Donker...ck in, pal...r u OK?

[Triple_D_Bet]

Fact of the matter is, I don't see Tripe or DS here: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/

So keep playing your loose-aggressive style Tripe, & I'll be collecting 34k total from our challenge.

I'm sure you'll forgive us if we don't think you have any poker credibility when you showed us your stupidity just 1 post ago.

And chipnaz, you'd better hope I win the challenge...if I don't and have to pay up, I'm going to have to get on my stiffs like yourself a lot more.

[downsouth]

Fact of the matter is, I don't see Tripe or DS here: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/

So keep playing your loose-aggressive style Tripe, & I'll be collecting 34k total from our challenge.

speaking of challenge. We can use this current poker format to do a nice month long challenge if you would like. I'm sure a "pro level" player such as yourself will happily jump on the chance to steal from this amateur. 2500 again, and you can even keep whatever you got in the first week.

[bobbywaves]

I'm sure you'll forgive us if we don't think you have any poker credibility when you showed us your stupidity just 1 post ago.

I wouldn't expect you to comprehend proper flop percentages, as it's the main reason you're getting destroyed in our challenge. Your delusion of winning our challenge, only further demonstrates your ignorance.

[bobbywaves]

speaking of challenge. We can use this current poker format to do a nice month long challenge if you would like. I'm sure a "pro level" player such as yourself will happily jump on the chance to steal from this amateur. 2500 again, and you can even keep whatever you got in the first week.

My challenges are annual, as it eliminates the variance you require to win a 1-2 month event. The 2014 annual tourney leaderboard further proves my point.

[TheCentaur]

Centy, I enjoy your poster nicknames. Not always a slam dunk, but some pretty good ones, usually makes me chuckle. Your obsession with biter is a little trying though; most of the time, he does just outplay you (as he does many of us). Getting sucked out on happens; if you want to have any credibility accusing anyone of cheating, you need to have a hell of a lot more proof than just your "hunch" that it happens too frequently to be anything else (same thing for you donker!).

In the hand posted, there's a reasonable argument that you WERE outplayed; calling that river bet is almost never a good idea with 2 pair. You probably ran into the bottom of biter's range there; would you have felt any differently about the hand if he showed off other possibilities, such as a set or a gutshot/flush draw that hit? In that situation, biter's not making that move without a hand that beats you very often at that stage of the tournament...he's just doing it so you'll overcall and give him your chips. When he makes a play that gets you to mistakenly call with the worst hand, it's hard to argue that you weren't outplayed. Sure, it was fortunate that the cards fell out that way, but this wasn't a suckout; you were manipulated to call by biter making a good play. That's kinda the textbook definition of "outplayed"

Triple D I greatly respect your opinion and I know it's unbiased. The current argument is not about cheating, it's about me and biteme's differing accounts of what was said immediately after the hand.

We will just have to agree to disagree about the actual hand. I am not saying biteme played the hand wrong, I am just saying if you fold 2 good pair to a pot sized bet to put you all in from biteme on the river with an unpaired rainbow unlikely straight board when he himself isn't all in ur going to let him run you over. I'm saying I disagree I beat only the bottom of his range. The 3 outer Queen on the river was what made that hand, and not his check on the turn. I bet that turn to find out if he had an ace so anything but a K or Q on the river I shut it down. I'm not saying it was a suckout, because for him this was nothing. I'm saying he got fortunate with the cards and he's saying it was his play that stacked me.

Biteme continually refers to his opinions and recollections of events as FACT, with no supporting evidence. Picking out hand histories doesn't show the chat and he knows that, not sure what game he thinks he's playing. He offers bobbywaves account that "say it" happened after the STAX hand as proof when that was never really in question. What was meant by it was the question. The conversation was continuous so it was my impression he was still talking about the hand that started it.

To me it's all about biteme's lack of humility, inability to admit possibly being wrong, and him being obnoxious at the table. It's no big deal, me and others are obnoxious plenty, people run bad and go on tilt. People don't incessantly deflect and rationalize and justify it though(except for hockey216).

