgement for the damage your neighbors pets and teen gang banger kids caused on your property but they won't pay... You feel unsafe now and feel the need to build a giant fence on the property line to block it all out and protect yourself..
That fence borders on both properties and you feel the fence costs should be paid for by them or be split at worst.. You never needed a fence until now...
Should that fence cost be paid for by your destructive neighbors that made you build it in the first place or should you pay for all the costs?
See where I'm getting at?
MY OWN SISTER EXPERIENCED this true story for the most part just for the record.. She had to sell her house and move in the end.. Neighborhood is crap now. Once was a great safe neighborhood.. Shits real!!!!
Comment -
MoneyLineDawgSBR Posting Legend
- 01-01-09
- 13253
#16834Bottom line is at the end of the day Mexico has zero leverage....Trump can cripple them if they don't play along and it's not really debatable
Love these morons thinking anything differentComment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
