I'm a Qualified Flight Instructor for drones.
-
Think outside the box for once in your life Tripe.
I'm a Qualified Flight Instructor for drones.Comment -
Your second lie isn't any better than the first, although I'm sure it sounds more believable to you...problem is there's no such thing. I happen to have bought one recently for commercial use and know this, but anyone could realize you're full of it with a quick google.
Moreover, my original point still stands: you're too dense to understand grade-school concepts, and you expect us to believe that your poverty-dwelling retirded ass could afford a drone let alone be trusted to teach people to safelu use theirs? Unreal....got a third lie for us? Or do we have to go back to the usual (you being a stiff, you being behind me on the leaderboard you've suddenly shut up about, you winning less in a year of SBR poker than I do in a session, etc)
Comment -
Safelu is a typo of course, it happens...not afraid to admit when I make a mistake, especially a trivial one. 'Retirded' isn't a typo; as explained before, that's an accurate description of your financial situation
From the deflection, I take it you couldn't come up with any more flight instructor lies? Maybe you should spend a little more time reading the things you cut out of peoples' posts and a little less time pretending to be the things you're not (a tough guy, well-off, competent poker player, man of integrity, etc)
Comment -
Typos do happen...Mostly by careless folks, some by uneducated folks. You're simply the latter.
I stand by my statement, "retirded" is not a word:'Retirded' isn't a typo; as explained before, that's an accurate description of your financial situation
Furthermore, you're retarded for claiming retirded to be a word.Comment -
Merriam is a little behind the times...typical for dictionaries to lag a bit when a word first enters popular use. We're only now starting to see the conditions where folks like yourself with cognitive shortcomings (in other words, genetically dumb) are guaranteed a meager substinence existence, which is why the word is only now entering the mainstream. Surprised that the guy who flashes his man-Typos do happen...Mostly by careless folks, some by uneducated folks. You're simply the latter.
I stand by my statement, "retirded" is not a word:
Furthermore, you're retarded for claiming retirded to be a word.
online in a desperate attempt for women is so reluctant to be the posterchild for a new word, doesn't seem like you
Comment -
I do like the retirded word. Makes me chuckle.Comment -
Wrong, Merriam recently had an update:
More than 1,000 new words were added to their dictionary, funny how "retirded" still doesn't cut the mustard.
Comment -
Included in those words is prosopagnosia, a term 70 years old with extensive study and history....as often happens when you reference reality, it supports my statementsWrong, Merriam recently had an update:
More than 1,000 new words were added to their dictionary, funny how "retirded" still doesn't cut the mustard.
Retirded is definitely too new to be added, but I'm sure it won't be long now...your poverty status is well documented, and I'm sure you'll continue to do your part by providing more evidence of your cognitive deficits. Keep it up buddy, we'll get the word in Merriams yet!
Comment -
It would definitely be a long term wager given how long Merriams can take; I'm not confident you'd live long enough to pay up, and I don't like my chances of collecting from your estate as you're unlikely to have one. Fortunately, it's a moot point as I don't bet with stiffs...fortunate for you that is, given how much you're down lifetime wagering with posters
Comment -
I don't know chip up well. But I do know when a poster like Bobo takes your side, it cant bode well for you.Comment -
Just what I thought, you're chicken shit to back up your words with posted up pts. Credit wager obviously off the table, since you're a proven thief.It would definitely be a long term wager given how long Merriams can take; I'm not confident you'd live long enough to pay up, and I don't like my chances of collecting from your estate as you're unlikely to have one. Fortunately, it's a moot point as I don't bet with stiffs...fortunate for you that is, given how much you're down lifetime wagering with posters
I'm way up wagering with posters & SBR Book, I won 20k+ lifetime against you alone.
Comment -
Besides being a broke dikk, didn't realize you're homosexual as well. Noticed above your avatar, you PM rooster pics for betpoints. I'm sure Tripe would be interested in seeing your 2 inch pecker for 100 pts.
Apparently you'll do anything for that DSI cash, your janitor job not paying enough Jay?Comment -
Guy doesn't want to wager with someone he claims is a thief, but can't wrap his pea-brain around someone else wanting to do the sameJust what I thought, you're chicken shit to back up your words with posted up pts. Credit wager obviously off the table, since you're a proven thief.