BTW I am still waiting for his explanation of rationalizing previous smack talk to me by citing a superuser thread meanwhile he was talking smack to everyone. He has toned it down lately but for awhile he was doing it to everyone. It was discussed at length in another thread and he never gave a sensible answer. You want to talk smack, fine, just don't fabricate excuses through illogical cause/effect scenarios. It's a glaring discrepancy but to admit that would be admitting he made a boo boo so don't hold ur breath.

[TheCentaur]

No cat in this fight, but I was at the final table & remember it this way:

1) Bite makes 2 pair on turn (A's & 9s), checks it.
2) Cent catches Q on river giving him 2 pair as well (K's & Q's), calling Bite's all in.
3) Cent watches rest of tourney from the rail. Saying things like "lucky" & "what was I suppose to do, can't fold that."
4) Bite replies "outplayed."

Steps 3 and 4 are most definitely reversed, the "outplayed" was immediately after the end of the hand, and my comments of "lucky" and "what was I supposed to do, can't fold that" were in response to his assertion that he "outplayed" me FACT ()

[Lowly Oaftard]

If I was a real poker player, I'd say something like this :

It's a pretty ridiculous assertion that Biteme is a "superuser". You guys are just super tilt monsters. You can't come unhinged just because an aggro players bluff gets there sometimes, or because you lack the stones to call him light. If you just kept your cool against him, you'd limit his edge over you a great deal. Instead, you fuel the hysteria with bad beat stories and laughable finger pointing instead of trying to adjust to what he's doing. While he is a good player, he has more leaks than a waterfall that seem to be a result of him goofing off most of the time ( For example, Bite sometimes shoves 100+bb deep blind preflop in a session multiple times! He'll even give you a countdown and reminders of which hand he's going to do this. Surely, the great collection of poker minds at SBR could come up with a strategy to exploit this!)...so you're actually losing to him at much less than his best ( I'm guessing when he heads to the casino for real money play, his game is much more sharp and focused). Hang up the rigtard hack conspiracy theories and try getting better at poker.

However, I'm a rigtard, so for the record :

BitemeUSADOJ has clearly MASTERED techniques in RING GAME play that allow him to not only ANTICIPATE the arrival of community cards but ALSO he can SEE his OPPONENTS hole cards ( which doesn't really explain why he would bluff into the top of your range and suckout, but hey, let's not let logic get in the way of explaining away defeat). I believe this BEGAN when I started RECOMMENDING shift key METHODS of manipulating the RNG algorithm - BitemeUSADOJ experimented with these TECHNIQUES that led him to unlock some key COMBINATIONS that allow him to implement SUPER USER status! Now he can USE THE SHIFT KEY to not only BRING FAVORABLE CARDS, but give him CLAIRVOYANT INSIGHT into which cards will be arriving! BitemeUSADOJ - I urge you to publicize your strategies in the forums so Auto Donk and others have a fighting CHANCE against your FORMIDABLE KEY PRESSING!

[GUMMO77]

Lowly comes in

[Triple_D_Bet]

My challenges are annual, as it eliminates the variance you require to win a 1-2 month event. The 2014 annual tourney leaderboard further proves my point.

Well, to be more accurate: after you got stomped by DS and were forced to revise your opinion of yourself, you started ducking all reasonable challenges by insisting on highly restrictive formats that reward participation more than skill. You had no problem thinking the challenge represented skill until you were beat; only afterwards were you insisting it was too high variance. DS has given you every opportunity and numerous options for a challenge in the meantime, including an annual one...but you're (understandably) too scared to accept them, and insist on imposing conditions simply to try to exclude DS and most others from participating. You're fooling yourself I'm sure, just not the rest of us

Triple D I greatly respect your opinion and I know it's unbiased. The current argument is not about cheating, it's about me and biteme's differing accounts of what was said immediately after the hand.

