Congrats to poster ChipUP on winning the 11pm tourney

[bobbywaves]

Having cash in your pocket or having bought something says nothing about your income; you've proven that yourself, by showing us pictures of your life savings in a sportsbook while your income remains poverty-line or below.

Is this one of the many screenshots you're referring to?



Having tens of thousands tied up in a sportsbook, only proves someone has disposable savings not needed for their day to day living expenses. Certainly not indicative behavior of an "income that remains poverty-line or below," as you ignorantly claim.

Similarly, quality of poker play is determined by several well-understood factors, bankroll at any given time not being one of them...but it's a poker thing, wouldn't expect you to understand.

To be a good gambler, I'll expand what is needed to the Big Four: bankroll, knowledge, money management, & discipline. Since you ignorantly think bankroll is not necessary in poker, then I suggest you always buy in short & get back to me. You don't have to take my word for it, I suggest you click on the video below & let Johnny Patrick educate you. As you're obviously the "Dork" Johnny references in vid:

[Triple_D_Bet]

I still can't believe he shipped you those points thinking that they wouldn't be distributed to his debtors.
Then complained about it.
Was probably the most satisfying thread of 2016

Quite possibly Jay! Always nice to see a stiff forced to pay what they owe, even if it's only a tiny percent. Plus we were able to get you the point he owed you for so long too

[Triple_D_Bet]

Is this one of the many screenshots you're referring to?



Having tens of thousands tied up in a sportsbook, only proves someone has disposable savings not needed for their day to day living expenses. Certainly not indicative behavior of an "income that remains poverty-line or below," as you ignorantly claim.



To be a good gambler, I'll expand what is needed to the Big Four: bankroll, knowledge, money management, & discipline. Since you ignorantly think bankroll is not necessary in poker, then I suggest you always buy in short & get back to me. You don't have to take my word for it, I suggest you click on the video below & let Johnny Patrick educate you. As you're obviously the "Dork" Johnny references in vid:

One of many screenshots? Try the only screenshot lol...and yes, that's the sole screenshot you tote out as if it proves something. Sure, it shows you don't need that money for your day-to-day expenses...based on evidence you've provided yourself, that's because your living expenses are subsidized if not paid outright as part of some social welfare program or another. $30k in a sportsbook for most people means they have the disposable income to afford it; considering your income is officially below poverty level though, it looks like you simply have your lifes savings tucked away there, and quite possibly to hide it so you can still qualify for handouts

The depth of a bankroll only matters to a certain point, and it matters not at all the way you play, nor does it indicate good poker play. Since you believe differently, care to tell us your version of how deep a bankroll should be to play freerolls?

As for the rest...bankroll management? Like when you bet 100% of your bankroll on a wager you then lose, but you preserve your bankroll by refusing to pay, like you did with DS?

Money management doesn't seem to be your strong point considering your poverty, and we know knowledge is something you're extremely short on. One might be tempted to call you 'disciplined' for dedicating so many hours of your life to seeing which freeroll has fewer players so you can mincash as often as possible, but on closer inspection, it quickly becomes obvious you just don't have anything else going on in life, and certainly no prospects of getting even mediocre results without it.

It does give me a chuckle to see you use these words without understanding that you contradict most of them routinely, so thanks for that

[Triple_D_Bet]

Oh, and lest the point gets lost while refuting your different nonsense, I'll restate it: you're clearly and obviously down wagering with posters here overall

[bobbywaves]

you're clearly and obviously down wagering with posters here overall

Funny how my balance, store purchases, & winning 35k total from our poker bet, clearly & obviously proves otherwise.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Funny how my balance, store purchases, & winning 35k total from our poker bet, clearly & obviously proves otherwise.

Nope, as I've explained above...but as I've also explained above, you're incapable of observing the facts that contradict what you want to believe. Amusing to me (and others I'm sure) that while a good poker player needs to be aware of reality while tricking others, you're unaware of reality and only able to trick yourself, with both of those factors contributing to you thinking you're decent while disproving the theory with most of what you say. (Still nothing to say regarding proper bankroll size for freerolls?? )

[bobbywaves]

Still nothing to say regarding proper bankroll size for freerolls?

There's nothing to say about a freeroll tourney bankroll, as every player is given the same starting stack.

The bankroll & big four reference was obviously for casino cash games, as the Johnny Patrick video clearly demonstrated.