I'm way up wagering with posters & SBR Book, I won 20k+ lifetime against you alone.
Guy decides that being up in wagering on one poster means he's up overall, when he's clearly negative in a big way and still stiffing from the last wager he proposed and lost
...and guy makes a poor attempt at a joke alleging another poster would expose himself for minor compensation, when he was outed desperately doing the same to attract women to his hovelBesides being a broke dikk, didn't realize you're homosexual as well. Noticed above your avatar, you PM rooster pics for betpoints. I'm sure Tripe would be interested in seeing your 2 inch pecker for 100 pts.
Apparently you'll do anything for that DSI cash, your janitor job not paying enough Jay?
Just when we thought you couldn't find new ways to be interestingly dumb, you surprised us again bobbo...well done
Comment -
I realize you have problems with reading comprehension, I have no problem wagering you. I simply stated you're a proven thief. As such, no credit wagers will be accepted from you. Anyone proven untrustworthy like yourself, requires third party post up.
When I'm well up over 20k with you, it's very safe to say I'm up overall. But you don't have to take my word for it, simply check my store purchases & current balance as proof.Guy decides that being up in wagering on one poster means he's up overall
Who's joking? Certainly not me. Read above Jay's avatar, so you can take him up on his offer Tripe.]and guy makes a poor attempt at a joke alleging another poster would expose himself for minor compensationComment -
Non Pros can get Bobo's rooster pic at 1 point per inch
Comment -
Get it Bob? You know how much non pros can transfer!!
Comment -
Looking at your point history, it's obvious you're down overall in a big way...but don't let reality get in the way of what you like to believe
No, you're not making what anyone would consider a joke, but you were trying to...an example of an actual joke:
Now that's funny! And no he doesn't get it Jay, that sort of thinking is way out of his league...but the rest of us who understand these things appreciate it
Comment -
Balance and purchases aren't proof of anything (especially when you're stiffing 72k points). The proof is in your points history and easily viewed, and you're negative in a big way betting vs other posters. I'd offer and win a wager regarding it as I've done in the past with you, but 1) you're unlikely to accept due to losing every one of those bets to me and 2) I don't bet with stiffs.Comment -
It's proof of everything.
Only way I would bet a thief like yourself, you would have to post up your measly 10k.The proof is in your points history and easily viewed, and you're negative in a big way betting vs other posters. I'd offer and win a wager regarding it as I've done in the past with you, but 1) you're unlikely to accept due to losing every one of those bets to me and 2) I don't bet with stiffs.Comment -
You haven't given me any proof, but here's a bunch of proof for you:
Balance & purchase history obviously proves what someone has been able to accomplish on this site. It proves if their pro membership is +EV or -EV. It proves if you're a good bettor, if you have the big 3 necessary to win: bankroll, money management skills, & discipline. For those who play poker, it proves what kind of a poker player they are. It even proves what kind of a person you are, if you donate to charities or not.
The evidence of you being a thief is quite clear & well documented: I posted up a bet & you stole my post up, it's very cut & dry: Tripe steals 675 pt post up!same as with you considering me a thief despite the evidence being clear to the contraryComment -
Having cash in your pocket or having bought something says nothing about your income; you've proven that yourself, by showing us pictures of your life savings in a sportsbook while your income remains poverty-line or below. It's a fundamental math error to think otherwise, but it's certainly not the first or simplest math error we've seen you make. Similarly, quality of poker play is determined by several well-understood factors, bankroll at any given time not being one of them...but it's a poker thing, wouldn't expect you to understand.
The link and that incident are evidence that 1) you can't read, 2) you're mad about the consequences of your poor reading skills, 3) you still like to pretend to be an internet tough guy and 4) you're the only stiff who's been dumb enough to try to enter one of my contests while stiffing...nothing more
Comment -
I still can't believe he shipped you those points thinking that they wouldn't be distributed to his debtors.
Then complained about it.
Was probably the most satisfying thread of 2016
Comment