We will just have to agree to disagree about the actual hand. I am not saying biteme played the hand wrong, I am just saying if you fold 2 good pair to a pot sized bet to put you all in from biteme on the river with an unpaired rainbow unlikely straight board when he himself isn't all in ur going to let him run you over. I'm saying I disagree I beat only the bottom of his range. The 3 outer Queen on the river was what made that hand, and not his check on the turn. I bet that turn to find out if he had an ace so anything but a K or Q on the river I shut it down. I'm not saying it was a suckout, because for him this was nothing. I'm saying he got fortunate with the cards and he's saying it was his play that stacked me.

Biteme continually refers to his opinions and recollections of events as FACT, with no supporting evidence. Picking out hand histories doesn't show the chat and he knows that, not sure what game he thinks he's playing. He offers bobbywaves account that "say it" happened after the STAX hand as proof when that was never really in question. What was meant by it was the question. The conversation was continuous so it was my impression he was still talking about the hand that started it.

To me it's all about biteme's lack of humility, inability to admit possibly being wrong, and him being obnoxious at the table. It's no big deal, me and others are obnoxious plenty, people run bad and go on tilt. People don't incessantly deflect and rationalize and justify it though(except for hockey216).

BTW I am still waiting for his explanation of rationalizing previous smack talk to me by citing a superuser thread meanwhile he was talking smack to everyone. He has toned it down lately but for awhile he was doing it to everyone. It was discussed at length in another thread and he never gave a sensible answer. You want to talk smack, fine, just don't fabricate excuses through illogical cause/effect scenarios. It's a glaring discrepancy but to admit that would be admitting he made a boo boo so don't hold ur breath.

We can agree to disagree on the hand, but I still say your hand there, as it played out, is just a bluff-catcher 90%+ of the time....bite's simply not putting his tourney life on the line with less. Sure he got fortunate for you to river 2 pair, but everyone gets fortunate with the same frequency; better players get the most out of it when it happens, and bite excels at this exactly because people have trouble knowing when he's making a move and when he's got the goods, and tend to overcall and pay him off.

As for the trash talk, I don't get it...sure he's talking trash. I don't know the sequence of events, but even if it went down as you describe, what's the big deal? There's a reasonable argument in my mind that it's an accurate statement, but even if it wasn't and was just baseless trash talk, so what? I like to think trash talk adds another level to poker, and if it tilts the shit out of your opponent and gets them to make more mistakes, you use it. Deeply personal stuff or obscenity-filled rants would cross the line from trash talk to just rude, but it's a poker table...mocking another person's play is just another level of mind games, and beyond any poker edge, it's just plain fun. My trash talk against bobbo is a good example: while it's accurate, it's not going to change his game much if at all (he'd have to have some game to be able to change it), but it's amusing to point out how terrible he is and have him fumble around for excuses.

I dunno...hard to beat up someone for thinking their memory is more accurate than someone else's memory, especially when the only other person to chime in supports bite's story (even if it is someone as delusional in all things poker as bobbo). I don't think humility really factors into it. As for bite rarely admitting to a mistake...it's probably got something to do with the fact he doesn't make em all that often

[downsouth]

My challenges are annual, as it eliminates the variance you require to win a 1-2 month event. The 2014 annual tourney leaderboard further proves my point.

And you missed the part where you refuse any HEADS UP challenge with me as I stomped you in our previous one. Even your precious annual challenge you have made it clear that it will not be heads up but rather a group effort which I have stated since the beginning I have no interest in.

[TheCentaur]

We can agree to disagree on the hand, but I still say your hand there, as it played out, is just a bluff-catcher 90%+ of the time....bite's simply not putting his tourney life on the line with less.

Once again that's your opinion and I respect it, but he was not putting his tourney life on the line because he would still have playable chips, and that is his strategy. I and many others constantly see him push people all in with much less, and it's an error to act as if a bluff from him is his holding a small percentage of the time. I have called it numerous times and posted some of the ones on the flop where he was drawing to runners (basically no draw) and hit.

As for the trash talk, I don't get it...sure he's talking trash. I don't know the sequence of events, but even if it went down as you describe, what's the big deal?