[Triple_D_Bet]

There's nothing to say about a freeroll tourney bankroll, as every player is given the same starting stack.

The bankroll & big four reference was obviously for casino cash games, as the Johnny Patrick video clearly demonstrated.

Good to see you finally admit you were wrong about something (although starting stack for a tournament has nothing to do with the concept of bankroll sizing, at least it's a baby step)

Of course, your disclaimer that you were only talking about casino cash games falls a bit flat since that's nobody brought those up before...but just a standard backpeddle for you.

On the concept of actual bankroll management, you ever planning to get back to us on how offering (and losing) a wager for 100% of your bankroll fits your concept of bankroll or money management?

[bobbywaves]

Good to see you finally admit you were wrong about something (although starting stack for a tournament has nothing to do with the concept of bankroll sizing, at least it's a baby step)

I simply proved you wrong as always.

Of course, your disclaimer that you were only talking about casino cash games falls a bit flat since that's nobody brought those up before...but just a standard backpeddle for you.

I brought casino cash games up, to prove my point about bankroll management & the big 4. Try to follow along dummy, you're like talking to a brick wall. Not to offend the brick wall, as it's smarter than you.

On the concept of actual bankroll management, you ever planning to get back to us on how offering (and losing) a wager for 100% of your bankroll fits your concept of bankroll or money management?

Sure, bankroll management comes into play on most of my sports bets, as it's pretty much a 50/50 proposition. But when I have can't lose wagers like an annual poker bet with you, Waves likes to raise the stakes to whatever I can get Tripe the sucker to accept. In your case, I milked the cow you for 29k. Another instance the stakes were raised was with DS, stating I would reach 100k pts before Tat. Unfortunately DS ignorantly tried to circumvent our bet by breaking my no loan term, when he loaned Tat 100k.

[Triple_D_Bet]

I simply proved you wrong as always.



I brought casino cash games up, to prove my point about bankroll management & the big 4. Try to follow along dummy, you're like talking to a brick wall. Not to offend the brick wall, as it's smarter than you.



Sure, bankroll management comes into play on most of my sports bets, as it's pretty much a 50/50 proposition. But when I have can't lose wagers like an annual poker bet with you, Waves likes to raise the stakes to whatever I can get Tripe the sucker to accept. In your case, I milked the cow you for 29k. Another instance the stakes were raised was with DS, stating I would reach 100k pts before Tat. Unfortunately DS ignorantly tried to circumvent our bet by breaking my no loan term, when he loaned Tat 100k.

Nah, but in your little mind, claiming you proved someone wrong is as good as doing it, can't say I'm surprised.

You brought up casino games to prove a point about something unrelated...I don't think this 'prove' word means what you think it does

As for bankroll management, if you're willing to bet 100% of your bankroll on a wager you could easily lose (because you did), you're not qualified to be discussing the issue. Moot point I suppose, since your insistence that it was a valid wager but you somehow didn't lose shows your grasp of English/logic/wagering is as such a low level as to make you unfit for pretty much any discussion on this site. But hey, keep repeating your debunked claims, maybe someday you'll even believe them yourself

[bobbywaves]

maybe someday you'll even believe them yourself

Someday? I believe my proven claims every day.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Someday? I believe my proven claims every day.

You seem to believe some of them, but your actions show us there are many you don't believe, when you claim one thing and repeatedly fail to act on those beliefs (claim to be better at ring games for example, then use every excuse in the book to duck playing anyone)

[Jayvegas420]

Bobby moves from the $1- $2 table to the $.25 table when he sees me coming.
If I follow him there, he logs out.

If it weren't for 12th place finishes Bob would be pointless.

Sad

[bobbywaves]

(claim to be better at ring games for example, then use every excuse in the book to duck playing anyone)

I'm always playing Omaha ring games on weekends, many have seen me.

I'm simply flipping the majority of my rolls, as I value my time.

My poker skills demonstrated in daily tourney's combined with rollover skills, is why my balance is 3x greater than yours & 13x greater than Jay's.

[Triple_D_Bet]

I'm always playing Omaha ring games on weekends, many have seen me.

I'm simply flipping the majority of my rolls, as I value my time.

My poker skills demonstrated in daily tourney's combined with rollover skills, is why my balance is 3x greater than yours & 13x greater than Jay's.

