he admitted it was for the purpose of cheating. hurting a foe unfairly is just as bad as helping yourself unfairly.
like i said, a misclick and being ignorant are acceptable reasons to fold. if he had said nothing during the hand, it wouldnt be punishable either because without proof you have nothing.
a different example with collusion instead:
in a hand where a short stack goes all in and 2 large stacks agree to check it down. if you agree at the table to check it down...that is cheating. now most people would know to check it down if neither got a great hand, but its still colluding if you say it at the table.
seems you are confusing chip dumping and collusion
i don't think its a perma-ban or even a 2 week ban in this case, maybe a day or 2.
like i said, a misclick and being ignorant are acceptable reasons to fold. if he had said nothing during the hand, it wouldnt be punishable either because without proof you have nothing.
a different example with collusion instead:
in a hand where a short stack goes all in and 2 large stacks agree to check it down. if you agree at the table to check it down...that is cheating. now most people would know to check it down if neither got a great hand, but its still colluding if you say it at the table.
seems you are confusing chip dumping and collusion
i don't think its a perma-ban or even a 2 week ban in this case, maybe a day or 2.