Because he is on record previously stating it is impolite. When called out on it you get excuses and deflection of blame from him

I dunno...hard to beat up someone for thinking their memory is more accurate than someone else's memory

He initiated it in post #44 of this thread. When I dispute his account he says his memories are FACT and mine are lies and mischaracterizations followed up by insults and name calling (which I eventually join him in since he wants to open up that box)

There are posters in here that keep saying it's bad to disagree with him because it usually ends up bad for them. This is because when you disagree with him or challenge his perfection he argues maniacally and relentlessly. Along with the zealous defense of his flawlessness he seeks to insult and belittle the "attacker" and most people just don't want to deal with it. I just don't give a shit

[TheCentaur]

especially when the only other person to chime in supports bite's story (even if it is someone as delusional in all things poker as bobbo).

I appreciate Bobby trying to help but he admitted he wasn't paying attention to some things and the post of chronological statements in #71 makes no sense. My "what was I supposed to do, I had two pair..." was in response to "outplayed", I didn't just chime that up unprovoked as soon as the hand ended.

Hey biteme, was my "what was I supposed to do, can't fold that" statement before or after your "outplayed"?

This is going to be tough for him, because he will have to either lie to himself beyond any rationalization or discredit the testimony of his star witness

[bobbywaves]

DS has given you every opportunity and numerous options for a challenge in the meantime, including an annual one...but you're (understandably) too scared to accept them, and insist on imposing conditions simply to try to exclude DS and most others from participating. You're fooling yourself I'm sure, just not the rest of us

DS had multiple opportunities to join challenge, but he doesn't play well with others & chose to use you as a pathetic excuse not to play. I encouraged DS & others to join annual challenge last year & again this year, the more entries the better. Fact is DS didn't join after realizing he doesn't stand a chance in an annual challenge format, as the leaderboard clearly demonstrates.

[bobbywaves]

I appreciate Bobby trying to help but he admitted he wasn't paying attention to some things and the post of chronological statements in #71 makes no sense. My "what was I supposed to do, I had two pair..." was in response to "outplayed", I didn't just chime that up unprovoked as soon as the hand ended.

Hey biteme, was my "what was I supposed to do, can't fold that" statement before or after your "outplayed"?

This is going to be tough for him, because he will have to either lie to himself beyond any rationalization or discredit the testimony of his star witness

Correct....I always pay more attention to the poker game than chat, as my results clearly indicate. Perhaps if someone like POS did the same, he would have made a World Cup team.

With that said, I recalled the sequence of events to the best of my knowledge.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Once again that's your opinion and I respect it, but he was not putting his tourney life on the line because he would still have playable chips, and that is his strategy. I and many others constantly see him push people all in with much less, and it's an error to act as if a bluff from him is his holding a small percentage of the time. I have called it numerous times and posted some of the ones on the flop where he was drawing to runners (basically no draw) and hit.

Bite frequently shows bluffs in ring games where he's bet big with nothing, and he almost always gets a fold. He does so in spots where he's highly likely to succed, and by showing his hand, he gets people call him down light when it matters, as you did here in my opinion. When this occurs, it's hard not to consider it being outplayed. No shame in it, he's done the same to me and many others (possible exception of bobbo, who has already folded preflop). We'll have to disagree here I guess.

Because he is on record previously stating it is impolite. When called out on it you get excuses and deflection of blame from him

From the post you seem to be referring to (copied in http://www.sportsbookreview.com/foru...l#post22385277), you'll see bite starts off with strategic showing of bluffs...pretty pertinent to the above imo. Then he goes on to describe a specific situation: showing a bluff in order to berate the person for folding to it (in his words, "whatta fukkin donk... whatta fukkin idiot for laying that down, etc..."). I think there's quite a difference between baseless name calling and an arguably true statement such as "outplayed". It's hard to argue he shouldn't keep doing what he's doing when he gets you to call him.