The value most people get from SBR is entertainment value, which is somewhat subjective...monetary value is negligible, and far below what most of us could make elsewhere. I do acknowledge that for a retirded fellow like you leaching off others, this is probably the pinnacle of what you can earn hourly, even after factoring in the time you spend chained to the computer looking for the smallest daily to mincash or waiting for someone to flip for pennies.

However, to my point: you claim to be better than people like sin, myself, and others in ring games (non-flipping, which I guess has ot be spelled out for your pea-brain-edness); yet despite spending plenty of time on this site, you choose not to. When someone claims to believe something and then fails to put it in action when it would benefit them, they're either lying or are too stupid to realize the contradiction in their beliefs. I think you fall under the former for most of your self-deceptions, but I acknowledge there's a significant chance it's the latter

Poker balance...why even bring it up? If Jay and I increased our balances above yours (which I'm certainly capable of doing, since I win points when I play ring games instead of losing the minimum like you do), you'd just come up with some new rationalization to justify your fantasy that you're better than me. Your 'poker skills' are just you out-participating everyone and being more willing to bore yourself for a mincash than people who actually do place value on their time, and you've lost everything you've won in poker from the bad wagers you've made over the years. Going on 10 years here, and for all the time you've spent, you'd have been better off just logging in to get your daily points and doing nothing else

[Jayvegas420]

I'm always playing Omaha ring games on weekends, many have seen me.

I'm simply flipping the majority of my rolls, as I value my time.

My poker skills demonstrated in daily tourney's combined with rollover skills, is why my balance is 3x greater than yours & 13x greater than Jay's.

I'll take that action

[bobbywaves]

The value most people get from SBR is entertainment value

Wow, I actually agree with you. The entertainment value I get in slow rolling douchebags like yourself, far exceeds the value of the $75 Red Robin card I just cashed out.

you claim to be better than people like sin, myself

Correct, I already proved my superiority by beating you in our annual challenge poker bet. Sin won't even accept an annual bet with me, due to my winning record against him on annual board.

Poker balance...why even bring it up?

Simple...Balances & store cash outs are the only measurement of success here.

If Jay and I increased our balances above yours

When pigs fly.

you'd just come up with some new rationalization to justify your fantasy that you're better than me.

The fact I took you for 29k in our poker bet, justifies the reality that I'm better than you.

Going on 10 years here, and for all the time you've spent, you'd have been better off just logging in to get your daily points and doing nothing else

Let's do the math on your ignorant statement, to see if you're correct:

I've been here 9.2 years. Even if I logged in every day for 9.2 years, I would have amassed:
(365.24 days x 9.2 = 3,360 days x 12pts/day = 40,320 - 24,000 (8 years pro renewal) = 16,320 net login pts for 9.2 years.

Let's compare with what I actually amassed: 34,340 current balance + 88,719 store cash outs = 122,059 net pts.

122,059 > 16,320

[bobbywaves]

I'll take that action

What action will you take, what did I offer?

Are you saying you're finally man enough to accept my annual poker challenge? Take the skirt off Jay.

[Jayvegas420]

You'll back up your absurd claim by offering Tripe & I 13/1 odds....
Because you aren't a big mouth who reneges on outlandish statements.
So I will certainly take that action!

[bobbywaves]

You'll back up your absurd claim by offering Tripe & I 13/1 odds.

13/1 odds on what?

Because you aren't a big mouth who reneges on outlandish statements.

[Jayvegas420]

Blah blah blah blah blah

[Triple_D_Bet]

Wow, I actually agree with you. The entertainment value I get in slow rolling douchebags like yourself, far exceeds the value of the $75 Red Robin card I just cashed out.



Correct, I already proved my superiority by beating you in our annual challenge poker bet. Sin won't even accept an annual bet with me, due to my winning record against him on annual board.



Simple...Balances & store cash outs are the only measurement of success here.




When pigs fly.



The fact I took you for 29k in our poker bet, justifies the reality that I'm better than you.



Let's do the math on your ignorant statement, to see if you're correct:

I've been here 9.2 years. Even if I logged in every day for 9.2 years, I would have amassed:
(365.24 days x 9.2 = 3,360 days x 12pts/day = 40,320 - 24,000 (8 years pro renewal) = 16,320 net login pts for 9.2 years.

Let's compare with what I actually amassed: 34,340 current balance + 88,719 store cash outs = 122,059 net pts.

122,059 > 16,320

People won't accept your ridiculous poker bet because they have no desire to spend an entire year for chump change. Hammering participation award freeroll poker for all you can is the best you can do for income, but it's not the case for most of us.