He initiated it in post #44 of this thread. When I dispute his account he says his memories are FACT and mine are lies and mischaracterizations followed up by insults and name calling (which I eventually join him in since he wants to open up that box)

There are posters in here that keep saying it's bad to disagree with him because it usually ends up bad for them. This is because when you disagree with him or challenge his perfection he argues maniacally and relentlessly. Along with the zealous defense of his flawlessness he seeks to insult and belittle the "attacker" and most people just don't want to deal with it. I just don't give a shit

I can't really fault someone for being more confident in their memories than another's...it's well-known that we trust our memories more than we should. I don't think it's a good idea to tango with bite; not because of the reasons you list, but because he's usually right, and when he lays it out for all to see it can be humiliating. No clue who started saying anything, but honestly I don't see anything wrong with either person saying things first.

DS had multiple opportunities to join challenge, but he doesn't play well with others & chose to use you as a pathetic excuse not to play. I encouraged DS & others to join annual challenge last year & again this year, the more entries the better. Fact is DS didn't join after realizing he doesn't stand a chance in an annual challenge format, as the leaderboard clearly demonstrates.

Now now bobbo...except for you, nobody else can ignore the facts that you had no issue with heads up challenges, or less-than-annual challenges, or ones-that-don't-start-on-some-random-month-you-prefer challenges. You didn't have a problem with any of these back when you thought being on a leaderboard (getting beat in a contest only you were competing in) meant you were a good player...only after DS thoroughly beat you did you realize you weren't the player you thought you were. After you flailed about for restrictions on future challenges and DS met them, you kept changing your mind and ultimately decided you'd only do contests with conditions DS has said he doesn't want to do. If you can't beat em, just keep running from em right bobbo?

Correct....I always pay more attention to the poker game than chat, as my results clearly indicate. Perhaps if someone like POS did the same, he would have made a World Cup team.

With that said, I recalled the sequence of events to the best of my knowledge.

Considering how much attention you claim your poker game needs (full turn timer to decide whether or not to commit with small PP before blinded out, full turn timer to decide to decide whether to check or bet 1 chip when flopping quads, full turn timer to decide whether or not to call 1 chip with flopped quads, etc), it's a good thing things like heartbeat and breathing are autonomic...otherwise these "tough decisions" might just kill you

[JAKEPEAVY21]

centaur routinely bends me over with inferior holdings..no mention of any of it here? JJ<56 allin pre

[BeerDog99]

Consistently I have seen so many people that complain about bad beats, cheating and superusers, routinely deliver bad beats themselves and then go quiet as a church mouse when that happens.

What is ultimate irony is that the same people then use the excuse of the bad play/beat as the reason why they made the call/shove when they knew they were beat, because they knew the "SBR rigged poker RNG" would save them...... LOL! Circular logic on all fronts...

[Vegas39]

Consistently I have seen so many people that complain about bad beats, cheating and superusers, routinely deliver bad beats themselves and then go quiet as a church mouse when that happens.

What is ultimate irony is that the same people then use the excuse of the bad play/beat as the reason why they made the call/shove when they knew they were beat, because they knew the "SBR rigged poker RNG" would save them...... LOL! Circular logic on all fronts...

[TheCentaur]

Consistently I have seen so many people that complain about bad beats, cheating and superusers, routinely deliver bad beats themselves and then go quiet as a church mouse when that happens.

What is ultimate irony is that the same people then use the excuse of the bad play/beat as the reason why they made the call/shove when they knew they were beat, because they knew the "SBR rigged poker RNG" would save them...... LOL! Circular logic on all fronts...

Yeah, except I said "unreal and sorry" to Jake when that hit. I don't rub it in someone's face no matter how I win

[JAKEPEAVY21]

Yeah, except I said "unreal and sorry" to Jake when that hit. I don't rub it in someone's face no matter how I win

very nice of you but in all honesty, after getting a bad beat, I could careless if the villain says sorry or GFY

[TheCentaur]

Bite frequently shows bluffs in ring games where he's bet big with nothing, and he almost always gets a fold. He does so in spots where he's highly likely to succed, and by showing his hand, he gets people call him down light when it matters, as you did here in my opinion. When this occurs, it's hard not to consider it being outplayed. No shame in it, he's done the same to me and many others (possible exception of bobbo, who has already folded preflop). We'll have to disagree here I guess.

That's a great strategy in theory. What I don't get is your statement, "He gets people to call light when it matters". Not sure how early in a 10 point buy-in daily matters more than all in 400-700 point bluffs in ring games. He gets caught (I and others have many examples) bluffing for hundreds of points to set up winning an early hand in a 10 point tourney

Anyway I commend Biteme on discontinuing this back and forth and I will do the same

[TheCentaur]

very nice of you but in all honesty, after getting a bad beat, I could careless if the villain says sorry or GFY

I understand ur mad, it was a bad suckout

I was responding to you and beerdog saying "quiet as a church mouse" and "why no mention of it" when I did mention it was a bad beat and said sorry

[BeerDog99]

I understand ur mad, it was a bad suckout

I was responding to you and beerdog saying "quiet as a church mouse" and "why no mention of it" when I did mention it was a bad beat and said sorry

I was not specifically referring to you nor what the specific hand Jake referred to. That said, with you and I, I do remember recently where you totally luck boxxed me out of a tourney and winning it and not saying anything. Also I seem to remember a while ago you using the above excuse for a bad call/win because you are forced to play that way due to the "faulty RNG". You are not the only one saying/playing that way, but definitely one of the chief proponents of it.

Either way, the point is saying "sorry" after the fact of complaining that it is rigged and there are superusers is just silly.

I have said sorry, oops, ouch and the like after I have made a bad call/shove and sucked out on the hand because I understand the feeling when you set a trap and lose to an inferior hand.

The key difference is that I do not believe the outcome is predetermined or favoured for one player or another.

Putting my tinfoil hat on, I do believe I run bad when it matters more than others.... :-)

[downsouth]

I'm not gonna lie. I often call even when Im certain Im behind just for the enjoyment of bad beating someone. Especially if its one of the people I know will get bent out of shape doing it. Combo of it being only betpoints and often rollover points makes it worth getting stacked just to see someone rant when I hit.

[TheCentaur]

I was not specifically referring to you nor what the specific hand Jake referred to. That said, with you and I, I do remember recently where you totally luck boxxed me out of a tourney and winning it and not saying anything. Also I seem to remember a while ago you using the above excuse for a bad call/win because you are forced to play that way due to the "faulty RNG". You are not the only one saying/playing that way, but definitely one of the chief proponents of it.

Either way, the point is saying "sorry" after the fact of complaining that it is rigged and there are superusers is just silly.

I have said sorry, oops, ouch and the like after I have made a bad call/shove and sucked out on the hand because I understand the feeling when you set a trap and lose to an inferior hand.

The key difference is that I do not believe the outcome is predetermined or favoured for one player or another.

Putting my tinfoil hat on, I do believe I run bad when it matters more than others.... :-)

It was posted right after my 56 sucked out, in a thread that you and others are aligned against me, but if you say it wasn't about that hand I'll take your word for it

Lot of butthurt team biteme members in here

I bad beat someone, acknowledge it, say sorry, and some people still find some convoluted way to say I'm at fault

BTW I donked off a huge chip lead 3 handed to finish third so that should give some of you satisfaction

[BeerDog99]

It was posted right after my 56 sucked out, in a thread that you and others are aligned against me, but if you say it wasn't about that hand I'll take your word for it

Lot of butthurt team biteme members in here

I bad beat someone, acknowledge it, say sorry, and some people still find some convoluted way to say I'm at fault

BTW I donked off a huge chip lead 3 handed to finish third so that should give some of you satisfaction

I did not quote any specific post intentionally, I stated "consistently" which is similar to saying "generally", hence the lack of specificity.

lol not butthurt here. Just chiming in on interesting/amusing discussions.

As Jake said, I personally really do not care what people do or say when they bad beat someone, I only really find the irony amusing of the rigtards team members.

With a few notable poster exceptions, I take no satisfaction in you or anyone else losing. I just hope, for your sake, you learn from it and improve for the future.