Let's be real bobbo: you've won a bet vs me, lost every other, and have repeatedly been shown to be a mediocre nit of a player. If you had lost our poker bet, you'd just be back to what you were doing before (making up bogus definitions of success and claiming superiority). It's obvious over the years you're not interested in proving yourself the best, you're only interested in shifting the goalposts however necessary to trick yourself into thinking so. The fact that out of all possible combinations, you can't even find a possible definition that makes you the best is pretty funny though

As yet another example of the above, now that you've cashed out some points, you're on to saying it's a measure of success...whereas you used to say that only broke dikks cashed out. That's one of the things we like about you bobbo: your poor memory combined with hypocrisy makes for great entertainment value

I guess the fact that I took you for numerous bets involving clearly documented reality you refused to see means that, by your definition, I'm better at reality than you?

Your math is quite a bit off, but that's no shocker. The fact remains that for all the time you spent on poker freerolls, it just barely offsets your massive betting losses (netted about 117k from poker, lost 130k+ in wagers with posters, sportsbook net less than would be expected from trivia handouts). Congrats on spending 10 years and countless hours picking up enough other freebies though, and managing to cash them out for almost $400 a year. It's probably only $0.30 an hour, and nothing wrong with that if it's just entertainment value (especially since that seems to be a main source of income for you)...only stupid if you try to claim (contrary to the facts) that you're winning in a category when you're clearly not.

[bobbywaves]

People won't accept your ridiculous poker bet because they have no desire to spend an entire year for chump change.

Several peeps have accepted my annual poker bets, yourself included moron. I see the same people playing all the dailies. So they will spend the entire year playing, whether they have a bet with me or not. The 35k total I won from our poker bet, had a net value of $1,682.69 worth in pizza. While that's "chump change" for me, it's certainly not chump change for the majority of posters like Jayvegas.

Let's be real bobbo: you've won a bet vs me

Thanks for keeping it real Tripe.

Your math is quite a bit off

My math was spot on, as usual.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Several peeps have accepted my annual poker bets, yourself included moron. I see the same people playing all the dailies. So they will spend the entire year playing, whether they have a bet with me or not. The 35k total I won from our poker bet, had a net value of $1,682.69 worth in pizza. While that's "chump change" for me, it's certainly not chump change for the majority of posters like Jayvegas.



Thanks for keeping it real Tripe.



My math was spot on, as usual.

Typical bobbo...can't understand that 'will not' is present/future tense, thinks value in pizza gift cards is same as cash value, tries to claim $1600 is chump change when he's confirmed his income is below poverty line. When he runs into something he can't deny (that he's lost every bet vs me when it comes to him not acknowledging reality), he just tries to change reality to match his imagination and agrees with himself. And last but super-common, instead of refuting stated facts with facts or logic, he just declares himself right despite the evidence

You've already got Imbecile of the Year locked up man, no need to keep trying so hard...but if you're gonna stay at it, new material please; it's getting to the point where it's barely worth mocking your idiocy (if that's your goal, to be so relentlessly stupid that people tire of pointing it out, then well don )

[bobbywaves]

When he runs into something he can't deny (that he's lost every bet vs me when it comes to him not acknowledging reality),

I can't deny the reality of me being up 20k+ lifetime against you.

[Jayvegas420]

Ran away from me again last night.
I even told him I only Antes a few of his chips but, he clicked the sit out button and typed crap to me till I went to another table.

What a fukkin cream puff.

[bobbywaves]

Ran away from me again last night.

Ran away? More like you interrupted my flip game, like the no life loser you are.

[Triple_D_Bet]

I can't deny the reality of me being up 20k+ lifetime against you.

Up 20k vs me means you're down 150k vs everyone else...not particularly impressive

Ran away from me again last night.
I even told him I only Antes a few of his chips but, he clicked the sit out button and typed crap to me till I went to another table.

What a fukkin cream puff.

Well-known that bobbo doesn't want to play actual poker...but considering the fact he's a stiff, a little harassment on the tables is the least he deserves

[bobbywaves]

Up 20k vs me means you're down 150k vs everyone else...not particularly impressive

Funny how my 33k balance & 90k+ in store purchases, doesn't reflect me being down 150k as you ignorantly suggest.

Well-known that bobbo doesn't want to play actual poker.