[Auto Donk]

Consistently I have seen so many people that complain about bad beats, cheating and superusers, routinely deliver bad beats themselves and then go quiet as a church mouse when that happens.

What is ultimate irony is that the same people then use the excuse of the bad play/beat as the reason why they made the call/shove when they knew they were beat, because they knew the "SBR rigged poker RNG" would save them...... LOL! Circular logic on all fronts...

I gotta admit i'm guilty of the "i know this rigge pos site is gonna save me," and it does. not as of late... how peculiar.......

[downsouth]

It was posted right after my 56 sucked out, in a thread that you and others are aligned against me, but if you say it wasn't about that hand I'll take your word for it

Lot of butthurt team biteme members in here

I bad beat someone, acknowledge it, say sorry, and some people still find some convoluted way to say I'm at fault

BTW I donked off a huge chip lead 3 handed to finish third so that should give some of you satisfaction

If it makes you feel any better you are on my lists of people I will knowingly call behind just in the hope that I can suckout.

[zam77]

This thread have potential for a bestseller??? Not sure I have the time to read a good novel unless it's highly recommended by the long list of co-authors?

[bobbywaves]

If it makes you feel any better you are on my lists of people I will knowingly call behind just in the hope that I can suckout.

Hopefully I made your list as well. If not, please add me. Thanks.

[Auto Donk]

BUMP FOR USCPHILLYGUY..... for him to see that what he so accurately finds rotten in Denmark, uh.... I mean, uh, .... at SBR, has been very rotten for quite a while!

Funny, tho, as I must be one of the stupidest mother fckers on the planet, because in my first week on this b.s. site, when I literally crushed every trny and rigged ring gamed that I played in due to my new player karma, this "BiteMe" i.d. was the only i.d. that could take chips off me, and always with some crazy-come-from-behind suckout!!!

so I've known from week one this i.d. is fck'd up and is either "insider connected" or perhaps used by insiders themselves to syphon up points.......... yet I've still shipped the loser thousands of chips...... LOL....

as George W. once said "Fool me once, shame on you.... fool me twice... uh... uh.... We won't be fooled again!!!"

well, I was fooled at least fifty more times..... So I am as f'n retarrded as wussybobbywaves says...... sorry for doubting you, Wussy.

Now, for all of you dumbasses who have lost, or will lose, chips to biteme when he's "using", ie, cheating in my opinion..... YOU'VE BEEN FOOLED ONCE, you now have only yourselves to blame when the cockmaster sucks out on you and felts you in the future (or calls ur $20 raise with 94offsuit only to just SOMEHOW HAPPEN to get that ol-so-probable 449 flop)!!!!!

my fav biteme hand I still recall from my first week on SBR...... while rolling over a 600-pt trny win:

AD: AJ; BiteMeSfCm: A10

Flop: A J 2 rainbow

AD: shove; BiteMeSfCm insta call:

turn: 10

River: 10

yah baby! I've just been BiteMeShitFacedCockMastered!!!!!!!!!!!!


Good luck playing this vermin...............

[Auto Donk]

Bite ...when cent got AK ...K hits flop ...he shoves, you make quick pause...you say this is going to hit and shove for 700 or so chips with A10... Turn comes 10... River 10.... Woe..That's just the last one I recall.. But cent has a whole thread about it that I'm sure your aware of. You can't blame people for questioning.. You could just be that lucky.. Idk.. Cause I ran really good for a month or so and couldn't lose. Superuser or just card favored?

he loves the running tens..... as in the updated bump, that's the same beat the c.p.o.s. bitemeSfCm put down on me in my most notable f'n rigged hand of all!!!!!!!!!! SBitemesfcmR!!!!!!

[Ra77er]

Oh yea glad I saw this thread he is a superuser for sure

[bobbywaves]

I must be one of the stupidest mother fckers on the planet

So I am as f'n retarrded as bobbywaves says...... sorry for doubting you, Waves.

[Auto Donk]

Fucck it, Waves...... you got me..... you win................