I only play poker 6 days/week.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Funny how my 33k balance & 90k+ in store purchases, doesn't reflect me being down 150k as you ignorantly suggest.



I only play poker 6 days/week.

Your balance is less than half what you're actively stiffing for on your last lost wager, and you're incapable of grasping the simple fact that your participation awards allow you to have made some purchases despite being massively down in wagering...not funny so much as a little sad that in this day and age chronologically grown men can be so willfully stupid

Unlikely you play poker 6 day a week or even once a week...if you've played poker more than a dozen hands in your life I'd be shocked. As sin has succinctly pointed out, you play cards; as I've pointed out, you're a microstakes nit whose highest poker achievement is grinding out meager win rates in freerolls and tiny stakes

[bobbywaves]

have made some purchases despite being massively down in wagering.

Impossible for me to be "massively down in wagering," when I haven't stiffed anyone or solicited a loan in the 9+ years I've been here. Not to mention my 35k total profit, just from our poker bet alone.

Unlikely you play poker 6 day a week or even once a week.

It's 100% likely, considering I'm retired & not a working stiff like you.

if you've played poker more than a dozen hands in your life I'd be shocked.

Your feeble mind is easily shocked.

[tatddy]

63 posts of Bobby and Trip going back and forth on the same exact argument they've had in countless threads since anything relevant to the piece of trash Chip/Bored was discussed. Hopefully SBR is eternal because I don't want to think about these 2 in 20 years texting this back and forth in pajamas while the sig others look on.

Silver lining....at least it bumps the stiff thread so nobody forgets how horrible a person Chip is.

"Here you go, Honey remind him about that poker bet...then we can catch the early bird"

[Triple_D_Bet]

63 posts of Bobby and Trip going back and forth on the same exact argument they've had in countless threads since anything relevant to the piece of trash Chip/Bored was discussed. Hopefully SBR is eternal because I don't want to think about these 2 in 20 years texting this back and forth in pajamas while the sig others look on.

Silver lining....at least it bumps the stiff thread so nobody forgets how horrible a person Chip is.

"Here you go, Honey remind him about that poker bet...then we can catch the early bird"

Heh...I think posterity will see this as what it is: me beating up a bit on a punching bag too dumb to know it's being punched. I'll admit that punching a bag isn't usually great spectator sport, although we've had some good moments. You'd think there'd be more comedy with both bobbo and I proving him dumb, but bobbo's help being unintentional and limited by his cognitive difficulties keeps the entertainment factor down too often

But as you say, at least nobody in the poker forum is unaware that chip and bobbo are stiffs!

If the wife, the TV and pretty much everything else in that picture is imaginary (and heart attack #whatever doesn't get him first), I think you just Nostradamus'ed the shit out of the situation

[Jayvegas420]

Wow, I actually agree with you. The entertainment value I get in slow rolling douchebags like yourself, far exceeds the value of the $75 Red Robin card I just cashed out.



Correct, I already proved my superiority by beating you in our annual challenge poker bet. Sin won't even accept an annual bet with me, due to my winning record against him on annual board.



Simple...Balances & store cash outs are the only measurement of success here.




When pigs fly.



The fact I took you for 29k in our poker bet, justifies the reality that I'm better than you.



Let's do the math on your ignorant statement, to see if you're correct:

I've been here 9.2 years. Even if I logged in every day for 9.2 years, I would have amassed:
(365.24 days x 9.2 = 3,360 days x 12pts/day = 40,320 - 24,000 (8 years pro renewal) = 16,320 net login pts for 9.2 years.

Let's compare with what I actually amassed: 34,340 current balance + 88,719 store cash outs = 122,059 net pts.

122,059 > 16,320

If you would like to do some real math here it is:

you have wasted hours & hours every single day of your life. Logging on to SBR to make a complete fool of yourself in the forums..... and as a side result, you have earned exactly $2.60 per day. That's right Bob all of your trash talking all of the hours spent in the poker room all of the long hours you spend contriving bets to stiff and rip off other members..... The bottom line is you are earning $2.60 a day.

Yes, that covers your property tax on the $28,000 home you live in and pays for your yearly supply of C Cup Man Bras but, c'mon Bob....
9 fukking years of your life for $2.60 a day.
There's got to be a better way

For most people here at SBR those points are incidental or a side benefit. For you they are the sole reason you dedicate your life to this site.


Sad

[tatddy]

Trip....what makes you think that pic wasn't intended to be you?!